Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

Sara Moss Elem

Rockwall County · Region 10: Richardson · 326 students

Current score
59/1002025-26
Score vs similar economic context
−22.6 ptsvs 81.6 average · 1,752 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
1,728 of 1,752tied with 12 others
F59

At a glance

The current score is below the 81.6 average for 1,752 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Read the full rating context and placement

Sara Moss Elem is rated F by TEA, scoring 59 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 81.6 average for 1,752 rated schools serving a similar economic context. TEA has published 1 year of scores for this school, so there is no trend to read yet.

Ranks 1,728th of 1,752 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 12 others).

1 consecutive year rated unacceptable.

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 1 year of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. Who this school serves
  6. Student counts behind the percentages
  7. Teachers
  8. Where this comes from

1 year of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
9080706050 59 2025-26

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26F5981.6 1,752 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement58 F−23.0 vs similar economic context · 1,691 reporting
  • School Progress54 F−27.4 vs similar economic context · 1,684 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps60 D−18.9 vs similar economic context · 1,669 reporting
  • Academic Growth54 F−21.3 vs similar economic context · 1,645 reporting
  • Relative Performance54 F−25.3 vs similar economic context · 1,684 reporting
  • Sara Moss Elem
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,752 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement58F2
School Progress54F6
Closing the Gaps60D10
Academic Growth54F6
Relative Performance54F6

Closest to moving up: Student Achievement, 2 points below D in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is Student Achievement (58), so School Progress (54) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 58.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level57%−20 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,691 reporting
  • Meets grade level32%−20 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,691 reporting
  • Masters grade level11%−11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,691 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level64%−15 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,689 reporting
  • Meets grade level41%−16 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,689 reporting
  • Masters grade level16%−8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,689 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level55%−19 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,681 reporting
  • Meets grade level31%−15 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,681 reporting
  • Masters grade level9%−9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,681 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level43%−35 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,553 reporting
  • Meets grade level13%−38 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,553 reporting
  • Masters grade level4%−20 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,553 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,752 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
326
Economically disadvantaged
52.5%−0.5 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
13.2%−0.5 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
28.8%+10.0 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
—
Chronically absent
—

Student demographics

Sara Moss Elem

African American: 40.8%Hispanic: 26.7%White: 27.3%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 1.5%Pacific Islander: 0.3%Two or More Races: 3.1%
  • African American 40.8%
  • Hispanic 26.7%
  • White 27.3%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 1.5%
  • Pacific Islander 0.3%
  • Two or More Races 3.1%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,752 reporting for every category shown · 1,752 in full cohort

African American: 9.8%Hispanic: 42.3%White: 40.4%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 2.9%Pacific Islander: 0.2%Two or More Races: 4.1%
  • African American 9.8%
  • Hispanic 42.3%
  • White 40.4%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 2.9%
  • Pacific Islander 0.2%
  • Two or More Races 4.1%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
326
Economically disadvantaged students
171
Emergent bilingual students
43
Special education students
94

TEA context labels

  • New campus compared with last year’s fall enrollment

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
Not reported
Students in TEA mobility denominator
Not reported
TEA-published mobility rate
Not reported

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Teachers

Average salary
$64,710−$1,937 vs similar economic context
Teachers
27−15.3 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
12.1−7.5 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Sara Moss Elem

Beginning: 11.2%1 to 5 years: 38.7%6 to 10 years: 11.2%11 to 20 years: 32%21 to 30 years: 7.4%
  • Beginning 11.2%
  • 1 to 5 years 38.7%
  • 6 to 10 years 11.2%
  • 11 to 20 years 32%
  • 21 to 30 years 7.4%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,752 reporting for every category shown · 1,752 in full cohort

Beginning: 5.8%1 to 5 years: 24.7%6 to 10 years: 19.3%11 to 20 years: 29%21 to 30 years: 16.6%Over 30 years: 4.3%
  • Beginning 5.8%
  • 1 to 5 years 24.7%
  • 6 to 10 years 19.3%
  • 11 to 20 years 29%
  • 21 to 30 years 16.6%
  • Over 30 years 4.3%

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 199902111.