Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

Secondary DAEP

Victoria County · Region 03: Victoria · 81 students

Not Rated

At a glance

TEA did not issue an overall rating for Secondary DAEP for 2025-26. Everything TEA did publish for this school is below.

Read the full rating context and placement

TEA did not issue an overall rating for Secondary DAEP for 2025-26. Everything TEA did publish for this school is below.

TEA did not issue an overall rating for this school. Scores below are the figures TEA published; the letter grades are the state's where it issued them.

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 5 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. Who this school serves
  6. Student counts behind the percentages
  7. Enrollment over time
  8. Discipline and removal from class
  9. Spending per student
  10. Teachers and actual class size
  11. Where this comes from

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
90807060 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas average 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26Not Rated—78.0 2,111 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25Not Rated—77.6 2,100 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting
2023-24Not Rated—75.2 2,086 reporting78.9 7,466 reporting
2022-23Not Rated—75.6 2,067 reporting79.1 7,377 reporting
2021-22Not Rated—81.6 2,047 reporting83.7 7,283 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement—Not reported · similar economic context 73.1 · 1,952 reporting
  • School Progress—Not reported · similar economic context 79.2 · 1,947 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps—Not reported · similar economic context 75.2 · 1,933 reporting
  • Academic Growth—Not reported · similar economic context 72.4 · 1,899 reporting
  • Relative Performance—Not reported · similar economic context 77.6 · 1,947 reporting
  • Secondary DAEP
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,111 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement—Not rated—
School Progress—Not rated—
Closing the Gaps—Not rated—
Academic Growth—Not rated—
Relative Performance—Not rated—

The scores above are the ones TEA published. TEA did not issue letter grades for this school, so none are shown: the A–F thresholds marked on the chart are the state's, but applying them here would produce a grade the state chose to withhold.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level—Not reported · Similar economic-disadvantage rate 69.2% · 1,952 reporting
  • Meets grade level—Not reported · Similar economic-disadvantage rate 43% · 1,952 reporting
  • Masters grade level—Not reported · Similar economic-disadvantage rate 17% · 1,952 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level—Not reported · Similar economic-disadvantage rate 67% · 1,942 reporting
  • Meets grade level—Not reported · Similar economic-disadvantage rate 38.7% · 1,942 reporting
  • Masters grade level—Not reported · Similar economic-disadvantage rate 14.5% · 1,942 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,111 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
81
Economically disadvantaged
77.8%−0.4 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
8.6%−18.1 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
21.0%+2.3 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
81.3%−12.2 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
51.3%+31.4 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Secondary DAEP

African American: 4.9%Hispanic: 71.6%White: 19.8%Two or More Races: 3.7%
  • African American 4.9%
  • Hispanic 71.6%
  • White 19.8%
  • Two or More Races 3.7%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,111 reporting for every category shown · 2,111 in full cohort

African American: 13.8%Hispanic: 65.1%White: 15.9%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 1.8%Pacific Islander: 0.2%Two or More Races: 2.8%
  • African American 13.8%
  • Hispanic 65.1%
  • White 15.9%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 1.8%
  • Pacific Islander 0.2%
  • Two or More Races 2.8%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
81
Economically disadvantaged students
63
Emergent bilingual students
7
Special education students
17

TEA context labels

  • Disciplinary Alternative Education Program (DAEP)

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
654
Students in TEA mobility denominator
654
TEA-published mobility rate
100%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 81 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 17 (17.3%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
81

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
−17

Decrease · −17.3%

Change since 2021–22
+49

Increase · +153.1%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
81
Selected comparison
635.6

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,084 rated schools reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Secondary DAEP
School yearStudents enrolledSecondary DAEPChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22 32 First available year 657.4
2022–23 84 Increase of 52 (162.5%) 660.9
2023–24 102 Increase of 18 (21.4%) 656.4
2024–25 98 Decrease of 4 (3.9%) 654.3
2025–26 81 Decrease of 17 (17.3%) 635.6

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
135

Rate not available

Disciplinary actions
212

Rate not available

Cumulative year-end enrollment
Not reported

2024–25

TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Secondary DAEP
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 Not reported 41 — 71 — — —
2021–22 Not reported 70 — 168 — — —
2022–23 Not reported 67 — 117 — — —
2023–24 Not reported 68 — 93 — — —
2024–25 Not reported 135 — 212 — — —
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Secondary DAEP in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline 135 — 212 — — —
In-school suspensions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Out-of-school suspensions 72 — 132 — — —
DAEP placements 77 — 80 — — —
Mandatory DAEP placements 53 — 55 — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements 24 — 25 — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$7k$45k$83k20182020202220242025
  • Secondary DAEP
  • Parent district: Victoria ISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$9,509
Selected comparison
$13,036

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,099 rated schools reporting

−$3,527 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $9,509 per student for this campus, $13,822 per student for its parent district, Victoria ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearSecondary DAEPParent district: Victoria ISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2018$20,130$10,244$13,054$8,073 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,980 rated schools reporting
2019$19,807$10,062$13,108$8,222 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,000 rated schools reporting
2020$20,200$10,107$14,058$8,730 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,018 rated schools reporting
2021$78,903$11,099$14,797$9,348 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,030 rated schools reporting
2022$26,923$12,925$15,708$10,726 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,048 rated schools reporting
2023$10,845$13,490$16,792$11,267 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,067 rated schools reporting
2024$8,994$15,440$18,125$12,285 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,086 rated schools reporting
2025$9,509$13,822$18,972$13,036 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,099 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$61,389−$5,418 vs similar economic context
Teachers
12−31.7 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
6.9−7.1 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Secondary DAEP

Beginning: 6%1 to 5 years: 23.1%6 to 10 years: 13.7%11 to 20 years: 29.9%21 to 30 years: 9.4%Over 30 years: 17.1%
  • Beginning 6%
  • 1 to 5 years 23.1%
  • 6 to 10 years 13.7%
  • 11 to 20 years 29.9%
  • 21 to 30 years 9.4%
  • Over 30 years 17.1%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,111 reporting for every category shown · 2,111 in full cohort

Beginning: 6.9%1 to 5 years: 27.6%6 to 10 years: 18.9%11 to 20 years: 27.1%21 to 30 years: 15.1%Over 30 years: 3.7%
  • Beginning 6.9%
  • 1 to 5 years 27.6%
  • 6 to 10 years 18.9%
  • 11 to 20 years 27.1%
  • 21 to 30 years 15.1%
  • Over 30 years 3.7%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for Secondary DAEP in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classSecondary DAEP · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Grade 68.717.9
Secondary English5.115.4
Secondary languages other than English12.518.3
Secondary math5.716.5
Secondary science12.517.9
Secondary social studies1617.9

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 6 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 235902004.