+4.8 ptsvs 88.2 average · 929 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
151 of 929tied with 71 others
Score vs region
+12.5 ptsvs 80.5 average · 839 rated schools in Region 11: Fort Worth
Region 11: Fort Worth placement
54 of 839tied with 35 others
Score vs county
+13.0 ptsvs 80 average · 466 rated schools in Tarrant County
Tarrant County placement
34 of 466tied with 18 others
Score vs similar-size group
+12.1 ptsvs 80.9 average · 3,833 similarly sized rated schools
Similar size placement
220 of 3,833tied with 123 others
Score vs state
+11.7 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
Texas placement
588 of 7,646tied with 249 others
A93
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is flat; under the rules in force back then it scored 95 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 88.2 average for 929 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 80.5 average for 839 rated schools in Region 11: Fort Worth.The current score is above the 80 average for 466 rated schools in Tarrant County.The current score is above the 80.9 average for 3,833 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
STAAR result
All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters
Meets
78%vs 66.4% avg · +11.6 pts
Masters
51%vs 34.7% avg · +16.3 pts
Among 909 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Smithfield MS is rated A by TEA, scoring 93 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 88.2 average for 929 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is unchanged since 2021-22.
Ranks 151st of 929 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 71 others).
Smithfield MS is rated A by TEA, scoring 93 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.5 average for 839 rated schools in Region 11: Fort Worth. It is unchanged since 2021-22.
Ranks 54th of 839 rated schools in Region 11: Fort Worth (tied with 35 others).
Smithfield MS is rated A by TEA, scoring 93 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80 average for 466 rated schools in Tarrant County. It is unchanged since 2021-22.
Ranks 34th of 466 rated schools in Tarrant County (tied with 18 others).
Smithfield MS is rated A by TEA, scoring 93 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.9 average for 3,833 similarly sized rated schools. It is unchanged since 2021-22.
Ranks 220th of 3,833 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 123 others).
Smithfield MS is rated A by TEA, scoring 93 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is unchanged since 2021-22.
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 95 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Student Achievement93 A+4.0 vs similar economic context · 909 reporting
School Progress91 A+6.3 vs similar economic context · 907 reporting
Closing the Gaps92 A+6.3 vs similar economic context · 902 reporting
Academic Growth91 A+9.6 vs similar economic context · 893 reporting
Relative Performance91 A+11.1 vs similar economic context · 907 reporting
Smithfield MS
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (929 in cohort)
Domain scores
Domain
Score
Grade
Points to next grade
Student Achievement
93
A
—
School Progress
91
A
—
Closing the Gaps
92
A
—
Academic Growth
91
A
—
Relative Performance
91
A
—
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student
Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is Student Achievement (93), so
School Progress (91) is published above but does not enter the overall
score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 93.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
All Subjects
Approaches grade level91%+5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 909 reporting
Meets grade level78%+12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 909 reporting
Masters grade level51%+16 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 909 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
Approaches grade level92%+5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 909 reporting
Meets grade level80%+9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 909 reporting
Masters grade level54%+18 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 909 reporting
Math3 performance levels
Approaches grade level92%+8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 907 reporting
Meets grade level80%+19 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 907 reporting
Masters grade level47%+17 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 907 reporting
Science3 performance levels
Approaches grade level93%+7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 832 reporting
Meets grade level84%+20 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 832 reporting
Masters grade level67%+30 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 832 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
Approaches grade level80%−5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 445 reporting
Meets grade level59%−4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 445 reporting
Masters grade level39%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 445 reporting
Approaches grade level
Meets grade level
Masters grade level
Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (929 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
784
Economically disadvantaged
26.5%−1.0 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
4.2%−5.9 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
14.0%−3.1 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
96.1%+0.7 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
7.5%−2.4 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Smithfield MS
African American 6.1%
Hispanic 20.9%
White 60.8%
American Indian 0.9%
Asian 6%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 5.1%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 929 reporting for every category shown · 929 in full cohort
African American 8.9%
Hispanic 28%
White 48.2%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 9.4%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 5%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 11: Fort Worth · 839 reporting for every category shown · 839 in full cohort
African American 15.4%
Hispanic 39.6%
White 34.4%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 5.3%
Pacific Islander 0.3%
Two or More Races 4.6%
Selected comparison averageFor Tarrant County · 466 reporting for every category shown · 466 in full cohort
African American 21.3%
Hispanic 45.2%
White 22.9%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 5.4%
Pacific Islander 0.3%
Two or More Races 4.6%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 3,833 reporting for every category shown · 3,833 in full cohort
African American 12.4%
Hispanic 53.6%
White 24.2%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 5.6%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 3.7%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
African American 11.5%
Hispanic 52.6%
White 27.8%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
784
Economically disadvantaged students
208
Emergent bilingual students
33
Special education students
110
Campus mobility · 2024–25
Mobile students
46
Students in TEA mobility denominator
824
TEA-published mobility rate
5.6%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 784 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 14 (1.8%) from 2024–25.
Latest enrollment
784
2025–26
Change from 2024–25
−14
Decrease · −1.8%
Change since 2021–22
−42
Decrease · −5.1%
Enrollment in 2025–26
This school
784
Selected comparison
828.7
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 922 rated schools reporting
Student enrollment by school year for Smithfield MS
School year
Students enrolledSmithfield MS
Change from previous school year
Average enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22
826
First available year
845.9
2022–23
821
Decrease of 5 (0.6%)
850.3
2023–24
806
Decrease of 15 (1.8%)
844.7
2024–25
798
Decrease of 8 (1.0%)
840.3
2025–26
784
Decrease of 14 (1.8%)
828.7
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
106
12.9% of cumulative year-end enrollment
Disciplinary actions
237
28.90 per 100 students
Cumulative year-end enrollment
820
2024–25
Share of students · 2024–25
This school
12.9%
Selected comparison
8.0%
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 673 rated schools reporting
+4.9 pts vs similar economic context
Actions per 100 students · 2024–25
This school
28.9
Selected comparison
16.1
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 759 rated schools reporting
+12.8 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Smithfield MS
School year
Cumulative enrollment
Studentsall discipline
Students% of enrollment
Actionsall discipline
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21
897
49
5.5%
113
12.60
6.2%
11
2021–22
867
87
10.0%
196
22.61
8.5%
16.9
2022–23
846
95
11.2%
213
25.18
8.8%
17.7
2023–24
837
106
12.7%
213
25.45
8.3%
16.9
2024–25
820
106
12.9%
237
28.90
8.0%
16.1
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Smithfield MS in 2024–25
Category
Students
Students% of enrollment
Actions
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline
106
12.9%
237
28.90
8.0%
16.1
In-school suspensions
49
6.0%
85
10.37
7.3%
12.6
Out-of-school suspensions
82
10.0%
128
15.61
4.0%
5.3
DAEP placements
19
2.3%
24
2.93
2.9%
3.4
Mandatory DAEP placements
Suppressed
—
11
1.34
—
2.7
Discretionary DAEP placements
Suppressed
—
13
1.59
—
1.7
JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
Smithfield MS
Parent district: Birdville ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
This school
$14,692
Selected comparison
$11,365
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 916 rated schools reporting
+$3,327 vs similar economic context
For 2025, TEA reported $14,692 per student for this campus, $21,752 per student for its parent district, Birdville ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
Year
Smithfield MS
Parent district: Birdville ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison average
Reportingselected comparison
2018
$7,042
$11,380
$13,054
$7,563
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 820 rated schools reporting
2019
$7,215
$11,652
$13,108
$7,643
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 835 rated schools reporting
2020
$7,308
$14,680
$14,058
$7,958
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 845 rated schools reporting
2021
$7,322
$18,547
$14,797
$8,419
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 853 rated schools reporting
2022
$8,300
$14,853
$15,708
$9,647
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 870 rated schools reporting
2023
$8,277
$15,125
$16,792
$10,137
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 888 rated schools reporting
2024
$8,557
$19,477
$18,125
$11,311
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 902 rated schools reporting
2025
$14,692
$21,752
$18,972
$11,365
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 916 rated schools reporting
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
Average salary
$70,511+$2,102 vs similar economic context
Teachers
50−3.7 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
15.7+1.0 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Smithfield MS
Beginning 8%
1 to 5 years 32.1%
6 to 10 years 12.2%
11 to 20 years 27.1%
21 to 30 years 15.4%
Over 30 years 5.2%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 929 reporting for every category shown · 929 in full cohort
Beginning 4.8%
1 to 5 years 22.6%
6 to 10 years 19.8%
11 to 20 years 32.2%
21 to 30 years 17.3%
Over 30 years 3.1%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 11: Fort Worth · 839 reporting for every category shown · 839 in full cohort
Beginning 5.6%
1 to 5 years 24%
6 to 10 years 20.6%
11 to 20 years 30%
21 to 30 years 16.7%
Over 30 years 2.8%
Selected comparison averageFor Tarrant County · 466 reporting for every category shown · 466 in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 24%
6 to 10 years 20.5%
11 to 20 years 29.9%
21 to 30 years 16.3%
Over 30 years 2.7%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 3,833 reporting for every category shown · 3,833 in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 26.7%
6 to 10 years 20%
11 to 20 years 29%
21 to 30 years 15%
Over 30 years 2.8%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 25.6%
6 to 10 years 19.2%
11 to 20 years 28.7%
21 to 30 years 15.9%
Over 30 years 3.7%
Average students in a class
TEA average class size by grade or subject for Smithfield MS in 2024–25
Grade or subject
Average students per classSmithfield MS · 2024–25
Average students per classselected comparison
Grade 6
22.6
19.1
Secondary English
22.1
17.1
Secondary languages other than English
18.7
19.4
Secondary math
21.6
17.7
Secondary science
22.4
19.4
Secondary social studies
24
19.5
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 6 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
Out of 120 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
#4–10 rankings
Fourth- through tenth-place results
1 measure
6of 399
Science — Masters
Tarrant County · of the 399 that report this measure
Other top-5% rankings
High placements in larger reporting groups
8 measures
11of 399
Science — Meets
Tarrant County · of the 399 that report this measure · tied with 2
20of 457
All Subjects — Masters
Tarrant County · of the 457 that report this measure · tied with 2
20of 455
Math — Meets
Tarrant County · of the 455 that report this measure
23of 456
Reading — Masters
Tarrant County · of the 456 that report this measure · tied with 2
23of 455
Math — Masters
Tarrant County · of the 455 that report this measure
35of 810
Relative Performance
Region 11: Fort Worth · of the 810 that report this measure · tied with 14
44of 810
Math — Approaches
Region 11: Fort Worth · of the 810 that report this measure · tied with 15
204of 3,747
All Subjects — Meets
Similar size · of the 3,747 that report this measure · tied with 29
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above
this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears
once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any
tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones
no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 220902046.