Enrollment in 2025–26
- This school
- 598
- Selected comparison
- 640.6
Traditional public school campus
Smith Int
Kaufman County · Region 10: Richardson · 598 students
- Current score
- 71/1002025-26
- Change
- −6 ptssince 2021-22
- Score vs similar economic context
- −8.3 ptsvs 79.3 average · 2,033 rated schools serving a similar economic context
- Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
- 1,587 of 2,033tied with 52 others
- Score vs region
- −11.2 ptsvs 82.2 average · 1,157 rated schools in Region 10: Richardson
- Region 10: Richardson placement
- 978 of 1,157tied with 16 others
- Score vs county
- −6.6 ptsvs 77.6 average · 62 rated schools in Kaufman County
- Kaufman County placement
- 46 of 62among reporting schools
- Score vs similar-size group
- −9.4 ptsvs 80.4 average · 4,688 similarly sized rated schools
- Similar size placement
- 3,764 of 4,688tied with 80 others
- Score vs state
- −10.3 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
- Texas placement
- 6,354 of 7,646tied with 116 others
C71
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 79 in 2021-22. The current score is below the 79.3 average for 2,033 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is below the 82.2 average for 1,157 rated schools in Region 10: Richardson.The current score is below the 77.6 average for 62 rated schools in Kaufman County.The current score is below the 80.4 average for 4,688 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is below the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Read the full rating context and placement
Smith Int is rated C by TEA, scoring 71 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 79.3 average for 2,033 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is down 6 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 1,587th of 2,033 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 52 others).
Smith Int is rated C by TEA, scoring 71 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 82.2 average for 1,157 rated schools in Region 10: Richardson. It is down 6 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 978th of 1,157 rated schools in Region 10: Richardson (tied with 16 others).
Smith Int is rated C by TEA, scoring 71 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 77.6 average for 62 rated schools in Kaufman County. It is down 6 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 46th of 62 rated schools in Kaufman County.
Smith Int is rated C by TEA, scoring 71 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 80.4 average for 4,688 similarly sized rated schools. It is down 6 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 3,764th of 4,688 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 80 others).
Smith Int is rated C by TEA, scoring 71 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is down 6 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 6,354th of 7,646 rated Texas schools (tied with 116 others).
Put the numbers in context
Compare with
Jump to a section
5 years of ratings
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated C with 79 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
View the yearly scores and comparisons
| Year | Rating | Score | Selected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rate | StateTexas average |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | C | 71 | 79.3 2,033 reporting | 81.3 7,646 reporting |
| 2024-25 | C | 73 | 79.1 2,012 reporting | 81.2 7,554 reporting |
| 2023-24 | D | 67 | 77.1 1,997 reporting | 78.9 7,466 reporting |
| 2022-23 | C | 74 | 77.5 1,967 reporting | 79.1 7,377 reporting |
| 2021-22 | C | 77 | 82.0 1,946 reporting | 83.7 7,283 reporting |
Where the score comes from
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
- Smith Int
- Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,033 in cohort)
| Domain | Score | Grade | Points to next grade |
|---|---|---|---|
| Student Achievement | 71 | C | 9 |
| School Progress | 75 | C | 5 |
| Closing the Gaps | 61 | D | 9 |
| Academic Growth | 67 | D | 3 |
| Relative Performance | 75 | C | 5 |
Closest to moving up: School Progress, 5 points below B in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (75), so Student Achievement (71) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 75.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
- Approaches grade level
- Meets grade level
- Masters grade level
- Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,033 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
- Students
- 598
- Economically disadvantaged
- 68.6%±0.0 pts vs similar economic context
- English learners
- 6.0%−13.9 pts vs similar economic context
- Special education
- 25.3%+6.5 pts vs similar economic context
- Attendance
- 93.5%−0.5 pts vs similar economic context
- Chronically absent
- 21.1%+3.6 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Smith Int
- African American 65.6%
- Hispanic 18.7%
- White 9.7%
- Asian 1.3%
- Pacific Islander 0.2%
- Two or More Races 4.5%
Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,033 reporting for every category shown · 2,033 in full cohort
- African American 12.1%
- Hispanic 55.4%
- White 26.3%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 2.1%
- Pacific Islander 0.2%
- Two or More Races 3.5%
Selected comparison average For Region 10: Richardson · 1,157 reporting for every category shown · 1,157 in full cohort
- African American 17.4%
- Hispanic 43.5%
- White 24.5%
- American Indian 0.6%
- Asian 9.9%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 4%
Selected comparison average For Kaufman County · 62 reporting for every category shown · 62 in full cohort
- African American 24.7%
- Hispanic 39.8%
- White 29.6%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 1.3%
- Pacific Islander 0.2%
- Two or More Races 4.2%
Selected comparison average For similarly sized schools · 4,688 reporting for every category shown · 4,688 in full cohort
- African American 12.2%
- Hispanic 54.5%
- White 24.4%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 4.8%
- Pacific Islander 0.2%
- Two or More Races 3.6%
Statewide average 7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
- African American 11.5%
- Hispanic 52.6%
- White 27.8%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 4.2%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
- Students in this TEA accountability summary
- 598
- Economically disadvantaged students
- 410
- Emergent bilingual students
- 36
- Special education students
- 151
Campus mobility · 2024–25
- Mobile students
- 126
- Students in TEA mobility denominator
- 743
- TEA-published mobility rate
- 17%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 598 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 82 (12.1%) from 2024–25.
- Latest enrollment
- 598
2025–26
- Change from 2024–25
- −82
Decrease · −12.1%
- Change since 2021–22
- +77
Increase · +14.8%
| School year | Students enrolledSmith Int | Change from previous school year | Average enrollmentselected comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021–22 | 521 | First available year | 653.8 |
| 2022–23 | 602 | Increase of 81 (15.5%) | 660.4 |
| 2023–24 | 693 | Increase of 91 (15.1%) | 659.3 |
| 2024–25 | 680 | Decrease of 13 (1.9%) | 656.6 |
| 2025–26 | 598 | Decrease of 82 (12.1%) | 640.6 |
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
- Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
- 247
34.7% of cumulative year-end enrollment
- Disciplinary actions
- 692
97.33 per 100 students
- Cumulative year-end enrollment
- 711
2024–25
Share of students · 2024–25
- This school
- 34.7%
- Selected comparison
- 13.0%
Actions per 100 students · 2024–25
- This school
- 97.33
- Selected comparison
- 30.7
| School year | Cumulative enrollment | Studentsall discipline | Students% of enrollment | Actionsall discipline | Actionsper 100 students | Studentsselected comparison average % | Actionsselected comparison average per 100 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020–21 | 1,110 | 125 | 11.3% | 258 | 23.24 | 9.6% | 19.3 |
| 2021–22 | 615 | 158 | 25.7% | 403 | 65.53 | 12.9% | 30.3 |
| 2022–23 | 683 | 224 | 32.8% | 665 | 97.36 | 13.4% | 32.3 |
| 2023–24 | 806 | 298 | 37.0% | 882 | 109.43 | 13.3% | 32.3 |
| 2024–25 | 711 | 247 | 34.7% | 692 | 97.33 | 13.0% | 30.7 |
See 2024–25 discipline categories
| Category | Students | Students% of enrollment | Actions | Actionsper 100 students | Studentsselected comparison average % | Actionsselected comparison average per 100 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All discipline | 247 | 34.7% | 692 | 97.33 | 13.0% | 30.7 |
| In-school suspensions | 222 | 31.2% | 515 | 72.43 | 11.6% | 23.3 |
| Out-of-school suspensions | 104 | 14.6% | 165 | 23.21 | 7.3% | 10.9 |
| DAEP placements | 10 | 1.4% | 12 | 1.69 | 5.1% | 6.1 |
| Mandatory DAEP placements | Suppressed | — | Suppressed | — | — | — |
| Discretionary DAEP placements | Suppressed | — | Suppressed | — | — | — |
| JJAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Mandatory JJAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Discretionary JJAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Expulsions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Mandatory expulsions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Discretionary expulsions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
- Smith Int
- Parent district: Forney ISD
- Texas average
- Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
- This school
- $8,508
- Selected comparison
- $13,239
For 2025, TEA reported $8,508 per student for this campus, $19,790 per student for its parent district, Forney ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
| Year | Smith Int | Parent district: Forney ISD | Texas average | Selected comparison average | Reportingselected comparison |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | $5,982 | $9,960 | $13,054 | $8,014 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,874 rated schools reporting |
| 2019 | $6,046 | $12,041 | $13,108 | $8,185 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,891 rated schools reporting |
| 2020 | $5,814 | $13,290 | $14,058 | $8,725 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,911 rated schools reporting |
| 2021 | $5,971 | $20,660 | $14,797 | $9,213 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,924 rated schools reporting |
| 2022 | $7,718 | $21,445 | $15,708 | $10,483 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,947 rated schools reporting |
| 2023 | $8,158 | $28,149 | $16,792 | $11,198 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,969 rated schools reporting |
| 2024 | $9,362 | $32,204 | $18,125 | $12,401 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,996 rated schools reporting |
| 2025 | $8,508 | $19,790 | $18,972 | $13,239 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,011 rated schools reporting |
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
- Average salary
- $67,348+$870 vs similar economic context
- Teachers
- 50+6.3 vs similar economic context
- Students per staff member
- 12.1−1.8 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Smith Int
- Beginning 4%
- 1 to 5 years 41.5%
- 6 to 10 years 19.2%
- 11 to 20 years 23%
- 21 to 30 years 12.1%
Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,033 reporting for every category shown · 2,033 in full cohort
- Beginning 6.4%
- 1 to 5 years 26.8%
- 6 to 10 years 19%
- 11 to 20 years 27.7%
- 21 to 30 years 15.5%
- Over 30 years 3.9%
Selected comparison average For Region 10: Richardson · 1,157 reporting for every category shown · 1,157 in full cohort
- Beginning 6.9%
- 1 to 5 years 29%
- 6 to 10 years 20.1%
- 11 to 20 years 27.5%
- 21 to 30 years 13.7%
- Over 30 years 2.8%
Selected comparison average For Kaufman County · 62 reporting for every category shown · 62 in full cohort
- Beginning 8.2%
- 1 to 5 years 34%
- 6 to 10 years 18.6%
- 11 to 20 years 21.9%
- 21 to 30 years 14.8%
- Over 30 years 2.5%
Selected comparison average For similarly sized schools · 4,688 reporting for every category shown · 4,688 in full cohort
- Beginning 6.1%
- 1 to 5 years 26.4%
- 6 to 10 years 19.8%
- 11 to 20 years 29%
- 21 to 30 years 15.4%
- Over 30 years 3.1%
Statewide average 7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
- Beginning 6.2%
- 1 to 5 years 25.6%
- 6 to 10 years 19.2%
- 11 to 20 years 28.7%
- 21 to 30 years 15.9%
- Over 30 years 3.7%
Average students in a class
| Grade or subject | Average students per classSmith Int · 2024–25 | Average students per classselected comparison |
|---|---|---|
| Grade 5 | 19.9 | 19.9 |
| Grade 6 | 18 | 17.8 |
| Secondary English | 22.2 | 15.2 |
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 3 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Download the full dataset · this campus's district
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 129902109.