Districts, charter school systems & campuses · Source: Texas Education Agency
Selma ElemB83vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Traditional public school campus
Selma Elem
Bexar County · Region 20: San Antonio · 468 students
Current score
83/1002025-26
Score vs similar economic context
+1.7 ptsvs 81.3 average · 1,793 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
790 of 1,793tied with 63 others
Score vs region
+4.4 ptsvs 78.6 average · 650 rated schools in Region 20: San Antonio
Region 20: San Antonio placement
238 of 650tied with 14 others
Score vs county
+5.4 ptsvs 77.6 average · 401 rated schools in Bexar County
Bexar County placement
124 of 401tied with 10 others
Score vs similar-size group
+2.9 ptsvs 80.1 average · 4,575 similarly sized rated schools
Similar size placement
1,925 of 4,575tied with 136 others
Score vs state
+1.7 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
Texas placement
3,601 of 7,646tied with 244 others
B83
At a glance
The current score is above the 81.3 average for 1,793 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 78.6 average for 650 rated schools in Region 20: San Antonio.The current score is above the 77.6 average for 401 rated schools in Bexar County.The current score is above the 80.1 average for 4,575 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
Current strength
Closing the Gaps above the similar-context average
85+6.6 pts vs 78.4
85 is 6.6 points above
the 78.4 average among 1,703 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Selma Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 83 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.3 average for 1,793 rated schools serving a similar economic context. TEA has published 1 year of scores for this school, so there is no trend to read yet.
Ranks 790th of 1,793 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 63 others).
Selma Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 83 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 78.6 average for 650 rated schools in Region 20: San Antonio. TEA has published 1 year of scores for this school, so there is no trend to read yet.
Ranks 238th of 650 rated schools in Region 20: San Antonio (tied with 14 others).
Selma Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 83 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 77.6 average for 401 rated schools in Bexar County. TEA has published 1 year of scores for this school, so there is no trend to read yet.
Ranks 124th of 401 rated schools in Bexar County (tied with 10 others).
Selma Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 83 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.1 average for 4,575 similarly sized rated schools. TEA has published 1 year of scores for this school, so there is no trend to read yet.
Ranks 1,925th of 4,575 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 136 others).
Selma Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 83 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. TEA has published 1 year of scores for this school, so there is no trend to read yet.
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Student Achievement72 C−8.6 vs similar economic context · 1,725 reporting
School Progress82 B+0.7 vs similar economic context · 1,718 reporting
Closing the Gaps85 B+6.6 vs similar economic context · 1,703 reporting
Academic Growth82 B+7.0 vs similar economic context · 1,677 reporting
Relative Performance69 D−10.3 vs similar economic context · 1,718 reporting
Selma Elem
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,793 in cohort)
Domain scores
Domain
Score
Grade
Points to next grade
Student Achievement
72
C
8
School Progress
82
B
8
Closing the Gaps
85
B
5
Academic Growth
82
B
8
Relative Performance
69
D
1
Closest to moving up: Closing the Gaps, 5 points below A in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student
Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (82), so
Student Achievement (72) is published above but does not enter the overall
score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 82.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
All Subjects
Approaches grade level72%−4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,725 reporting
Meets grade level44%−7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,725 reporting
Masters grade level17%−5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,725 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
Approaches grade level78%−0 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,723 reporting
Meets grade level54%−2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,723 reporting
Masters grade level24%+1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,723 reporting
Math3 performance levels
Approaches grade level69%−5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,714 reporting
Meets grade level40%−5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,714 reporting
Masters grade level13%−5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,714 reporting
Science3 performance levels
Approaches grade level63%−15 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,584 reporting
Meets grade level28%−22 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,584 reporting
Masters grade level12%−11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,584 reporting
Approaches grade level
Meets grade level
Masters grade level
Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,793 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
468
Economically disadvantaged
54.2%−0.4 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
25.6%+11.6 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
18.7%−0.1 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
—
Chronically absent
—
Student demographics
Selma Elem
African American 10.5%
Hispanic 65.2%
White 16.8%
Asian 1.1%
Pacific Islander 0.9%
Two or More Races 5.6%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,793 reporting for every category shown · 1,793 in full cohort
African American 9.9%
Hispanic 43.5%
White 39.4%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 2.7%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 4.1%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 20: San Antonio · 650 reporting for every category shown · 650 in full cohort
African American 5.2%
Hispanic 70.7%
White 19.2%
American Indian 0.2%
Asian 1.7%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 2.9%
Selected comparison averageFor Bexar County · 401 reporting for every category shown · 401 in full cohort
African American 7%
Hispanic 75.9%
White 11.5%
American Indian 0.2%
Asian 2.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 4,575 reporting for every category shown · 4,575 in full cohort
African American 12%
Hispanic 55.1%
White 25.3%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 3.8%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
African American 11.5%
Hispanic 52.6%
White 27.8%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
465
Economically disadvantaged students
252
Emergent bilingual students
119
Special education students
87
TEA context labels
New campus compared with last year’s fall enrollment
Campus mobility · 2024–25
Mobile students
Not reported
Students in TEA mobility denominator
Not reported
TEA-published mobility rate
Not reported
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Teachers
Average salary
$65,819−$740 vs similar economic context
Teachers
36−6.1 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
13−6.5 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Selma Elem
1 to 5 years 35%
6 to 10 years 10.9%
11 to 20 years 43.4%
21 to 30 years 5%
Over 30 years 5.6%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,793 reporting for every category shown · 1,793 in full cohort
Beginning 5.8%
1 to 5 years 24.8%
6 to 10 years 19.2%
11 to 20 years 28.9%
21 to 30 years 16.4%
Over 30 years 4.4%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 20: San Antonio · 650 reporting for every category shown · 650 in full cohort
Beginning 4.5%
1 to 5 years 23.5%
6 to 10 years 19.8%
11 to 20 years 31.3%
21 to 30 years 17%
Over 30 years 2.8%
Selected comparison averageFor Bexar County · 401 reporting for every category shown · 401 in full cohort
Beginning 4.9%
1 to 5 years 24.1%
6 to 10 years 20.5%
11 to 20 years 30.8%
21 to 30 years 15.9%
Over 30 years 2.7%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 4,575 reporting for every category shown · 4,575 in full cohort
Beginning 6.1%
1 to 5 years 26.1%
6 to 10 years 19.4%
11 to 20 years 28.9%
21 to 30 years 16%
Over 30 years 3.3%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 25.6%
6 to 10 years 19.2%
11 to 20 years 28.7%
21 to 30 years 15.9%
Over 30 years 3.7%
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 015916125.