Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

Stacy Kaye Danielson MS

Williamson County · Region 13: Austin · 1,095 students

Official school websiteSchool information and family resources

Current score
77/1002025-26
Change
−9 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
−10.9 ptsvs 87.9 average · 957 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
884 of 957tied with 11 others
C77

At a glance

Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 84 in 2021-22. The current score is below the 87.9 average for 957 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

No academic result met this site’s published threshold for a selected positive signal against Similar economic-disadvantage rate.

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Stacy Kaye Danielson MS is rated C by TEA, scoring 77 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 87.9 average for 957 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is down 9 points since 2021-22.

Ranks 884th of 957 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 11 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 5 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. Who this school serves
  6. Student counts behind the percentages
  7. Enrollment over time
  8. Discipline and removal from class
  9. Spending per student
  10. Teachers and actual class size
  11. Where this comes from

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
908070 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas averageStacy Kaye Danielson MS 8684818677 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated B with 84 that year.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26C7787.9 957 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25B8687.8 942 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting
2023-24B8186.5 929 reporting78.9 7,466 reporting
2022-23B8486.8 912 reporting79.1 7,377 reporting
2021-22B8688.0 897 reporting83.7 7,283 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement79 C−9.6 vs similar economic context · 936 reporting
  • School Progress78 C−6.6 vs similar economic context · 934 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps72 C−13.4 vs similar economic context · 927 reporting
  • Academic Growth78 C−3.0 vs similar economic context · 917 reporting
  • Relative Performance58 F−22.0 vs similar economic context · 934 reporting
  • Stacy Kaye Danielson MS
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (957 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement79C1
School Progress78C2
Closing the Gaps72C8
Academic Growth78C2
Relative Performance58F2

Closest to moving up: Student Achievement, 1 point below B in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is Student Achievement (79), so School Progress (78) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 79.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level72%−13 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 936 reporting
  • Meets grade level48%−18 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 936 reporting
  • Masters grade level25%−9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 936 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level77%−9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 935 reporting
  • Meets grade level55%−15 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 935 reporting
  • Masters grade level32%−3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 935 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level70%−13 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 933 reporting
  • Meets grade level43%−17 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 933 reporting
  • Masters grade level18%−11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 933 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level79%−7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 852 reporting
  • Meets grade level61%−3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 852 reporting
  • Masters grade level35%−1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 852 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level57%−28 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 467 reporting
  • Meets grade level30%−33 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 467 reporting
  • Masters grade level14%−21 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 467 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (957 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
1,095
Economically disadvantaged
28.0%−1.0 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
10.5%+0.4 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
25.0%+7.8 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
94.0%−1.3 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
14.5%+4.3 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Stacy Kaye Danielson MS

African American: 7.7%Hispanic: 36.7%White: 38.4%American Indian: 0.1%Asian: 11.9%Pacific Islander: 0.1%Two or More Races: 5.2%
  • African American 7.7%
  • Hispanic 36.7%
  • White 38.4%
  • American Indian 0.1%
  • Asian 11.9%
  • Pacific Islander 0.1%
  • Two or More Races 5.2%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 957 reporting for every category shown · 957 in full cohort

African American: 9%Hispanic: 28.9%White: 48%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 8.7%Pacific Islander: 0.1%Two or More Races: 5%
  • African American 9%
  • Hispanic 28.9%
  • White 48%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 8.7%
  • Pacific Islander 0.1%
  • Two or More Races 5%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
1,094
Economically disadvantaged students
306
Emergent bilingual students
115
Special education students
273

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
102
Students in TEA mobility denominator
1,246
TEA-published mobility rate
8.2%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 1,095 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 87 (7.4%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
1,095

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
−87

Decrease · −7.4%

Change since 2021–22
−116

Decrease · −9.6%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
1,095
Selected comparison
811.5

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 947 rated schools reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Stacy Kaye Danielson MS
School yearStudents enrolledStacy Kaye Danielson MSChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22 1,211 First available year 827.2
2022–23 1,357 Increase of 146 (12.1%) 831.2
2023–24 1,436 Increase of 79 (5.8%) 825.4
2024–25 1,182 Decrease of 254 (17.7%) 821.5
2025–26 1,095 Decrease of 87 (7.4%) 811.5

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
124

10.0% of cumulative year-end enrollment

Disciplinary actions
264

21.34 per 100 students

Cumulative year-end enrollment
1,237

2024–25

Share of students · 2024–25

This school
10.0%
Selected comparison
8.4%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 699 rated schools reporting

+1.6 pts vs similar economic context

Actions per 100 students · 2024–25

This school
21.34
Selected comparison
16.9

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 786 rated schools reporting

+4.4 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Stacy Kaye Danielson MS
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 1,040 65 6.3% 97 9.33 6.6% 11.8
2021–22 1,318 180 13.7% 344 26.10 8.9% 17.7
2022–23 1,442 159 11.0% 315 21.84 9.2% 18.6
2023–24 1,498 211 14.1% 463 30.91 8.7% 17.9
2024–25 1,237 124 10.0% 264 21.34 8.4% 16.9
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Stacy Kaye Danielson MS in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline 124 10.0% 264 21.34 8.4% 16.9
In-school suspensions 121 9.8% 237 19.16 7.6% 13.2
Out-of-school suspensions 15 1.2% 16 1.29 4.1% 5.6
DAEP placements 10 0.8% 11 0.89 3.0% 3.5
Mandatory DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$6k$14k$22k202120232025
  • Stacy Kaye Danielson MS
  • Parent district: Leander ISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$7,811
Selected comparison
$11,429

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 941 rated schools reporting

−$3,618 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $7,811 per student for this campus, $20,543 per student for its parent district, Leander ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearStacy Kaye Danielson MSParent district: Leander ISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2021$6,496$14,703$14,797$8,500 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 877 rated schools reporting
2022$7,032$14,776$15,708$9,715 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 896 rated schools reporting
2023$7,413$14,111$16,792$10,173 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 913 rated schools reporting
2024$7,657$18,103$18,125$11,346 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 928 rated schools reporting
2025$7,811$20,543$18,972$11,429 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 941 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$64,276−$4,089 vs similar economic context
Teachers
73+20.0 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
15.1+0.5 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Stacy Kaye Danielson MS

Beginning: 4.1%1 to 5 years: 32.9%6 to 10 years: 18.6%11 to 20 years: 24.1%21 to 30 years: 18.3%Over 30 years: 2.1%
  • Beginning 4.1%
  • 1 to 5 years 32.9%
  • 6 to 10 years 18.6%
  • 11 to 20 years 24.1%
  • 21 to 30 years 18.3%
  • Over 30 years 2.1%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 957 reporting for every category shown · 957 in full cohort

Beginning: 4.8%1 to 5 years: 22.5%6 to 10 years: 19.7%11 to 20 years: 32.4%21 to 30 years: 17.3%Over 30 years: 3.2%
  • Beginning 4.8%
  • 1 to 5 years 22.5%
  • 6 to 10 years 19.7%
  • 11 to 20 years 32.4%
  • 21 to 30 years 17.3%
  • Over 30 years 3.2%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for Stacy Kaye Danielson MS in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classStacy Kaye Danielson MS · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Grade 621.218.8
Secondary English23.816.9
Secondary languages other than English26.419.2
Secondary math23.217.6
Secondary science26.319.2
Secondary social studies23.919.4

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 6 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 246913049.