+1.6 ptsvs 77.4 average · 2,384 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
1,111 of 2,384tied with 117 others
Score vs region
−4.9 ptsvs 83.9 average · 207 rated schools in Region 19: El Paso
Region 19: El Paso placement
151 of 207tied with 6 others
Score vs county
−5.1 ptsvs 84.1 average · 203 rated schools in El Paso County
El Paso County placement
149 of 203tied with 6 others
Score vs similar-size group
−1.1 ptsvs 80.1 average · 4,427 similarly sized rated schools
Similar size placement
2,488 of 4,427tied with 164 others
Score vs state
−2.3 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
Texas placement
4,679 of 7,646tied with 283 others
C79
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 89 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 77.4 average for 2,384 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is below the 83.9 average for 207 rated schools in Region 19: El Paso.The current score is below the 84.1 average for 203 rated schools in El Paso County.The current score is below the 80.1 average for 4,427 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is below the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
STAAR result
All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters
Meets
45%vs 40.5% avg · +4.5 pts
Masters
17%vs 15.9% avg · +1.1 pts
Among 2,223 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Thomas Manor is rated C by TEA, scoring 79 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 77.4 average for 2,384 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is down 10 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 1,111th of 2,384 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 117 others).
Thomas Manor is rated C by TEA, scoring 79 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 83.9 average for 207 rated schools in Region 19: El Paso. It is down 10 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 151st of 207 rated schools in Region 19: El Paso (tied with 6 others).
Thomas Manor is rated C by TEA, scoring 79 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 84.1 average for 203 rated schools in El Paso County. It is down 10 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 149th of 203 rated schools in El Paso County (tied with 6 others).
Thomas Manor is rated C by TEA, scoring 79 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 80.1 average for 4,427 similarly sized rated schools. It is down 10 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 2,488th of 4,427 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 164 others).
Thomas Manor is rated C by TEA, scoring 79 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is down 10 points since 2021-22.
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated B with 89 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Student Achievement72 C+1.5 vs similar economic context · 2,223 reporting
School Progress81 B+2.4 vs similar economic context · 2,217 reporting
Closing the Gaps74 C−0.7 vs similar economic context · 2,204 reporting
Academic Growth70 C−2.7 vs similar economic context · 2,179 reporting
Relative Performance81 B+4.4 vs similar economic context · 2,217 reporting
Thomas Manor
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,384 in cohort)
Domain scores
Domain
Score
Grade
Points to next grade
Student Achievement
72
C
8
School Progress
81
B
9
Closing the Gaps
74
C
6
Academic Growth
70
C
10
Relative Performance
81
B
9
Closest to moving up: Closing the Gaps, 6 points below B in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student
Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (81), so
Student Achievement (72) is published above but does not enter the overall
score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 81.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
All Subjects
Approaches grade level70%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,223 reporting
Meets grade level45%+5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,223 reporting
Masters grade level17%+1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,223 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
Approaches grade level73%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,222 reporting
Meets grade level49%+5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,222 reporting
Masters grade level18%+0 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,222 reporting
Math3 performance levels
Approaches grade level71%+5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,214 reporting
Meets grade level46%+8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,214 reporting
Masters grade level16%+1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,214 reporting
Science3 performance levels
Approaches grade level58%−6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,077 reporting
Meets grade level33%−1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,077 reporting
Masters grade level14%+0 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,077 reporting
Approaches grade level
Meets grade level
Masters grade level
Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,384 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
447
Economically disadvantaged
88.1%−0.4 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
45.4%+7.5 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
21.3%+3.1 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
94.8%+1.8 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
15.7%−6.9 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Thomas Manor
Hispanic 97.3%
White 2.7%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,384 reporting for every category shown · 2,384 in full cohort
African American 14.5%
Hispanic 74.7%
White 7.3%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 1.4%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 1.8%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 19: El Paso · 207 reporting for every category shown · 207 in full cohort
African American 1.9%
Hispanic 91.2%
White 4.8%
American Indian 0.2%
Asian 0.6%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 1.1%
Selected comparison averageFor El Paso County · 203 reporting for every category shown · 203 in full cohort
African American 2%
Hispanic 91.3%
White 4.7%
American Indian 0.2%
Asian 0.6%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 1.1%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 4,427 reporting for every category shown · 4,427 in full cohort
African American 11.9%
Hispanic 55.1%
White 25.6%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 3.7%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
African American 11.5%
Hispanic 52.6%
White 27.8%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
445
Economically disadvantaged students
392
Emergent bilingual students
202
Special education students
95
Campus mobility · 2024–25
Mobile students
72
Students in TEA mobility denominator
438
TEA-published mobility rate
16.4%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 447 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 15 (3.2%) from 2024–25.
Latest enrollment
447
2025–26
Change from 2024–25
−15
Decrease · −3.2%
Change since 2021–22
−153
Decrease · −25.5%
Enrollment in 2025–26
This school
447
Selected comparison
588
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,357 rated schools reporting
Student enrollment by school year for Thomas Manor
School year
Students enrolledThomas Manor
Change from previous school year
Average enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22
600
First available year
629
2022–23
451
Decrease of 149 (24.8%)
625
2023–24
432
Decrease of 19 (4.2%)
615.9
2024–25
462
Increase of 30 (6.9%)
610.3
2025–26
447
Decrease of 15 (3.2%)
588
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
34
6.9% of cumulative year-end enrollment
Disciplinary actions
59
12.02 per 100 students
Cumulative year-end enrollment
491
2024–25
Share of students · 2024–25
This school
6.9%
Selected comparison
13.3%
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,547 rated schools reporting
−6.4 pts vs similar economic context
Actions per 100 students · 2024–25
This school
12.02
Selected comparison
31.9
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,665 rated schools reporting
−19.9 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Thomas Manor
School year
Cumulative enrollment
Studentsall discipline
Students% of enrollment
Actionsall discipline
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21
609
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
2021–22
637
29
4.5%
42
6.59
12.9%
30.7
2022–23
486
24
4.9%
49
10.08
13.7%
33.7
2023–24
464
56
12.1%
79
17.03
13.8%
33.8
2024–25
491
34
6.9%
59
12.02
13.3%
31.9
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Thomas Manor in 2024–25
Category
Students
Students% of enrollment
Actions
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline
34
6.9%
59
12.02
13.3%
31.9
In-school suspensions
34
6.9%
53
10.79
11.6%
22.7
Out-of-school suspensions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
Thomas Manor
Parent district: Ysleta ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
This school
$11,165
Selected comparison
$13,010
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,371 rated schools reporting
−$1,845 vs similar economic context
For 2025, TEA reported $11,165 per student for this campus, $16,357 per student for its parent district, Ysleta ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
Year
Thomas Manor
Parent district: Ysleta ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison average
Reportingselected comparison
2018
$8,206
$15,777
$13,054
$8,290
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,253 rated schools reporting
2019
$8,539
$14,422
$13,108
$8,326
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,284 rated schools reporting
2020
$8,698
$13,296
$14,058
$8,849
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,294 rated schools reporting
2021
$9,264
$15,128
$14,797
$9,589
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,299 rated schools reporting
2022
$9,880
$19,206
$15,708
$11,083
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,318 rated schools reporting
2023
$12,431
$20,106
$16,792
$11,632
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,344 rated schools reporting
2024
$12,213
$17,973
$18,125
$12,451
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,357 rated schools reporting
2025
$11,165
$16,357
$18,972
$13,010
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,371 rated schools reporting
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
Average salary
$68,940+$968 vs similar economic context
Teachers
33−8.5 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
13.6−0.9 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Thomas Manor
Beginning 6.1%
1 to 5 years 14.4%
6 to 10 years 13.8%
11 to 20 years 25.5%
21 to 30 years 37.1%
Over 30 years 3.1%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,384 reporting for every category shown · 2,384 in full cohort
Beginning 7.4%
1 to 5 years 27.4%
6 to 10 years 18.9%
11 to 20 years 27.1%
21 to 30 years 15%
Over 30 years 3.5%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 19: El Paso · 207 reporting for every category shown · 207 in full cohort
Beginning 4.4%
1 to 5 years 18.9%
6 to 10 years 18.5%
11 to 20 years 34%
21 to 30 years 21.5%
Over 30 years 2.7%
Selected comparison averageFor El Paso County · 203 reporting for every category shown · 203 in full cohort
Beginning 3.9%
1 to 5 years 18.8%
6 to 10 years 18.5%
11 to 20 years 34.4%
21 to 30 years 21.7%
Over 30 years 2.7%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 4,427 reporting for every category shown · 4,427 in full cohort
Beginning 6.1%
1 to 5 years 25.9%
6 to 10 years 19.3%
11 to 20 years 28.9%
21 to 30 years 16.2%
Over 30 years 3.4%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 25.6%
6 to 10 years 19.2%
11 to 20 years 28.7%
21 to 30 years 15.9%
Over 30 years 3.7%
Average students in a class
TEA average class size by grade or subject for Thomas Manor in 2024–25
Grade or subject
Average students per classThomas Manor · 2024–25
Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten
16.3
18.1
Grade 1
20.7
18.3
Grade 2
17.4
18.3
Grade 3
16.3
18.6
Grade 4
18.4
18.6
Grade 5
36.6
19.4
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 6 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 071905146.