+7.1 ptsvs 89.9 average · 758 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
19 of 758tied with 10 others
Score vs region
+13.7 ptsvs 83.3 average · 1,303 rated schools in Region 04: Houston
Region 04: Houston placement
19 of 1,303tied with 18 others
Score vs county
+13.6 ptsvs 83.4 average · 911 rated schools in Harris County
Harris County placement
18 of 911tied with 13 others
Score vs similar-size group
+16.3 ptsvs 80.7 average · 4,097 similarly sized rated schools
Similar size placement
35 of 4,097tied with 16 others
Score vs state
+15.7 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
Texas placement
82 of 7,646tied with 63 others
A97
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving up; under the rules in force back then it scored 97 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 89.9 average for 758 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 83.3 average for 1,303 rated schools in Region 04: Houston.The current score is above the 83.4 average for 911 rated schools in Harris County.The current score is above the 80.7 average for 4,097 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
Current strength
Academic Growth above the similar-context average
97+13.1 pts vs 83.9
97 is 13.1 points above
the 83.9 average among 737 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
Tied for 2nd of 737 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure; 4 schools share that value.
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Roberts Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 97 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 89.9 average for 758 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is up 1 point since 2021-22.
Ranks 19th of 758 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 10 others).
Roberts Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 97 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 83.3 average for 1,303 rated schools in Region 04: Houston. It is up 1 point since 2021-22.
Ranks 19th of 1,303 rated schools in Region 04: Houston (tied with 18 others).
Roberts Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 97 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 83.4 average for 911 rated schools in Harris County. It is up 1 point since 2021-22.
Ranks 18th of 911 rated schools in Harris County (tied with 13 others).
Roberts Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 97 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.7 average for 4,097 similarly sized rated schools. It is up 1 point since 2021-22.
Ranks 35th of 4,097 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 16 others).
Roberts Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 97 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is up 1 point since 2021-22.
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 97 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Student Achievement96 A+5.1 vs similar economic context · 748 reporting
School Progress97 A+10.9 vs similar economic context · 746 reporting
Closing the Gaps97 A+9.6 vs similar economic context · 743 reporting
Academic Growth97 A+13.1 vs similar economic context · 737 reporting
Relative Performance93 A+13.7 vs similar economic context · 746 reporting
Roberts Elem
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (758 in cohort)
Domain scores
Domain
Score
Grade
Points to next grade
Student Achievement
96
A
—
School Progress
97
A
—
Closing the Gaps
97
A
—
Academic Growth
97
A
—
Relative Performance
93
A
—
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student
Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (97), so
Student Achievement (96) is published above but does not enter the overall
score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 97.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
All Subjects
Approaches grade level96%+8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 748 reporting
Meets grade level89%+18 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 748 reporting
Masters grade level67%+27 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 748 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
Approaches grade level96%+7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 748 reporting
Meets grade level89%+14 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 748 reporting
Masters grade level68%+25 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 748 reporting
Math3 performance levels
Approaches grade level96%+9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 746 reporting
Meets grade level89%+22 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 746 reporting
Masters grade level67%+32 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 746 reporting
Science3 performance levels
Approaches grade level97%+9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 694 reporting
Meets grade level89%+22 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 694 reporting
Masters grade level67%+26 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 694 reporting
Approaches grade level
Meets grade level
Masters grade level
Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (758 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
741
Economically disadvantaged
18.7%−0.9 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
22.5%+12.0 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
9.9%−6.7 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
97.0%+1.3 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
4.7%−3.4 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Roberts Elem
African American 14.9%
Hispanic 15.2%
White 29%
American Indian 0.1%
Asian 33.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 7.3%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 758 reporting for every category shown · 758 in full cohort
African American 7.4%
Hispanic 23.5%
White 48.2%
American Indian 0.4%
Asian 15%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 5.4%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 04: Houston · 1,303 reporting for every category shown · 1,303 in full cohort
African American 19.1%
Hispanic 53.8%
White 16.9%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 6.7%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.1%
Selected comparison averageFor Harris County · 911 reporting for every category shown · 911 in full cohort
African American 19.3%
Hispanic 59.1%
White 13.1%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 5.4%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 2.7%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 4,097 reporting for every category shown · 4,097 in full cohort
African American 12.4%
Hispanic 53.8%
White 24.2%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 5.5%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 3.6%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
African American 11.5%
Hispanic 52.6%
White 27.8%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
737
Economically disadvantaged students
138
Emergent bilingual students
166
Special education students
73
Campus mobility · 2024–25
Mobile students
71
Students in TEA mobility denominator
639
TEA-published mobility rate
11.1%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 741 students in 2025–26, an increase of 20 (2.8%) from 2024–25.
Latest enrollment
741
2025–26
Change from 2024–25
+20
Increase · +2.8%
Change since 2021–22
+54
Increase · +7.9%
Enrollment in 2025–26
This school
741
Selected comparison
876.5
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 753 rated schools reporting
Student enrollment by school year for Roberts Elem
School year
Students enrolledRoberts Elem
Change from previous school year
Average enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22
687
First available year
892.1
2022–23
724
Increase of 37 (5.4%)
905.8
2023–24
730
Increase of 6 (0.8%)
896.2
2024–25
721
Decrease of 9 (1.2%)
885.5
2025–26
741
Increase of 20 (2.8%)
876.5
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
Not reported
Rate not available
Disciplinary actions
Not reported
Rate not available
Cumulative year-end enrollment
773
2024–25
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Roberts Elem
School year
Cumulative enrollment
Studentsall discipline
Students% of enrollment
Actionsall discipline
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21
722
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
2021–22
722
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
2022–23
762
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
2023–24
790
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
2024–25
773
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Roberts Elem in 2024–25
Category
Students
Students% of enrollment
Actions
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
In-school suspensions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Out-of-school suspensions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
Roberts Elem
Parent district: Houston ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
This school
$8,177
Selected comparison
$10,996
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 752 rated schools reporting
−$2,819 vs similar economic context
For 2025, TEA reported $8,177 per student for this campus, $17,026 per student for its parent district, Houston ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
Year
Roberts Elem
Parent district: Houston ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison average
Reportingselected comparison
2018
$6,093
$14,470
$13,054
$7,386
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 658 rated schools reporting
2019
$6,192
$13,643
$13,108
$7,469
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 674 rated schools reporting
2020
$5,768
$13,627
$14,058
$7,765
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 686 rated schools reporting
2021
$6,933
$13,515
$14,797
$8,304
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 692 rated schools reporting
2022
$7,152
$14,985
$15,708
$9,502
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 704 rated schools reporting
2023
$7,421
$16,350
$16,792
$9,961
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 720 rated schools reporting
2024
$7,532
$18,150
$18,125
$10,815
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 736 rated schools reporting
2025
$8,177
$17,026
$18,972
$10,996
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 752 rated schools reporting
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
Average salary
$70,032+$949 vs similar economic context
Teachers
41−14.9 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
18+3.0 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Roberts Elem
Beginning 4.9%
1 to 5 years 19.5%
6 to 10 years 26.8%
11 to 20 years 43.9%
21 to 30 years 4.9%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 758 reporting for every category shown · 758 in full cohort
Beginning 4.4%
1 to 5 years 22.9%
6 to 10 years 19.9%
11 to 20 years 32.6%
21 to 30 years 17.2%
Over 30 years 2.8%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 04: Houston · 1,303 reporting for every category shown · 1,303 in full cohort
Beginning 7.7%
1 to 5 years 27.3%
6 to 10 years 20.6%
11 to 20 years 27.2%
21 to 30 years 13.5%
Over 30 years 2.6%
Selected comparison averageFor Harris County · 911 reporting for every category shown · 911 in full cohort
Beginning 8.9%
1 to 5 years 28.4%
6 to 10 years 20.3%
11 to 20 years 26.2%
21 to 30 years 13%
Over 30 years 2.5%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 4,097 reporting for every category shown · 4,097 in full cohort
Beginning 6.1%
1 to 5 years 26.6%
6 to 10 years 20%
11 to 20 years 29%
21 to 30 years 15.1%
Over 30 years 2.9%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 25.6%
6 to 10 years 19.2%
11 to 20 years 28.7%
21 to 30 years 15.9%
Over 30 years 3.7%
Average students in a class
TEA average class size by grade or subject for Roberts Elem in 2024–25
Grade or subject
Average students per classRoberts Elem · 2024–25
Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten
18.7
18.8
Grade 1
16.1
19.1
Grade 2
16.9
19.7
Grade 3
20
21.4
Grade 4
19.7
20.5
Grade 5
20.9
22
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 6 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
Out of 105 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
#1 rankings
First-place results
1 measure
1of 1,224
Academic Growth
Region 04: Houston · of the 1,224 that report this measure · tied with 7
#4–10 rankings
Fourth- through tenth-place results
2 measures
7of 873
Math — Masters
Harris County · of the 873 that report this measure · tied with 1
8of 746
School Progress
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 746 that report this measure · tied with 8
Other top-5% rankings
High placements in larger reporting groups
16 measures
11of 874
All Subjects — Masters
Harris County · of the 874 that report this measure
15of 874
Reading — Masters
Harris County · of the 874 that report this measure · tied with 6
15of 873
Math — Meets
Harris County · of the 873 that report this measure
18of 911
Overall score
Harris County · of the 911 that report this measure · tied with 13
21of 874
All Subjects — Meets
Harris County · of the 874 that report this measure · tied with 3
24of 874
Student Achievement
Harris County · of the 874 that report this measure · tied with 17
24of 874
Attendance
Harris County · of the 874 that report this measure · tied with 7
25of 743
Closing the Gaps
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 743 that report this measure · tied with 14
27of 874
Reading — Meets
Harris County · of the 874 that report this measure · tied with 8
29of 874
Reading — Approaches
Harris County · of the 874 that report this measure · tied with 13
30of 746
Relative Performance
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 746 that report this measure · tied with 12
31of 874
All Subjects — Approaches
Harris County · of the 874 that report this measure · tied with 4
31of 802
Science — Masters
Harris County · of the 802 that report this measure · tied with 2
33of 873
Math — Approaches
Harris County · of the 873 that report this measure · tied with 9
38of 802
Science — Meets
Harris County · of the 802 that report this measure · tied with 4
98of 3,676
Science — Approaches
Similar size · of the 3,676 that report this measure · tied with 39
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above
this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears
once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any
tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones
no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 101912229.