txschools.net

Unofficial · not affiliated with the Texas Education Agency · what this is

Campus · Traditional

T E Baxter Elem

Ellis County · Region 10: Richardson · 617 students

Learn more & enroll

B80

T E Baxter Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 80 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 86.5 average of the 1,121 schools serving a similar share of economically disadvantaged students, and below the statewide average of 81.3. It is down 7 points since 2021-22 — both years scored under TEA's current rules, since TEA rewrote them in 2023; under the rules in force back then it scored 82.

Ranks 4,402nd of 7,646 Texas schools (tied with 276 others), and 709th of 1,157 in Region 10: Richardson (tied with 25 others).

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 5 years of ratings
  3. How this school's change over time is ranked
  4. Where the score comes from
  5. Student outcomes
  6. Who this school serves
  7. Spending per student
  8. Teachers
  9. Where this comes from

5 years of ratings

Compare against
908070 Schools like this oneTexas averageT E Baxter Elem 8781868880 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated B with 82 that year.

Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSimilarState
2025-26B8086.581.3
2024-25B8886.481.2
2023-24B8685.078.9
2022-23B8185.479.1
2021-22B8786.883.7

How this school's change over time is ranked

TEA publishes most measures for one year only, so a change ranking exists just where the same figure is published across years — the overall score, the five score domains, and per-student spending. This page does not yet state where T E Baxter Elem itself places on these lists, only that the lists exist; open one to find this school's own row.

Texas schools

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement79 C−8.1 vs similar · −0.5 vs region
  • School Progress79 C−4.7 vs similar · −2.8 vs region
  • Closing the Gaps81 B−2.9 vs similar · +1.6 vs region
  • Academic Growth79 C−0.6 vs similar · +1.9 vs region
  • Relative Performance69 D−11.0 vs similar · −8.8 vs region
  • T E Baxter Elem
  • Similar student population (1,121)
  • Region 10: Richardson (1,157)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement79C1
School Progress79C1
Closing the Gaps81B9
Academic Growth79C1
Relative Performance69D1

Closest to moving up: Student Achievement, 1 point below B in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level80%−4 vs Similar student population
  • Meets grade level55%−8 vs Similar student population
  • Masters grade level21%−10 vs Similar student population

Reading

  • Approaches grade level85%+0 vs Similar student population
  • Meets grade level58%−9 vs Similar student population
  • Masters grade level26%−6 vs Similar student population

Math

  • Approaches grade level77%−4 vs Similar student population
  • Meets grade level55%−1 vs Similar student population
  • Masters grade level17%−9 vs Similar student population

Science

  • Approaches grade level78%−6 vs Similar student population
  • Meets grade level45%−16 vs Similar student population
  • Masters grade level16%−17 vs Similar student population
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar student population (1,121)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The tick on each bar marks the average for Similar student population (1,121 schools) — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
617
Economically disadvantaged
33.1%−1.0 pts vs similar
English learners
4.7%−5.8 pts vs similar
Special education
19.9%+2.3 pts vs similar
Attendance
95.2%+0.1 pts vs similar
Chronically absent
9.2%−2.1 pts vs similar

Student demographics

African American: 18.5%Hispanic: 24.1%White: 50.1%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 1%Pacific Islander: 0.3%Two or More Races: 5.7%
  • African American 18.5%
  • Hispanic 24.1%
  • White 50.1%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 1%
  • Pacific Islander 0.3%
  • Two or More Races 5.7%

Spending per student

Compared against TEA's own peer group, which controls for size and student population, and against the state.

$12k$18k$24k20182020202220242025
  • T E Baxter Elem
  • TEA peer group
  • Texas average

TEA's published file does not include peer-group spending for this entity, so no comparison is shown.

Not reported by TEA for this entity: peer.

Teachers

Average salary
$67,706−$388 vs similar
Teachers
41
Students per staff member
15.1

Teaching experience

1 to 5 years: 22%6 to 10 years: 12%11 to 20 years: 51.3%21 to 30 years: 14.7%
  • 1 to 5 years 22%
  • 6 to 10 years 12%
  • 11 to 20 years 51.3%
  • 21 to 30 years 14.7%

Where this comes from

Every figure on this page comes from data the Texas Education Agency publishes at txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026 and archived with a checksum so each number stays traceable to the bytes TEA served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for districts only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here — 9,086 entities in two formats is 18,172 assets, on top of everything else this site publishes, and that is past the 20,000-asset limit this site is published under. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 070908104.