Districts, charter school systems & campuses · Source: Texas Education Agency
Roberts ElemB88vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Traditional public school campus
Roberts Elem
Lubbock County · Region 17: Lubbock · 535 students
Current score
88/1002025-26
Change
−4 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
+10.1 ptsvs 77.9 average · 2,106 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
333 of 2,106tied with 45 others
Score vs region
+6.5 ptsvs 81.5 average · 182 rated schools in Region 17: Lubbock
Region 17: Lubbock placement
58 of 182tied with 6 others
Score vs county
+6.7 ptsvs 81.3 average · 84 rated schools in Lubbock County
Lubbock County placement
22 of 84tied with 3 others
Score vs similar-size group
+7.8 ptsvs 80.2 average · 4,764 similarly sized rated schools
Similar size placement
1,201 of 4,764tied with 138 others
Score vs state
+6.7 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
Texas placement
2,199 of 7,646tied with 256 others
B88
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 93 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 77.9 average for 2,106 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 81.5 average for 182 rated schools in Region 17: Lubbock.The current score is above the 81.3 average for 84 rated schools in Lubbock County.The current score is above the 80.2 average for 4,764 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
STAAR result
All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters
Meets
67%vs 42.9% avg · +24.1 pts
Masters
36%vs 16.9% avg · +19.1 pts
Among 1,946 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Roberts Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 88 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 77.9 average for 2,106 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is down 4 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 333rd of 2,106 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 45 others).
Roberts Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 88 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.5 average for 182 rated schools in Region 17: Lubbock. It is down 4 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 58th of 182 rated schools in Region 17: Lubbock (tied with 6 others).
Roberts Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 88 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.3 average for 84 rated schools in Lubbock County. It is down 4 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 22nd of 84 rated schools in Lubbock County (tied with 3 others).
Roberts Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 88 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.2 average for 4,764 similarly sized rated schools. It is down 4 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 1,201st of 4,764 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 138 others).
Roberts Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 88 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is down 4 points since 2021-22.
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 93 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Student Achievement91 A+18.0 vs similar economic context · 1,946 reporting
School Progress92 A+12.9 vs similar economic context · 1,941 reporting
Closing the Gaps78 C+2.9 vs similar economic context · 1,927 reporting
Academic Growth81 B+8.6 vs similar economic context · 1,894 reporting
Relative Performance92 A+14.5 vs similar economic context · 1,941 reporting
Roberts Elem
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,106 in cohort)
Domain scores
Domain
Score
Grade
Points to next grade
Student Achievement
91
A
—
School Progress
92
A
—
Closing the Gaps
78
C
2
Academic Growth
81
B
9
Relative Performance
92
A
—
Closest to moving up: Closing the Gaps, 2 points below B in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student
Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (92), so
Student Achievement (91) is published above but does not enter the overall
score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 92.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
All Subjects
Approaches grade level86%+17 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,946 reporting
Meets grade level67%+24 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,946 reporting
Masters grade level36%+19 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,946 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
Approaches grade level91%+19 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,944 reporting
Meets grade level77%+29 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,944 reporting
Masters grade level43%+24 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,944 reporting
Math3 performance levels
Approaches grade level85%+18 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,936 reporting
Meets grade level65%+26 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,936 reporting
Masters grade level35%+21 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,936 reporting
Science3 performance levels
Approaches grade level78%+10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,798 reporting
Meets grade level40%+2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,798 reporting
Masters grade level14%−2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,798 reporting
Approaches grade level
Meets grade level
Masters grade level
Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,106 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
535
Economically disadvantaged
78.1%−0.4 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
5.8%−21.3 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
18.5%−0.2 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
94.2%+0.7 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
18.6%−1.4 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Roberts Elem
African American 9.3%
Hispanic 70.1%
White 16.6%
American Indian 0.6%
Asian 0.4%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 2.8%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,106 reporting for every category shown · 2,106 in full cohort
African American 13.9%
Hispanic 65.4%
White 15.7%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 1.8%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 2.8%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 17: Lubbock · 182 reporting for every category shown · 182 in full cohort
African American 5%
Hispanic 61%
White 30.8%
American Indian 0.2%
Asian 1%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 1.9%
Selected comparison averageFor Lubbock County · 84 reporting for every category shown · 84 in full cohort
African American 8.8%
Hispanic 54.8%
White 31.4%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 1.8%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 2.7%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 4,764 reporting for every category shown · 4,764 in full cohort
African American 12.2%
Hispanic 54.9%
White 24.6%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.4%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.5%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
African American 11.5%
Hispanic 52.6%
White 27.8%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
535
Economically disadvantaged students
418
Emergent bilingual students
31
Special education students
99
Campus mobility · 2024–25
Mobile students
55
Students in TEA mobility denominator
420
TEA-published mobility rate
13.1%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 535 students in 2025–26, an increase of 9 (1.7%) from 2024–25.
Latest enrollment
535
2025–26
Change from 2024–25
+9
Increase · +1.7%
Change since 2021–22
+19
Increase · +3.7%
Enrollment in 2025–26
This school
535
Selected comparison
634.3
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,079 rated schools reporting
Student enrollment by school year for Roberts Elem
School year
Students enrolledRoberts Elem
Change from previous school year
Average enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22
516
First available year
656.4
2022–23
535
Increase of 19 (3.7%)
660.3
2023–24
513
Decrease of 22 (4.1%)
655.4
2024–25
526
Increase of 13 (2.5%)
652.7
2025–26
535
Increase of 9 (1.7%)
634.3
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
Suppressed
Rate not available
Disciplinary actions
11
2.01 per 100 students
Cumulative year-end enrollment
548
2024–25
Actions per 100 students · 2024–25
This school
2.01
Selected comparison
32.5
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,679 rated schools reporting
−30.5 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Roberts Elem
School year
Cumulative enrollment
Studentsall discipline
Students% of enrollment
Actionsall discipline
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21
576
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
2021–22
562
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
2022–23
575
12
2.1%
22
3.83
13.8%
34.3
2023–24
555
15
2.7%
21
3.78
13.7%
34
2024–25
548
Suppressed
—
11
2.01
—
32.5
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Roberts Elem in 2024–25
Category
Students
Students% of enrollment
Actions
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline
Suppressed
—
11
2.01
—
32.5
In-school suspensions
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Out-of-school suspensions
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
DAEP placements
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Mandatory DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary DAEP placements
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
Roberts Elem
Parent district: Lubbock ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
This school
$9,699
Selected comparison
$13,079
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,094 rated schools reporting
−$3,380 vs similar economic context
For 2025, TEA reported $9,699 per student for this campus, $14,938 per student for its parent district, Lubbock ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
Year
Roberts Elem
Parent district: Lubbock ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison average
Reportingselected comparison
2018
$5,733
$11,154
$13,054
$8,081
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,978 rated schools reporting
2019
$5,710
$11,025
$13,108
$8,229
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,998 rated schools reporting
2020
$6,566
$12,439
$14,058
$8,734
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,015 rated schools reporting
2021
$7,282
$14,076
$14,797
$9,355
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,028 rated schools reporting
2022
$7,883
$14,384
$15,708
$10,734
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,045 rated schools reporting
2023
$7,805
$16,314
$16,792
$11,289
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,062 rated schools reporting
2024
$8,244
$15,605
$18,125
$12,349
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,080 rated schools reporting
2025
$9,699
$14,938
$18,972
$13,079
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,094 rated schools reporting
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
Average salary
$57,914−$8,931 vs similar economic context
Teachers
38−5.1 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
14±0.0 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Roberts Elem
Beginning 7.8%
1 to 5 years 36.6%
6 to 10 years 21.4%
11 to 20 years 18.5%
21 to 30 years 15.7%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,106 reporting for every category shown · 2,106 in full cohort
Beginning 6.9%
1 to 5 years 27.6%
6 to 10 years 19%
11 to 20 years 27.1%
21 to 30 years 15.1%
Over 30 years 3.7%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 17: Lubbock · 182 reporting for every category shown · 182 in full cohort
Beginning 7.4%
1 to 5 years 25.5%
6 to 10 years 18.1%
11 to 20 years 27.1%
21 to 30 years 16.6%
Over 30 years 4.7%
Selected comparison averageFor Lubbock County · 84 reporting for every category shown · 84 in full cohort
Beginning 8%
1 to 5 years 25.6%
6 to 10 years 19.1%
11 to 20 years 26.9%
21 to 30 years 15.6%
Over 30 years 3.6%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 4,764 reporting for every category shown · 4,764 in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 26.3%
6 to 10 years 19.6%
11 to 20 years 29%
21 to 30 years 15.7%
Over 30 years 3.2%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 25.6%
6 to 10 years 19.2%
11 to 20 years 28.7%
21 to 30 years 15.9%
Over 30 years 3.7%
Average students in a class
TEA average class size by grade or subject for Roberts Elem in 2024–25
Grade or subject
Average students per classRoberts Elem · 2024–25
Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten
19.8
18
Grade 1
18
18.3
Grade 2
21
18.4
Grade 3
18
18.8
Grade 4
19.5
19.1
Grade 5
20.7
20.1
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 6 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
Out of 105 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
#4–10 rankings
Fourth- through tenth-place results
6 measures
5of 81
Relative Performance
Lubbock County · of the 81 that report this measure
7of 82
Reading — Meets
Lubbock County · of the 82 that report this measure · tied with 1
9of 82
Reading — Masters
Lubbock County · of the 82 that report this measure · tied with 2
9of 81
Math — Meets
Lubbock County · of the 81 that report this measure · tied with 1
10of 82
All Subjects — Masters
Lubbock County · of the 82 that report this measure
10of 81
Math — Masters
Lubbock County · of the 81 that report this measure
Other top-5% rankings
High placements in larger reporting groups
4 measures
56of 1,944
Reading — Approaches
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,944 that report this measure · tied with 11
64of 1,946
All Subjects — Meets
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,946 that report this measure · tied with 12
83of 1,946
Student Achievement
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,946 that report this measure · tied with 28
96of 1,946
All Subjects — Approaches
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,946 that report this measure · tied with 13
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above
this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears
once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any
tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones
no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 152901193.