+9.9 ptsvs 81.1 average · 196 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
38 of 196tied with 8 others
Score vs similar-size group
+11.0 ptsvs 80 average · 420 similarly sized rated charter campuses
Similar size placement
49 of 420tied with 18 others
Score vs state
+9.3 ptsvs 81.7 average · 829 rated Texas charter campuses
Texas charter placement
167 of 829tied with 39 others
A91
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 92 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 81.1 average for 196 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 80 average for 420 similarly sized rated charter campuses.The current score is above the 81.7 average for 829 rated Texas charter campuses.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
STAAR result
All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters
Meets
62%vs 43.5% avg · +18.5 pts
Masters
30%vs 17.3% avg · +12.7 pts
Among 196 charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Sst Sugar Land is rated A by TEA, scoring 91 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.1 average for 196 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context. It is down 5 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 38th of 196 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context (tied with 8 others).
Sst Sugar Land is rated A by TEA, scoring 91 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80 average for 420 similarly sized rated charter campuses. It is down 5 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 49th of 420 similarly sized rated charter campuses (tied with 18 others).
Sst Sugar Land is rated A by TEA, scoring 91 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.7 average for 829 rated Texas charter campuses. It is down 5 points since 2021-22.
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 92 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Student Achievement90 A+11.1 vs similar economic context · 196 reporting
School Progress90 A+8.5 vs similar economic context · 195 reporting
Closing the Gaps92 A+14.7 vs similar economic context · 188 reporting
Academic Growth86 B+13.3 vs similar economic context · 180 reporting
Relative Performance90 A+9.7 vs similar economic context · 193 reporting
Sst Sugar Land
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (196 in cohort)
Domain scores
Domain
Score
Grade
Points to next grade
Student Achievement
90
A
—
School Progress
90
A
—
Closing the Gaps
92
A
—
Academic Growth
86
B
4
Relative Performance
90
A
—
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student
Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
All Subjects
Approaches grade level88%+16 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 196 reporting
Meets grade level62%+19 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 196 reporting
Masters grade level30%+13 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 196 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
Approaches grade level92%+19 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 196 reporting
Meets grade level66%+17 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 196 reporting
Masters grade level31%+12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 196 reporting
Math3 performance levels
Approaches grade level87%+20 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 194 reporting
Meets grade level64%+29 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 194 reporting
Masters grade level32%+19 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 194 reporting
Science3 performance levels
Approaches grade level72%−4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 190 reporting
Meets grade level35%−7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 190 reporting
Masters grade level16%−1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 190 reporting
Approaches grade level
Meets grade level
Masters grade level
Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (196 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only charter campuses for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
471
Economically disadvantaged
69.2%−0.9 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
27.8%+1.5 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
8.3%−4.9 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
96.8%+4.7 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
6.9%−19.1 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Sst Sugar Land
African American 53.1%
Hispanic 28.2%
White 3.2%
American Indian 0.2%
Asian 13.6%
Two or More Races 1.7%
Selected comparison averageFor charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 196 reporting for every category shown · 196 in full cohort
African American 19.4%
Hispanic 62%
White 11.6%
American Indian 0.2%
Asian 3.9%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 2.7%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized charter campuses · 420 reporting for every category shown · 420 in full cohort
African American 16.7%
Hispanic 66.1%
White 9.5%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 5.3%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 2.1%
Texas charter average829 reporting for every category shown · 829 Texas charter campuses in full cohort
African American 17.5%
Hispanic 61.8%
White 12.2%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 5.5%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 2.5%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
471
Economically disadvantaged students
326
Emergent bilingual students
131
Special education students
39
Campus mobility · 2024–25
Mobile students
82
Students in TEA mobility denominator
659
TEA-published mobility rate
12.4%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 471 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 268 (36.3%) from 2024–25.
Latest enrollment
471
2025–26
Change from 2024–25
−268
Decrease · −36.3%
Change since 2021–22
−306
Decrease · −39.4%
Enrollment in 2025–26
This school
471
Selected comparison
501.7
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 196 rated charter campuses reporting
Student enrollment by school year for Sst Sugar Land
School year
Students enrolledSst Sugar Land
Change from previous school year
Average enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22
777
First available year
472.9
2022–23
774
Decrease of 3 (0.4%)
493.9
2023–24
701
Decrease of 73 (9.4%)
499.9
2024–25
739
Increase of 38 (5.4%)
498.4
2025–26
471
Decrease of 268 (36.3%)
501.7
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting charter campuses in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
59
7.5% of cumulative year-end enrollment
Disciplinary actions
99
12.53 per 100 students
Cumulative year-end enrollment
790
2024–25
Share of students · 2024–25
This school
7.5%
Selected comparison
9.3%
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 141 rated charter campuses reporting
−1.8 pts vs similar economic context
Actions per 100 students · 2024–25
This school
12.53
Selected comparison
15.3
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 146 rated charter campuses reporting
−2.8 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Sst Sugar Land
School year
Cumulative enrollment
Studentsall discipline
Students% of enrollment
Actionsall discipline
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21
938
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
2021–22
851
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
2022–23
854
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
2023–24
780
27
3.5%
33
4.23
9.7%
16.4
2024–25
790
59
7.5%
99
12.53
9.3%
15.3
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Sst Sugar Land in 2024–25
Category
Students
Students% of enrollment
Actions
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline
59
7.5%
99
12.53
9.3%
15.3
In-school suspensions
13
1.6%
18
2.28
5.5%
7.3
Out-of-school suspensions
54
6.8%
81
10.25
7.9%
11
DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized charter campuses can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
Sst Sugar Land
Parent district: School of Science and Technology Discovery
Texas average
Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
This school
$12,507
Selected comparison
$11,598
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 189 rated charter campuses reporting
+$909 vs similar economic context
For 2025, TEA reported $12,507 per student for this campus, $12,957 per student for its parent district, School of Science and Technology Discovery, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
Year
Sst Sugar Land
Parent district: School of Science and Technology Discovery
Texas average
Selected comparison average
Reportingselected comparison
2019
$25,564
$11,065
$13,108
$8,553
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 134 rated charter campuses reporting
2020
$9,822
$10,672
$14,058
$9,502
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 149 rated charter campuses reporting
2021
$7,780
$10,388
$14,797
$9,464
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 164 rated charter campuses reporting
2022
$10,830
$11,731
$15,708
$10,797
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 171 rated charter campuses reporting
2023
$11,011
$12,748
$16,792
$11,112
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 176 rated charter campuses reporting
2024
$13,509
$12,448
$18,125
$11,549
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 182 rated charter campuses reporting
2025
$12,507
$12,957
$18,972
$11,598
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 189 rated charter campuses reporting
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
Average salary
$64,787+$2,650 vs similar economic context
Teachers
37+7.4 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
12.8−5.7 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Sst Sugar Land
Beginning 13%
1 to 5 years 35.3%
6 to 10 years 15.8%
11 to 20 years 30.4%
21 to 30 years 2.7%
Over 30 years 2.7%
Selected comparison averageFor charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 196 reporting for every category shown · 196 in full cohort
Beginning 15%
1 to 5 years 44.9%
6 to 10 years 20%
11 to 20 years 15.5%
21 to 30 years 4%
Over 30 years 0.7%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized charter campuses · 420 reporting for every category shown · 420 in full cohort
Beginning 13.5%
1 to 5 years 47.3%
6 to 10 years 19.4%
11 to 20 years 13.5%
21 to 30 years 4%
Over 30 years 0.6%
Texas charter average829 reporting for every category shown · 829 Texas charter campuses in full cohort
Beginning 13%
1 to 5 years 44.3%
6 to 10 years 19.6%
11 to 20 years 15.4%
21 to 30 years 4.8%
Over 30 years 0.9%
Average students in a class
TEA average class size by grade or subject for Sst Sugar Land in 2024–25
Grade or subject
Average students per classSst Sugar Land · 2024–25
Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten
23.7
21.1
Grade 1
21.7
22.9
Grade 2
23.5
23.7
Grade 3
27.7
23.8
Grade 4
21.5
24.1
Grade 5
21.6
23.9
Grade 6
23.1
22.3
Secondary English
18.3
16.5
Secondary languages other than English
14.4
16
Secondary math
21.6
16.5
Secondary science
25.3
17.5
Secondary social studies
25.3
18.1
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 12 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
Out of 63 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
#4–10 rankings
Fourth- through tenth-place results
5 measures
4of 190
Attendance
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 190 that report this measure
7of 196
Reading — Approaches
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 196 that report this measure
8of 190
Chronically absent (lowest is best)
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 190 that report this measure · tied with 1
9of 194
Math — Meets
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 194 that report this measure
9of 194
Math — Masters
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 194 that report this measure · tied with 1
Other top-5% rankings
High placements in larger reporting groups
1 measure
24of 420
All Subjects — Approaches
Similar size · of the 420 that report this measure · tied with 8
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above
this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears
once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any
tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones
no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 015831005.