Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

Thomas MS

Harris County · Region 04: Houston · 366 students

Official school websiteSchool information and family resources

Current score
88/1002025-26
Change
+16 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
+10.2 ptsvs 77.8 average · 1,445 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
248 of 1,445tied with 41 others
B88

At a glance

Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving up; under the rules in force back then it scored 77 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 77.8 average for 1,445 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

Recent movement

Overall score rose 5 points

83 to 88 2024-25 to 2025-26

  • 88 is 10.2 points above the 77.8 average among 1,445 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Recent domain gain

Relative Performance rose 10 points

75 to 85 2024-25 to 2025-26

  • 85 is 8.2 points above the 76.8 average among 1,337 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Current strength

Closing the Gaps above the similar-context average

91 +15.8 pts vs 75.2

  • 91 is 15.8 points above the 75.2 average among 1,330 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Thomas MS is rated B by TEA, scoring 88 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 77.8 average for 1,445 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is up 16 points since 2021-22.

Ranks 248th of 1,445 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 41 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 5 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. Who this school serves
  6. Student counts behind the percentages
  7. Enrollment over time
  8. Discipline and removal from class
  9. Spending per student
  10. Teachers and actual class size
  11. Where this school ranks best
  12. Where this comes from

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
9080706050 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas averageThomas MS 7257668388 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated C with 77 that year.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26B8877.8 1,445 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25B8377.5 1,430 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting
2023-24D6673.8 1,416 reporting78.9 7,466 reporting
2022-23F5772.9 1,412 reporting79.1 7,377 reporting
2021-22C7282.0 1,399 reporting83.7 7,283 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement73 C+2.9 vs similar economic context · 1,341 reporting
  • School Progress87 B+8.1 vs similar economic context · 1,338 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps91 A+15.8 vs similar economic context · 1,330 reporting
  • Academic Growth87 B+13.4 vs similar economic context · 1,319 reporting
  • Relative Performance85 B+8.2 vs similar economic context · 1,337 reporting
  • Thomas MS
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,445 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement73C7
School Progress87B3
Closing the Gaps91A—
Academic Growth87B3
Relative Performance85B5

Closest to moving up: School Progress, 3 points below A in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (87), so Student Achievement (73) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 87.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level70%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,341 reporting
  • Meets grade level40%−0 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,341 reporting
  • Masters grade level13%−3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,341 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level80%+12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,341 reporting
  • Meets grade level49%+5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,341 reporting
  • Masters grade level14%−3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,341 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level73%+7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,338 reporting
  • Meets grade level41%+2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,338 reporting
  • Masters grade level15%−0 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,338 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level64%+2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,270 reporting
  • Meets grade level31%−2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,270 reporting
  • Masters grade level10%−4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,270 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level38%−24 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 401 reporting
  • Meets grade level20%−14 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 401 reporting
  • Masters grade level8%−7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 401 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,445 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
366
Economically disadvantaged
98.1%+4.5 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
18.9%−24.9 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
29.0%+11.8 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
93.4%+0.5 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
25.6%+1.9 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Thomas MS

African American: 66.4%Hispanic: 30.3%White: 1.6%Pacific Islander: 0.5%Two or More Races: 1.1%
  • African American 66.4%
  • Hispanic 30.3%
  • White 1.6%
  • Pacific Islander 0.5%
  • Two or More Races 1.1%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,445 reporting for every category shown · 1,445 in full cohort

African American: 15%Hispanic: 77.9%White: 4.3%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 1.2%Pacific Islander: 0.1%Two or More Races: 1.3%
  • African American 15%
  • Hispanic 77.9%
  • White 4.3%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 1.2%
  • Pacific Islander 0.1%
  • Two or More Races 1.3%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
366
Economically disadvantaged students
359
Emergent bilingual students
69
Special education students
106

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
212
Students in TEA mobility denominator
537
TEA-published mobility rate
39.5%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 366 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 25 (6.4%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
366

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
−25

Decrease · −6.4%

Change since 2021–22
−158

Decrease · −30.2%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
366
Selected comparison
547.1

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,427 rated schools reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Thomas MS
School yearStudents enrolledThomas MSChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22 524 First available year 597.4
2022–23 526 Increase of 2 (0.4%) 592.1
2023–24 474 Decrease of 52 (9.9%) 582.4
2024–25 391 Decrease of 83 (17.5%) 574.7
2025–26 366 Decrease of 25 (6.4%) 547.1

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
107

21.0% of cumulative year-end enrollment

Disciplinary actions
191

37.52 per 100 students

Cumulative year-end enrollment
509

2024–25

Share of students · 2024–25

This school
21.0%
Selected comparison
13.1%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 798 rated schools reporting

+7.9 pts vs similar economic context

Actions per 100 students · 2024–25

This school
37.52
Selected comparison
31.1

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 866 rated schools reporting

+6.4 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Thomas MS
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 710 Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
2021–22 654 315 48.2% 965 147.55 12.8% 30.1
2022–23 684 259 37.9% 640 93.57 13.6% 32.3
2023–24 593 196 33.0% 375 63.24 13.8% 32.9
2024–25 509 107 21.0% 191 37.52 13.1% 31.1
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Thomas MS in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline 107 21.0% 191 37.52 13.1% 31.1
In-school suspensions 37 7.3% 56 11.00 11.6% 22.4
Out-of-school suspensions 82 16.1% 118 23.18 9.9% 16.4
DAEP placements 14 2.8% 17 3.34 5.0% 6.1
Mandatory DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$7k$13k$20k20182020202220242025
  • Thomas MS
  • Parent district: Houston ISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$17,674
Selected comparison
$13,584

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,429 rated schools reporting

+$4,091 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $17,674 per student for this campus, $17,026 per student for its parent district, Houston ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearThomas MSParent district: Houston ISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2018$12,807$14,470$13,054$8,414 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,366 rated schools reporting
2019$8,711$13,643$13,108$8,380 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,381 rated schools reporting
2020$9,865$13,627$14,058$8,899 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,384 rated schools reporting
2021$8,799$13,515$14,797$9,800 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,386 rated schools reporting
2022$10,562$14,985$15,708$11,269 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,399 rated schools reporting
2023$12,361$16,350$16,792$11,843 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,412 rated schools reporting
2024$17,080$18,150$18,125$12,923 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,419 rated schools reporting
2025$17,674$17,026$18,972$13,584 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,429 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$84,297+$15,512 vs similar economic context
Teachers
30−9.0 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
12.4−2.4 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Thomas MS

Beginning: 13.6%1 to 5 years: 33.2%6 to 10 years: 27.1%11 to 20 years: 12.5%21 to 30 years: 13.6%
  • Beginning 13.6%
  • 1 to 5 years 33.2%
  • 6 to 10 years 27.1%
  • 11 to 20 years 12.5%
  • 21 to 30 years 13.6%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,445 reporting for every category shown · 1,445 in full cohort

Beginning: 7.7%1 to 5 years: 26.9%6 to 10 years: 18.5%11 to 20 years: 27.1%21 to 30 years: 14.9%Over 30 years: 3.4%
  • Beginning 7.7%
  • 1 to 5 years 26.9%
  • 6 to 10 years 18.5%
  • 11 to 20 years 27.1%
  • 21 to 30 years 14.9%
  • Over 30 years 3.4%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for Thomas MS in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classThomas MS · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Grade 615.817.1
Secondary English13.814.9
Secondary math14.516.7
Secondary science1817.4
Secondary social studies17.917.4

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 5 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this school ranks best

Out of 120 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.

Other top-5% rankings

High placements in larger reporting groups

1 measure

  • 47of 906

    Per-student spending

    Harris County · of the 906 that report this measure

These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 101912077.