Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

Rosemeade Elem

Dallas County · Region 10: Richardson · 384 students

Official school websiteSchool information and family resources

Current score
87/1002025-26
Change
−3 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
+1.1 ptsvs 85.9 average · 1,185 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
580 of 1,185tied with 73 others
B87

At a glance

Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 91 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 85.9 average for 1,185 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

STAAR result

All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
66%vs 61.4% avg · +4.6 pts
Masters
45%vs 29.6% avg · +15.4 pts

Among 1,158 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

STAAR result

Math above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
65%vs 55.3% avg · +9.7 pts
Masters
40%vs 24.7% avg · +15.3 pts

Among 1,154 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

STAAR result

Reading above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
74%vs 65.9% avg · +8.1 pts
Masters
57%vs 30.9% avg · +26.1 pts

Among 1,157 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Rosemeade Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 87 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 85.9 average for 1,185 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is down 3 points since 2021-22.

Ranks 580th of 1,185 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 73 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 5 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. Who this school serves
  6. Student counts behind the percentages
  7. Enrollment over time
  8. Discipline and removal from class
  9. Spending per student
  10. Teachers and actual class size
  11. Where this school ranks best
  12. Where this comes from

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
908070 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas averageRosemeade Elem 9091929187 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 91 that year.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26B8785.9 1,185 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25A9185.9 1,162 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting
2023-24A9284.4 1,146 reporting78.9 7,466 reporting
2022-23A9184.7 1,133 reporting79.1 7,377 reporting
2021-22A9086.4 1,116 reporting83.7 7,283 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement91 A+4.5 vs similar economic context · 1,158 reporting
  • School Progress85 B+1.6 vs similar economic context · 1,155 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps77 C−6.4 vs similar economic context · 1,146 reporting
  • Academic Growth71 C−8.1 vs similar economic context · 1,136 reporting
  • Relative Performance85 B+5.2 vs similar economic context · 1,155 reporting
  • Rosemeade Elem
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,185 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement91A—
School Progress85B5
Closing the Gaps77C3
Academic Growth71C9
Relative Performance85B5

Closest to moving up: Closing the Gaps, 3 points below B in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is Student Achievement (91), so School Progress (85) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 91.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level85%+2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,158 reporting
  • Meets grade level66%+5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,158 reporting
  • Masters grade level45%+15 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,158 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level88%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,157 reporting
  • Meets grade level74%+8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,157 reporting
  • Masters grade level57%+26 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,157 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level85%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,154 reporting
  • Meets grade level65%+10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,154 reporting
  • Masters grade level40%+15 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,154 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level76%−8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,066 reporting
  • Meets grade level48%−12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,066 reporting
  • Masters grade level28%−4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,066 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,185 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
384
Economically disadvantaged
34.9%−0.9 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
21.1%+10.5 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
30.2%+12.4 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
96.8%+1.7 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
3.0%−8.7 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Rosemeade Elem

African American: 8.1%Hispanic: 38.5%White: 28.1%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 15.9%Two or More Races: 9.1%
  • African American 8.1%
  • Hispanic 38.5%
  • White 28.1%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 15.9%
  • Two or More Races 9.1%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,185 reporting for every category shown · 1,185 in full cohort

African American: 9.1%Hispanic: 32.2%White: 47.5%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 5.9%Pacific Islander: 0.1%Two or More Races: 4.7%
  • African American 9.1%
  • Hispanic 32.2%
  • White 47.5%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 5.9%
  • Pacific Islander 0.1%
  • Two or More Races 4.7%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
384
Economically disadvantaged students
134
Emergent bilingual students
81
Special education students
116

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
17
Students in TEA mobility denominator
267
TEA-published mobility rate
6.4%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 384 students in 2025–26, an increase of 24 (6.7%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
384

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
+24

Increase · +6.7%

Change since 2021–22
−73

Decrease · −16.0%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
384
Selected comparison
761

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,161 rated schools reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Rosemeade Elem
School yearStudents enrolledRosemeade ElemChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22 457 First available year 771.2
2022–23 461 Increase of 4 (0.9%) 772.9
2023–24 392 Decrease of 69 (15.0%) 772.9
2024–25 360 Decrease of 32 (8.2%) 768.3
2025–26 384 Increase of 24 (6.7%) 761

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
Suppressed

Rate not available

Disciplinary actions
Suppressed

Rate not available

Cumulative year-end enrollment
385

2024–25

TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Rosemeade Elem
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 441 Not reported — Not reported — — —
2021–22 489 Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
2022–23 485 Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
2023–24 415 Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
2024–25 385 Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Rosemeade Elem in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
In-school suspensions Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Out-of-school suspensions Not reported — Not reported — — —
DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$7k$17k$27k20182020202220242025
  • Rosemeade Elem
  • Parent district: Carrollton-Farmers Branch ISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$25,626
Selected comparison
$11,923

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,162 rated schools reporting

+$13,703 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $25,626 per student for this campus, $21,031 per student for its parent district, Carrollton-Farmers Branch ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearRosemeade ElemParent district: Carrollton-Farmers Branch ISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2018$7,312$11,879$13,054$7,671 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,058 rated schools reporting
2019$8,387$14,148$13,108$7,806 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,074 rated schools reporting
2020$9,458$14,789$14,058$8,134 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,082 rated schools reporting
2021$9,091$17,995$14,797$8,593 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,096 rated schools reporting
2022$9,898$20,893$15,708$9,810 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,115 rated schools reporting
2023$10,345$18,021$16,792$10,407 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,134 rated schools reporting
2024$12,363$17,883$18,125$11,538 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,146 rated schools reporting
2025$25,626$21,031$18,972$11,923 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,162 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$71,126+$3,252 vs similar economic context
Teachers
27−22.9 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
14.2−0.1 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Rosemeade Elem

Beginning: 3.7%1 to 5 years: 29.6%6 to 10 years: 18.5%11 to 20 years: 11.1%21 to 30 years: 33.3%Over 30 years: 3.7%
  • Beginning 3.7%
  • 1 to 5 years 29.6%
  • 6 to 10 years 18.5%
  • 11 to 20 years 11.1%
  • 21 to 30 years 33.3%
  • Over 30 years 3.7%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,185 reporting for every category shown · 1,185 in full cohort

Beginning: 5.1%1 to 5 years: 22.9%6 to 10 years: 19.6%11 to 20 years: 31.6%21 to 30 years: 17.3%Over 30 years: 3.4%
  • Beginning 5.1%
  • 1 to 5 years 22.9%
  • 6 to 10 years 19.6%
  • 11 to 20 years 31.6%
  • 21 to 30 years 17.3%
  • Over 30 years 3.4%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for Rosemeade Elem in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classRosemeade Elem · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten1718.5
Grade 11519
Grade 217.819.3
Grade 316.220
Grade 419.619.7
Grade 521.621.2

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 6 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this school ranks best

Out of 105 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.

Other top-5% rankings

High placements in larger reporting groups

5 measures

  • 20of 1,107

    Attendance

    Region 10: Richardson · of the 1,107 that report this measure · tied with 19

  • 20of 552

    Chronically absent (lowest is best)

    Dallas County · of the 552 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 32of 1,157

    Reading — Masters

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,157 that report this measure · tied with 6

  • 44of 1,162

    Per-student spending

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,162 that report this measure

  • 158of 3,559

    All Subjects — Masters

    Similar size · of the 3,559 that report this measure · tied with 22

These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 057903118.