+6.4 ptsvs 91.6 average · 420 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
4 of 420tied with 2 others
Score vs region
+15.8 ptsvs 82.2 average · 1,157 rated schools in Region 10: Richardson
Region 10: Richardson placement
6 of 1,157tied with 13 others
Score vs county
+16.6 ptsvs 81.4 average · 563 rated schools in Dallas County
Dallas County placement
6 of 563tied with 10 others
Score vs similar-size group
+17.9 ptsvs 80.1 average · 4,464 similarly sized rated schools
Similar size placement
27 of 4,464tied with 24 others
Score vs state
+16.7 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
Texas placement
35 of 7,646tied with 46 others
A98
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving up; under the rules in force back then it scored 94 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 91.6 average for 420 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 82.2 average for 1,157 rated schools in Region 10: Richardson.The current score is above the 81.4 average for 563 rated schools in Dallas County.The current score is above the 80.1 average for 4,464 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
Current strength
Academic Growth above the similar-context average
98+11.5 pts vs 86.5
98 is 11.5 points above
the 86.5 average among 407 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
1st of 407 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Sudie L Williams Talented and Gifted Academy is rated A by TEA, scoring 98 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 91.6 average for 420 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is up 1 point since 2021-22.
Ranks 4th of 420 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 2 others).
Sudie L Williams Talented and Gifted Academy is rated A by TEA, scoring 98 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 82.2 average for 1,157 rated schools in Region 10: Richardson. It is up 1 point since 2021-22.
Ranks 6th of 1,157 rated schools in Region 10: Richardson (tied with 13 others).
Sudie L Williams Talented and Gifted Academy is rated A by TEA, scoring 98 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.4 average for 563 rated schools in Dallas County. It is up 1 point since 2021-22.
Ranks 6th of 563 rated schools in Dallas County (tied with 10 others).
Sudie L Williams Talented and Gifted Academy is rated A by TEA, scoring 98 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.1 average for 4,464 similarly sized rated schools. It is up 1 point since 2021-22.
Ranks 27th of 4,464 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 24 others).
Sudie L Williams Talented and Gifted Academy is rated A by TEA, scoring 98 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is up 1 point since 2021-22.
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 94 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Student Achievement99 A+6.3 vs similar economic context · 412 reporting
School Progress98 A+10.1 vs similar economic context · 410 reporting
Closing the Gaps97 A+7.8 vs similar economic context · 407 reporting
Academic Growth98 A+11.5 vs similar economic context · 407 reporting
Relative Performance97 A+19.1 vs similar economic context · 410 reporting
Sudie L Williams Talented and Gifted Academy
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (420 in cohort)
Domain scores
Domain
Score
Grade
Points to next grade
Student Achievement
99
A
—
School Progress
98
A
—
Closing the Gaps
97
A
—
Academic Growth
98
A
—
Relative Performance
97
A
—
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student
Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is Student Achievement (99), so
School Progress (98) is published above but does not enter the overall
score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 99.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
All Subjects
Approaches grade level100%+9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 412 reporting
Meets grade level98%+22 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 412 reporting
Masters grade level89%+42 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 412 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
Approaches grade level100%+7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 412 reporting
Meets grade level100%+19 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 412 reporting
Masters grade level97%+47 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 412 reporting
Math3 performance levels
Approaches grade level100%+10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 410 reporting
Meets grade level98%+25 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 410 reporting
Masters grade level85%+42 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 410 reporting
Science3 performance levels
Approaches grade level99%+10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 380 reporting
Meets grade level92%+23 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 380 reporting
Masters grade level75%+32 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 380 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
Approaches grade level100%+10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 134 reporting
Meets grade level98%+25 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 134 reporting
Masters grade level92%+44 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 134 reporting
Approaches grade level
Meets grade level
Masters grade level
Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (420 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
452
Economically disadvantaged
5.8%−3.2 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
0.7%−10.4 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
8.0%−7.3 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
97.3%+1.3 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
1.3%−5.0 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Sudie L Williams Talented and Gifted Academy
African American 4.9%
Hispanic 18.1%
White 60%
American Indian 1.3%
Asian 7.3%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 8.2%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 420 reporting for every category shown · 420 in full cohort
African American 4.7%
Hispanic 17.1%
White 48.3%
American Indian 0.5%
Asian 23.6%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 5.7%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 10: Richardson · 1,157 reporting for every category shown · 1,157 in full cohort
African American 17.4%
Hispanic 43.5%
White 24.5%
American Indian 0.6%
Asian 9.9%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 4%
Selected comparison averageFor Dallas County · 563 reporting for every category shown · 563 in full cohort
African American 21.3%
Hispanic 59%
White 10.9%
American Indian 0.6%
Asian 5.4%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 2.6%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 4,464 reporting for every category shown · 4,464 in full cohort
African American 11.9%
Hispanic 55.1%
White 25.5%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 3.7%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
African American 11.5%
Hispanic 52.6%
White 27.8%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
452
Economically disadvantaged students
26
Emergent bilingual students
3
Special education students
36
Campus mobility · 2024–25
Mobile students
6
Students in TEA mobility denominator
448
TEA-published mobility rate
1.3%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 452 students in 2025–26, an increase of 6 (1.3%) from 2024–25.
Latest enrollment
452
2025–26
Change from 2024–25
+6
Increase · +1.3%
Change since 2021–22
+26
Increase · +6.1%
Enrollment in 2025–26
This school
452
Selected comparison
861.6
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 415 rated schools reporting
Student enrollment by school year for Sudie L Williams Talented and Gifted Academy
School year
Students enrolledSudie L Williams Talented and Gifted Academy
Change from previous school year
Average enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22
426
First available year
870
2022–23
429
Increase of 3 (0.7%)
891.2
2023–24
442
Increase of 13 (3.0%)
879.5
2024–25
446
Increase of 4 (0.9%)
872.4
2025–26
452
Increase of 6 (1.3%)
861.6
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
Suppressed
Rate not available
Disciplinary actions
Suppressed
Rate not available
Cumulative year-end enrollment
446
2024–25
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Sudie L Williams Talented and Gifted Academy
School year
Cumulative enrollment
Studentsall discipline
Students% of enrollment
Actionsall discipline
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21
428
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
2021–22
430
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
2022–23
429
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
2023–24
440
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
2024–25
446
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Sudie L Williams Talented and Gifted Academy in 2024–25
Category
Students
Students% of enrollment
Actions
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
In-school suspensions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Out-of-school suspensions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
DAEP placements
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Mandatory DAEP placements
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Discretionary DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
Sudie L Williams Talented and Gifted Academy
Parent district: Dallas ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
This school
$11,651
Selected comparison
$10,873
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 411 rated schools reporting
+$778 vs similar economic context
For 2025, TEA reported $11,651 per student for this campus, $23,271 per student for its parent district, Dallas ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
Year
Sudie L Williams Talented and Gifted Academy
Parent district: Dallas ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison average
Reportingselected comparison
2019
$10,623
$13,990
$13,108
$7,343
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 355 rated schools reporting
2020
$9,030
$14,981
$14,058
$7,647
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 365 rated schools reporting
2021
$8,467
$17,075
$14,797
$8,275
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 375 rated schools reporting
2022
$9,006
$18,716
$15,708
$9,542
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 382 rated schools reporting
2023
$9,939
$20,932
$16,792
$9,490
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 388 rated schools reporting
2024
$12,247
$22,990
$18,125
$10,211
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 401 rated schools reporting
2025
$11,651
$23,271
$18,972
$10,873
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 411 rated schools reporting
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
Average salary
$80,106+$10,602 vs similar economic context
Teachers
26−30.3 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
17.6+2.8 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Sudie L Williams Talented and Gifted Academy
1 to 5 years 10.2%
6 to 10 years 43%
11 to 20 years 43%
21 to 30 years 3.9%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 420 reporting for every category shown · 420 in full cohort
Beginning 4.2%
1 to 5 years 23.9%
6 to 10 years 20%
11 to 20 years 31.7%
21 to 30 years 17%
Over 30 years 2.4%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 10: Richardson · 1,157 reporting for every category shown · 1,157 in full cohort
Beginning 6.9%
1 to 5 years 29%
6 to 10 years 20.1%
11 to 20 years 27.5%
21 to 30 years 13.7%
Over 30 years 2.8%
Selected comparison averageFor Dallas County · 563 reporting for every category shown · 563 in full cohort
Beginning 7.5%
1 to 5 years 30.2%
6 to 10 years 21.2%
11 to 20 years 26.5%
21 to 30 years 11.9%
Over 30 years 2.7%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 4,464 reporting for every category shown · 4,464 in full cohort
Beginning 6.1%
1 to 5 years 25.9%
6 to 10 years 19.3%
11 to 20 years 28.9%
21 to 30 years 16.1%
Over 30 years 3.4%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 25.6%
6 to 10 years 19.2%
11 to 20 years 28.7%
21 to 30 years 15.9%
Over 30 years 3.7%
Average students in a class
TEA average class size by grade or subject for Sudie L Williams Talented and Gifted Academy in 2024–25
Grade or subject
Average students per classSudie L Williams Talented and Gifted Academy · 2024–25
Average students per classselected comparison
Grade 4
22.5
20.4
Grade 5
22.5
22.4
Grade 6
23.3
18.6
Secondary English
21.6
18.9
Secondary languages other than English
22.7
21.7
Secondary math
21.5
18.9
Secondary science
22.3
21.6
Secondary social studies
21.6
21.9
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 8 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
Out of 120 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
#1 rankings
First-place results
8 measures
1of 7,260
All Subjects — Approaches
Texas average · of the 7,260 that report this measure · tied with 24
1of 7,254
Reading — Approaches
Texas average · of the 7,254 that report this measure · tied with 32
1of 7,254
Reading — Meets
Texas average · of the 7,254 that report this measure · tied with 6
1of 7,254
Reading — Masters
Texas average · of the 7,254 that report this measure
1of 7,227
Math — Approaches
Texas average · of the 7,227 that report this measure · tied with 37
1of 4,231
All Subjects — Masters
Similar size · of the 4,231 that report this measure
1of 4,231
Math — Masters
Similar size · of the 4,231 that report this measure
1of 1,089
Academic Growth
Region 10: Richardson · of the 1,089 that report this measure
#2–3 rankings
Second- and third-place results
6 measures
2of 4,231
Student Achievement
Similar size · of the 4,231 that report this measure · tied with 4
2of 410
School Progress
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 410 that report this measure · tied with 2
2of 410
Math — Meets
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 410 that report this measure · tied with 2
3of 1,062
Social Studies — Masters
Similar size · of the 1,062 that report this measure
3of 552
Chronically absent (lowest is best)
Dallas County · of the 552 that report this measure
3of 134
Social Studies — Meets
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 134 that report this measure
#4–10 rankings
Fourth- through tenth-place results
5 measures
4of 420
Overall score
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 420 that report this measure · tied with 2
4of 412
All Subjects — Meets
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 412 that report this measure
4of 410
Relative Performance
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 410 that report this measure · tied with 1
5of 552
Attendance
Dallas County · of the 552 that report this measure · tied with 1
10of 540
Science — Masters
Dallas County · of the 540 that report this measure
Other top-5% rankings
High placements in larger reporting groups
3 measures
16of 549
Closing the Gaps
Dallas County · of the 549 that report this measure · tied with 6
16of 540
Science — Meets
Dallas County · of the 540 that report this measure · tied with 1
17of 540
Science — Approaches
Dallas County · of the 540 that report this measure · tied with 5
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above
this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears
once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any
tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones
no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 057905384.