+19.1 ptsvs 77.9 average · 2,110 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
19 of 2,110tied with 11 others
Score vs region
+14.8 ptsvs 82.2 average · 1,157 rated schools in Region 10: Richardson
Region 10: Richardson placement
20 of 1,157tied with 6 others
Score vs county
+15.6 ptsvs 81.4 average · 563 rated schools in Dallas County
Dallas County placement
17 of 563tied with 4 others
Score vs similar-size group
+16.8 ptsvs 80.2 average · 3,692 similarly sized rated schools
Similar size placement
53 of 3,692tied with 37 others
Score vs state
+15.7 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
Texas placement
82 of 7,646tied with 63 others
A97
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is flat; under the rules in force back then it scored 96 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 77.9 average for 2,110 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 82.2 average for 1,157 rated schools in Region 10: Richardson.The current score is above the 81.4 average for 563 rated schools in Dallas County.The current score is above the 80.2 average for 3,692 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
STAAR result
Math above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters
Meets
95%vs 38.6% avg · +56.4 pts
Masters
65%vs 14.5% avg · +50.5 pts
Among 1,942 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
1st of 1,942 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
2nd of 1,942 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
School for the Talented & Gifted In Pleasant Grove is rated A by TEA, scoring 97 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 77.9 average for 2,110 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is unchanged since 2021-22.
Ranks 19th of 2,110 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 11 others).
School for the Talented & Gifted In Pleasant Grove is rated A by TEA, scoring 97 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 82.2 average for 1,157 rated schools in Region 10: Richardson. It is unchanged since 2021-22.
Ranks 20th of 1,157 rated schools in Region 10: Richardson (tied with 6 others).
School for the Talented & Gifted In Pleasant Grove is rated A by TEA, scoring 97 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.4 average for 563 rated schools in Dallas County. It is unchanged since 2021-22.
Ranks 17th of 563 rated schools in Dallas County (tied with 4 others).
School for the Talented & Gifted In Pleasant Grove is rated A by TEA, scoring 97 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.2 average for 3,692 similarly sized rated schools. It is unchanged since 2021-22.
Ranks 53rd of 3,692 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 37 others).
School for the Talented & Gifted In Pleasant Grove is rated A by TEA, scoring 97 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is unchanged since 2021-22.
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 96 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Student Achievement97 A+24.0 vs similar economic context · 1,952 reporting
School Progress97 A+17.9 vs similar economic context · 1,947 reporting
Closing the Gaps97 A+21.9 vs similar economic context · 1,933 reporting
Academic Growth94 A+21.6 vs similar economic context · 1,899 reporting
Relative Performance97 A+19.5 vs similar economic context · 1,947 reporting
School for the Talented & Gifted In Pleasant Grove
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,110 in cohort)
Domain scores
Domain
Score
Grade
Points to next grade
Student Achievement
97
A
—
School Progress
97
A
—
Closing the Gaps
97
A
—
Academic Growth
94
A
—
Relative Performance
97
A
—
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student
Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
All Subjects
Approaches grade level99%+30 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,952 reporting
Meets grade level93%+50 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,952 reporting
Masters grade level69%+52 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,952 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
Approaches grade level100%+28 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,950 reporting
Meets grade level97%+49 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,950 reporting
Masters grade level83%+64 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,950 reporting
Math3 performance levels
Approaches grade level99%+32 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,942 reporting
Meets grade level95%+56 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,942 reporting
Masters grade level65%+51 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,942 reporting
Science3 performance levels
Approaches grade level99%+31 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,802 reporting
Meets grade level85%+46 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,802 reporting
Masters grade level57%+41 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,802 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
Approaches grade level95%+27 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 812 reporting
Meets grade level78%+39 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 812 reporting
Masters grade level46%+29 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 812 reporting
Approaches grade level
Meets grade level
Masters grade level
Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,110 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
372
Economically disadvantaged
78.0%−0.4 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
38.7%+11.8 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
1.3%−17.4 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
97.5%+4.0 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
1.8%−18.2 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
School for the Talented & Gifted In Pleasant Grove
African American 0.8%
Hispanic 97.3%
White 1.3%
American Indian 0.5%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,110 reporting for every category shown · 2,110 in full cohort
African American 13.9%
Hispanic 65.3%
White 15.8%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 1.8%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 2.8%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 10: Richardson · 1,157 reporting for every category shown · 1,157 in full cohort
African American 17.4%
Hispanic 43.5%
White 24.5%
American Indian 0.6%
Asian 9.9%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 4%
Selected comparison averageFor Dallas County · 563 reporting for every category shown · 563 in full cohort
African American 21.3%
Hispanic 59%
White 10.9%
American Indian 0.6%
Asian 5.4%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 2.6%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 3,692 reporting for every category shown · 3,692 in full cohort
African American 11.5%
Hispanic 54.6%
White 27.3%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 2.9%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.3%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
African American 11.5%
Hispanic 52.6%
White 27.8%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
372
Economically disadvantaged students
290
Emergent bilingual students
144
Special education students
5
Campus mobility · 2024–25
Mobile students
10
Students in TEA mobility denominator
388
TEA-published mobility rate
2.6%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 372 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 13 (3.4%) from 2024–25.
Latest enrollment
372
2025–26
Change from 2024–25
−13
Decrease · −3.4%
Change since 2021–22
−13
Decrease · −3.4%
Enrollment in 2025–26
This school
372
Selected comparison
636.5
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,083 rated schools reporting
Student enrollment by school year for School for the Talented & Gifted In Pleasant Grove
School year
Students enrolledSchool for the Talented & Gifted In Pleasant Grove
Change from previous school year
Average enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22
385
First available year
658.2
2022–23
383
Decrease of 2 (0.5%)
662.2
2023–24
382
Decrease of 1 (0.3%)
657.4
2024–25
385
Increase of 3 (0.8%)
655.1
2025–26
372
Decrease of 13 (3.4%)
636.5
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
Not reported
Rate not available
Disciplinary actions
Not reported
Rate not available
Cumulative year-end enrollment
381
2024–25
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for School for the Talented & Gifted In Pleasant Grove
School year
Cumulative enrollment
Studentsall discipline
Students% of enrollment
Actionsall discipline
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21
387
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
2021–22
386
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
2022–23
381
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
2023–24
376
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
2024–25
381
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for School for the Talented & Gifted In Pleasant Grove in 2024–25
Category
Students
Students% of enrollment
Actions
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
In-school suspensions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Out-of-school suspensions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
School for the Talented & Gifted In Pleasant Grove
Parent district: Dallas ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
This school
$11,508
Selected comparison
$13,041
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,098 rated schools reporting
−$1,533 vs similar economic context
For 2025, TEA reported $11,508 per student for this campus, $23,271 per student for its parent district, Dallas ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
Year
School for the Talented & Gifted In Pleasant Grove
Parent district: Dallas ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison average
Reportingselected comparison
2019
$9,799
$13,990
$13,108
$8,225
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,002 rated schools reporting
2020
$8,770
$14,981
$14,058
$8,734
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,019 rated schools reporting
2021
$8,265
$17,075
$14,797
$9,352
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,031 rated schools reporting
2022
$24,860
$18,716
$15,708
$10,728
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,049 rated schools reporting
2023
$20,118
$20,932
$16,792
$11,267
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,066 rated schools reporting
2024
$11,450
$22,990
$18,125
$12,288
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,085 rated schools reporting
2025
$11,508
$23,271
$18,972
$13,041
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,098 rated schools reporting
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
Average salary
$75,855+$9,047 vs similar economic context
Teachers
24−19.5 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
15.5+1.5 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
School for the Talented & Gifted In Pleasant Grove
Beginning 8.3%
1 to 5 years 33.3%
6 to 10 years 29.2%
11 to 20 years 20.8%
21 to 30 years 8.3%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,110 reporting for every category shown · 2,110 in full cohort
Beginning 6.9%
1 to 5 years 27.6%
6 to 10 years 18.9%
11 to 20 years 27.1%
21 to 30 years 15.1%
Over 30 years 3.7%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 10: Richardson · 1,157 reporting for every category shown · 1,157 in full cohort
Beginning 6.9%
1 to 5 years 29%
6 to 10 years 20.1%
11 to 20 years 27.5%
21 to 30 years 13.7%
Over 30 years 2.8%
Selected comparison averageFor Dallas County · 563 reporting for every category shown · 563 in full cohort
Beginning 7.5%
1 to 5 years 30.2%
6 to 10 years 21.2%
11 to 20 years 26.5%
21 to 30 years 11.9%
Over 30 years 2.7%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 3,692 reporting for every category shown · 3,692 in full cohort
Beginning 6.1%
1 to 5 years 25.5%
6 to 10 years 19%
11 to 20 years 28.9%
21 to 30 years 16.5%
Over 30 years 3.7%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 25.6%
6 to 10 years 19.2%
11 to 20 years 28.7%
21 to 30 years 15.9%
Over 30 years 3.7%
Average students in a class
TEA average class size by grade or subject for School for the Talented & Gifted In Pleasant Grove in 2024–25
Grade or subject
Average students per classSchool for the Talented & Gifted In Pleasant Grove · 2024–25
Average students per classselected comparison
Grade 4
13.1
19.1
Grade 5
23
20.1
Grade 6
21.5
17.9
Secondary English
20.8
15.4
Secondary languages other than English
21.9
18.3
Secondary math
21.9
16.5
Secondary science
20.8
17.8
Secondary social studies
23
17.9
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 8 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
Out of 120 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
#1 rankings
First-place results
3 measures
1of 7,254
Reading — Approaches
Texas average · of the 7,254 that report this measure · tied with 32
1of 1,950
Reading — Masters
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,950 that report this measure
1of 1,942
Math — Meets
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,942 that report this measure
#2–3 rankings
Second- and third-place results
3 measures
2of 1,952
All Subjects — Masters
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,952 that report this measure
2of 1,942
Math — Masters
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,942 that report this measure
2of 552
Attendance
Dallas County · of the 552 that report this measure · tied with 1
#4–10 rankings
Fourth- through tenth-place results
6 measures
4of 1,952
All Subjects — Approaches
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,952 that report this measure · tied with 9
4of 1,952
All Subjects — Meets
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,952 that report this measure
4of 1,950
Reading — Meets
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,950 that report this measure · tied with 2
6of 1,942
Math — Approaches
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,942 that report this measure · tied with 5
6of 552
Chronically absent (lowest is best)
Dallas County · of the 552 that report this measure · tied with 2
7of 1,899
Academic Growth
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,899 that report this measure · tied with 4
Other top-5% rankings
High placements in larger reporting groups
10 measures
12of 1,106
Relative Performance
Region 10: Richardson · of the 1,106 that report this measure · tied with 5
13of 1,106
School Progress
Region 10: Richardson · of the 1,106 that report this measure · tied with 5
15of 1,952
Student Achievement
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,952 that report this measure · tied with 7
16of 549
Closing the Gaps
Dallas County · of the 549 that report this measure · tied with 6
17of 563
Overall score
Dallas County · of the 563 that report this measure · tied with 4
17of 540
Science — Approaches
Dallas County · of the 540 that report this measure · tied with 5
21of 1,802
Science — Masters
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,802 that report this measure · tied with 1
24of 540
Science — Meets
Dallas County · of the 540 that report this measure · tied with 2
29of 812
Social Studies — Masters
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 812 that report this measure
37of 812
Social Studies — Meets
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 812 that report this measure · tied with 2
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above
this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears
once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any
tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones
no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 057905363.