Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Open-enrollment charter campus

Sst Sugar Land

School of Science and Technology Discovery · Richmond · 471 students

Official school websiteSchool information and family resources

Current score
91/1002025-26
Change
−5 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
+9.9 ptsvs 81.1 average · 196 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
38 of 196tied with 8 others
A91

At a glance

Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 92 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 81.1 average for 196 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

STAAR result

All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
62%vs 43.5% avg · +18.5 pts
Masters
30%vs 17.3% avg · +12.7 pts

Among 196 charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

STAAR result

Math above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
64%vs 34.7% avg · +29.3 pts
Masters
32%vs 13.3% avg · +18.7 pts

Among 194 charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

STAAR result

Reading above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
66%vs 49% avg · +17 pts
Masters
31%vs 19.2% avg · +11.8 pts

Among 196 charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Sst Sugar Land is rated A by TEA, scoring 91 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.1 average for 196 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context. It is down 5 points since 2021-22.

Ranks 38th of 196 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context (tied with 8 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 5 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. Who this school serves
  6. Student counts behind the percentages
  7. Enrollment over time
  8. Discipline and removal from class
  9. Spending per student
  10. Teachers and actual class size
  11. Where this school ranks best
  12. Where this comes from

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
908070 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas charter averageSst Sugar Land 9691919291 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 92 that year.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas charter average
2025-26A9181.1 196 reporting81.7 829 reporting
2024-25A9282.7 190 reporting81.3 797 reporting
2023-24A9181.1 183 reporting79.5 776 reporting
2022-23A9182.3 175 reporting79.6 749 reporting
2021-22A9685.5 167 reporting84.5 700 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement90 A+11.1 vs similar economic context · 196 reporting
  • School Progress90 A+8.5 vs similar economic context · 195 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps92 A+14.7 vs similar economic context · 188 reporting
  • Academic Growth86 B+13.3 vs similar economic context · 180 reporting
  • Relative Performance90 A+9.7 vs similar economic context · 193 reporting
  • Sst Sugar Land
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (196 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement90A—
School Progress90A—
Closing the Gaps92A—
Academic Growth86B4
Relative Performance90A—

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level88%+16 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 196 reporting
  • Meets grade level62%+19 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 196 reporting
  • Masters grade level30%+13 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 196 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level92%+19 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 196 reporting
  • Meets grade level66%+17 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 196 reporting
  • Masters grade level31%+12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 196 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level87%+20 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 194 reporting
  • Meets grade level64%+29 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 194 reporting
  • Masters grade level32%+19 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 194 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level72%−4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 190 reporting
  • Meets grade level35%−7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 190 reporting
  • Masters grade level16%−1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 190 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (196 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only charter campuses for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
471
Economically disadvantaged
69.2%−0.9 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
27.8%+1.5 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
8.3%−4.9 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
96.8%+4.7 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
6.9%−19.1 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Sst Sugar Land

African American: 53.1%Hispanic: 28.2%White: 3.2%American Indian: 0.2%Asian: 13.6%Two or More Races: 1.7%
  • African American 53.1%
  • Hispanic 28.2%
  • White 3.2%
  • American Indian 0.2%
  • Asian 13.6%
  • Two or More Races 1.7%

Selected comparison average For charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 196 reporting for every category shown · 196 in full cohort

African American: 19.4%Hispanic: 62%White: 11.6%American Indian: 0.2%Asian: 3.9%Pacific Islander: 0.2%Two or More Races: 2.7%
  • African American 19.4%
  • Hispanic 62%
  • White 11.6%
  • American Indian 0.2%
  • Asian 3.9%
  • Pacific Islander 0.2%
  • Two or More Races 2.7%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
471
Economically disadvantaged students
326
Emergent bilingual students
131
Special education students
39

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
82
Students in TEA mobility denominator
659
TEA-published mobility rate
12.4%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 471 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 268 (36.3%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
471

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
−268

Decrease · −36.3%

Change since 2021–22
−306

Decrease · −39.4%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
471
Selected comparison
501.7

average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 196 rated charter campuses reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Sst Sugar Land
School yearStudents enrolledSst Sugar LandChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22 777 First available year 472.9
2022–23 774 Decrease of 3 (0.4%) 493.9
2023–24 701 Decrease of 73 (9.4%) 499.9
2024–25 739 Increase of 38 (5.4%) 498.4
2025–26 471 Decrease of 268 (36.3%) 501.7

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting charter campuses in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
59

7.5% of cumulative year-end enrollment

Disciplinary actions
99

12.53 per 100 students

Cumulative year-end enrollment
790

2024–25

Share of students · 2024–25

This school
7.5%
Selected comparison
9.3%

average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 141 rated charter campuses reporting

−1.8 pts vs similar economic context

Actions per 100 students · 2024–25

This school
12.53
Selected comparison
15.3

average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 146 rated charter campuses reporting

−2.8 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Sst Sugar Land
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 938 Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
2021–22 851 Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
2022–23 854 Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
2023–24 780 27 3.5% 33 4.23 9.7% 16.4
2024–25 790 59 7.5% 99 12.53 9.3% 15.3
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Sst Sugar Land in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline 59 7.5% 99 12.53 9.3% 15.3
In-school suspensions 13 1.6% 18 2.28 5.5% 7.3
Out-of-school suspensions 54 6.8% 81 10.25 7.9% 11
DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized charter campuses can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$7k$17k$27k2019202120232025
  • Sst Sugar Land
  • Parent district: School of Science and Technology Discovery
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$12,507
Selected comparison
$11,598

average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 189 rated charter campuses reporting

+$909 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $12,507 per student for this campus, $12,957 per student for its parent district, School of Science and Technology Discovery, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearSst Sugar LandParent district: School of Science and Technology DiscoveryTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2019$25,564$11,065$13,108$8,553 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 134 rated charter campuses reporting
2020$9,822$10,672$14,058$9,502 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 149 rated charter campuses reporting
2021$7,780$10,388$14,797$9,464 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 164 rated charter campuses reporting
2022$10,830$11,731$15,708$10,797 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 171 rated charter campuses reporting
2023$11,011$12,748$16,792$11,112 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 176 rated charter campuses reporting
2024$13,509$12,448$18,125$11,549 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 182 rated charter campuses reporting
2025$12,507$12,957$18,972$11,598 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 189 rated charter campuses reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$64,787+$2,650 vs similar economic context
Teachers
37+7.4 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
12.8−5.7 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Sst Sugar Land

Beginning: 13%1 to 5 years: 35.3%6 to 10 years: 15.8%11 to 20 years: 30.4%21 to 30 years: 2.7%Over 30 years: 2.7%
  • Beginning 13%
  • 1 to 5 years 35.3%
  • 6 to 10 years 15.8%
  • 11 to 20 years 30.4%
  • 21 to 30 years 2.7%
  • Over 30 years 2.7%

Selected comparison average For charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 196 reporting for every category shown · 196 in full cohort

Beginning: 15%1 to 5 years: 44.9%6 to 10 years: 20%11 to 20 years: 15.5%21 to 30 years: 4%Over 30 years: 0.7%
  • Beginning 15%
  • 1 to 5 years 44.9%
  • 6 to 10 years 20%
  • 11 to 20 years 15.5%
  • 21 to 30 years 4%
  • Over 30 years 0.7%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for Sst Sugar Land in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classSst Sugar Land · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten23.721.1
Grade 121.722.9
Grade 223.523.7
Grade 327.723.8
Grade 421.524.1
Grade 521.623.9
Grade 623.122.3
Secondary English18.316.5
Secondary languages other than English14.416
Secondary math21.616.5
Secondary science25.317.5
Secondary social studies25.318.1

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 12 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this school ranks best

Out of 63 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.

#4–10 rankings

Fourth- through tenth-place results

5 measures

  • 4of 190

    Attendance

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 190 that report this measure

  • 7of 196

    Reading — Approaches

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 196 that report this measure

  • 8of 190

    Chronically absent (lowest is best)

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 190 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 9of 194

    Math — Meets

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 194 that report this measure

  • 9of 194

    Math — Masters

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 194 that report this measure · tied with 1

Other top-5% rankings

High placements in larger reporting groups

1 measure

  • 24of 420

    All Subjects — Approaches

    Similar size · of the 420 that report this measure · tied with 8

These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 015831005.