Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

Robert H Rockenbaugh Elem

Tarrant County · Region 11: Fort Worth · 460 students

Official school websiteSchool information and family resources

Current score
95/1002025-26
Change
−2 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
+3.0 ptsvs 92 average · 317 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
30 of 317tied with 42 others
A95

At a glance

Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 98 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 92 average for 317 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

STAAR result

All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
89%vs 77.4% avg · +11.6 pts
Masters
67%vs 48.7% avg · +18.3 pts

Among 312 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

STAAR result

Math above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
87%vs 74.6% avg · +12.4 pts
Masters
63%vs 45% avg · +18 pts

Among 310 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

STAAR result

Reading above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
92%vs 81.8% avg · +10.2 pts
Masters
71%vs 52.4% avg · +18.6 pts

Among 312 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Robert H Rockenbaugh Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 95 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 92 average for 317 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is down 2 points since 2021-22.

Ranks 30th of 317 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 42 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 5 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. Who this school serves
  6. Student counts behind the percentages
  7. Enrollment over time
  8. Discipline and removal from class
  9. Spending per student
  10. Teachers and actual class size
  11. Where this school ranks best
  12. Where this comes from

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
908070 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas averageRobert H Rockenbaugh Elem 9796979795 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 98 that year.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26A9592.0 317 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25A9792.5 309 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting
2023-24A9791.7 302 reporting78.9 7,466 reporting
2022-23A9692.1 292 reporting79.1 7,377 reporting
2021-22A9792.7 285 reporting83.7 7,283 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement96 A+3.0 vs similar economic context · 312 reporting
  • School Progress93 A+4.6 vs similar economic context · 310 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps94 A+4.1 vs similar economic context · 308 reporting
  • Academic Growth93 A+5.9 vs similar economic context · 308 reporting
  • Relative Performance88 B+10.0 vs similar economic context · 310 reporting
  • Robert H Rockenbaugh Elem
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (317 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement96A—
School Progress93A—
Closing the Gaps94A—
Academic Growth93A—
Relative Performance88B2

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is Student Achievement (96), so School Progress (93) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 96.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level96%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 312 reporting
  • Meets grade level89%+12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 312 reporting
  • Masters grade level67%+18 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 312 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level96%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 312 reporting
  • Meets grade level92%+10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 312 reporting
  • Masters grade level71%+19 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 312 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level96%+5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 310 reporting
  • Meets grade level87%+12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 310 reporting
  • Masters grade level63%+18 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 310 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (317 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
460
Economically disadvantaged
2.6%−4.7 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
11.3%+0.2 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
16.7%+1.5 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
96.3%+0.3 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
3.3%−2.6 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Robert H Rockenbaugh Elem

African American: 1.3%Hispanic: 14.6%White: 55.2%American Indian: 1.1%Asian: 20.2%Two or More Races: 7.6%
  • African American 1.3%
  • Hispanic 14.6%
  • White 55.2%
  • American Indian 1.1%
  • Asian 20.2%
  • Two or More Races 7.6%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 317 reporting for every category shown · 317 in full cohort

African American: 4.3%Hispanic: 15.5%White: 48.4%American Indian: 0.5%Asian: 25.4%Pacific Islander: 0.1%Two or More Races: 5.8%
  • African American 4.3%
  • Hispanic 15.5%
  • White 48.4%
  • American Indian 0.5%
  • Asian 25.4%
  • Pacific Islander 0.1%
  • Two or More Races 5.8%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
460
Economically disadvantaged students
12
Emergent bilingual students
52
Special education students
77

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
14
Students in TEA mobility denominator
336
TEA-published mobility rate
4.2%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 460 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 34 (6.9%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
460

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
−34

Decrease · −6.9%

Change since 2021–22
−22

Decrease · −4.6%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
460
Selected comparison
846.6

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 313 rated schools reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Robert H Rockenbaugh Elem
School yearStudents enrolledRobert H Rockenbaugh ElemChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22 482 First available year 864.6
2022–23 531 Increase of 49 (10.2%) 882.3
2023–24 537 Increase of 6 (1.1%) 864.2
2024–25 494 Decrease of 43 (8.0%) 857.5
2025–26 460 Decrease of 34 (6.9%) 846.6

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
Suppressed

Rate not available

Disciplinary actions
Suppressed

Rate not available

Cumulative year-end enrollment
513

2024–25

TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Robert H Rockenbaugh Elem
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 531 Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
2021–22 513 Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
2022–23 557 Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
2023–24 547 Suppressed — 12 2.19 — 6.8
2024–25 513 Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Robert H Rockenbaugh Elem in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
In-school suspensions Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Out-of-school suspensions Not reported — Not reported — — —
DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$6k$14k$22k20182020202220242025
  • Robert H Rockenbaugh Elem
  • Parent district: Carroll ISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$10,226
Selected comparison
$10,606

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 308 rated schools reporting

−$380 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $10,226 per student for this campus, $17,762 per student for its parent district, Carroll ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearRobert H Rockenbaugh ElemParent district: Carroll ISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2018$8,618$16,700$13,054$7,081 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 257 rated schools reporting
2019$8,981$20,818$13,108$7,264 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 265 rated schools reporting
2020$9,688$19,862$14,058$7,564 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 272 rated schools reporting
2021$10,266$17,912$14,797$7,988 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 281 rated schools reporting
2022$10,655$14,946$15,708$9,253 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 286 rated schools reporting
2023$10,393$15,707$16,792$9,173 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 291 rated schools reporting
2024$10,005$17,368$18,125$9,987 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 301 rated schools reporting
2025$10,226$17,762$18,972$10,606 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 308 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$70,889+$1,286 vs similar economic context
Teachers
38−17.5 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
12.2−2.5 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Robert H Rockenbaugh Elem

1 to 5 years: 15.9%6 to 10 years: 24.7%11 to 20 years: 29.2%21 to 30 years: 22.3%Over 30 years: 8%
  • 1 to 5 years 15.9%
  • 6 to 10 years 24.7%
  • 11 to 20 years 29.2%
  • 21 to 30 years 22.3%
  • Over 30 years 8%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 317 reporting for every category shown · 317 in full cohort

Beginning: 3.9%1 to 5 years: 24.3%6 to 10 years: 19.9%11 to 20 years: 31.4%21 to 30 years: 17%Over 30 years: 2.3%
  • Beginning 3.9%
  • 1 to 5 years 24.3%
  • 6 to 10 years 19.9%
  • 11 to 20 years 31.4%
  • 21 to 30 years 17%
  • Over 30 years 2.3%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for Robert H Rockenbaugh Elem in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classRobert H Rockenbaugh Elem · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten19.319
Grade 118.719.3
Grade 217.719.7
Grade 317.721.7
Grade 42220.4

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 5 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this school ranks best

Out of 90 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.

#2–3 rankings

Second- and third-place results

2 measures

  • 3of 813

    All Subjects — Masters

    Region 11: Fort Worth · of the 813 that report this measure · tied with 2

  • 3of 812

    Reading — Masters

    Region 11: Fort Worth · of the 812 that report this measure · tied with 1

#4–10 rankings

Fourth- through tenth-place results

7 measures

  • 6of 455

    Math — Masters

    Tarrant County · of the 455 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 6of 449

    Academic Growth

    Tarrant County · of the 449 that report this measure · tied with 4

  • 8of 457

    All Subjects — Meets

    Tarrant County · of the 457 that report this measure

  • 10of 810

    Math — Meets

    Region 11: Fort Worth · of the 810 that report this measure

  • 10of 457

    All Subjects — Approaches

    Tarrant County · of the 457 that report this measure · tied with 6

  • 10of 456

    Reading — Meets

    Tarrant County · of the 456 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 10of 455

    Math — Approaches

    Tarrant County · of the 455 that report this measure · tied with 3

Other top-5% rankings

High placements in larger reporting groups

6 measures

  • 11of 457

    Student Achievement

    Tarrant County · of the 457 that report this measure · tied with 6

  • 15of 456

    Reading — Approaches

    Tarrant County · of the 456 that report this measure · tied with 6

  • 16of 456

    Chronically absent (lowest is best)

    Tarrant County · of the 456 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 19of 466

    Overall score

    Tarrant County · of the 466 that report this measure · tied with 4

  • 19of 453

    Closing the Gaps

    Tarrant County · of the 453 that report this measure · tied with 8

  • 24of 456

    School Progress

    Tarrant County · of the 456 that report this measure · tied with 7

These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 220919104.