Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

Schimelpfenig MS

Collin County · Region 10: Richardson · 1,000 students

Official school websiteSchool information and family resources

Current score
90/1002025-26
Change
−4 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
+2.3 ptsvs 87.7 average · 976 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
421 of 976tied with 75 others
A90

At a glance

Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 96 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 87.7 average for 976 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

STAAR result

All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
69%vs 65.1% avg · +3.9 pts
Masters
45%vs 33.1% avg · +11.9 pts

Among 956 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

STAAR result

Math above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
68%vs 59.2% avg · +8.8 pts
Masters
40%vs 28% avg · +12 pts

Among 952 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

STAAR result

Reading above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
73%vs 69.4% avg · +3.6 pts
Masters
50%vs 34.3% avg · +15.7 pts

Among 955 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Schimelpfenig MS is rated A by TEA, scoring 90 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 87.7 average for 976 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is down 4 points since 2021-22.

Ranks 421st of 976 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 75 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 5 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. Who this school serves
  6. Student counts behind the percentages
  7. Enrollment over time
  8. Discipline and removal from class
  9. Spending per student
  10. Teachers and actual class size
  11. Where this comes from

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
908070 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas averageSchimelpfenig MS 9494949390 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 96 that year.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26A9087.7 976 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25A9387.5 962 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting
2023-24A9486.2 950 reporting78.9 7,466 reporting
2022-23A9486.6 932 reporting79.1 7,377 reporting
2021-22A9487.7 917 reporting83.7 7,283 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement92 A+3.5 vs similar economic context · 956 reporting
  • School Progress87 B+2.5 vs similar economic context · 953 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps85 B−0.3 vs similar economic context · 946 reporting
  • Academic Growth85 B+4.3 vs similar economic context · 935 reporting
  • Relative Performance87 B+6.9 vs similar economic context · 953 reporting
  • Schimelpfenig MS
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (976 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement92A—
School Progress87B3
Closing the Gaps85B5
Academic Growth85B5
Relative Performance87B3

Closest to moving up: Closing the Gaps, 5 points below A in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is Student Achievement (92), so School Progress (87) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 92.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level86%+1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 956 reporting
  • Meets grade level69%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 956 reporting
  • Masters grade level45%+12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 956 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level90%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 955 reporting
  • Meets grade level73%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 955 reporting
  • Masters grade level50%+16 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 955 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level83%−0 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 952 reporting
  • Meets grade level68%+9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 952 reporting
  • Masters grade level40%+12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 952 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level87%+1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 869 reporting
  • Meets grade level74%+10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 869 reporting
  • Masters grade level46%+10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 869 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level79%−6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 488 reporting
  • Meets grade level59%−3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 488 reporting
  • Masters grade level40%+5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 488 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (976 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
1,000
Economically disadvantaged
28.9%−0.9 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
11.1%+1.0 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
18.5%+1.3 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
95.5%+0.2 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
11.3%+0.9 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Schimelpfenig MS

African American: 9.9%Hispanic: 22.5%White: 39.4%American Indian: 0.6%Asian: 22.1%Pacific Islander: 0.2%Two or More Races: 5.2%
  • African American 9.9%
  • Hispanic 22.5%
  • White 39.4%
  • American Indian 0.6%
  • Asian 22.1%
  • Pacific Islander 0.2%
  • Two or More Races 5.2%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 976 reporting for every category shown · 976 in full cohort

African American: 8.9%Hispanic: 29.3%White: 48.3%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 8.1%Pacific Islander: 0.1%Two or More Races: 4.9%
  • African American 8.9%
  • Hispanic 29.3%
  • White 48.3%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 8.1%
  • Pacific Islander 0.1%
  • Two or More Races 4.9%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
999
Economically disadvantaged students
289
Emergent bilingual students
111
Special education students
185

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
60
Students in TEA mobility denominator
865
TEA-published mobility rate
6.9%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 1,000 students in 2025–26, an increase of 174 (21.1%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
1,000

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
+174

Increase · +21.1%

Change since 2021–22
+200

Increase · +25.0%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
1,000
Selected comparison
800.8

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 966 rated schools reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Schimelpfenig MS
School yearStudents enrolledSchimelpfenig MSChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22 800 First available year 816.2
2022–23 828 Increase of 28 (3.5%) 819.5
2023–24 819 Decrease of 9 (1.1%) 813.8
2024–25 826 Increase of 7 (0.9%) 810.3
2025–26 1,000 Increase of 174 (21.1%) 800.8

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
85

9.9% of cumulative year-end enrollment

Disciplinary actions
169

19.72 per 100 students

Cumulative year-end enrollment
857

2024–25

Share of students · 2024–25

This school
9.9%
Selected comparison
8.6%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 727 rated schools reporting

+1.3 pts vs similar economic context

Actions per 100 students · 2024–25

This school
19.72
Selected comparison
17.4

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 810 rated schools reporting

+2.3 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Schimelpfenig MS
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 911 26 2.9% 36 3.95 7.0% 12.6
2021–22 827 84 10.2% 159 19.23 9.2% 18.7
2022–23 864 84 9.7% 176 20.37 9.5% 19.4
2023–24 847 82 9.7% 159 18.77 8.9% 18.6
2024–25 857 85 9.9% 169 19.72 8.6% 17.4
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Schimelpfenig MS in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline 85 9.9% 169 19.72 8.6% 17.4
In-school suspensions 84 9.8% 154 17.97 7.7% 13.6
Out-of-school suspensions Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Mandatory DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$6k$14k$22k20182020202220242025
  • Schimelpfenig MS
  • Parent district: Plano ISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$8,810
Selected comparison
$11,637

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 961 rated schools reporting

−$2,827 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $8,810 per student for this campus, $21,349 per student for its parent district, Plano ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearSchimelpfenig MSParent district: Plano ISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2018$7,329$14,443$13,054$7,645 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 866 rated schools reporting
2019$6,989$15,018$13,108$7,753 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 879 rated schools reporting
2020$6,829$14,436$14,058$8,091 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 889 rated schools reporting
2021$6,845$14,483$14,797$8,508 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 898 rated schools reporting
2022$7,737$15,185$15,708$9,753 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 916 rated schools reporting
2023$7,648$15,274$16,792$10,317 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 933 rated schools reporting
2024$8,037$17,470$18,125$11,400 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 949 rated schools reporting
2025$8,810$21,349$18,972$11,637 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 961 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$71,423+$3,133 vs similar economic context
Teachers
63+11.0 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
15.8+1.3 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Schimelpfenig MS

Beginning: 4.1%1 to 5 years: 31.9%6 to 10 years: 17.9%11 to 20 years: 32.4%21 to 30 years: 11.7%Over 30 years: 2.4%
  • Beginning 4.1%
  • 1 to 5 years 31.9%
  • 6 to 10 years 17.9%
  • 11 to 20 years 32.4%
  • 21 to 30 years 11.7%
  • Over 30 years 2.4%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 976 reporting for every category shown · 976 in full cohort

Beginning: 4.8%1 to 5 years: 22.4%6 to 10 years: 19.6%11 to 20 years: 32.4%21 to 30 years: 17.3%Over 30 years: 3.2%
  • Beginning 4.8%
  • 1 to 5 years 22.4%
  • 6 to 10 years 19.6%
  • 11 to 20 years 32.4%
  • 21 to 30 years 17.3%
  • Over 30 years 3.2%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for Schimelpfenig MS in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classSchimelpfenig MS · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Grade 623.218.7
Secondary English14.916.8
Secondary languages other than English19.319.1
Secondary math22.417.5
Secondary science22.319
Secondary social studies23.919.2

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 6 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 043910047.