Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Open-enrollment charter campus · Online school · Alternative Education Accountability

Trinity Charter Schools - Reclaim Virtual Academy

Trinity Charter School · 47 students

Official school websiteSchool information and family resources

Not Rated

At a glance

TEA did not issue an overall rating for Trinity Charter Schools - Reclaim Virtual Academy for 2025-26. Everything TEA did publish for this charter campus is below.

Read the full rating context and placement

TEA did not issue an overall rating for Trinity Charter Schools - Reclaim Virtual Academy for 2025-26. Everything TEA did publish for this charter campus is below.

TEA did not issue an overall rating for this school. Scores below are the figures TEA published; the letter grades are the state's where it issued them.

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. Official improvement and transfer notices
  3. 5 years of ratings
  4. Where the score comes from
  5. Student outcomes
  6. After high school: the following fall
  7. Who this school serves
  8. Student counts behind the percentages
  9. Enrollment over time
  10. Discipline and removal from class
  11. Spending per student
  12. Teachers and actual class size
  13. Where this comes from

Official improvement and transfer notices

Official state and federal designations can carry support, reporting requirements or a family transfer option that a single A–F rating does not explain.

2026 federal improvement status

Comprehensive Support and Improvement

Official support label: Comprehensive Identified

Identification reason: CSI Low Graduation Rate

TEA track year 1 · Title I campus

Open the official TEA list and methodology

Schools identified for improvement

This school
Listed
Selected comparison
31.4%

average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 392 rated charter campuses reporting

Schools on the PEG list

This school
Not listed
Selected comparison
0.0%

average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 392 rated charter campuses reporting

Selected comparison percentages are the share of reporting schools in that group found on each dated list. They are neutral prevalence context; changing the comparison never changes this school's official status.

These are dated TEA statuses, fetched 24 August 2026; they are not added to or subtracted from this site's rating.

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
908070 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas charter average 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas charter average
2025-26Not Rated—80.3 392 reporting81.7 829 reporting
2024-25Not Rated—78.6 385 reporting81.3 797 reporting
2023-24Not Rated—76.1 377 reporting79.5 776 reporting
2022-23Not Rated—75.9 366 reporting79.6 749 reporting
2021-22Not Rated—83.3 346 reporting84.5 700 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement—Not reported · similar economic context 74.2 · 392 reporting
  • School Progress—Not reported · similar economic context 81.3 · 392 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps—Not reported · similar economic context 77.1 · 386 reporting
  • Academic Growth—Not reported · similar economic context 73.4 · 374 reporting
  • Relative Performance—Not reported · similar economic context 79.4 · 388 reporting
  • Trinity Charter Schools - Reclaim Virtual Academy
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (392 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement—Not rated—
School Progress—Not rated—
Closing the Gaps—Not rated—
Academic Growth—Not rated—
Relative Performance—Not rated—

The scores above are the ones TEA published. TEA did not issue letter grades for this school, so none are shown: the A–F thresholds marked on the chart are the state's, but applying them here would produce a grade the state chose to withhold.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level32%−36 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 392 reporting
  • Meets grade level4%−37 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 392 reporting
  • Masters grade level0%−15 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 392 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level21%−48 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 392 reporting
  • Meets grade level0%−44 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 392 reporting
  • Masters grade level0%−16 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 392 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level0%−67 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 390 reporting
  • Meets grade level0%−35 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 390 reporting
  • Masters grade level0%−13 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 390 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level—Not reported · Similar economic-disadvantage rate 70.7% · 369 reporting
  • Meets grade level—Not reported · Similar economic-disadvantage rate 38.9% · 369 reporting
  • Masters grade level—Not reported · Similar economic-disadvantage rate 15.3% · 369 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level60%−9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 252 reporting
  • Meets grade level20%−18 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 252 reporting
  • Masters grade level0%−17 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 252 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (392 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

College, career and military readiness

Total credit for CCMR criteria
15.0%−68.0 pts vs similar economic context
CCMR criteria
CriterionThis school% of graduatesAveragesimilar economic contextDifferencepercentage pointsReportingselected comparison
Total credit for CCMR criteria15.0%83.0%−68.0 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 133 rated charter campuses reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course0.0%65.1%−65.1 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 134 rated charter campuses reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA0.0%33.0%−33.0 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 134 rated charter campuses reporting
Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)0.0%28.3%−28.3 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 134 rated charter campuses reporting
Earned college credit for a dual credit course0.0%10.5%−10.5 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 134 rated charter campuses reporting
Earned an industry-based certification7.7%14.8%−7.1 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 134 rated charter campuses reporting
Earned a level I or level II certificate0.0%0.4%−0.4 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 134 rated charter campuses reporting
Earned an associate degree0.0%1.7%−1.7 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 134 rated charter campuses reporting
Completed an OnRamps course and qualified for college credit0.0%4.0%−4.0 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 134 rated charter campuses reporting
Graduated with completed individualized education program (IEP) and workforce readiness0.0%2.0%−2.0 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 134 rated charter campuses reporting
Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student3.8%8.4%−4.6 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 134 rated charter campuses reporting
Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces3.8%1.8%+2.0 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 134 rated charter campuses reporting

Every row is a share of this school's graduates, and every row is a way of meeting CCMR — so on every row, a bigger share is better. Difference is this school minus the average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate, counted in percentage points: +5.0 would mean five more graduates in every hundred met that criterion here. The selected comparison is an unweighted average of the reported charter campus percentages, not a pooled rate across all graduates in the group. Graduates may meet several criteria, so the rows do not add up to the total.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only charter campuses for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

After high school: the following fall

Where school graduates appeared in Texas public higher-education records the fall after graduation. This is a limited next-step measure, not an eventual college-going or completion rate.

Graduates in the report
39

Class of 2023–24

Enrolled in Texas public higher education
6

15.4% of graduates

Not found in Texas public higher-ed records
33

84.6% of graduates

Not trackable
0

Fall 2024

Graduates in the report

This school
39
Selected comparison
81.4

average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 107 rated charter campuses reporting

Enrolled in Texas public higher education

This school
6
Selected comparison
39.8

average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 107 rated charter campuses reporting

Texas-public enrollment rate

This school
15.4%
Selected comparison
45.0%

average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 107 rated charter campuses reporting

−29.6 pts vs similar economic context

Not-found rate

This school
84.6%
Selected comparison
49.4%

average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 107 rated charter campuses reporting

+35.2 pts vs similar economic context

Not-trackable rate

This school
0.0%
Selected comparison
5.6%

average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 107 rated charter campuses reporting

−5.6 pts vs similar economic context

Selected comparison counts are neutral cohort scale context. The percentages put differently sized graduating classes on the same basis, but still cover only the limited Texas-public system observed by this report.

Source: Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board, high-school graduates enrolled in higher education, fetched 24 August 2026. The report covers graduates who enrolled in a Texas public college or university the following fall and includes only districts or campuses with more than 25 graduates.

“Not found” does not mean a graduate did not continue their education. It can include private or out-of-state college, work, military service, enrollment after the fall term, or another path the Texas public system does not observe.

“Not trackable” is not an outcome. THECB uses it for graduates with a non-standard identifier that could not be matched to higher-education records.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
47
Economically disadvantaged
91.5%+1.2 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
0.0%−43.8 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
12.8%+0.1 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
64.2%−28.5 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
89.3%+65.4 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Trinity Charter Schools - Reclaim Virtual Academy

African American: 17%Hispanic: 40.4%White: 34%Two or More Races: 8.5%
  • African American 17%
  • Hispanic 40.4%
  • White 34%
  • Two or More Races 8.5%

Selected comparison average For charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 392 reporting for every category shown · 392 in full cohort

African American: 18.7%Hispanic: 74.7%White: 3.5%American Indian: 0.2%Asian: 1.5%Pacific Islander: 0.1%Two or More Races: 1.4%
  • African American 18.7%
  • Hispanic 74.7%
  • White 3.5%
  • American Indian 0.2%
  • Asian 1.5%
  • Pacific Islander 0.1%
  • Two or More Races 1.4%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
47
Economically disadvantaged students
43
Emergent bilingual students
0
Special education students
6

TEA context labels

  • Alternative education type: residential facility
  • Rated under AEA procedures
  • Residential treatment facility under AEA or AskTED

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
103
Students in TEA mobility denominator
131
TEA-published mobility rate
78.6%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 47 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 21 (30.9%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
47

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
−21

Decrease · −30.9%

Change since 2022–23
+37

Increase · +370.0%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
47
Selected comparison
506.1

average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 390 rated charter campuses reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Trinity Charter Schools - Reclaim Virtual Academy
School yearStudents enrolledTrinity Charter Schools - Reclaim Virtual AcademyChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22 Not reported Not available —
2022–23 10 No adjacent prior year 499.6
2023–24 96 Increase of 86 (860.0%) 507.3
2024–25 68 Decrease of 28 (29.2%) 508.8
2025–26 47 Decrease of 21 (30.9%) 506.1

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting charter campuses in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
Not reported

Rate not available

Disciplinary actions
Not reported

Rate not available

Cumulative year-end enrollment
130

2024–25

TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Trinity Charter Schools - Reclaim Virtual Academy
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 109 Not reported — Not reported — — —
2021–22 32 Not reported — Not reported — — —
2022–23 73 Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
2023–24 244 Not reported — Not reported — — —
2024–25 130 Not reported — Not reported — — —
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Trinity Charter Schools - Reclaim Virtual Academy in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline Not reported — Not reported — — —
In-school suspensions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Out-of-school suspensions Not reported — Not reported — — —
DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized charter campuses can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$7k$38k$68k20182020202220242025
  • Trinity Charter Schools - Reclaim Virtual Academy
  • Parent district: Trinity Charter School
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$8,838
Selected comparison
$11,865

average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 387 rated charter campuses reporting

−$3,027 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $8,838 per student for this campus, $25,617 per student for its parent district, Trinity Charter School, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearTrinity Charter Schools - Reclaim Virtual AcademyParent district: Trinity Charter SchoolTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2018$16,002$17,184$13,054$8,575 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 236 rated charter campuses reporting
2019$18,900$19,489$13,108$8,588 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 294 rated charter campuses reporting
2020$16,746$19,993$14,058$9,179 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 311 rated charter campuses reporting
2021$14,088$20,287$14,797$9,546 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 336 rated charter campuses reporting
2022$64,773$23,231$15,708$11,465 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 355 rated charter campuses reporting
2023$53,626$26,367$16,792$11,460 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 365 rated charter campuses reporting
2024$11,167$26,253$18,125$11,517 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 375 rated charter campuses reporting
2025$8,838$25,617$18,972$11,865 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 387 rated charter campuses reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$61,990−$1,985 vs similar economic context
Teachers
4−25.1 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
11.7−6.1 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Trinity Charter Schools - Reclaim Virtual Academy

1 to 5 years: 75%6 to 10 years: 25%
  • 1 to 5 years 75%
  • 6 to 10 years 25%

Selected comparison average For charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 392 reporting for every category shown · 392 in full cohort

Beginning: 13.1%1 to 5 years: 47.2%6 to 10 years: 19.9%11 to 20 years: 14.8%21 to 30 years: 4.4%Over 30 years: 0.8%
  • Beginning 13.1%
  • 1 to 5 years 47.2%
  • 6 to 10 years 19.9%
  • 11 to 20 years 14.8%
  • 21 to 30 years 4.4%
  • Over 30 years 0.8%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for Trinity Charter Schools - Reclaim Virtual Academy in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classTrinity Charter Schools - Reclaim Virtual Academy · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Secondary English2.118.9
Secondary languages other than English2.317.9
Secondary math219.3
Secondary science2.220.1
Secondary social studies220.3

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 5 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 046802011.