Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus · Alternative Education Accountability

Stars Accelerated HS

Hood County · Region 11: Fort Worth · 34 students

Official school websiteSchool information and family resources

Current score
94/1002025-26
Change
+3 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
+15.8 ptsvs 78.2 average · 2,095 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
67 of 2,095tied with 24 others
A94

At a glance

Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving up; under the rules in force back then it scored 94 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 78.2 average for 2,095 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

STAAR result

All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
45%vs 43.6% avg · +1.4 pts
Masters
21%vs 17.2% avg · +3.8 pts

Among 1,940 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

Current strength

Overall score above the similar-context average

94 +15.8 pts vs 78.2

  • 94 is 15.8 points above the 78.2 average among 2,095 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Current strength

Student Achievement above the similar-context average

94 +20.3 pts vs 73.7

  • 94 is 20.3 points above the 73.7 average among 1,940 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Stars Accelerated HS is rated A by TEA, scoring 94 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 78.2 average for 2,095 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is up 3 points since 2021-22.

Ranks 67th of 2,095 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 24 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 5 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. After high school: the following fall
  6. Who this school serves
  7. Student counts behind the percentages
  8. Enrollment over time
  9. Discipline and removal from class
  10. Spending per student
  11. Teachers
  12. Where this school ranks best
  13. Where this comes from

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
908070 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas averageStars Accelerated HS 9192969894 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 94 that year.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26A9478.2 2,095 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25A9877.8 2,084 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting
2023-24A9675.4 2,072 reporting78.9 7,466 reporting
2022-23A9275.9 2,049 reporting79.1 7,377 reporting
2021-22A9181.8 2,030 reporting83.7 7,283 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement94 A+20.3 vs similar economic context · 1,940 reporting
  • School Progress—Not reported · similar economic context 79.4 · 1,935 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps—Not reported · similar economic context 75.4 · 1,921 reporting
  • Academic Growth—Not reported · similar economic context 72.6 · 1,883 reporting
  • Relative Performance—Not reported · similar economic context 77.8 · 1,935 reporting
  • Stars Accelerated HS
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,095 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement94A—
School Progress—Not rated—
Closing the Gaps—Not rated—
Academic Growth—Not rated—
Relative Performance—Not rated—

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level94%+24 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,940 reporting
  • Meets grade level45%+1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,940 reporting
  • Masters grade level21%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,940 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level85%+13 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,938 reporting
  • Meets grade level38%−10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,938 reporting
  • Masters grade level15%−4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,938 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level—Not reported · Similar economic-disadvantage rate 67.4% · 1,930 reporting
  • Meets grade level—Not reported · Similar economic-disadvantage rate 39.2% · 1,930 reporting
  • Masters grade level—Not reported · Similar economic-disadvantage rate 14.7% · 1,930 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level—Not reported · Similar economic-disadvantage rate 68.6% · 1,790 reporting
  • Meets grade level—Not reported · Similar economic-disadvantage rate 39.5% · 1,790 reporting
  • Masters grade level—Not reported · Similar economic-disadvantage rate 16.7% · 1,790 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level100%+31 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 813 reporting
  • Meets grade level60%+19 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 813 reporting
  • Masters grade level33%+15 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 813 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,095 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Completion

Four-Year
94.7%+13.3 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 43 rated schools reporting
Five-Year
91.9%+4.8 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 43 rated schools reporting
Six-Year
96.2%+7.1 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 43 rated schools reporting
Dropout Rate
6.1%+1.1 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 43 rated schools reporting

These measures use TEA's alternative-education accountability population. Each comparison average includes only schools in that population that report that specific measure; its reporting count is shown beside the average. It is an unweighted average of those reported school rates, not a pooled rate across every student in the group.

College, career and military readiness

Total credit for CCMR criteria
63.0%−22.9 pts vs similar economic context
CCMR criteria
CriterionThis school% of graduatesAveragesimilar economic contextDifferencepercentage pointsReportingselected comparison
Total credit for CCMR criteria63.0%85.9%−22.9 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 392 rated schools reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course60.0%58.3%+1.7 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 395 rated schools reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA8.6%25.0%−16.4 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 395 rated schools reporting
Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)0.0%11.9%−11.9 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 395 rated schools reporting
Earned college credit for a dual credit course2.9%31.5%−28.6 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 395 rated schools reporting
Earned an industry-based certification0.0%37.2%−37.2 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 395 rated schools reporting
Earned a level I or level II certificate0.0%2.4%−2.4 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 395 rated schools reporting
Earned an associate degree0.0%7.3%−7.3 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 395 rated schools reporting
Completed an OnRamps course and qualified for college credit0.0%5.0%−5.0 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 395 rated schools reporting
Graduated with completed individualized education program (IEP) and workforce readiness2.9%3.3%−0.4 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 395 rated schools reporting
Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student0.0%8.2%−8.2 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 395 rated schools reporting
Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces0.0%2.9%−2.9 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 395 rated schools reporting

Every row is a share of this school's graduates, and every row is a way of meeting CCMR — so on every row, a bigger share is better. Difference is this school minus the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate, counted in percentage points: +5.0 would mean five more graduates in every hundred met that criterion here. The selected comparison is an unweighted average of the reported school percentages, not a pooled rate across all graduates in the group. Graduates may meet several criteria, so the rows do not add up to the total.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

After high school: the following fall

Where school graduates appeared in Texas public higher-education records the fall after graduation. This is a limited next-step measure, not an eventual college-going or completion rate.

Graduates in the report
45

Class of 2023–24

Enrolled in Texas public higher education
5

11.1% of graduates

Not found in Texas public higher-ed records
38

84.4% of graduates

Not trackable
2

Fall 2024

Graduates in the report

This school
45
Selected comparison
265.4

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 338 rated schools reporting

Enrolled in Texas public higher education

This school
5
Selected comparison
112

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 338 rated schools reporting

Texas-public enrollment rate

This school
11.1%
Selected comparison
41.9%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 338 rated schools reporting

−30.8 pts vs similar economic context

Not-found rate

This school
84.4%
Selected comparison
52.1%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 338 rated schools reporting

+32.3 pts vs similar economic context

Not-trackable rate

This school
4.4%
Selected comparison
6.0%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 338 rated schools reporting

−1.6 pts vs similar economic context

Selected comparison counts are neutral cohort scale context. The percentages put differently sized graduating classes on the same basis, but still cover only the limited Texas-public system observed by this report.

Source: Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board, high-school graduates enrolled in higher education, fetched 24 August 2026. The report covers graduates who enrolled in a Texas public college or university the following fall and includes only districts or campuses with more than 25 graduates.

“Not found” does not mean a graduate did not continue their education. It can include private or out-of-state college, work, military service, enrollment after the fall term, or another path the Texas public system does not observe.

“Not trackable” is not an outcome. THECB uses it for graduates with a non-standard identifier that could not be matched to higher-education records.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
34
Economically disadvantaged
76.5%−0.2 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
14.7%−10.8 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
11.8%−7.0 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
90.5%−3.1 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
41.7%+22.4 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Stars Accelerated HS

African American: 5.9%Hispanic: 29.4%White: 61.8%American Indian: 2.9%
  • African American 5.9%
  • Hispanic 29.4%
  • White 61.8%
  • American Indian 2.9%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,095 reporting for every category shown · 2,095 in full cohort

African American: 13.5%Hispanic: 63.8%White: 17.5%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 1.8%Pacific Islander: 0.2%Two or More Races: 3%
  • African American 13.5%
  • Hispanic 63.8%
  • White 17.5%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 1.8%
  • Pacific Islander 0.2%
  • Two or More Races 3%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
34
Economically disadvantaged students
26
Emergent bilingual students
5
Special education students
4

TEA context labels

  • Alternative education campus under AEA procedures
  • Alternative education type: dropout recovery school
  • Rated under AEA procedures

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
55
Students in TEA mobility denominator
75
TEA-published mobility rate
73.3%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 34 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 10 (22.7%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
34

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
−10

Decrease · −22.7%

Change since 2021–22
−12

Decrease · −26.1%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
34
Selected comparison
639.4

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,068 rated schools reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Stars Accelerated HS
School yearStudents enrolledStars Accelerated HSChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22 46 First available year 657.8
2022–23 32 Decrease of 14 (30.4%) 660.8
2023–24 37 Increase of 5 (15.6%) 658
2024–25 44 Increase of 7 (18.9%) 655.8
2025–26 34 Decrease of 10 (22.7%) 639.4

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
Suppressed

Rate not available

Disciplinary actions
15

21.43 per 100 students

Cumulative year-end enrollment
70

2024–25

Actions per 100 students · 2024–25

This school
21.43
Selected comparison
31.9

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,678 rated schools reporting

−10.5 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Stars Accelerated HS
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 87 Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
2021–22 93 Suppressed — 10 10.75 — 30.8
2022–23 73 Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
2023–24 83 15 18.1% 23 27.71 13.5% 33.4
2024–25 70 Suppressed — 15 21.43 — 31.9
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Stars Accelerated HS in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline Suppressed — 15 21.43 — 31.9
In-school suspensions Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Out-of-school suspensions Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Mandatory DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$7k$16k$26k20182020202220242025
  • Stars Accelerated HS
  • Parent district: Granbury ISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$18,439
Selected comparison
$13,023

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,082 rated schools reporting

+$5,416 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $18,439 per student for this campus, $14,142 per student for its parent district, Granbury ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearStars Accelerated HSParent district: Granbury ISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2018$14,179$10,786$13,054$8,054 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,965 rated schools reporting
2019$19,046$10,576$13,108$8,203 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,984 rated schools reporting
2020$14,342$11,373$14,058$8,733 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,002 rated schools reporting
2021$17,872$11,329$14,797$9,306 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,014 rated schools reporting
2022$14,505$11,827$15,708$10,630 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,030 rated schools reporting
2023$18,912$13,831$16,792$11,268 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,049 rated schools reporting
2024$20,694$14,210$18,125$12,265 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,070 rated schools reporting
2025$18,439$14,142$18,972$13,023 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,082 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers

Average salary
$74,760+$8,018 vs similar economic context
Teachers
6−37.1 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
5.3−8.7 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Stars Accelerated HS

1 to 5 years: 15.6%6 to 10 years: 15.6%11 to 20 years: 37.5%21 to 30 years: 31.3%
  • 1 to 5 years 15.6%
  • 6 to 10 years 15.6%
  • 11 to 20 years 37.5%
  • 21 to 30 years 31.3%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,095 reporting for every category shown · 2,095 in full cohort

Beginning: 6.8%1 to 5 years: 27.5%6 to 10 years: 19%11 to 20 years: 27.2%21 to 30 years: 15.2%Over 30 years: 3.7%
  • Beginning 6.8%
  • 1 to 5 years 27.5%
  • 6 to 10 years 19%
  • 11 to 20 years 27.2%
  • 21 to 30 years 15.2%
  • Over 30 years 3.7%

Where this school ranks best

Out of 131 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.

#1 rankings

First-place results

2 measures

  • 1of 15

    Per-student spending

    Hood County · of the 15 that report this measure

  • 1of 14

    All Subjects — Approaches

    Hood County · of the 14 that report this measure

#2–3 rankings

Second- and third-place results

3 measures

  • 2of 15

    Overall score

    Hood County · of the 15 that report this measure

  • 2of 14

    Student Achievement

    Hood County · of the 14 that report this measure

  • 3of 14

    Reading — Approaches

    Hood County · of the 14 that report this measure · tied with 2

#4–10 rankings

Fourth- through tenth-place results

6 measures

  • 5of 44

    Social Studies — Masters

    Similar size · of the 44 that report this measure · tied with 2

  • 5of 19

    Six-Year Completion Rate

    Region 11: Fort Worth (alternative-education accountability only) · of the 19 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 7of 54

    All Subjects — Masters

    Similar size · of the 54 that report this measure

  • 7of 19

    Four-Year Completion Rate

    Region 11: Fort Worth (alternative-education accountability only) · of the 19 that report this measure

  • 8of 38

    Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA

    Similar size · of the 38 that report this measure

  • 9of 52

    Reading — Masters

    Similar size · of the 52 that report this measure · tied with 1

These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 111901002.