+0.2 ptsvs 78.8 average · 2,056 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
1,061 of 2,056tied with 80 others
Score vs region
−0.9 ptsvs 79.9 average · 519 rated schools in Region 13: Austin
Region 13: Austin placement
297 of 519tied with 21 others
Score vs county
−4.5 ptsvs 83.5 average · 164 rated schools in Williamson County
Williamson County placement
107 of 164tied with 8 others
Score vs similar-size group
−1.3 ptsvs 80.3 average · 3,593 similarly sized rated schools
Similar size placement
2,047 of 3,593tied with 142 others
Score vs state
−2.3 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
Texas placement
4,679 of 7,646tied with 283 others
C79
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving up; under the rules in force back then it scored 54 in 2021-22. The current score is level with the 78.8 average for 2,056 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is below the 79.9 average for 519 rated schools in Region 13: Austin.The current score is below the 83.5 average for 164 rated schools in Williamson County.The current score is below the 80.3 average for 3,593 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is below the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
Current strength
Chronically absent lower than the similar-context average
0%−18.4 pts vs 18.4%
0% is 18.4 percentage points lower than
the 18.4% average among 1,986 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
Tied for 1st-lowest of 1,986 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure; 6 schools share that value.
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
TH Johnson Elem is rated C by TEA, scoring 79 out of 100 for 2025-26 — level with the 78.8 average for 2,056 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is up 17 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 1,061st of 2,056 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 80 others).
TH Johnson Elem is rated C by TEA, scoring 79 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 79.9 average for 519 rated schools in Region 13: Austin. It is up 17 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 297th of 519 rated schools in Region 13: Austin (tied with 21 others).
TH Johnson Elem is rated C by TEA, scoring 79 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 83.5 average for 164 rated schools in Williamson County. It is up 17 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 107th of 164 rated schools in Williamson County (tied with 8 others).
TH Johnson Elem is rated C by TEA, scoring 79 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 80.3 average for 3,593 similarly sized rated schools. It is up 17 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 2,047th of 3,593 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 142 others).
TH Johnson Elem is rated C by TEA, scoring 79 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is up 17 points since 2021-22.
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated Not Rated with 54 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,056 in cohort)
Domain scores
Domain
Score
Grade
Points to next grade
Student Achievement
—
Not rated
—
School Progress
—
Not rated
—
Closing the Gaps
—
Not rated
—
Academic Growth
—
Not rated
—
Relative Performance
—
Not rated
—
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
364
Economically disadvantaged
72.7%+0.1 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
20.3%−1.9 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
13.4%−5.4 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
95.0%+1.3 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
0.0%−18.4 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
TH Johnson Elem
African American 8.4%
Hispanic 64.6%
White 23.1%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 1.1%
Two or More Races 2.5%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,056 reporting for every category shown · 2,056 in full cohort
African American 12.6%
Hispanic 59.6%
White 22%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 1.9%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 3.2%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 13: Austin · 519 reporting for every category shown · 519 in full cohort
African American 6.8%
Hispanic 49.9%
White 31.9%
American Indian 0.2%
Asian 6.7%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 4.4%
Selected comparison averageFor Williamson County · 164 reporting for every category shown · 164 in full cohort
African American 7.1%
Hispanic 37%
White 35.7%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 13.5%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 6.3%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 3,593 reporting for every category shown · 3,593 in full cohort
African American 11.3%
Hispanic 54.5%
White 27.6%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 2.8%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.3%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
African American 11.5%
Hispanic 52.6%
White 27.8%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
359
Economically disadvantaged students
261
Emergent bilingual students
73
Special education students
48
TEA context labels
Highest grade is early education, pre-K or kindergarten
Campus mobility · 2024–25
Mobile students
Not reported
Students in TEA mobility denominator
Not reported
TEA-published mobility rate
Not reported
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 364 students in 2025–26, an increase of 13 (3.7%) from 2024–25.
Latest enrollment
364
2025–26
Change from 2024–25
+13
Increase · +3.7%
Change since 2021–22
−6
Decrease · −1.6%
Enrollment in 2025–26
This school
364
Selected comparison
636.4
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,025 rated schools reporting
Student enrollment by school year for TH Johnson Elem
School year
Students enrolledTH Johnson Elem
Change from previous school year
Average enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22
370
First available year
652.9
2022–23
566
Increase of 196 (53.0%)
658
2023–24
363
Decrease of 203 (35.9%)
656
2024–25
351
Decrease of 12 (3.3%)
652.5
2025–26
364
Increase of 13 (3.7%)
636.4
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
Not reported
Rate not available
Disciplinary actions
Not reported
Rate not available
Cumulative year-end enrollment
389
2024–25
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for TH Johnson Elem
School year
Cumulative enrollment
Studentsall discipline
Students% of enrollment
Actionsall discipline
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21
389
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
2021–22
394
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
2022–23
609
12
2.0%
24
3.94
13.6%
33.3
2023–24
405
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
2024–25
389
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for TH Johnson Elem in 2024–25
Category
Students
Students% of enrollment
Actions
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
In-school suspensions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Out-of-school suspensions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
TH Johnson Elem
Parent district: Taylor ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
This school
$25,249
Selected comparison
$13,082
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,038 rated schools reporting
+$12,167 vs similar economic context
For 2025, TEA reported $25,249 per student for this campus, $30,200 per student for its parent district, Taylor ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
Year
TH Johnson Elem
Parent district: Taylor ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison average
Reportingselected comparison
2018
$6,849
$15,581
$13,054
$8,049
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,907 rated schools reporting
2019
$6,719
$12,663
$13,108
$8,197
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,928 rated schools reporting
2020
$8,285
$12,379
$14,058
$8,743
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,950 rated schools reporting
2021
$9,102
$17,967
$14,797
$9,287
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,963 rated schools reporting
2022
$7,662
$15,711
$15,708
$10,558
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,984 rated schools reporting
2023
$6,630
$15,289
$16,792
$11,245
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,002 rated schools reporting
2024
$13,045
$24,579
$18,125
$12,311
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,025 rated schools reporting
2025
$25,249
$30,200
$18,972
$13,082
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,038 rated schools reporting
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
Average salary
$64,043−$2,500 vs similar economic context
Teachers
22−21.4 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
16.5+2.5 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
TH Johnson Elem
1 to 5 years 36.7%
6 to 10 years 40.8%
11 to 20 years 18.3%
21 to 30 years 4.6%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,056 reporting for every category shown · 2,056 in full cohort
Beginning 6.6%
1 to 5 years 27.1%
6 to 10 years 19%
11 to 20 years 27.3%
21 to 30 years 15.4%
Over 30 years 3.9%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 13: Austin · 519 reporting for every category shown · 519 in full cohort
Beginning 5.9%
1 to 5 years 28%
6 to 10 years 19.4%
11 to 20 years 28.3%
21 to 30 years 14.4%
Over 30 years 3.2%
Selected comparison averageFor Williamson County · 164 reporting for every category shown · 164 in full cohort
Beginning 5.6%
1 to 5 years 27.2%
6 to 10 years 19.7%
11 to 20 years 29.5%
21 to 30 years 15%
Over 30 years 2.5%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 3,593 reporting for every category shown · 3,593 in full cohort
Beginning 6.1%
1 to 5 years 25.4%
6 to 10 years 18.9%
11 to 20 years 29%
21 to 30 years 16.6%
Over 30 years 3.7%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 25.6%
6 to 10 years 19.2%
11 to 20 years 28.7%
21 to 30 years 15.9%
Over 30 years 3.7%
Average students in a class
TEA average class size by grade or subject for TH Johnson Elem in 2024–25
Grade or subject
Average students per classTH Johnson Elem · 2024–25
Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten
19.5
17.9
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 1 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
Out of 20 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
#1 rankings
First-place results
1 measure
1of 7,358
Chronically absent (lowest is best)
Texas average · of the 7,358 that report this measure · tied with 21 · full ranking
Other top-5% rankings
High placements in larger reporting groups
1 measure
87of 2,038
Per-student spending
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 2,038 that report this measure
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above
this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears
once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any
tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones
no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 246911107.