Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

Tommie Dobie Bothwell Elem

Collin County · Region 10: Richardson · 629 students

Current score
87/1002025-26
Change
−3 ptssince 2024-25
Score vs similar economic context
−3.8 ptsvs 90.8 average · 671 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
560 of 671tied with 29 others
B87

At a glance

The available rating history is moving down. The current score is below the 90.8 average for 671 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

Current strength

Chronically absent lower than the similar-context average

5.5% −1.7 pts vs 7.2%

  • 5.5% is 1.7 percentage points lower than the 7.2% average among 657 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Tommie Dobie Bothwell Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 87 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 90.8 average for 671 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is down 3 points since 2024-25.

Ranks 560th of 671 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 29 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 2 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. Who this school serves
  6. Student counts behind the percentages
  7. Enrollment over time
  8. Discipline and removal from class
  9. Spending per student
  10. Teachers and actual class size
  11. Where this comes from

2 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
908070 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas averageTommie Dobie Bothwell Elem 9087 2024-252025-26

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26B8790.8 671 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25A9091.1 663 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement91 A−0.8 vs similar economic context · 659 reporting
  • School Progress79 C−8.1 vs similar economic context · 657 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps76 C−12.3 vs similar economic context · 655 reporting
  • Academic Growth79 C−6.2 vs similar economic context · 654 reporting
  • Relative Performance70 C−8.8 vs similar economic context · 657 reporting
  • Tommie Dobie Bothwell Elem
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (671 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement91A—
School Progress79C1
Closing the Gaps76C4
Academic Growth79C1
Relative Performance70C10

Closest to moving up: Closing the Gaps, 4 points below B in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is Student Achievement (91), so School Progress (79) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 91.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level85%−5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 659 reporting
  • Meets grade level67%−6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 659 reporting
  • Masters grade level38%−5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 659 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level90%−1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 659 reporting
  • Meets grade level72%−6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 659 reporting
  • Masters grade level42%−4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 659 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level83%−5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 657 reporting
  • Meets grade level67%−3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 657 reporting
  • Masters grade level37%−2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 657 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level79%−10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 617 reporting
  • Meets grade level49%−19 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 617 reporting
  • Masters grade level29%−13 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 617 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (671 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
629
Economically disadvantaged
14.4%−0.7 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
30.1%+19.3 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
16.3%+0.3 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
96.1%+0.3 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
5.5%−1.7 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Tommie Dobie Bothwell Elem

African American: 11.6%Hispanic: 14.7%White: 24.1%American Indian: 1.8%Asian: 43.5%Two or More Races: 4.3%
  • African American 11.6%
  • Hispanic 14.7%
  • White 24.1%
  • American Indian 1.8%
  • Asian 43.5%
  • Two or More Races 4.3%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 671 reporting for every category shown · 671 in full cohort

African American: 6.4%Hispanic: 20.7%White: 48.2%American Indian: 0.4%Asian: 18.6%Pacific Islander: 0.1%Two or More Races: 5.6%
  • African American 6.4%
  • Hispanic 20.7%
  • White 48.2%
  • American Indian 0.4%
  • Asian 18.6%
  • Pacific Islander 0.1%
  • Two or More Races 5.6%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
627
Economically disadvantaged students
90
Emergent bilingual students
189
Special education students
102

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
49
Students in TEA mobility denominator
416
TEA-published mobility rate
11.8%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 629 students in 2025–26, an increase of 157 (33.3%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
629

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
+157

Increase · +33.3%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
629
Selected comparison
860.1

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 668 rated schools reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Tommie Dobie Bothwell Elem
School yearStudents enrolledTommie Dobie Bothwell ElemChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2024–25 472 First available year 869
2025–26 629 Increase of 157 (33.3%) 860.1

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
Suppressed

Rate not available

Disciplinary actions
Suppressed

Rate not available

Cumulative year-end enrollment
514

2024–25

TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Tommie Dobie Bothwell Elem
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2024–25 514 Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Tommie Dobie Bothwell Elem in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
In-school suspensions Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Out-of-school suspensions Not reported — Not reported — — —
DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$8k$31k$53k2025
  • Tommie Dobie Bothwell Elem
  • Parent district: Celina ISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$9,290
Selected comparison
$10,894

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 663 rated schools reporting

−$1,604 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $9,290 per student for this campus, $50,144 per student for its parent district, Celina ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearTommie Dobie Bothwell ElemParent district: Celina ISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2025$9,290$50,144$18,972$10,894 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 663 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$62,740−$6,490 vs similar economic context
Teachers
40−15.6 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
15.8+0.9 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Tommie Dobie Bothwell Elem

Beginning: 27%1 to 5 years: 27.7%6 to 10 years: 27.7%11 to 20 years: 10.1%21 to 30 years: 5%Over 30 years: 2.5%
  • Beginning 27%
  • 1 to 5 years 27.7%
  • 6 to 10 years 27.7%
  • 11 to 20 years 10.1%
  • 21 to 30 years 5%
  • Over 30 years 2.5%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 671 reporting for every category shown · 671 in full cohort

Beginning: 4.4%1 to 5 years: 23.1%6 to 10 years: 20.1%11 to 20 years: 32.6%21 to 30 years: 17%Over 30 years: 2.7%
  • Beginning 4.4%
  • 1 to 5 years 23.1%
  • 6 to 10 years 20.1%
  • 11 to 20 years 32.6%
  • 21 to 30 years 17%
  • Over 30 years 2.7%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for Tommie Dobie Bothwell Elem in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classTommie Dobie Bothwell Elem · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten16.618.9
Grade 419.520.4
Grade 515.822.2

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 3 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 043903106.