+13.5 ptsvs 81.5 average · 147 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
9 of 147tied with 7 others
Score vs similar-size group
+13.3 ptsvs 81.7 average · 412 similarly sized rated charter campuses
Similar size placement
18 of 412tied with 16 others
Score vs state
+13.3 ptsvs 81.7 average · 829 rated Texas charter campuses
Texas charter placement
41 of 829tied with 32 others
A95
At a glance
The available rating history is moving up. The current score is above the 81.5 average for 147 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 81.7 average for 412 similarly sized rated charter campuses.The current score is above the 81.7 average for 829 rated Texas charter campuses.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
Current strength
Academic Growth above the similar-context average
93+19.7 pts vs 73.3
93 is 19.7 points above
the 73.3 average among 136 charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
2nd of 136 charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Sst Sugar Land College Prep HS is rated A by TEA, scoring 95 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.5 average for 147 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context. It is up 1 point since 2023-24.
Ranks 9th of 147 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context (tied with 7 others).
Sst Sugar Land College Prep HS is rated A by TEA, scoring 95 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.7 average for 412 similarly sized rated charter campuses. It is up 1 point since 2023-24.
Ranks 18th of 412 similarly sized rated charter campuses (tied with 16 others).
Sst Sugar Land College Prep HS is rated A by TEA, scoring 95 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.7 average for 829 rated Texas charter campuses. It is up 1 point since 2023-24.
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Student Achievement94 A+13.7 vs similar economic context · 147 reporting
School Progress95 A+13.7 vs similar economic context · 147 reporting
Closing the Gaps96 A+17.6 vs similar economic context · 142 reporting
Academic Growth93 A+19.7 vs similar economic context · 136 reporting
Relative Performance95 A+14.8 vs similar economic context · 145 reporting
Sst Sugar Land College Prep HS
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (147 in cohort)
Domain scores
Domain
Score
Grade
Points to next grade
Student Achievement
94
A
—
School Progress
95
A
—
Closing the Gaps
96
A
—
Academic Growth
93
A
—
Relative Performance
95
A
—
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student
Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (95), so
Student Achievement (94) is published above but does not enter the overall
score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 95.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
All Subjects
Approaches grade level94%+21 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 147 reporting
Meets grade level81%+36 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 147 reporting
Masters grade level54%+35 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 147 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
Approaches grade level95%+21 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 147 reporting
Meets grade level86%+35 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 147 reporting
Masters grade level54%+33 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 147 reporting
Math3 performance levels
Approaches grade level96%+28 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 145 reporting
Meets grade level83%+47 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 145 reporting
Masters grade level57%+43 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 145 reporting
Science3 performance levels
Approaches grade level94%+17 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 140 reporting
Meets grade level82%+38 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 140 reporting
Masters grade level61%+42 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 140 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
Approaches grade level89%+15 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 102 reporting
Meets grade level59%+16 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 102 reporting
Masters grade level35%+15 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 102 reporting
Approaches grade level
Meets grade level
Masters grade level
Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (147 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Graduation
Four-Year
0.0%−69.7 pts vs similar economic contextaverage forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 49 rated charter campuses reporting
Five-Year
0.0%−63.9 pts vs similar economic contextaverage forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 48 rated charter campuses reporting
Six-Year
0.0%−61.9 pts vs similar economic contextaverage forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 49 rated charter campuses reporting
Dropout Rate
0.0%−0.5 pts vs similar economic contextaverage forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 49 rated charter campuses reporting
These measures use TEA's standard-accountability population. Each comparison average includes only charter campuses in that population that report that specific measure; its reporting count is shown beside the average. It is an unweighted average of those reported charter campus rates, not a pooled rate across every student in the group.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only charter campuses for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
773
Economically disadvantaged
63.1%−0.8 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
25.0%+3.0 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
5.0%−8.4 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
97.0%+4.8 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
3.9%−21.0 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Sst Sugar Land College Prep HS
African American 38.8%
Hispanic 21.5%
White 7.5%
American Indian 0.5%
Asian 30.3%
Two or More Races 1.4%
Selected comparison averageFor charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 147 reporting for every category shown · 147 in full cohort
African American 21.4%
Hispanic 54.6%
White 14.8%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 5.7%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 3.1%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized charter campuses · 412 reporting for every category shown · 412 in full cohort
African American 14.9%
Hispanic 66.2%
White 9.5%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 7%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 2.1%
Texas charter average829 reporting for every category shown · 829 Texas charter campuses in full cohort
African American 17.5%
Hispanic 61.8%
White 12.2%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 5.5%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 2.5%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
773
Economically disadvantaged students
488
Emergent bilingual students
193
Special education students
39
Campus mobility · 2024–25
Mobile students
16
Students in TEA mobility denominator
131
TEA-published mobility rate
12.2%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 773 students in 2025–26, an increase of 648 (518.4%) from 2024–25.
Latest enrollment
773
2025–26
Change from 2024–25
+648
Increase · +518.4%
Change since 2023–24
+675
Increase · +688.8%
Enrollment in 2025–26
This school
773
Selected comparison
508.6
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 147 rated charter campuses reporting
Student enrollment by school year for Sst Sugar Land College Prep HS
School year
Students enrolledSst Sugar Land College Prep HS
Change from previous school year
Average enrollmentselected comparison
2023–24
98
First available year
505
2024–25
125
Increase of 27 (27.6%)
508.6
2025–26
773
Increase of 648 (518.4%)
508.6
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting charter campuses in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
Suppressed
Rate not available
Disciplinary actions
Suppressed
Rate not available
Cumulative year-end enrollment
131
2024–25
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Sst Sugar Land College Prep HS
School year
Cumulative enrollment
Studentsall discipline
Students% of enrollment
Actionsall discipline
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2023–24
110
12
10.9%
14
12.73
10.4%
18.7
2024–25
131
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Sst Sugar Land College Prep HS in 2024–25
Category
Students
Students% of enrollment
Actions
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
In-school suspensions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Out-of-school suspensions
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized charter campuses can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
Sst Sugar Land College Prep HS
Parent district: School of Science and Technology Discovery
Texas average
Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
This school
$22,085
Selected comparison
$11,583
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 139 rated charter campuses reporting
+$10,503 vs similar economic context
For 2025, TEA reported $22,085 per student for this campus, $12,957 per student for its parent district, School of Science and Technology Discovery, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
Year
Sst Sugar Land College Prep HS
Parent district: School of Science and Technology Discovery
Texas average
Selected comparison average
Reportingselected comparison
2024
$18,348
$12,448
$18,125
$11,372
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 131 rated charter campuses reporting
2025
$22,085
$12,957
$18,972
$11,583
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 139 rated charter campuses reporting
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
Average salary
$63,776+$1,706 vs similar economic context
Teachers
43+12.4 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
17.9+0.1 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Sst Sugar Land College Prep HS
Beginning 20.2%
1 to 5 years 39%
6 to 10 years 29.2%
11 to 20 years 9.3%
21 to 30 years 2.3%
Selected comparison averageFor charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 147 reporting for every category shown · 147 in full cohort
Beginning 16.3%
1 to 5 years 43.1%
6 to 10 years 20%
11 to 20 years 15.3%
21 to 30 years 4.5%
Over 30 years 0.9%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized charter campuses · 412 reporting for every category shown · 412 in full cohort
Beginning 13.5%
1 to 5 years 46.7%
6 to 10 years 19.9%
11 to 20 years 13.5%
21 to 30 years 3.5%
Over 30 years 0.4%
Texas charter average829 reporting for every category shown · 829 Texas charter campuses in full cohort
Beginning 13%
1 to 5 years 44.3%
6 to 10 years 19.6%
11 to 20 years 15.4%
21 to 30 years 4.8%
Over 30 years 0.9%
Average students in a class
TEA average class size by grade or subject for Sst Sugar Land College Prep HS in 2024–25
Grade or subject
Average students per classSst Sugar Land College Prep HS · 2024–25
Average students per classselected comparison
Secondary English
16
15.9
Secondary languages other than English
10.7
16
Secondary math
15.8
16.3
Secondary science
16.4
17.2
Secondary social studies
16.7
17.8
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 5 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
Out of 84 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
#1 rankings
First-place results
2 measures
1of 147
Reading — Meets
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 147 that report this measure
1of 145
Math — Masters
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 145 that report this measure · tied with 1
#2–3 rankings
Second- and third-place results
11 measures
2of 147
All Subjects — Masters
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 147 that report this measure
2of 145
Math — Approaches
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 145 that report this measure · tied with 1
2of 145
Math — Meets
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 145 that report this measure
2of 140
Science — Meets
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 140 that report this measure · tied with 1
2of 140
Science — Masters
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 140 that report this measure
2of 136
Academic Growth
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 136 that report this measure
3of 147
All Subjects — Approaches
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 147 that report this measure · tied with 2
3of 147
All Subjects — Meets
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 147 that report this measure
3of 147
Reading — Masters
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 147 that report this measure
3of 140
Attendance
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 140 that report this measure
3of 140
Chronically absent (lowest is best)
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 140 that report this measure
#4–10 rankings
Fourth- through tenth-place results
3 measures
4of 147
Reading — Approaches
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 147 that report this measure · tied with 1
4of 139
Per-student spending
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 139 that report this measure
8of 142
Closing the Gaps
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 142 that report this measure · tied with 2
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above
this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears
once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any
tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones
no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 015831009.