+15.8 ptsvs 78.2 average · 2,095 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
67 of 2,095tied with 24 others
Score vs region
+13.5 ptsvs 80.5 average · 839 rated schools in Region 11: Fort Worth
Region 11: Fort Worth placement
35 of 839tied with 18 others
Score vs county
+10.7 ptsvs 83.3 average · 15 rated schools in Hood County
Hood County placement
2 of 15among reporting schools
Score vs similar-size group
+10.0 ptsvs 84 average · 67 similarly sized rated schools
Similar size placement
13 of 67tied with 2 others
Score vs state
+12.7 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
Texas placement
379 of 7,646tied with 208 others
A94
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving up; under the rules in force back then it scored 94 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 78.2 average for 2,095 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 80.5 average for 839 rated schools in Region 11: Fort Worth.The current score is above the 83.3 average for 15 rated schools in Hood County.The current score is above the 84 average for 67 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
STAAR result
All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters
Meets
45%vs 43.6% avg · +1.4 pts
Masters
21%vs 17.2% avg · +3.8 pts
Among 1,940 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Stars Accelerated HS is rated A by TEA, scoring 94 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 78.2 average for 2,095 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is up 3 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 67th of 2,095 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 24 others).
Stars Accelerated HS is rated A by TEA, scoring 94 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.5 average for 839 rated schools in Region 11: Fort Worth. It is up 3 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 35th of 839 rated schools in Region 11: Fort Worth (tied with 18 others).
Stars Accelerated HS is rated A by TEA, scoring 94 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 83.3 average for 15 rated schools in Hood County. It is up 3 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 2nd of 15 rated schools in Hood County.
Stars Accelerated HS is rated A by TEA, scoring 94 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 84 average for 67 similarly sized rated schools. It is up 3 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 13th of 67 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 2 others).
Stars Accelerated HS is rated A by TEA, scoring 94 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is up 3 points since 2021-22.
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 94 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Student Achievement94 A+20.3 vs similar economic context · 1,940 reporting
School Progress—Not reported · similar economic context 79.4 · 1,935 reporting
Closing the Gaps—Not reported · similar economic context 75.4 · 1,921 reporting
Approaches grade level100%+31 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 813 reporting
Meets grade level60%+19 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 813 reporting
Masters grade level33%+15 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 813 reporting
Approaches grade level
Meets grade level
Masters grade level
Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,095 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Completion
Four-Year
94.7%+13.3 pts vs similar economic contextaverage forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 43 rated schools reporting
Five-Year
91.9%+4.8 pts vs similar economic contextaverage forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 43 rated schools reporting
Six-Year
96.2%+7.1 pts vs similar economic contextaverage forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 43 rated schools reporting
Dropout Rate
6.1%+1.1 pts vs similar economic contextaverage forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 43 rated schools reporting
These measures use TEA's alternative-education accountability population. Each comparison average includes only schools in that population that report that specific measure; its reporting count is shown beside the average. It is an unweighted average of those reported school rates, not a pooled rate across every student in the group.
College, career and military readiness
Total credit for CCMR criteria
63.0%−22.9 pts vs similar economic context
CCMR criteria
Criterion
This school% of graduates
Averagesimilar economic context
Differencepercentage points
Reportingselected comparison
Total credit for CCMR criteria
63.0%
85.9%
−22.9
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 392 rated schools reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course
60.0%
58.3%
+1.7
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 395 rated schools reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA
8.6%
25.0%
−16.4
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 395 rated schools reporting
Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)
0.0%
11.9%
−11.9
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 395 rated schools reporting
Earned college credit for a dual credit course
2.9%
31.5%
−28.6
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 395 rated schools reporting
Earned an industry-based certification
0.0%
37.2%
−37.2
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 395 rated schools reporting
Earned a level I or level II certificate
0.0%
2.4%
−2.4
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 395 rated schools reporting
Earned an associate degree
0.0%
7.3%
−7.3
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 395 rated schools reporting
Completed an OnRamps course and qualified for college credit
0.0%
5.0%
−5.0
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 395 rated schools reporting
Graduated with completed individualized education program (IEP) and workforce readiness
2.9%
3.3%
−0.4
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 395 rated schools reporting
Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student
0.0%
8.2%
−8.2
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 395 rated schools reporting
Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces
0.0%
2.9%
−2.9
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 395 rated schools reporting
Every row is a share of this school's graduates, and every row is a way of
meeting CCMR — so on every row, a bigger share is better. Difference is this
school minus the average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate,
counted in percentage points: +5.0 would mean five more graduates in every hundred met that
criterion here. The selected comparison is an unweighted average of the reported school percentages, not a pooled rate across all graduates in the group. Graduates may meet several criteria, so the rows do not add up to the total.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
After high school: the following fall
Where school graduates appeared in Texas public higher-education records the fall after graduation. This is a limited next-step measure, not an eventual college-going or completion rate.
Graduates in the report
45
Class of 2023–24
Enrolled in Texas public higher education
5
11.1% of graduates
Not found in Texas public higher-ed records
38
84.4% of graduates
Not trackable
2
Fall 2024
Graduates in the report
This school
45
Selected comparison
265.4
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 338 rated schools reporting
Enrolled in Texas public higher education
This school
5
Selected comparison
112
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 338 rated schools reporting
Texas-public enrollment rate
This school
11.1%
Selected comparison
41.9%
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 338 rated schools reporting
−30.8 pts vs similar economic context
Not-found rate
This school
84.4%
Selected comparison
52.1%
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 338 rated schools reporting
+32.3 pts vs similar economic context
Not-trackable rate
This school
4.4%
Selected comparison
6.0%
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 338 rated schools reporting
−1.6 pts vs similar economic context
Selected comparison counts are neutral cohort scale context. The percentages put differently sized graduating classes on the same basis, but still cover only the limited Texas-public system observed by this report.
Source: Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board, high-school graduates enrolled in higher education, fetched 24 August 2026. The report covers graduates who enrolled in a Texas public college or university the following fall and includes only districts or campuses with more than 25 graduates.
“Not found” does not mean a graduate did not continue their education. It can include private or out-of-state college, work, military service, enrollment after the fall term, or another path the Texas public system does not observe.
“Not trackable” is not an outcome. THECB uses it for graduates with a non-standard identifier that could not be matched to higher-education records.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
34
Economically disadvantaged
76.5%−0.2 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
14.7%−10.8 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
11.8%−7.0 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
90.5%−3.1 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
41.7%+22.4 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Stars Accelerated HS
African American 5.9%
Hispanic 29.4%
White 61.8%
American Indian 2.9%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,095 reporting for every category shown · 2,095 in full cohort
African American 13.5%
Hispanic 63.8%
White 17.5%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 1.8%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 3%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 11: Fort Worth · 839 reporting for every category shown · 839 in full cohort
African American 15.4%
Hispanic 39.6%
White 34.4%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 5.3%
Pacific Islander 0.3%
Two or More Races 4.6%
Selected comparison averageFor Hood County · 15 reporting for every category shown · 15 in full cohort
African American 1.6%
Hispanic 25%
White 68.9%
American Indian 0.5%
Asian 0.5%
Pacific Islander 0.4%
Two or More Races 3.1%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 67 reporting for every category shown · 67 in full cohort
African American 7.1%
Hispanic 55.3%
White 33%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 1.6%
Pacific Islander 0.3%
Two or More Races 2.4%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
African American 11.5%
Hispanic 52.6%
White 27.8%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
34
Economically disadvantaged students
26
Emergent bilingual students
5
Special education students
4
TEA context labels
Alternative education campus under AEA procedures
Alternative education type: dropout recovery school
Rated under AEA procedures
Campus mobility · 2024–25
Mobile students
55
Students in TEA mobility denominator
75
TEA-published mobility rate
73.3%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 34 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 10 (22.7%) from 2024–25.
Latest enrollment
34
2025–26
Change from 2024–25
−10
Decrease · −22.7%
Change since 2021–22
−12
Decrease · −26.1%
Enrollment in 2025–26
This school
34
Selected comparison
639.4
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,068 rated schools reporting
Student enrollment by school year for Stars Accelerated HS
School year
Students enrolledStars Accelerated HS
Change from previous school year
Average enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22
46
First available year
657.8
2022–23
32
Decrease of 14 (30.4%)
660.8
2023–24
37
Increase of 5 (15.6%)
658
2024–25
44
Increase of 7 (18.9%)
655.8
2025–26
34
Decrease of 10 (22.7%)
639.4
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
Suppressed
Rate not available
Disciplinary actions
15
21.43 per 100 students
Cumulative year-end enrollment
70
2024–25
Actions per 100 students · 2024–25
This school
21.43
Selected comparison
31.9
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,678 rated schools reporting
−10.5 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Stars Accelerated HS
School year
Cumulative enrollment
Studentsall discipline
Students% of enrollment
Actionsall discipline
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21
87
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
2021–22
93
Suppressed
—
10
10.75
—
30.8
2022–23
73
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
2023–24
83
15
18.1%
23
27.71
13.5%
33.4
2024–25
70
Suppressed
—
15
21.43
—
31.9
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Stars Accelerated HS in 2024–25
Category
Students
Students% of enrollment
Actions
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline
Suppressed
—
15
21.43
—
31.9
In-school suspensions
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Out-of-school suspensions
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
DAEP placements
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Mandatory DAEP placements
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Discretionary DAEP placements
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
Stars Accelerated HS
Parent district: Granbury ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
This school
$18,439
Selected comparison
$13,023
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,082 rated schools reporting
+$5,416 vs similar economic context
For 2025, TEA reported $18,439 per student for this campus, $14,142 per student for its parent district, Granbury ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
Year
Stars Accelerated HS
Parent district: Granbury ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison average
Reportingselected comparison
2018
$14,179
$10,786
$13,054
$8,054
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,965 rated schools reporting
2019
$19,046
$10,576
$13,108
$8,203
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,984 rated schools reporting
2020
$14,342
$11,373
$14,058
$8,733
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,002 rated schools reporting
2021
$17,872
$11,329
$14,797
$9,306
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,014 rated schools reporting
2022
$14,505
$11,827
$15,708
$10,630
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,030 rated schools reporting
2023
$18,912
$13,831
$16,792
$11,268
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,049 rated schools reporting
2024
$20,694
$14,210
$18,125
$12,265
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,070 rated schools reporting
2025
$18,439
$14,142
$18,972
$13,023
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,082 rated schools reporting
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers
Average salary
$74,760+$8,018 vs similar economic context
Teachers
6−37.1 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
5.3−8.7 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Stars Accelerated HS
1 to 5 years 15.6%
6 to 10 years 15.6%
11 to 20 years 37.5%
21 to 30 years 31.3%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,095 reporting for every category shown · 2,095 in full cohort
Beginning 6.8%
1 to 5 years 27.5%
6 to 10 years 19%
11 to 20 years 27.2%
21 to 30 years 15.2%
Over 30 years 3.7%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 11: Fort Worth · 839 reporting for every category shown · 839 in full cohort
Beginning 5.6%
1 to 5 years 24%
6 to 10 years 20.6%
11 to 20 years 30%
21 to 30 years 16.7%
Over 30 years 2.8%
Selected comparison averageFor Hood County · 15 reporting for every category shown · 15 in full cohort
Beginning 5.1%
1 to 5 years 21.4%
6 to 10 years 20%
11 to 20 years 35.1%
21 to 30 years 15.5%
Over 30 years 3%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 67 reporting for every category shown · 67 in full cohort
Beginning 5.7%
1 to 5 years 19.5%
6 to 10 years 10.4%
11 to 20 years 27.2%
21 to 30 years 15.8%
Over 30 years 6.4%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 25.6%
6 to 10 years 19.2%
11 to 20 years 28.7%
21 to 30 years 15.9%
Over 30 years 3.7%
Where this school ranks best
Out of 131 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
#1 rankings
First-place results
2 measures
1of 15
Per-student spending
Hood County · of the 15 that report this measure
1of 14
All Subjects — Approaches
Hood County · of the 14 that report this measure
#2–3 rankings
Second- and third-place results
3 measures
2of 15
Overall score
Hood County · of the 15 that report this measure
2of 14
Student Achievement
Hood County · of the 14 that report this measure
3of 14
Reading — Approaches
Hood County · of the 14 that report this measure · tied with 2
#4–10 rankings
Fourth- through tenth-place results
6 measures
5of 44
Social Studies — Masters
Similar size · of the 44 that report this measure · tied with 2
5of 19
Six-Year Completion Rate
Region 11: Fort Worth (alternative-education accountability only) · of the 19 that report this measure · tied with 1
7of 54
All Subjects — Masters
Similar size · of the 54 that report this measure
7of 19
Four-Year Completion Rate
Region 11: Fort Worth (alternative-education accountability only) · of the 19 that report this measure
8of 38
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA
Similar size · of the 38 that report this measure
9of 52
Reading — Masters
Similar size · of the 52 that report this measure · tied with 1
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above
this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears
once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any
tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones
no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 111901002.