−3.9 ptsvs 82.9 average · 111 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
71 of 111tied with 6 others
Score vs similar-size group
−3.1 ptsvs 82.1 average · 390 similarly sized rated charter campuses
Similar size placement
248 of 390tied with 15 others
Score vs state
−2.7 ptsvs 81.7 average · 829 rated Texas charter campuses
Texas charter placement
528 of 829tied with 22 others
C79
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 93 in 2021-22. The current score is below the 82.9 average for 111 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context.The current score is below the 82.1 average for 390 similarly sized rated charter campuses.The current score is below the 81.7 average for 829 rated Texas charter campuses.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
STAAR result
All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters
Meets
53%vs 48.5% avg · +4.5 pts
Masters
27%vs 21% avg · +6 pts
Among 111 charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Sst Alamo is rated C by TEA, scoring 79 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 82.9 average for 111 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context. It is down 13 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 71st of 111 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context (tied with 6 others).
Sst Alamo is rated C by TEA, scoring 79 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 82.1 average for 390 similarly sized rated charter campuses. It is down 13 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 248th of 390 similarly sized rated charter campuses (tied with 15 others).
Sst Alamo is rated C by TEA, scoring 79 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 81.7 average for 829 rated Texas charter campuses. It is down 13 points since 2021-22.
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 93 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Student Achievement80 B−1.9 vs similar economic context · 111 reporting
School Progress81 B−0.9 vs similar economic context · 110 reporting
Closing the Gaps74 C−7.0 vs similar economic context · 107 reporting
Academic Growth80 B+5.0 vs similar economic context · 103 reporting
Relative Performance81 B+0.7 vs similar economic context · 109 reporting
Sst Alamo
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (111 in cohort)
Domain scores
Domain
Score
Grade
Points to next grade
Student Achievement
80
B
10
School Progress
81
B
9
Closing the Gaps
74
C
6
Academic Growth
80
B
10
Relative Performance
81
B
9
Closest to moving up: Closing the Gaps, 6 points below B in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student
Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (81), so
Student Achievement (80) is published above but does not enter the overall
score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 81.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
All Subjects
Approaches grade level79%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 111 reporting
Meets grade level53%+5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 111 reporting
Masters grade level27%+6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 111 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
Approaches grade level86%+10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 111 reporting
Meets grade level65%+10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 111 reporting
Masters grade level38%+15 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 111 reporting
Math3 performance levels
Approaches grade level76%+5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 110 reporting
Meets grade level46%+5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 110 reporting
Masters grade level21%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 110 reporting
Science3 performance levels
Approaches grade level69%−7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 106 reporting
Meets grade level34%−12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 106 reporting
Masters grade level12%−10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 106 reporting
Approaches grade level
Meets grade level
Masters grade level
Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (111 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only charter campuses for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
810
Economically disadvantaged
53.8%−1.6 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
14.7%−5.6 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
19.0%+5.5 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
94.8%+2.4 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
11.9%−11.8 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Sst Alamo
African American 12%
Hispanic 63.2%
White 18.9%
American Indian 0.1%
Asian 2%
Two or More Races 3.8%
Selected comparison averageFor charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 111 reporting for every category shown · 111 in full cohort
African American 19.6%
Hispanic 46.7%
White 22.3%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 7.4%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 3.5%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized charter campuses · 390 reporting for every category shown · 390 in full cohort
African American 14.4%
Hispanic 66.9%
White 9.5%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 6.8%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 2%
Texas charter average829 reporting for every category shown · 829 Texas charter campuses in full cohort
African American 17.5%
Hispanic 61.8%
White 12.2%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 5.5%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 2.5%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
810
Economically disadvantaged students
436
Emergent bilingual students
119
Special education students
154
Campus mobility · 2024–25
Mobile students
46
Students in TEA mobility denominator
727
TEA-published mobility rate
6.3%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 810 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 38 (4.5%) from 2024–25.
Latest enrollment
810
2025–26
Change from 2024–25
−38
Decrease · −4.5%
Change since 2021–22
+28
Increase · +3.6%
Enrollment in 2025–26
This school
810
Selected comparison
506.9
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 111 rated charter campuses reporting
Student enrollment by school year for Sst Alamo
School year
Students enrolledSst Alamo
Change from previous school year
Average enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22
782
First available year
428.8
2022–23
771
Decrease of 11 (1.4%)
449.2
2023–24
846
Increase of 75 (9.7%)
487
2024–25
848
Increase of 2 (0.2%)
492.8
2025–26
810
Decrease of 38 (4.5%)
506.9
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting charter campuses in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
16
1.8% of cumulative year-end enrollment
Disciplinary actions
21
2.37 per 100 students
Cumulative year-end enrollment
887
2024–25
Share of students · 2024–25
This school
1.8%
Selected comparison
9.1%
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 76 rated charter campuses reporting
−7.3 pts vs similar economic context
Actions per 100 students · 2024–25
This school
2.37
Selected comparison
14.3
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 82 rated charter campuses reporting
−11.9 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Sst Alamo
School year
Cumulative enrollment
Studentsall discipline
Students% of enrollment
Actionsall discipline
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21
758
Suppressed
—
12
1.58
—
6.5
2021–22
830
30
3.6%
37
4.46
8.7%
13.7
2022–23
820
28
3.4%
38
4.63
9.5%
14.5
2023–24
884
36
4.1%
58
6.56
8.8%
14.6
2024–25
887
16
1.8%
21
2.37
9.1%
14.3
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Sst Alamo in 2024–25
Category
Students
Students% of enrollment
Actions
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline
16
1.8%
21
2.37
9.1%
14.3
In-school suspensions
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Out-of-school suspensions
13
1.5%
14
1.58
7.2%
9.5
DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Expulsions
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Mandatory expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary expulsions
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized charter campuses can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
Sst Alamo
Parent district: School of Science and Technology
Texas average
Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
This school
$11,378
Selected comparison
$11,035
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 107 rated charter campuses reporting
+$343 vs similar economic context
For 2025, TEA reported $11,378 per student for this campus, $12,429 per student for its parent district, School of Science and Technology, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
Year
Sst Alamo
Parent district: School of Science and Technology
Texas average
Selected comparison average
Reportingselected comparison
2018
$8,083
$9,549
$13,054
$7,735
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 75 rated charter campuses reporting
2019
$8,855
$9,832
$13,108
$8,319
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 81 rated charter campuses reporting
2020
$10,863
$11,303
$14,058
$8,689
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 86 rated charter campuses reporting
2021
$9,286
$11,180
$14,797
$9,074
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 90 rated charter campuses reporting
2022
$11,906
$12,555
$15,708
$10,289
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 94 rated charter campuses reporting
2023
$12,469
$13,435
$16,792
$10,771
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 99 rated charter campuses reporting
2024
$11,369
$12,052
$18,125
$10,923
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 101 rated charter campuses reporting
2025
$11,378
$12,429
$18,972
$11,035
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 107 rated charter campuses reporting
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
Average salary
$63,943+$2,058 vs similar economic context
Teachers
48+18.3 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
16.8−1.5 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Sst Alamo
Beginning 7.7%
1 to 5 years 44.9%
6 to 10 years 22.8%
11 to 20 years 24.8%
Selected comparison averageFor charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 111 reporting for every category shown · 111 in full cohort
Beginning 13.9%
1 to 5 years 40.1%
6 to 10 years 21%
11 to 20 years 17.8%
21 to 30 years 5.9%
Over 30 years 1.2%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized charter campuses · 390 reporting for every category shown · 390 in full cohort
Beginning 13.7%
1 to 5 years 47.2%
6 to 10 years 19.9%
11 to 20 years 13.1%
21 to 30 years 3.4%
Over 30 years 0.4%
Texas charter average829 reporting for every category shown · 829 Texas charter campuses in full cohort
Beginning 13%
1 to 5 years 44.3%
6 to 10 years 19.6%
11 to 20 years 15.4%
21 to 30 years 4.8%
Over 30 years 0.9%
Average students in a class
TEA average class size by grade or subject for Sst Alamo in 2024–25
Grade or subject
Average students per classSst Alamo · 2024–25
Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten
25.7
21.8
Grade 1
25.9
22
Grade 2
28.8
23.1
Grade 3
28.8
23
Grade 4
29.3
23.1
Grade 5
27.7
23.6
Grade 6
23
21.6
Secondary languages other than English
27
15.1
Secondary math
19
15.9
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 9 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 015827002.