Recent movement
Overall score rose 6 points
88 to 94 2024-25 to 2025-26
- 94 is 14.4 points above the 79.6 average among 2,026 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
Traditional public school campus · Online school
South Texas ISD Virtual Academy
South Texas ISD · 223 students
- Current score
- 94/1002025-26
- Change
- +10 ptssince 2022-23
- Score vs similar economic context
- +14.4 ptsvs 79.6 average · 2,026 rated schools serving a similar economic context
- Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
- 81 of 2,026tied with 39 others
- Score vs region
- +8.3 ptsvs 85.7 average · 505 rated schools in Region 01: Edinburg
- Region 01: Edinburg placement
- 34 of 505tied with 15 others
- Score vs county
- +8.0 ptsvs 86 average · 127 rated schools in Cameron County
- Cameron County placement
- 7 of 127tied with 5 others
- Score vs similar-size group
- +13.0 ptsvs 81 average · 1,577 similarly sized rated schools
- Similar size placement
- 103 of 1,577tied with 47 others
- Score vs state
- +12.7 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
- Texas placement
- 379 of 7,646tied with 208 others
A94
At a glance
The available rating history is moving up. The current score is above the 79.6 average for 2,026 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 85.7 average for 505 rated schools in Region 01: Edinburg.The current score is above the 86 average for 127 rated schools in Cameron County.The current score is above the 81 average for 1,577 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
Recent domain gain
Academic Growth rose 23 points
60 to 83 2024-25 to 2025-26
- 83 is 9.3 points above the 73.7 average among 1,849 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
STAAR result
All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters
- Meets
- 58%vs 47.3% avg · +10.7 pts
- Masters
- 26%vs 19.2% avg · +6.8 pts
Among 1,917 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measureRecent movement
Overall score rose 6 points
88 to 94 2024-25 to 2025-26
- 94 is 8.3 points above the 85.7 average among 505 schools in Region 01: Edinburg reporting this measure.
Recent domain gain
Academic Growth rose 23 points
60 to 83 2024-25 to 2025-26
- 83 is 5.3 points above the 77.7 average among 485 schools in Region 01: Edinburg reporting this measure.
Top placement
Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student
22.7% 1st of 86 schools in Region 01: Edinburg reporting this measure · 2025-26
See the full measureRecent movement
Overall score rose 6 points
88 to 94 2024-25 to 2025-26
- 94 is 8 points above the 86 average among 127 schools in Cameron County reporting this measure.
Recent domain gain
Academic Growth rose 23 points
60 to 83 2024-25 to 2025-26
- 83 is 5.8 points above the 77.2 average among 125 schools in Cameron County reporting this measure.
Top placement
Earned a level I or level II certificate
13.6% 1st of 23 schools in Cameron County reporting this measure · 2025-26
See the full measureRecent movement
Overall score rose 6 points
88 to 94 2024-25 to 2025-26
- 94 is 13 points above the 81 average among 1,577 similarly sized schools reporting this measure.
Recent domain gain
Academic Growth rose 23 points
60 to 83 2024-25 to 2025-26
- 83 is 9 points above the 74 average among 1,379 similarly sized schools reporting this measure.
STAAR result
All Subjects above similar-size averages at Meets and Masters
- Meets
- 58%vs 49.3% avg · +8.7 pts
- Masters
- 26%vs 19.7% avg · +6.3 pts
Among 1,407 similarly sized schools reporting this measure.
See the full measureRecent movement
Overall score rose 6 points
88 to 94 2024-25 to 2025-26
- 94 is 12.7 points above the 81.3 average among 7,646 Texas schools reporting this measure.
Recent domain gain
Academic Growth rose 23 points
60 to 83 2024-25 to 2025-26
- 83 is 7.3 points above the 75.7 average among 7,090 Texas schools reporting this measure.
STAAR result
All Subjects above Texas averages at Meets and Masters
- Meets
- 58%vs 50.8% avg · +7.2 pts
- Masters
- 26%vs 22.8% avg · +3.2 pts
Among 7,260 Texas schools reporting this measure.
See the full measureSelected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
South Texas ISD Virtual Academy is rated A by TEA, scoring 94 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 79.6 average for 2,026 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is up 10 points since 2022-23.
Ranks 81st of 2,026 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 39 others).
South Texas ISD Virtual Academy is rated A by TEA, scoring 94 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 85.7 average for 505 rated schools in Region 01: Edinburg. It is up 10 points since 2022-23.
Ranks 34th of 505 rated schools in Region 01: Edinburg (tied with 15 others).
South Texas ISD Virtual Academy is rated A by TEA, scoring 94 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 86 average for 127 rated schools in Cameron County. It is up 10 points since 2022-23.
Ranks 7th of 127 rated schools in Cameron County (tied with 5 others).
South Texas ISD Virtual Academy is rated A by TEA, scoring 94 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81 average for 1,577 similarly sized rated schools. It is up 10 points since 2022-23.
Ranks 103rd of 1,577 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 47 others).
South Texas ISD Virtual Academy is rated A by TEA, scoring 94 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is up 10 points since 2022-23.
Ranks 379th of 7,646 rated Texas schools (tied with 208 others).
Put the numbers in context
Compare with
Jump to a section
4 years of ratings
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
View the yearly scores and comparisons
| Year | Rating | Score | Selected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rate | StateTexas average |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | A | 94 | 79.6 2,026 reporting | 81.3 7,646 reporting |
| 2024-25 | B | 88 | 79.3 2,004 reporting | 81.2 7,554 reporting |
| 2023-24 | A | 93 | 77.4 1,989 reporting | 78.9 7,466 reporting |
| 2022-23 | B | 84 | 78.0 1,956 reporting | 79.1 7,377 reporting |
Where the score comes from
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
- South Texas ISD Virtual Academy
- Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,026 in cohort)
| Domain | Score | Grade | Points to next grade |
|---|---|---|---|
| Student Achievement | 92 | A | — |
| School Progress | 93 | A | — |
| Closing the Gaps | 95 | A | — |
| Academic Growth | 83 | B | 7 |
| Relative Performance | 93 | A | — |
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (93), so Student Achievement (92) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 93.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
- Approaches grade level
- Meets grade level
- Masters grade level
- Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,026 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Graduation
- Four-Year
- 0.0%−93.5 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 449 rated schools reporting
- Five-Year
- 0.0%−93.2 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 445 rated schools reporting
- Six-Year
- 0.0%−92.3 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 445 rated schools reporting
- Dropout Rate
- 0.0%−0.7 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 451 rated schools reporting
These measures use TEA's standard-accountability population. Each comparison average includes only schools in that population that report that specific measure; its reporting count is shown beside the average. It is an unweighted average of those reported school rates, not a pooled rate across every student in the group.
College, career and military readiness
- Total credit for CCMR criteria
- 95.0%+7.4 pts vs similar economic context
| Criterion | This school% of graduates | Averagesimilar economic context | Differencepercentage points | Reportingselected comparison |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total credit for CCMR criteria | 95.0% | 87.6% | +7.4 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 484 rated schools reporting |
| Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course | 77.3% | 59.6% | +17.7 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 488 rated schools reporting |
| Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA | 18.2% | 27.2% | −9.0 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 488 rated schools reporting |
| Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s) | 13.6% | 11.0% | +2.6 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 488 rated schools reporting |
| Earned college credit for a dual credit course | 27.3% | 33.9% | −6.6 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 488 rated schools reporting |
| Earned an industry-based certification | 40.9% | 37.6% | +3.3 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 488 rated schools reporting |
| Earned a level I or level II certificate | 13.6% | 2.0% | +11.6 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 488 rated schools reporting |
| Earned an associate degree | 0.0% | 7.3% | −7.3 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 488 rated schools reporting |
| Completed an OnRamps course and qualified for college credit | 0.0% | 3.7% | −3.7 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 488 rated schools reporting |
| Graduated with completed individualized education program (IEP) and workforce readiness | 4.5% | 3.2% | +1.3 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 488 rated schools reporting |
| Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student | 22.7% | 8.2% | +14.5 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 488 rated schools reporting |
| Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces | 0.0% | 3.2% | −3.2 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 488 rated schools reporting |
Every row is a share of this school's graduates, and every row is a way of meeting CCMR — so on every row, a bigger share is better. Difference is this school minus the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate, counted in percentage points: +5.0 would mean five more graduates in every hundred met that criterion here. The selected comparison is an unweighted average of the reported school percentages, not a pooled rate across all graduates in the group. Graduates may meet several criteria, so the rows do not add up to the total.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
- Students
- 223
- Economically disadvantaged
- 66.8%±0.0 pts vs similar economic context
- English learners
- 11.2%−7.7 pts vs similar economic context
- Special education
- 16.1%−2.8 pts vs similar economic context
- Attendance
- 92.2%−1.9 pts vs similar economic context
- Chronically absent
- 25.9%+8.9 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
South Texas ISD Virtual Academy
- African American 0.4%
- Hispanic 82.1%
- White 13.9%
- American Indian 0.4%
- Asian 2.7%
- Two or More Races 0.4%
Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,026 reporting for every category shown · 2,026 in full cohort
- African American 11.8%
- Hispanic 53.5%
- White 28.3%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 2.2%
- Pacific Islander 0.2%
- Two or More Races 3.6%
Selected comparison average For Region 01: Edinburg · 505 reporting for every category shown · 505 in full cohort
- African American 0.2%
- Hispanic 97.5%
- White 1.9%
- Asian 0.3%
- Two or More Races 0.1%
Selected comparison average For Cameron County · 127 reporting for every category shown · 127 in full cohort
- African American 0.3%
- Hispanic 96.2%
- White 2.9%
- American Indian 0.1%
- Asian 0.4%
- Two or More Races 0.2%
Selected comparison average For similarly sized schools · 1,577 reporting for every category shown · 1,577 in full cohort
- African American 9%
- Hispanic 49.1%
- White 37.1%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 1.3%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 3.1%
Statewide average 7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
- African American 11.5%
- Hispanic 52.6%
- White 27.8%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 4.2%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
- Students in this TEA accountability summary
- 223
- Economically disadvantaged students
- 149
- Emergent bilingual students
- 25
- Special education students
- 36
Campus mobility · 2024–25
- Mobile students
- 59
- Students in TEA mobility denominator
- 253
- TEA-published mobility rate
- 23.3%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 223 students in 2025–26, an increase of 11 (5.2%) from 2024–25.
- Latest enrollment
- 223
2025–26
- Change from 2024–25
- +11
Increase · +5.2%
- Change since 2022–23
- +13
Increase · +6.2%
Enrollment in 2025–26
- This school
- 223
- Selected comparison
- 635.8
| School year | Students enrolledSouth Texas ISD Virtual Academy | Change from previous school year | Average enrollmentselected comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022–23 | 210 | First available year | 654.5 |
| 2023–24 | 181 | Decrease of 29 (13.8%) | 653.4 |
| 2024–25 | 212 | Increase of 31 (17.1%) | 650.6 |
| 2025–26 | 223 | Increase of 11 (5.2%) | 635.8 |
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
- Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
- Not reported
Rate not available
- Disciplinary actions
- Not reported
Rate not available
- Cumulative year-end enrollment
- 252
2024–25
| School year | Cumulative enrollment | Studentsall discipline | Students% of enrollment | Actionsall discipline | Actionsper 100 students | Studentsselected comparison average % | Actionsselected comparison average per 100 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022–23 | 226 | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| 2023–24 | 200 | Suppressed | — | Suppressed | — | — | — |
| 2024–25 | 252 | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
See 2024–25 discipline categories
| Category | Students | Students% of enrollment | Actions | Actionsper 100 students | Studentsselected comparison average % | Actionsselected comparison average per 100 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All discipline | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| In-school suspensions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Out-of-school suspensions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| DAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Mandatory DAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Discretionary DAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| JJAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Mandatory JJAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Discretionary JJAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Expulsions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Mandatory expulsions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Discretionary expulsions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
- South Texas ISD Virtual Academy
- Parent district: South Texas ISD
- Texas average
- Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
- This school
- $12,507
- Selected comparison
- $13,259
For 2025, TEA reported $12,507 per student for this campus, $26,055 per student for its parent district, South Texas ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
| Year | South Texas ISD Virtual Academy | Parent district: South Texas ISD | Texas average | Selected comparison average | Reportingselected comparison |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | $16,990 | $20,591 | $16,792 | $11,202 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,957 rated schools reporting |
| 2024 | $13,817 | $21,632 | $18,125 | $12,347 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,986 rated schools reporting |
| 2025 | $12,507 | $26,055 | $18,972 | $13,259 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,002 rated schools reporting |
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
- Average salary
- $74,274+$7,808 vs similar economic context
- Teachers
- 17−26.0 vs similar economic context
- Students per staff member
- 13.2−0.7 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
South Texas ISD Virtual Academy
- Beginning 4.7%
- 1 to 5 years 17.8%
- 6 to 10 years 35.5%
- 11 to 20 years 35.5%
- 21 to 30 years 5.9%
Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,026 reporting for every category shown · 2,026 in full cohort
- Beginning 6.3%
- 1 to 5 years 26.5%
- 6 to 10 years 19%
- 11 to 20 years 27.9%
- 21 to 30 years 15.6%
- Over 30 years 4%
Selected comparison average For Region 01: Edinburg · 505 reporting for every category shown · 505 in full cohort
- Beginning 2.7%
- 1 to 5 years 19.3%
- 6 to 10 years 16.2%
- 11 to 20 years 35%
- 21 to 30 years 22.6%
- Over 30 years 4.2%
Selected comparison average For Cameron County · 127 reporting for every category shown · 127 in full cohort
- Beginning 2.5%
- 1 to 5 years 20.5%
- 6 to 10 years 14.9%
- 11 to 20 years 35.1%
- 21 to 30 years 22.3%
- Over 30 years 4.7%
Selected comparison average For similarly sized schools · 1,577 reporting for every category shown · 1,577 in full cohort
- Beginning 6.6%
- 1 to 5 years 24.1%
- 6 to 10 years 17.6%
- 11 to 20 years 28.3%
- 21 to 30 years 17.7%
- Over 30 years 5.1%
Statewide average 7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
- Beginning 6.2%
- 1 to 5 years 25.6%
- 6 to 10 years 19.2%
- 11 to 20 years 28.7%
- 21 to 30 years 15.9%
- Over 30 years 3.7%
Average students in a class
| Grade or subject | Average students per classSouth Texas ISD Virtual Academy · 2024–25 | Average students per classselected comparison |
|---|---|---|
| Grade 6 | 22 | 17.8 |
| Secondary English | 19.8 | 15.1 |
| Secondary languages other than English | 10.2 | 17.7 |
| Secondary math | 19.1 | 16 |
| Secondary science | 19.9 | 17.4 |
| Secondary social studies | 20.6 | 17.3 |
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 6 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
Where this school ranks best
Out of 200 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
#1 rankings
First-place results
2 measures
-
1of 86
Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student
Region 01: Edinburg · of the 86 that report this measure
-
1of 23
Earned a level I or level II certificate
Cameron County · of the 23 that report this measure
#4–10 rankings
Fourth- through tenth-place results
3 measures
-
6of 23
Graduated with completed individualized education program (IEP) and workforce readiness
Cameron County · of the 23 that report this measure
-
7of 23
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course
Cameron County · of the 23 that report this measure
-
8of 125
Closing the Gaps
Cameron County · of the 125 that report this measure · tied with 1
Other top-5% rankings
High placements in larger reporting groups
2 measures
-
81of 2,026
Overall score
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 2,026 that report this measure · tied with 39
-
302of 7,237
Relative Performance
Texas average · of the 7,237 that report this measure · tied with 96
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Download the full dataset · this campus's district
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 031916009.