+10.1 ptsvs 79.9 average · 2,005 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
278 of 2,005tied with 70 others
Score vs region
+4.3 ptsvs 85.7 average · 505 rated schools in Region 01: Edinburg
Region 01: Edinburg placement
143 of 505tied with 41 others
Score vs county
+4.0 ptsvs 86 average · 127 rated schools in Cameron County
Cameron County placement
31 of 127tied with 13 others
Score vs similar-size group
+8.8 ptsvs 81.2 average · 3,047 similarly sized rated schools
Similar size placement
626 of 3,047tied with 143 others
Score vs state
+8.7 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
Texas placement
1,571 of 7,646tied with 341 others
A90
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving up; under the rules in force back then it scored 88 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 79.9 average for 2,005 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 85.7 average for 505 rated schools in Region 01: Edinburg.The current score is above the 86 average for 127 rated schools in Cameron County.The current score is above the 81.2 average for 3,047 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
STAAR result
All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters
Meets
60%vs 47.9% avg · +12.1 pts
Masters
33%vs 19.5% avg · +13.5 pts
Among 1,898 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Stillman MS is rated A by TEA, scoring 90 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 79.9 average for 2,005 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is up 2 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 278th of 2,005 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 70 others).
Stillman MS is rated A by TEA, scoring 90 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 85.7 average for 505 rated schools in Region 01: Edinburg. It is up 2 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 143rd of 505 rated schools in Region 01: Edinburg (tied with 41 others).
Stillman MS is rated A by TEA, scoring 90 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 86 average for 127 rated schools in Cameron County. It is up 2 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 31st of 127 rated schools in Cameron County (tied with 13 others).
Stillman MS is rated A by TEA, scoring 90 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.2 average for 3,047 similarly sized rated schools. It is up 2 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 626th of 3,047 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 143 others).
Stillman MS is rated A by TEA, scoring 90 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is up 2 points since 2021-22.
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated B with 88 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Student Achievement88 B+10.3 vs similar economic context · 1,898 reporting
School Progress91 A+10.2 vs similar economic context · 1,890 reporting
Closing the Gaps89 B+11.9 vs similar economic context · 1,871 reporting
Academic Growth80 B+6.1 vs similar economic context · 1,831 reporting
Relative Performance91 A+11.8 vs similar economic context · 1,890 reporting
Stillman MS
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,005 in cohort)
Domain scores
Domain
Score
Grade
Points to next grade
Student Achievement
88
B
2
School Progress
91
A
—
Closing the Gaps
89
B
1
Academic Growth
80
B
10
Relative Performance
91
A
—
Closest to moving up: Closing the Gaps, 1 point below A in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student
Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (91), so
Student Achievement (88) is published above but does not enter the overall
score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 91.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
All Subjects
Approaches grade level81%+7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,898 reporting
Meets grade level60%+12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,898 reporting
Masters grade level33%+14 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,898 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
Approaches grade level85%+9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,894 reporting
Meets grade level70%+17 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,894 reporting
Masters grade level41%+20 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,894 reporting
Math3 performance levels
Approaches grade level79%+8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,885 reporting
Meets grade level56%+14 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,885 reporting
Masters grade level28%+12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,885 reporting
Science3 performance levels
Approaches grade level88%+14 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,735 reporting
Meets grade level74%+28 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,735 reporting
Masters grade level42%+22 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,735 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
Approaches grade level72%−2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 935 reporting
Meets grade level31%−15 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 935 reporting
Masters grade level16%−5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 935 reporting
Approaches grade level
Meets grade level
Masters grade level
Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,005 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
921
Economically disadvantaged
65.0%−0.1 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
22.3%+4.3 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
18.8%−0.1 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
94.6%+0.5 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
15.1%−1.7 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Stillman MS
African American 0.1%
Hispanic 97.7%
White 1.4%
Asian 0.7%
Two or More Races 0.1%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,005 reporting for every category shown · 2,005 in full cohort
African American 11.4%
Hispanic 51.8%
White 30.4%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 2.2%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 3.7%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 01: Edinburg · 505 reporting for every category shown · 505 in full cohort
African American 0.2%
Hispanic 97.5%
White 1.9%
Asian 0.3%
Two or More Races 0.1%
Selected comparison averageFor Cameron County · 127 reporting for every category shown · 127 in full cohort
African American 0.3%
Hispanic 96.2%
White 2.9%
American Indian 0.1%
Asian 0.4%
Two or More Races 0.2%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 3,047 reporting for every category shown · 3,047 in full cohort
African American 12.7%
Hispanic 52.5%
White 24.1%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 6.5%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 3.7%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
African American 11.5%
Hispanic 52.6%
White 27.8%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
921
Economically disadvantaged students
599
Emergent bilingual students
205
Special education students
173
Campus mobility · 2024–25
Mobile students
189
Students in TEA mobility denominator
1,003
TEA-published mobility rate
18.8%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 921 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 43 (4.5%) from 2024–25.
Latest enrollment
921
2025–26
Change from 2024–25
−43
Decrease · −4.5%
Change since 2021–22
−194
Decrease · −17.4%
Enrollment in 2025–26
This school
921
Selected comparison
624
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,971 rated schools reporting
Student enrollment by school year for Stillman MS
School year
Students enrolledStillman MS
Change from previous school year
Average enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22
1,115
First available year
641.4
2022–23
1,095
Decrease of 20 (1.8%)
647.4
2023–24
1,047
Decrease of 48 (4.4%)
643.4
2024–25
964
Decrease of 83 (7.9%)
638.6
2025–26
921
Decrease of 43 (4.5%)
624
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
114
11.5% of cumulative year-end enrollment
Disciplinary actions
219
22.12 per 100 students
Cumulative year-end enrollment
990
2024–25
Share of students · 2024–25
This school
11.5%
Selected comparison
12.9%
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,543 rated schools reporting
−1.4 pts vs similar economic context
Actions per 100 students · 2024–25
This school
22.12
Selected comparison
30.4
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,655 rated schools reporting
−8.3 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Stillman MS
School year
Cumulative enrollment
Studentsall discipline
Students% of enrollment
Actionsall discipline
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21
1,149
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
2021–22
1,165
224
19.2%
494
42.40
12.9%
30.3
2022–23
1,129
277
24.5%
662
58.64
13.4%
32.2
2023–24
1,099
152
13.8%
318
28.94
13.2%
31.9
2024–25
990
114
11.5%
219
22.12
12.9%
30.4
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Stillman MS in 2024–25
Category
Students
Students% of enrollment
Actions
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline
114
11.5%
219
22.12
12.9%
30.4
In-school suspensions
106
10.7%
168
16.97
11.6%
23.1
Out-of-school suspensions
22
2.2%
30
3.03
7.2%
10.7
DAEP placements
14
1.4%
15
1.52
5.1%
6
Mandatory DAEP placements
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Discretionary DAEP placements
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
Stillman MS
Parent district: Brownsville ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
This school
$11,387
Selected comparison
$12,697
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,979 rated schools reporting
−$1,310 vs similar economic context
For 2025, TEA reported $11,387 per student for this campus, $16,535 per student for its parent district, Brownsville ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
Year
Stillman MS
Parent district: Brownsville ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison average
Reportingselected comparison
2018
$6,994
$11,135
$13,054
$7,926
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,842 rated schools reporting
2019
$6,962
$11,998
$13,108
$8,092
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,857 rated schools reporting
2020
$7,579
$13,029
$14,058
$8,672
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,878 rated schools reporting
2021
$7,015
$13,534
$14,797
$9,104
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,891 rated schools reporting
2022
$8,860
$15,729
$15,708
$10,468
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,911 rated schools reporting
2023
$10,042
$16,177
$16,792
$11,188
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,934 rated schools reporting
2024
$10,939
$16,871
$18,125
$12,083
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,963 rated schools reporting
2025
$11,387
$16,535
$18,972
$12,697
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,979 rated schools reporting
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
Average salary
$69,842+$3,430 vs similar economic context
Teachers
62+19.0 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
15+1.1 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Stillman MS
1 to 5 years 14.6%
6 to 10 years 3.2%
11 to 20 years 49.7%
21 to 30 years 24.2%
Over 30 years 8.1%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,005 reporting for every category shown · 2,005 in full cohort
Beginning 6.3%
1 to 5 years 26.3%
6 to 10 years 19.1%
11 to 20 years 27.9%
21 to 30 years 15.8%
Over 30 years 4.1%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 01: Edinburg · 505 reporting for every category shown · 505 in full cohort
Beginning 2.7%
1 to 5 years 19.3%
6 to 10 years 16.2%
11 to 20 years 35%
21 to 30 years 22.6%
Over 30 years 4.2%
Selected comparison averageFor Cameron County · 127 reporting for every category shown · 127 in full cohort
Beginning 2.5%
1 to 5 years 20.5%
6 to 10 years 14.9%
11 to 20 years 35.1%
21 to 30 years 22.3%
Over 30 years 4.7%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 3,047 reporting for every category shown · 3,047 in full cohort
Beginning 6.3%
1 to 5 years 27%
6 to 10 years 20.3%
11 to 20 years 28.9%
21 to 30 years 14.6%
Over 30 years 2.7%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 25.6%
6 to 10 years 19.2%
11 to 20 years 28.7%
21 to 30 years 15.9%
Over 30 years 3.7%
Average students in a class
TEA average class size by grade or subject for Stillman MS in 2024–25
Grade or subject
Average students per classStillman MS · 2024–25
Average students per classselected comparison
Grade 6
15.4
17.7
Secondary English
11.9
15.1
Secondary languages other than English
17.5
17.5
Secondary math
13.5
15.9
Secondary science
17.2
17.3
Secondary social studies
17.1
17.2
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 6 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
Out of 120 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
#4–10 rankings
Fourth- through tenth-place results
3 measures
6of 125
Reading — Masters
Cameron County · of the 125 that report this measure · tied with 2
8of 124
Science — Meets
Cameron County · of the 124 that report this measure
8of 124
Science — Masters
Cameron County · of the 124 that report this measure · tied with 1
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above
this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears
once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any
tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones
no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 031901054.