+0.5 ptsvs 86.5 average · 1,114 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
583 of 1,114tied with 65 others
Score vs region
+8.4 ptsvs 78.6 average · 650 rated schools in Region 20: San Antonio
Region 20: San Antonio placement
145 of 650tied with 18 others
Score vs county
+9.4 ptsvs 77.6 average · 401 rated schools in Bexar County
Bexar County placement
74 of 401tied with 12 others
Score vs similar-size group
+6.7 ptsvs 80.3 average · 4,741 similarly sized rated schools
Similar size placement
1,347 of 4,741tied with 211 others
Score vs state
+5.7 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
Texas placement
2,456 of 7,646tied with 307 others
B87
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 93 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 86.5 average for 1,114 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 78.6 average for 650 rated schools in Region 20: San Antonio.The current score is above the 77.6 average for 401 rated schools in Bexar County.The current score is above the 80.3 average for 4,741 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
STAAR result
All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters
Meets
65%vs 62.6% avg · +2.4 pts
Masters
34%vs 30.6% avg · +3.4 pts
Among 1,089 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Tuscany Heights is rated B by TEA, scoring 87 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 86.5 average for 1,114 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is down 5 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 583rd of 1,114 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 65 others).
Tuscany Heights is rated B by TEA, scoring 87 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 78.6 average for 650 rated schools in Region 20: San Antonio. It is down 5 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 145th of 650 rated schools in Region 20: San Antonio (tied with 18 others).
Tuscany Heights is rated B by TEA, scoring 87 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 77.6 average for 401 rated schools in Bexar County. It is down 5 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 74th of 401 rated schools in Bexar County (tied with 12 others).
Tuscany Heights is rated B by TEA, scoring 87 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.3 average for 4,741 similarly sized rated schools. It is down 5 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 1,347th of 4,741 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 211 others).
Tuscany Heights is rated B by TEA, scoring 87 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is down 5 points since 2021-22.
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 93 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Student Achievement90 A+2.9 vs similar economic context · 1,089 reporting
School Progress81 B−2.7 vs similar economic context · 1,086 reporting
Closing the Gaps79 C−4.9 vs similar economic context · 1,078 reporting
Academic Growth81 B+1.4 vs similar economic context · 1,069 reporting
Relative Performance81 B+1.0 vs similar economic context · 1,086 reporting
Tuscany Heights
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,114 in cohort)
Domain scores
Domain
Score
Grade
Points to next grade
Student Achievement
90
A
—
School Progress
81
B
9
Closing the Gaps
79
C
1
Academic Growth
81
B
9
Relative Performance
81
B
9
Closest to moving up: Closing the Gaps, 1 point below B in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student
Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is Student Achievement (90), so
School Progress (81) is published above but does not enter the overall
score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 90.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
All Subjects
Approaches grade level85%+2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,089 reporting
Meets grade level65%+2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,089 reporting
Masters grade level34%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,089 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
Approaches grade level89%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,088 reporting
Meets grade level72%+5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,088 reporting
Masters grade level41%+9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,088 reporting
Math3 performance levels
Approaches grade level84%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,085 reporting
Meets grade level65%+9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,085 reporting
Masters grade level32%+6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,085 reporting
Science3 performance levels
Approaches grade level82%−2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 999 reporting
Meets grade level48%−13 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 999 reporting
Masters grade level22%−11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 999 reporting
Approaches grade level
Meets grade level
Masters grade level
Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,114 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
574
Economically disadvantaged
33.0%−1.0 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
12.9%+2.4 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
19.8%+2.3 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
94.9%−0.2 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
11.7%+0.4 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Tuscany Heights
African American 9.4%
Hispanic 43.5%
White 30.1%
American Indian 0.2%
Asian 9.3%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 7.3%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,114 reporting for every category shown · 1,114 in full cohort
African American 9.1%
Hispanic 31.2%
White 47.8%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 6.7%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 4.8%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 20: San Antonio · 650 reporting for every category shown · 650 in full cohort
African American 5.2%
Hispanic 70.7%
White 19.2%
American Indian 0.2%
Asian 1.7%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 2.9%
Selected comparison averageFor Bexar County · 401 reporting for every category shown · 401 in full cohort
African American 7%
Hispanic 75.9%
White 11.5%
American Indian 0.2%
Asian 2.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 4,741 reporting for every category shown · 4,741 in full cohort
African American 12.2%
Hispanic 54.7%
White 24.6%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.6%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 3.5%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
African American 11.5%
Hispanic 52.6%
White 27.8%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
572
Economically disadvantaged students
189
Emergent bilingual students
74
Special education students
113
Campus mobility · 2024–25
Mobile students
56
Students in TEA mobility denominator
533
TEA-published mobility rate
10.5%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 574 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 49 (7.9%) from 2024–25.
Latest enrollment
574
2025–26
Change from 2024–25
−49
Decrease · −7.9%
Change since 2021–22
−156
Decrease · −21.4%
Enrollment in 2025–26
This school
574
Selected comparison
773
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,095 rated schools reporting
Student enrollment by school year for Tuscany Heights
School year
Students enrolledTuscany Heights
Change from previous school year
Average enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22
730
First available year
784.7
2022–23
686
Decrease of 44 (6.0%)
786.6
2023–24
642
Decrease of 44 (6.4%)
783.9
2024–25
623
Decrease of 19 (3.0%)
780.7
2025–26
574
Decrease of 49 (7.9%)
773
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
46
7.0% of cumulative year-end enrollment
Disciplinary actions
139
21.12 per 100 students
Cumulative year-end enrollment
658
2024–25
Share of students · 2024–25
This school
7.0%
Selected comparison
9.5%
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 843 rated schools reporting
−2.5 pts vs similar economic context
Actions per 100 students · 2024–25
This school
21.12
Selected comparison
19.7
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 926 rated schools reporting
+1.4 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Tuscany Heights
School year
Cumulative enrollment
Studentsall discipline
Students% of enrollment
Actionsall discipline
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21
751
27
3.6%
53
7.06
7.8%
14.1
2021–22
802
14
1.8%
24
2.99
9.9%
20.2
2022–23
734
34
4.6%
58
7.90
10.1%
21.1
2023–24
686
54
7.9%
140
20.41
9.8%
21
2024–25
658
46
7.0%
139
21.12
9.5%
19.7
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Tuscany Heights in 2024–25
Category
Students
Students% of enrollment
Actions
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline
46
7.0%
139
21.12
9.5%
19.7
In-school suspensions
46
7.0%
132
20.06
8.5%
15.4
Out-of-school suspensions
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
DAEP placements
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Mandatory DAEP placements
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Discretionary DAEP placements
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
Tuscany Heights
Parent district: North East ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
This school
$9,417
Selected comparison
$11,815
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,091 rated schools reporting
−$2,398 vs similar economic context
For 2025, TEA reported $9,417 per student for this campus, $14,654 per student for its parent district, North East ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
Year
Tuscany Heights
Parent district: North East ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison average
Reportingselected comparison
2018
$6,823
$13,083
$13,054
$7,627
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 989 rated schools reporting
2019
$6,941
$14,039
$13,108
$7,743
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,004 rated schools reporting
2020
$7,335
$13,031
$14,058
$8,092
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,013 rated schools reporting
2021
$7,274
$12,752
$14,797
$8,528
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,024 rated schools reporting
2022
$7,416
$13,646
$15,708
$9,782
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,044 rated schools reporting
2023
$7,823
$13,795
$16,792
$10,297
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,063 rated schools reporting
2024
$9,102
$16,269
$18,125
$11,374
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,075 rated schools reporting
2025
$9,417
$14,654
$18,972
$11,815
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,091 rated schools reporting
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
Average salary
$67,348−$772 vs similar economic context
Teachers
39−12.0 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
14.8+0.4 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Tuscany Heights
1 to 5 years 8.3%
6 to 10 years 23.4%
11 to 20 years 33.8%
21 to 30 years 34.5%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,114 reporting for every category shown · 1,114 in full cohort
Beginning 4.9%
1 to 5 years 22.6%
6 to 10 years 19.7%
11 to 20 years 32%
21 to 30 years 17.3%
Over 30 years 3.4%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 20: San Antonio · 650 reporting for every category shown · 650 in full cohort
Beginning 4.5%
1 to 5 years 23.5%
6 to 10 years 19.8%
11 to 20 years 31.3%
21 to 30 years 17%
Over 30 years 2.8%
Selected comparison averageFor Bexar County · 401 reporting for every category shown · 401 in full cohort
Beginning 4.9%
1 to 5 years 24.1%
6 to 10 years 20.5%
11 to 20 years 30.8%
21 to 30 years 15.9%
Over 30 years 2.7%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 4,741 reporting for every category shown · 4,741 in full cohort
Beginning 6.1%
1 to 5 years 26.4%
6 to 10 years 19.7%
11 to 20 years 29%
21 to 30 years 15.5%
Over 30 years 3.1%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 25.6%
6 to 10 years 19.2%
11 to 20 years 28.7%
21 to 30 years 15.9%
Over 30 years 3.7%
Average students in a class
TEA average class size by grade or subject for Tuscany Heights in 2024–25
Grade or subject
Average students per classTuscany Heights · 2024–25
Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten
16.5
18.5
Grade 1
18.3
19.1
Grade 2
20.8
19.6
Grade 3
20.3
20.2
Grade 4
21.7
19.8
Grade 5
23.6
21.4
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 6 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
Out of 105 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
Other top-5% rankings
High placements in larger reporting groups
1 measure
21of 386
Math — Masters
Bexar County · of the 386 that report this measure · tied with 2
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above
this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears
once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any
tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones
no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 015910144.