Current strength
Chronically absent lower than the similar-context average
20.5% −2.6 pts vs 23.1%
- 20.5% is 2.6 percentage points lower than the 23.1% average among 2,004 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
Traditional public school campus
Trout Pri
Angelina County · Region 07: Kilgore · 371 students
Official school websiteSchool information and family resources
- Current score
- 54/1002025-26
- Change
- −15 ptssince 2021-22
- Score vs similar economic context
- −23.6 ptsvs 77.6 average · 2,125 rated schools serving a similar economic context
- Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
- 2,070 of 2,125tied with 10 others
- Score vs region
- −26.0 ptsvs 80 average · 352 rated schools in Region 07: Kilgore
- Region 07: Kilgore placement
- 341 of 352tied with 2 others
- Score vs county
- −22.7 ptsvs 76.7 average · 30 rated schools in Angelina County
- Angelina County placement
- 29 of 30tied with 1 other
- Score vs similar-size group
- −26.3 ptsvs 80.3 average · 3,684 similarly sized rated schools
- Similar size placement
- 3,626 of 3,684tied with 15 others
- Score vs state
- −27.3 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
- Texas placement
- 7,553 of 7,646tied with 15 others
F54
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 68 in 2021-22. The current score is below the 77.6 average for 2,125 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is below the 80 average for 352 rated schools in Region 07: Kilgore.The current score is below the 76.7 average for 30 rated schools in Angelina County.The current score is below the 80.3 average for 3,684 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is below the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
No academic result met this site’s published threshold for a selected positive signal against Region 07: Kilgore.
Current strength
Chronically absent lower than the Angelina County average
20.5% −1.4 pts vs 21.9%
- 20.5% is 1.4 percentage points lower than the 21.9% average among 29 schools in Angelina County reporting this measure.
Current strength
Attendance above the Angelina County average
93.2% +1.4 pts vs 91.8%
- 93.2% is 1.4 percentage points above the 91.8% average among 29 schools in Angelina County reporting this measure.
No academic result met this site’s published threshold for a selected positive signal against similarly sized schools.
No academic result met this site’s published threshold for a selected positive signal against Texas average.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Trout Pri is rated F by TEA, scoring 54 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 77.6 average for 2,125 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is down 15 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 2,070th of 2,125 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 10 others).
Trout Pri is rated F by TEA, scoring 54 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 80 average for 352 rated schools in Region 07: Kilgore. It is down 15 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 341st of 352 rated schools in Region 07: Kilgore (tied with 2 others).
Trout Pri is rated F by TEA, scoring 54 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 76.7 average for 30 rated schools in Angelina County. It is down 15 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 29th of 30 rated schools in Angelina County (tied with 1 other).
Trout Pri is rated F by TEA, scoring 54 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 80.3 average for 3,684 similarly sized rated schools. It is down 15 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 3,626th of 3,684 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 15 others).
Trout Pri is rated F by TEA, scoring 54 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is down 15 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 7,553rd of 7,646 rated Texas schools (tied with 15 others).
1 consecutive year rated unacceptable.
Put the numbers in context
Compare with
Jump to a section
5 years of ratings
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated Not Rated with 68 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
View the yearly scores and comparisons
| Year | Rating | Score | Selected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rate | StateTexas average |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | F | 54 | 77.6 2,125 reporting | 81.3 7,646 reporting |
| 2024-25 | C | 75 | 77.3 2,107 reporting | 81.2 7,554 reporting |
| 2023-24 | D | 64 | 73.8 2,089 reporting | 78.9 7,466 reporting |
| 2022-23 | D | 69 | 73.4 2,081 reporting | 79.1 7,377 reporting |
| 2021-22 | D | 69 | 81.8 2,055 reporting | 83.7 7,283 reporting |
Where the score comes from
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
- Trout Pri
- Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,125 in cohort)
| Domain | Score | Grade | Points to next grade |
|---|---|---|---|
| Student Achievement | — | Not rated | — |
| School Progress | — | Not rated | — |
| Closing the Gaps | — | Not rated | — |
| Academic Growth | — | Not rated | — |
| Relative Performance | — | Not rated | — |
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
- Students
- 371
- Economically disadvantaged
- 92.2%+1.3 pts vs similar economic context
- English learners
- 5.9%−34.7 pts vs similar economic context
- Special education
- 12.4%−5.3 pts vs similar economic context
- Attendance
- 93.2%+0.2 pts vs similar economic context
- Chronically absent
- 20.5%−2.6 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Trout Pri
- African American 41%
- Hispanic 32.1%
- White 18.9%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 0.3%
- Two or More Races 7.5%
Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,125 reporting for every category shown · 2,125 in full cohort
- African American 14.9%
- Hispanic 76.3%
- White 5.6%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 1.3%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 1.6%
Selected comparison average For Region 07: Kilgore · 352 reporting for every category shown · 352 in full cohort
- African American 13.6%
- Hispanic 28.4%
- White 52.2%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 0.8%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 4.7%
Selected comparison average For Angelina County · 30 reporting for every category shown · 30 in full cohort
- African American 15.5%
- Hispanic 33.2%
- White 46.6%
- American Indian 0.2%
- Asian 0.6%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 3.9%
Selected comparison average For similarly sized schools · 3,684 reporting for every category shown · 3,684 in full cohort
- African American 11.4%
- Hispanic 54.5%
- White 27.4%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 2.9%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 3.3%
Statewide average 7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
- African American 11.5%
- Hispanic 52.6%
- White 27.8%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 4.2%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
- Students in this TEA accountability summary
- 371
- Economically disadvantaged students
- 342
- Emergent bilingual students
- 22
- Special education students
- 46
Campus mobility · 2024–25
- Mobile students
- 40
- Students in TEA mobility denominator
- 156
- TEA-published mobility rate
- 25.6%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 371 students in 2025–26, an increase of 152 (69.4%) from 2024–25.
- Latest enrollment
- 371
2025–26
- Change from 2024–25
- +152
Increase · +69.4%
- Change since 2021–22
- +97
Increase · +35.4%
Enrollment in 2025–26
- This school
- 371
- Selected comparison
- 571.2
| School year | Students enrolledTrout Pri | Change from previous school year | Average enrollmentselected comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021–22 | 274 | First available year | 616.6 |
| 2022–23 | 252 | Decrease of 22 (8.0%) | 613.1 |
| 2023–24 | 251 | Decrease of 1 (0.4%) | 603.1 |
| 2024–25 | 219 | Decrease of 32 (12.7%) | 596.3 |
| 2025–26 | 371 | Increase of 152 (69.4%) | 571.2 |
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
- Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
- Not reported
Rate not available
- Disciplinary actions
- Not reported
Rate not available
- Cumulative year-end enrollment
- 247
2024–25
| School year | Cumulative enrollment | Studentsall discipline | Students% of enrollment | Actionsall discipline | Actionsper 100 students | Studentsselected comparison average % | Actionsselected comparison average per 100 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020–21 | 311 | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| 2021–22 | 302 | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| 2022–23 | 298 | Suppressed | — | Suppressed | — | — | — |
| 2023–24 | 279 | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| 2024–25 | 247 | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
See 2024–25 discipline categories
| Category | Students | Students% of enrollment | Actions | Actionsper 100 students | Studentsselected comparison average % | Actionsselected comparison average per 100 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All discipline | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| In-school suspensions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Out-of-school suspensions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| DAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Mandatory DAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Discretionary DAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| JJAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Mandatory JJAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Discretionary JJAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Expulsions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Mandatory expulsions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Discretionary expulsions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
- Trout Pri
- Parent district: Lufkin ISD
- Texas average
- Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
- This school
- $8,175
- Selected comparison
- $13,200
For 2025, TEA reported $8,175 per student for this campus, $14,269 per student for its parent district, Lufkin ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
| Year | Trout Pri | Parent district: Lufkin ISD | Texas average | Selected comparison average | Reportingselected comparison |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | $6,379 | $10,430 | $13,054 | $8,322 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,004 rated schools reporting |
| 2019 | $7,224 | $11,552 | $13,108 | $8,337 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,031 rated schools reporting |
| 2020 | $6,729 | $13,250 | $14,058 | $8,843 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,035 rated schools reporting |
| 2021 | $7,413 | $18,110 | $14,797 | $9,658 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,038 rated schools reporting |
| 2022 | $8,703 | $17,861 | $15,708 | $11,222 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,055 rated schools reporting |
| 2023 | $8,874 | $18,261 | $16,792 | $11,728 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,080 rated schools reporting |
| 2024 | $7,726 | $15,650 | $18,125 | $12,640 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,092 rated schools reporting |
| 2025 | $8,175 | $14,269 | $18,972 | $13,200 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,105 rated schools reporting |
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
- Average salary
- $60,677−$7,600 vs similar economic context
- Teachers
- 23−16.7 vs similar economic context
- Students per staff member
- 15.9+1.3 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Trout Pri
- Beginning 4.3%
- 1 to 5 years 33%
- 6 to 10 years 21%
- 11 to 20 years 24.9%
- 21 to 30 years 12.4%
- Over 30 years 4.3%
Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,125 reporting for every category shown · 2,125 in full cohort
- Beginning 7.5%
- 1 to 5 years 27.2%
- 6 to 10 years 18.8%
- 11 to 20 years 27.1%
- 21 to 30 years 14.9%
- Over 30 years 3.4%
Selected comparison average For Region 07: Kilgore · 352 reporting for every category shown · 352 in full cohort
- Beginning 6.2%
- 1 to 5 years 24.6%
- 6 to 10 years 17.7%
- 11 to 20 years 28%
- 21 to 30 years 17.3%
- Over 30 years 6%
Selected comparison average For Angelina County · 30 reporting for every category shown · 30 in full cohort
- Beginning 9.5%
- 1 to 5 years 21.4%
- 6 to 10 years 21.9%
- 11 to 20 years 28.7%
- 21 to 30 years 13.8%
- Over 30 years 4.8%
Selected comparison average For similarly sized schools · 3,684 reporting for every category shown · 3,684 in full cohort
- Beginning 6.1%
- 1 to 5 years 25.4%
- 6 to 10 years 19%
- 11 to 20 years 29%
- 21 to 30 years 16.5%
- Over 30 years 3.7%
Statewide average 7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
- Beginning 6.2%
- 1 to 5 years 25.6%
- 6 to 10 years 19.2%
- 11 to 20 years 28.7%
- 21 to 30 years 15.9%
- Over 30 years 3.7%
Average students in a class
| Grade or subject | Average students per classTrout Pri · 2024–25 | Average students per classselected comparison |
|---|---|---|
| Kindergarten | 20.3 | 18.1 |
| Grade 1 | 15.6 | 18.4 |
| Grade 2 | 16.2 | 18.3 |
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 3 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Download the full dataset · this campus's district
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 003903130.