+2.3 ptsvs 87.7 average · 976 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
421 of 976tied with 75 others
Score vs region
+7.8 ptsvs 82.2 average · 1,157 rated schools in Region 10: Richardson
Region 10: Richardson placement
280 of 1,157tied with 56 others
Score vs county
+3.6 ptsvs 86.4 average · 307 rated schools in Collin County
Collin County placement
127 of 307tied with 22 others
Score vs similar-size group
+8.4 ptsvs 81.6 average · 2,636 similarly sized rated schools
Similar size placement
576 of 2,636tied with 128 others
Score vs state
+8.7 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
Texas placement
1,571 of 7,646tied with 341 others
A90
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 96 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 87.7 average for 976 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 82.2 average for 1,157 rated schools in Region 10: Richardson.The current score is above the 86.4 average for 307 rated schools in Collin County.The current score is above the 81.6 average for 2,636 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
STAAR result
All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters
Meets
69%vs 65.1% avg · +3.9 pts
Masters
45%vs 33.1% avg · +11.9 pts
Among 956 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Schimelpfenig MS is rated A by TEA, scoring 90 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 87.7 average for 976 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is down 4 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 421st of 976 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 75 others).
Schimelpfenig MS is rated A by TEA, scoring 90 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 82.2 average for 1,157 rated schools in Region 10: Richardson. It is down 4 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 280th of 1,157 rated schools in Region 10: Richardson (tied with 56 others).
Schimelpfenig MS is rated A by TEA, scoring 90 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 86.4 average for 307 rated schools in Collin County. It is down 4 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 127th of 307 rated schools in Collin County (tied with 22 others).
Schimelpfenig MS is rated A by TEA, scoring 90 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.6 average for 2,636 similarly sized rated schools. It is down 4 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 576th of 2,636 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 128 others).
Schimelpfenig MS is rated A by TEA, scoring 90 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is down 4 points since 2021-22.
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 96 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Student Achievement92 A+3.5 vs similar economic context · 956 reporting
School Progress87 B+2.5 vs similar economic context · 953 reporting
Closing the Gaps85 B−0.3 vs similar economic context · 946 reporting
Academic Growth85 B+4.3 vs similar economic context · 935 reporting
Relative Performance87 B+6.9 vs similar economic context · 953 reporting
Schimelpfenig MS
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (976 in cohort)
Domain scores
Domain
Score
Grade
Points to next grade
Student Achievement
92
A
—
School Progress
87
B
3
Closing the Gaps
85
B
5
Academic Growth
85
B
5
Relative Performance
87
B
3
Closest to moving up: Closing the Gaps, 5 points below A in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student
Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is Student Achievement (92), so
School Progress (87) is published above but does not enter the overall
score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 92.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
All Subjects
Approaches grade level86%+1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 956 reporting
Meets grade level69%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 956 reporting
Masters grade level45%+12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 956 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
Approaches grade level90%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 955 reporting
Meets grade level73%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 955 reporting
Masters grade level50%+16 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 955 reporting
Math3 performance levels
Approaches grade level83%−0 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 952 reporting
Meets grade level68%+9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 952 reporting
Masters grade level40%+12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 952 reporting
Science3 performance levels
Approaches grade level87%+1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 869 reporting
Meets grade level74%+10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 869 reporting
Masters grade level46%+10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 869 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
Approaches grade level79%−6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 488 reporting
Meets grade level59%−3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 488 reporting
Masters grade level40%+5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 488 reporting
Approaches grade level
Meets grade level
Masters grade level
Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (976 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
1,000
Economically disadvantaged
28.9%−0.9 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
11.1%+1.0 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
18.5%+1.3 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
95.5%+0.2 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
11.3%+0.9 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Schimelpfenig MS
African American 9.9%
Hispanic 22.5%
White 39.4%
American Indian 0.6%
Asian 22.1%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 5.2%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 976 reporting for every category shown · 976 in full cohort
African American 8.9%
Hispanic 29.3%
White 48.3%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 8.1%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 4.9%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 10: Richardson · 1,157 reporting for every category shown · 1,157 in full cohort
African American 17.4%
Hispanic 43.5%
White 24.5%
American Indian 0.6%
Asian 9.9%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 4%
Selected comparison averageFor Collin County · 307 reporting for every category shown · 307 in full cohort
African American 13.7%
Hispanic 22.2%
White 31.3%
American Indian 0.6%
Asian 26.3%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 5.8%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 2,636 reporting for every category shown · 2,636 in full cohort
African American 12.6%
Hispanic 52%
White 24.5%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 6.7%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 3.7%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
African American 11.5%
Hispanic 52.6%
White 27.8%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
999
Economically disadvantaged students
289
Emergent bilingual students
111
Special education students
185
Campus mobility · 2024–25
Mobile students
60
Students in TEA mobility denominator
865
TEA-published mobility rate
6.9%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 1,000 students in 2025–26, an increase of 174 (21.1%) from 2024–25.
Latest enrollment
1,000
2025–26
Change from 2024–25
+174
Increase · +21.1%
Change since 2021–22
+200
Increase · +25.0%
Enrollment in 2025–26
This school
1,000
Selected comparison
800.8
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 966 rated schools reporting
Student enrollment by school year for Schimelpfenig MS
School year
Students enrolledSchimelpfenig MS
Change from previous school year
Average enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22
800
First available year
816.2
2022–23
828
Increase of 28 (3.5%)
819.5
2023–24
819
Decrease of 9 (1.1%)
813.8
2024–25
826
Increase of 7 (0.9%)
810.3
2025–26
1,000
Increase of 174 (21.1%)
800.8
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
85
9.9% of cumulative year-end enrollment
Disciplinary actions
169
19.72 per 100 students
Cumulative year-end enrollment
857
2024–25
Share of students · 2024–25
This school
9.9%
Selected comparison
8.6%
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 727 rated schools reporting
+1.3 pts vs similar economic context
Actions per 100 students · 2024–25
This school
19.72
Selected comparison
17.4
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 810 rated schools reporting
+2.3 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Schimelpfenig MS
School year
Cumulative enrollment
Studentsall discipline
Students% of enrollment
Actionsall discipline
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21
911
26
2.9%
36
3.95
7.0%
12.6
2021–22
827
84
10.2%
159
19.23
9.2%
18.7
2022–23
864
84
9.7%
176
20.37
9.5%
19.4
2023–24
847
82
9.7%
159
18.77
8.9%
18.6
2024–25
857
85
9.9%
169
19.72
8.6%
17.4
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Schimelpfenig MS in 2024–25
Category
Students
Students% of enrollment
Actions
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline
85
9.9%
169
19.72
8.6%
17.4
In-school suspensions
84
9.8%
154
17.97
7.7%
13.6
Out-of-school suspensions
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
DAEP placements
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Mandatory DAEP placements
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Discretionary DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
Schimelpfenig MS
Parent district: Plano ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
This school
$8,810
Selected comparison
$11,637
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 961 rated schools reporting
−$2,827 vs similar economic context
For 2025, TEA reported $8,810 per student for this campus, $21,349 per student for its parent district, Plano ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
Year
Schimelpfenig MS
Parent district: Plano ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison average
Reportingselected comparison
2018
$7,329
$14,443
$13,054
$7,645
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 866 rated schools reporting
2019
$6,989
$15,018
$13,108
$7,753
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 879 rated schools reporting
2020
$6,829
$14,436
$14,058
$8,091
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 889 rated schools reporting
2021
$6,845
$14,483
$14,797
$8,508
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 898 rated schools reporting
2022
$7,737
$15,185
$15,708
$9,753
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 916 rated schools reporting
2023
$7,648
$15,274
$16,792
$10,317
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 933 rated schools reporting
2024
$8,037
$17,470
$18,125
$11,400
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 949 rated schools reporting
2025
$8,810
$21,349
$18,972
$11,637
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 961 rated schools reporting
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
Average salary
$71,423+$3,133 vs similar economic context
Teachers
63+11.0 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
15.8+1.3 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Schimelpfenig MS
Beginning 4.1%
1 to 5 years 31.9%
6 to 10 years 17.9%
11 to 20 years 32.4%
21 to 30 years 11.7%
Over 30 years 2.4%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 976 reporting for every category shown · 976 in full cohort
Beginning 4.8%
1 to 5 years 22.4%
6 to 10 years 19.6%
11 to 20 years 32.4%
21 to 30 years 17.3%
Over 30 years 3.2%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 10: Richardson · 1,157 reporting for every category shown · 1,157 in full cohort
Beginning 6.9%
1 to 5 years 29%
6 to 10 years 20.1%
11 to 20 years 27.5%
21 to 30 years 13.7%
Over 30 years 2.8%
Selected comparison averageFor Collin County · 307 reporting for every category shown · 307 in full cohort
Beginning 6.1%
1 to 5 years 29.2%
6 to 10 years 19.7%
11 to 20 years 28.4%
21 to 30 years 14.7%
Over 30 years 1.9%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 2,636 reporting for every category shown · 2,636 in full cohort
Beginning 6.3%
1 to 5 years 27%
6 to 10 years 20.4%
11 to 20 years 28.8%
21 to 30 years 14.6%
Over 30 years 2.7%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 25.6%
6 to 10 years 19.2%
11 to 20 years 28.7%
21 to 30 years 15.9%
Over 30 years 3.7%
Average students in a class
TEA average class size by grade or subject for Schimelpfenig MS in 2024–25
Grade or subject
Average students per classSchimelpfenig MS · 2024–25
Average students per classselected comparison
Grade 6
23.2
18.7
Secondary English
14.9
16.8
Secondary languages other than English
19.3
19.1
Secondary math
22.4
17.5
Secondary science
22.3
19
Secondary social studies
23.9
19.2
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 6 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 043910047.