txschools.net

Unofficial · not affiliated with the Texas Education Agency · what this is

Campus · Traditional

Tobias Elem

Hays County · Region 13: Austin · 742 students

Learn more & enroll

C79

Tobias Elem is rated C by TEA, scoring 79 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 80.7 average of the 1,937 schools serving a similar share of economically disadvantaged students, and below the statewide average of 81.3. It is down 3 points since 2021-22 — both years scored under TEA's current rules, since TEA rewrote them in 2023; under the rules in force back then it scored 76.

Ranks 4,679th of 7,646 Texas schools (tied with 283 others), and 297th of 519 in Region 13: Austin (tied with 21 others).

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 5 years of ratings
  3. How this school's change over time is ranked
  4. Where the score comes from
  5. Student outcomes
  6. Who this school serves
  7. Spending per student
  8. Teachers
  9. Where this school ranks best
  10. Where this comes from

5 years of ratings

Compare against
908070 Schools like this oneTexas averageTobias Elem 8278757679 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated C with 76 that year.

Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSimilarState
2025-26C7980.781.3
2024-25C7680.581.2
2023-24C7578.578.9
2022-23C7879.179.1
2021-22B8282.583.7

How this school's change over time is ranked

TEA publishes most measures for one year only, so a change ranking exists just where the same figure is published across years — the overall score, the five score domains, and per-student spending. This page does not yet state where Tobias Elem itself places on these lists, only that the lists exist; open one to find this school's own row.

Texas schools

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement76 C−3.3 vs similar · −1.6 vs region
  • School Progress78 C−3.3 vs similar · −0.8 vs region
  • Closing the Gaps81 B+3.0 vs similar · +3.8 vs region
  • Academic Growth78 C+3.5 vs similar · +2.0 vs region
  • Relative Performance77 C−2.5 vs similar · +5.1 vs region
  • Tobias Elem
  • Similar student population (1,937)
  • Region 13: Austin (519)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement76C4
School Progress78C2
Closing the Gaps81B9
Academic Growth78C2
Relative Performance77C3

Closest to moving up: School Progress, 2 points below B in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (78), so Student Achievement (76) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 78.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level72%−3 vs Similar student population
  • Meets grade level48%−2 vs Similar student population
  • Masters grade level25%+5 vs Similar student population

Reading

  • Approaches grade level82%+5 vs Similar student population
  • Meets grade level60%+6 vs Similar student population
  • Masters grade level31%+9 vs Similar student population

Math

  • Approaches grade level67%−5 vs Similar student population
  • Meets grade level46%+3 vs Similar student population
  • Masters grade level24%+7 vs Similar student population

Science

  • Approaches grade level57%−18 vs Similar student population
  • Meets grade level26%−22 vs Similar student population
  • Masters grade level9%−13 vs Similar student population
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar student population (1,937)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The tick on each bar marks the average for Similar student population (1,937 schools) — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
742
Economically disadvantaged
60.0%−0.3 pts vs similar
English learners
9.8%−6.1 pts vs similar
Special education
25.5%+6.6 pts vs similar
Attendance
94.3%+0.1 pts vs similar
Chronically absent
15.1%−0.9 pts vs similar

Student demographics

African American: 4.7%Hispanic: 65.8%White: 22.8%American Indian: 0.5%Asian: 1.2%Pacific Islander: 0.3%Two or More Races: 4.7%
  • African American 4.7%
  • Hispanic 65.8%
  • White 22.8%
  • American Indian 0.5%
  • Asian 1.2%
  • Pacific Islander 0.3%
  • Two or More Races 4.7%

Spending per student

Compared against TEA's own peer group, which controls for size and student population, and against the state.

$11k$17k$24k20182020202220242025
  • Tobias Elem
  • TEA peer group
  • Texas average

TEA's published file does not include peer-group spending for this entity, so no comparison is shown.

Not reported by TEA for this entity: peer.

Teachers

Average salary
$69,442+$2,963 vs similar
Teachers
52
Students per staff member
14.3

Teaching experience

Beginning: 1.9%1 to 5 years: 13.5%6 to 10 years: 28.8%11 to 20 years: 36.5%21 to 30 years: 17.3%Over 30 years: 1.9%
  • Beginning 1.9%
  • 1 to 5 years 13.5%
  • 6 to 10 years 28.8%
  • 11 to 20 years 36.5%
  • 21 to 30 years 17.3%
  • Over 30 years 1.9%

Where this school ranks best

Out of 88 rankings computed across every published metric and every comparison group, these are the placements that stand out. Press Copy for a citable sentence.

  • 8of 52

    Average teacher salary

    Hays County · of the 52 that report this measure

  • 9of 50

    Per-student spending

    Hays County · of the 50 that report this measure · tied with 25

These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this campus ranks poorly. Each statement below states its cohort and its denominator so it can be checked — a rank without an n is a boast, not a fact. Ties are shown because a shared ceiling is not a sole first place. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.

Where this comes from

Every figure on this page comes from data the Texas Education Agency publishes at txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026 and archived with a checksum so each number stays traceable to the bytes TEA served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for districts only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here — 9,086 entities in two formats is 18,172 assets, on top of everything else this site publishes, and that is past the 20,000-asset limit this site is published under. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 105906110.