Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

Taylor Elem

Tarrant County · Region 11: Fort Worth · 475 students

Current score
94/1002025-26
Change
±0 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
+2.5 ptsvs 91.5 average · 502 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
95 of 502tied with 63 others
A94

At a glance

Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is flat; under the rules in force back then it scored 95 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 91.5 average for 502 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

Recent domain gain

Relative Performance rose 2 points

79 to 81 2024-25 to 2025-26

  • 81 is 2.6 points above the 78.4 average among 492 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Current strength

Chronically absent lower than the similar-context average

0.8% −5.7 pts vs 6.5%

  • 0.8% is 5.7 percentage points lower than the 6.5% average among 488 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
  • 3rd-lowest of 488 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

STAAR result

All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
79%vs 76% avg · +3 pts
Masters
50%vs 46.4% avg · +3.6 pts

Among 494 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Taylor Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 94 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 91.5 average for 502 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is unchanged since 2021-22.

Ranks 95th of 502 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 63 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 5 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. Who this school serves
  6. Student counts behind the percentages
  7. Enrollment over time
  8. Discipline and removal from class
  9. Spending per student
  10. Teachers and actual class size
  11. Where this school ranks best
  12. Where this comes from

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
908070 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas averageTaylor Elem 9493949494 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 95 that year.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26A9491.5 502 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25A9492.0 492 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting
2023-24A9491.1 479 reporting78.9 7,466 reporting
2022-23A9391.5 467 reporting79.1 7,377 reporting
2021-22A9492.1 457 reporting83.7 7,283 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement94 A+1.4 vs similar economic context · 494 reporting
  • School Progress92 A+4.2 vs similar economic context · 492 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps94 A+4.9 vs similar economic context · 489 reporting
  • Academic Growth92 A+5.7 vs similar economic context · 489 reporting
  • Relative Performance81 B+2.6 vs similar economic context · 492 reporting
  • Taylor Elem
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (502 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement94A—
School Progress92A—
Closing the Gaps94A—
Academic Growth92A—
Relative Performance81B9

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is Student Achievement (94), so School Progress (92) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 94.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level93%+2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 494 reporting
  • Meets grade level79%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 494 reporting
  • Masters grade level50%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 494 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level94%+2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 494 reporting
  • Meets grade level83%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 494 reporting
  • Masters grade level55%+5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 494 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level95%+5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 492 reporting
  • Meets grade level81%+8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 492 reporting
  • Masters grade level50%+8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 492 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level85%−4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 455 reporting
  • Meets grade level63%−6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 455 reporting
  • Masters grade level33%−10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 455 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (502 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
475
Economically disadvantaged
8.1%−2.2 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
5.3%−5.5 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
18.9%+3.5 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
97.0%+1.1 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
0.8%−5.7 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Taylor Elem

African American: 4%Hispanic: 14.6%White: 61.9%American Indian: 0.8%Asian: 15.3%Pacific Islander: 0.2%Two or More Races: 3.2%
  • African American 4%
  • Hispanic 14.6%
  • White 61.9%
  • American Indian 0.8%
  • Asian 15.3%
  • Pacific Islander 0.2%
  • Two or More Races 3.2%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 502 reporting for every category shown · 502 in full cohort

African American: 5%Hispanic: 17.8%White: 48.7%American Indian: 0.5%Asian: 22.2%Pacific Islander: 0.1%Two or More Races: 5.7%
  • African American 5%
  • Hispanic 17.8%
  • White 48.7%
  • American Indian 0.5%
  • Asian 22.2%
  • Pacific Islander 0.1%
  • Two or More Races 5.7%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
472
Economically disadvantaged students
38
Emergent bilingual students
25
Special education students
89

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
17
Students in TEA mobility denominator
386
TEA-published mobility rate
4.4%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 475 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 36 (7.0%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
475

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
−36

Decrease · −7.0%

Change since 2021–22
−35

Decrease · −6.9%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
475
Selected comparison
867.2

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 497 rated schools reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Taylor Elem
School yearStudents enrolledTaylor ElemChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22 510 First available year 874.6
2022–23 512 Increase of 2 (0.4%) 893.3
2023–24 496 Decrease of 16 (3.1%) 885.4
2024–25 511 Increase of 15 (3.0%) 877.4
2025–26 475 Decrease of 36 (7.0%) 867.2

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
Suppressed

Rate not available

Disciplinary actions
14

2.70 per 100 students

Cumulative year-end enrollment
519

2024–25

Actions per 100 students · 2024–25

This school
2.7
Selected comparison
8

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 339 rated schools reporting

−5.3 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Taylor Elem
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 510 Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
2021–22 530 12 2.3% 35 6.60 4.7% 8
2022–23 525 17 3.2% 29 5.52 4.9% 8.1
2023–24 508 12 2.4% 22 4.33 4.8% 8.1
2024–25 519 Suppressed — 14 2.70 — 8
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Taylor Elem in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline Suppressed — 14 2.70 — 8
In-school suspensions Suppressed — 12 2.31 — 6.4
Out-of-school suspensions Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$7k$13k$20k20182020202220242025
  • Taylor Elem
  • Parent district: Grapevine-Colleyville ISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$9,726
Selected comparison
$10,744

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 491 rated schools reporting

−$1,018 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $9,726 per student for this campus, $16,051 per student for its parent district, Grapevine-Colleyville ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearTaylor ElemParent district: Grapevine-Colleyville ISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2018$8,719$18,978$13,054$7,238 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 418 rated schools reporting
2019$8,369$16,422$13,108$7,322 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 429 rated schools reporting
2020$8,103$15,562$14,058$7,627 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 439 rated schools reporting
2021$8,519$16,369$14,797$8,248 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 449 rated schools reporting
2022$9,807$16,148$15,708$9,419 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 458 rated schools reporting
2023$9,312$16,187$16,792$9,497 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 466 rated schools reporting
2024$9,609$15,750$18,125$10,156 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 479 rated schools reporting
2025$9,726$16,051$18,972$10,744 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 491 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$69,147−$284 vs similar economic context
Teachers
34−22.3 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
14−0.8 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Taylor Elem

1 to 5 years: 22%6 to 10 years: 18.1%11 to 20 years: 27.3%21 to 30 years: 23.7%Over 30 years: 8.9%
  • 1 to 5 years 22%
  • 6 to 10 years 18.1%
  • 11 to 20 years 27.3%
  • 21 to 30 years 23.7%
  • Over 30 years 8.9%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 502 reporting for every category shown · 502 in full cohort

Beginning: 4.3%1 to 5 years: 23.7%6 to 10 years: 20.1%11 to 20 years: 31.6%21 to 30 years: 17%Over 30 years: 2.6%
  • Beginning 4.3%
  • 1 to 5 years 23.7%
  • 6 to 10 years 20.1%
  • 11 to 20 years 31.6%
  • 21 to 30 years 17%
  • Over 30 years 2.6%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for Taylor Elem in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classTaylor Elem · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten2019
Grade 121.319.2
Grade 219.419.7
Grade 319.521.6
Grade 419.520.5
Grade 52222.4
Grade 6619.2
Secondary math118.9

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 8 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this school ranks best

Out of 105 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.

#2–3 rankings

Second- and third-place results

1 measure

  • 2of 814

    Chronically absent (lowest is best)

    Region 11: Fort Worth · of the 814 that report this measure

#4–10 rankings

Fourth- through tenth-place results

1 measure

  • 6of 457

    Attendance

    Tarrant County · of the 457 that report this measure · tied with 2

Other top-5% rankings

High placements in larger reporting groups

13 measures

  • 14of 455

    Math — Approaches

    Tarrant County · of the 455 that report this measure · tied with 4

  • 16of 455

    Math — Meets

    Tarrant County · of the 455 that report this measure · tied with 3

  • 18of 795

    Academic Growth

    Region 11: Fort Worth · of the 795 that report this measure · tied with 13

  • 18of 455

    Math — Masters

    Tarrant County · of the 455 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 19of 453

    Closing the Gaps

    Tarrant County · of the 453 that report this measure · tied with 8

  • 20of 456

    Reading — Masters

    Tarrant County · of the 456 that report this measure · tied with 2

  • 23of 457

    All Subjects — Masters

    Tarrant County · of the 457 that report this measure · tied with 3

  • 24of 466

    Overall score

    Tarrant County · of the 466 that report this measure · tied with 9

  • 42of 813

    All Subjects — Meets

    Region 11: Fort Worth · of the 813 that report this measure · tied with 6

  • 44of 812

    Reading — Meets

    Region 11: Fort Worth · of the 812 that report this measure · tied with 7

  • 45of 812

    Reading — Approaches

    Region 11: Fort Worth · of the 812 that report this measure · tied with 13

  • 190of 4,378

    Student Achievement

    Similar size · of the 4,378 that report this measure · tied with 80

  • 190of 4,378

    All Subjects — Approaches

    Similar size · of the 4,378 that report this measure · tied with 45

These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 220906105.