+8.6 ptsvs 83.4 average · 1,499 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
156 of 1,499tied with 88 others
Score vs region
+8.7 ptsvs 83.3 average · 1,303 rated schools in Region 04: Houston
Region 04: Houston placement
185 of 1,303tied with 67 others
Score vs county
+8.6 ptsvs 83.4 average · 911 rated schools in Harris County
Harris County placement
130 of 911tied with 41 others
Score vs similar-size group
+11.1 ptsvs 80.9 average · 3,866 similarly sized rated schools
Similar size placement
348 of 3,866tied with 162 others
Score vs state
+10.7 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
Texas placement
838 of 7,646tied with 318 others
A92
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving up; under the rules in force back then it scored 88 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 83.4 average for 1,499 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 83.3 average for 1,303 rated schools in Region 04: Houston.The current score is above the 83.4 average for 911 rated schools in Harris County.The current score is above the 80.9 average for 3,866 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
STAAR result
All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters
Meets
71%vs 56.3% avg · +14.7 pts
Masters
41%vs 25.3% avg · +15.7 pts
Among 1,456 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Sue Creech Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 92 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 83.4 average for 1,499 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is up 1 point since 2021-22.
Ranks 156th of 1,499 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 88 others).
Sue Creech Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 92 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 83.3 average for 1,303 rated schools in Region 04: Houston. It is up 1 point since 2021-22.
Ranks 185th of 1,303 rated schools in Region 04: Houston (tied with 67 others).
Sue Creech Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 92 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 83.4 average for 911 rated schools in Harris County. It is up 1 point since 2021-22.
Ranks 130th of 911 rated schools in Harris County (tied with 41 others).
Sue Creech Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 92 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.9 average for 3,866 similarly sized rated schools. It is up 1 point since 2021-22.
Ranks 348th of 3,866 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 162 others).
Sue Creech Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 92 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is up 1 point since 2021-22.
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated B with 88 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Student Achievement92 A+8.4 vs similar economic context · 1,456 reporting
School Progress90 A+7.9 vs similar economic context · 1,453 reporting
Closing the Gaps93 A+12.3 vs similar economic context · 1,443 reporting
Academic Growth90 A+13.1 vs similar economic context · 1,426 reporting
Relative Performance90 A+10.5 vs similar economic context · 1,453 reporting
Sue Creech Elem
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,499 in cohort)
Domain scores
Domain
Score
Grade
Points to next grade
Student Achievement
92
A
—
School Progress
90
A
—
Closing the Gaps
93
A
—
Academic Growth
90
A
—
Relative Performance
90
A
—
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student
Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is Student Achievement (92), so
School Progress (90) is published above but does not enter the overall
score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 92.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
All Subjects
Approaches grade level87%+7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,456 reporting
Meets grade level71%+15 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,456 reporting
Masters grade level41%+16 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,456 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
Approaches grade level89%+8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,455 reporting
Meets grade level79%+18 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,455 reporting
Masters grade level50%+23 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,455 reporting
Math3 performance levels
Approaches grade level85%+8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,451 reporting
Meets grade level64%+14 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,451 reporting
Masters grade level33%+12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,451 reporting
Science3 performance levels
Approaches grade level85%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,345 reporting
Meets grade level70%+15 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,345 reporting
Masters grade level38%+11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,345 reporting
Approaches grade level
Meets grade level
Masters grade level
Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,499 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
780
Economically disadvantaged
43.9%−0.8 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
29.7%+17.9 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
25.9%+7.6 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
96.5%+1.8 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
4.4%−8.9 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Sue Creech Elem
African American 15.7%
Hispanic 27.8%
White 37.7%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 13.3%
Two or More Races 5.3%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,499 reporting for every category shown · 1,499 in full cohort
African American 9.2%
Hispanic 37.7%
White 44.4%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 3.9%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 4.3%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 04: Houston · 1,303 reporting for every category shown · 1,303 in full cohort
African American 19.1%
Hispanic 53.8%
White 16.9%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 6.7%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.1%
Selected comparison averageFor Harris County · 911 reporting for every category shown · 911 in full cohort
African American 19.3%
Hispanic 59.1%
White 13.1%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 5.4%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 2.7%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 3,866 reporting for every category shown · 3,866 in full cohort
African American 12.4%
Hispanic 53.6%
White 24.2%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 5.6%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 3.7%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
African American 11.5%
Hispanic 52.6%
White 27.8%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
777
Economically disadvantaged students
341
Emergent bilingual students
231
Special education students
201
Campus mobility · 2024–25
Mobile students
81
Students in TEA mobility denominator
710
TEA-published mobility rate
11.4%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 780 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 24 (3.0%) from 2024–25.
Latest enrollment
780
2025–26
Change from 2024–25
−24
Decrease · −3.0%
Change since 2021–22
−65
Decrease · −7.7%
Enrollment in 2025–26
This school
780
Selected comparison
681
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,464 rated schools reporting
Student enrollment by school year for Sue Creech Elem
School year
Students enrolledSue Creech Elem
Change from previous school year
Average enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22
845
First available year
680
2022–23
873
Increase of 28 (3.3%)
684.9
2023–24
817
Decrease of 56 (6.4%)
684.7
2024–25
804
Decrease of 13 (1.6%)
681.5
2025–26
780
Decrease of 24 (3.0%)
681
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
10
1.2% of cumulative year-end enrollment
Disciplinary actions
20
2.35 per 100 students
Cumulative year-end enrollment
851
2024–25
Share of students · 2024–25
This school
1.2%
Selected comparison
11.2%
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,154 rated schools reporting
−10.0 pts vs similar economic context
Actions per 100 students · 2024–25
This school
2.35
Selected comparison
24.3
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,239 rated schools reporting
−21.9 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Sue Creech Elem
School year
Cumulative enrollment
Studentsall discipline
Students% of enrollment
Actionsall discipline
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21
914
15
1.6%
18
1.97
9.3%
17.6
2021–22
927
17
1.8%
24
2.59
11.3%
24.2
2022–23
931
14
1.5%
32
3.44
11.6%
25.3
2023–24
881
21
2.4%
25
2.84
11.6%
25.9
2024–25
851
10
1.2%
20
2.35
11.2%
24.3
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Sue Creech Elem in 2024–25
Category
Students
Students% of enrollment
Actions
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline
10
1.2%
20
2.35
11.2%
24.3
In-school suspensions
10
1.2%
18
2.12
10.1%
18.7
Out-of-school suspensions
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
Sue Creech Elem
Parent district: Katy ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
This school
$10,803
Selected comparison
$12,020
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,469 rated schools reporting
−$1,217 vs similar economic context
For 2025, TEA reported $10,803 per student for this campus, $17,981 per student for its parent district, Katy ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
Year
Sue Creech Elem
Parent district: Katy ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison average
Reportingselected comparison
2018
$15,736
$14,611
$13,054
$7,800
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,349 rated schools reporting
2019
$7,551
$14,868
$13,108
$8,006
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,370 rated schools reporting
2020
$7,076
$15,576
$14,058
$8,437
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,379 rated schools reporting
2021
$8,154
$13,959
$14,797
$8,850
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,399 rated schools reporting
2022
$8,934
$15,755
$15,708
$10,215
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,411 rated schools reporting
2023
$8,862
$17,477
$16,792
$10,640
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,430 rated schools reporting
2024
$10,461
$16,789
$18,125
$11,676
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,446 rated schools reporting
2025
$10,803
$17,981
$18,972
$12,020
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,469 rated schools reporting
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
Average salary
$71,938+$4,696 vs similar economic context
Teachers
60+15.9 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
12.9−7.9 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Sue Creech Elem
1 to 5 years 30%
6 to 10 years 26.6%
11 to 20 years 28.3%
21 to 30 years 15.1%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,499 reporting for every category shown · 1,499 in full cohort
Beginning 5.4%
1 to 5 years 23.6%
6 to 10 years 19.5%
11 to 20 years 30.4%
21 to 30 years 16.9%
Over 30 years 3.9%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 04: Houston · 1,303 reporting for every category shown · 1,303 in full cohort
Beginning 7.7%
1 to 5 years 27.3%
6 to 10 years 20.6%
11 to 20 years 27.2%
21 to 30 years 13.5%
Over 30 years 2.6%
Selected comparison averageFor Harris County · 911 reporting for every category shown · 911 in full cohort
Beginning 8.9%
1 to 5 years 28.4%
6 to 10 years 20.3%
11 to 20 years 26.2%
21 to 30 years 13%
Over 30 years 2.5%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 3,866 reporting for every category shown · 3,866 in full cohort
Beginning 6.1%
1 to 5 years 26.7%
6 to 10 years 20%
11 to 20 years 29%
21 to 30 years 15.1%
Over 30 years 2.8%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 25.6%
6 to 10 years 19.2%
11 to 20 years 28.7%
21 to 30 years 15.9%
Over 30 years 3.7%
Average students in a class
TEA average class size by grade or subject for Sue Creech Elem in 2024–25
Grade or subject
Average students per classSue Creech Elem · 2024–25
Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten
17
18
Grade 1
20.3
18.4
Grade 2
25.9
18.7
Grade 3
24.7
19.3
Grade 4
27.5
19.3
Grade 5
26.8
20.3
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 6 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
Out of 105 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
Other top-5% rankings
High placements in larger reporting groups
4 measures
50of 1,455
Reading — Masters
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,455 that report this measure · tied with 6
69of 1,455
Reading — Meets
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,455 that report this measure · tied with 9
73of 1,452
Attendance
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,452 that report this measure · tied with 6
77of 1,452
Chronically absent (lowest is best)
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,452 that report this measure · tied with 5
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above
this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears
once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any
tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones
no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 101914119.