Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Open-enrollment charter campus · Alternative Education Accountability

Thomas Buzbee Vocational School

Raven School · New Waverly · 14 students

Official school websiteSchool information and family resources

Not Rated

At a glance

TEA did not issue an overall rating for Thomas Buzbee Vocational School for 2025-26. Everything TEA did publish for this charter campus is below.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

Current strength

Chronically absent lower than the similar-context average

0% −23.5 pts vs 23.5%

  • 0% is 23.5 percentage points lower than the 23.5% average among 204 charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Current strength

Attendance above the similar-context average

100% +7.3 pts vs 92.7%

  • 100% is 7.3 percentage points above the 92.7% average among 204 charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

TEA did not issue an overall rating for Thomas Buzbee Vocational School for 2025-26. Everything TEA did publish for this charter campus is below.

TEA did not issue an overall rating for this school. Scores below are the figures TEA published; the letter grades are the state's where it issued them.

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 5 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. Who this school serves
  6. Student counts behind the percentages
  7. Enrollment over time
  8. Discipline and removal from class
  9. Spending per student
  10. Teachers and actual class size
  11. Where this comes from

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
908070 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas charter average 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas charter average
2025-26Not Rated—80.0 207 reporting81.7 829 reporting
2024-25Not Rated—78.3 202 reporting81.3 797 reporting
2023-24Not Rated—76.1 196 reporting79.5 776 reporting
2022-23Not Rated—75.4 188 reporting79.6 749 reporting
2021-22Not Rated—83.6 174 reporting84.5 700 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement—Not reported · similar economic context 73.9 · 207 reporting
  • School Progress—Not reported · similar economic context 80.9 · 207 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps—Not reported · similar economic context 76.4 · 202 reporting
  • Academic Growth—Not reported · similar economic context 72.9 · 195 reporting
  • Relative Performance—Not reported · similar economic context 79.3 · 203 reporting
  • Thomas Buzbee Vocational School
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (207 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement—Not rated—
School Progress—Not rated—
Closing the Gaps—Not rated—
Academic Growth—Not rated—
Relative Performance—Not rated—

The scores above are the ones TEA published. TEA did not issue letter grades for this school, so none are shown: the A–F thresholds marked on the chart are the state's, but applying them here would produce a grade the state chose to withhold.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level70%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 207 reporting
  • Meets grade level20%−20 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 207 reporting
  • Masters grade level0%−15 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 207 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level—Not reported · Similar economic-disadvantage rate 67.1% · 207 reporting
  • Meets grade level—Not reported · Similar economic-disadvantage rate 42.9% · 207 reporting
  • Masters grade level—Not reported · Similar economic-disadvantage rate 15.7% · 207 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level—Not reported · Similar economic-disadvantage rate 66% · 205 reporting
  • Meets grade level—Not reported · Similar economic-disadvantage rate 34.6% · 205 reporting
  • Masters grade level—Not reported · Similar economic-disadvantage rate 13.2% · 205 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level—Not reported · Similar economic-disadvantage rate 69.8% · 189 reporting
  • Meets grade level—Not reported · Similar economic-disadvantage rate 38.2% · 189 reporting
  • Masters grade level—Not reported · Similar economic-disadvantage rate 15.2% · 189 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level—Not reported · Similar economic-disadvantage rate 68.6% · 127 reporting
  • Meets grade level—Not reported · Similar economic-disadvantage rate 37% · 127 reporting
  • Masters grade level—Not reported · Similar economic-disadvantage rate 16.3% · 127 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (207 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

College, career and military readiness

CCMR criteria
CriterionThis school% of graduatesAveragesimilar economic contextDifferencepercentage pointsReportingselected comparison
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course0.0%66.4%−66.4 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 67 rated charter campuses reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA0.0%26.6%−26.6 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 67 rated charter campuses reporting
Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)0.0%24.4%−24.4 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 67 rated charter campuses reporting
Earned college credit for a dual credit course0.0%6.3%−6.3 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 67 rated charter campuses reporting
Earned an industry-based certification100.0%15.8%+84.2 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 67 rated charter campuses reporting
Earned a level I or level II certificate0.0%0.2%−0.2 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 67 rated charter campuses reporting
Earned an associate degree0.0%0.4%−0.4 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 67 rated charter campuses reporting
Completed an OnRamps course and qualified for college credit0.0%3.3%−3.3 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 67 rated charter campuses reporting
Graduated with completed individualized education program (IEP) and workforce readiness0.0%2.7%−2.7 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 67 rated charter campuses reporting
Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student0.0%8.8%−8.8 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 67 rated charter campuses reporting
Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces0.0%1.7%−1.7 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 67 rated charter campuses reporting

Every row is a share of this school's graduates, and every row is a way of meeting CCMR — so on every row, a bigger share is better. Difference is this school minus the average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate, counted in percentage points: +5.0 would mean five more graduates in every hundred met that criterion here. The selected comparison is an unweighted average of the reported charter campus percentages, not a pooled rate across all graduates in the group. Graduates may meet several criteria, so the rows do not add up to the total.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only charter campuses for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
14
Economically disadvantaged
100.0%+5.5 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
28.6%−18.4 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
35.7%+23.7 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
100.0%+7.3 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
0.0%−23.5 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Thomas Buzbee Vocational School

African American: 21.4%Hispanic: 42.9%White: 7.1%Two or More Races: 28.6%
  • African American 21.4%
  • Hispanic 42.9%
  • White 7.1%
  • Two or More Races 28.6%

Selected comparison average For charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 207 reporting for every category shown · 207 in full cohort

African American: 18.4%Hispanic: 75.6%White: 2.7%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 1.7%Two or More Races: 1.3%
  • African American 18.4%
  • Hispanic 75.6%
  • White 2.7%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 1.7%
  • Two or More Races 1.3%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
14
Economically disadvantaged students
14
Emergent bilingual students
4
Special education students
5

TEA context labels

  • Alternative education type: residential facility
  • Rated under AEA procedures
  • Residential treatment facility under AEA or AskTED

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
106
Students in TEA mobility denominator
110
TEA-published mobility rate
96.4%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 14 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 28 (66.7%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
14

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
−28

Decrease · −66.7%

Change since 2021–22
−15

Decrease · −51.7%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
14
Selected comparison
508.2

average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 205 rated charter campuses reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Thomas Buzbee Vocational School
School yearStudents enrolledThomas Buzbee Vocational SchoolChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22 29 First available year 485.8
2022–23 56 Increase of 27 (93.1%) 497.5
2023–24 36 Decrease of 20 (35.7%) 511.5
2024–25 42 Increase of 6 (16.7%) 509.4
2025–26 14 Decrease of 28 (66.7%) 508.2

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting charter campuses in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
Not reported

Rate not available

Disciplinary actions
Not reported

Rate not available

Cumulative year-end enrollment
110

2024–25

TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Thomas Buzbee Vocational School
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 76 Not reported — Not reported — — —
2021–22 93 Not reported — Not reported — — —
2022–23 124 Not reported — Not reported — — —
2023–24 100 Not reported — Not reported — — —
2024–25 110 Not reported — Not reported — — —
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Thomas Buzbee Vocational School in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline Not reported — Not reported — — —
In-school suspensions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Out-of-school suspensions Not reported — Not reported — — —
DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized charter campuses can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$7k$26k$45k20182020202220242025
  • Thomas Buzbee Vocational School
  • Parent district: Raven School
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$27,432
Selected comparison
$12,072

average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 204 rated charter campuses reporting

+$15,360 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $27,432 per student for this campus, $30,226 per student for its parent district, Raven School, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearThomas Buzbee Vocational SchoolParent district: Raven SchoolTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2018$14,764$18,477$13,054$8,688 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 114 rated charter campuses reporting
2019$16,293$19,476$13,108$8,362 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 154 rated charter campuses reporting
2020$29,175$36,647$14,058$8,934 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 158 rated charter campuses reporting
2021$22,573$30,121$14,797$9,395 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 172 rated charter campuses reporting
2022$30,357$40,508$15,708$11,442 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 183 rated charter campuses reporting
2023$21,944$26,423$16,792$11,382 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 190 rated charter campuses reporting
2024$38,437$43,062$18,125$11,168 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 197 rated charter campuses reporting
2025$27,432$30,226$18,972$12,072 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 204 rated charter campuses reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$56,982−$7,190 vs similar economic context
Teachers
5−23.3 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
2.9−15.4 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Thomas Buzbee Vocational School

1 to 5 years: 42.6%11 to 20 years: 42.6%21 to 30 years: 14.9%
  • 1 to 5 years 42.6%
  • 11 to 20 years 42.6%
  • 21 to 30 years 14.9%

Selected comparison average For charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 207 reporting for every category shown · 207 in full cohort

Beginning: 13.3%1 to 5 years: 47.9%6 to 10 years: 19.4%11 to 20 years: 14.9%21 to 30 years: 3.9%Over 30 years: 0.6%
  • Beginning 13.3%
  • 1 to 5 years 47.9%
  • 6 to 10 years 19.4%
  • 11 to 20 years 14.9%
  • 21 to 30 years 3.9%
  • Over 30 years 0.6%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for Thomas Buzbee Vocational School in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classThomas Buzbee Vocational School · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Secondary English3.919
Secondary math4.119.8
Secondary science4.920.5
Secondary social studies3.720.8

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 4 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 236801001.