Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

Robert C Zamora MS

Bexar County · Region 20: San Antonio · 638 students

Official school websiteSchool information and family resources

Current score
87/1002025-26
Change
+12 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
+9.6 ptsvs 77.4 average · 2,386 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
425 of 2,386tied with 74 others
B87

At a glance

Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving up; under the rules in force back then it scored 71 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 77.4 average for 2,386 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

Recent movement

Overall score rose 14 points

73 to 87 2024-25 to 2025-26

  • 87 is 9.6 points above the 77.4 average among 2,386 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Recent domain gain

Closing the Gaps rose 24 points

67 to 91 2024-25 to 2025-26

  • 91 is 16.4 points above the 74.6 average among 2,203 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

STAAR result

Reading above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
50%vs 44.6% avg · +5.4 pts
Masters
22%vs 17.5% avg · +4.5 pts

Among 2,222 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Robert C Zamora MS is rated B by TEA, scoring 87 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 77.4 average for 2,386 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is up 12 points since 2021-22.

Ranks 425th of 2,386 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 74 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 5 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. Who this school serves
  6. Student counts behind the percentages
  7. Enrollment over time
  8. Discipline and removal from class
  9. Spending per student
  10. Teachers and actual class size
  11. Where this comes from

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
90807060 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas averageRobert C Zamora MS 7569837387 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated C with 71 that year.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26B8777.4 2,386 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25C7377.1 2,374 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting
2023-24B8373.9 2,356 reporting78.9 7,466 reporting
2022-23D6973.9 2,345 reporting79.1 7,377 reporting
2021-22C7581.7 2,317 reporting83.7 7,283 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement74 C+3.3 vs similar economic context · 2,223 reporting
  • School Progress85 B+6.4 vs similar economic context · 2,217 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps91 A+16.4 vs similar economic context · 2,203 reporting
  • Academic Growth82 B+9.5 vs similar economic context · 2,177 reporting
  • Relative Performance85 B+8.3 vs similar economic context · 2,217 reporting
  • Robert C Zamora MS
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,386 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement74C6
School Progress85B5
Closing the Gaps91A—
Academic Growth82B8
Relative Performance85B5

Closest to moving up: School Progress, 5 points below A in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (85), so Student Achievement (74) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 85.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level72%+5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,223 reporting
  • Meets grade level40%−1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,223 reporting
  • Masters grade level15%−1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,223 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level80%+11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,222 reporting
  • Meets grade level50%+5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,222 reporting
  • Masters grade level22%+5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,222 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level75%+9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,213 reporting
  • Meets grade level36%−2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,213 reporting
  • Masters grade level10%−5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,213 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level62%−2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,074 reporting
  • Meets grade level34%−1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,074 reporting
  • Masters grade level15%+1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,074 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level52%−12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 772 reporting
  • Meets grade level27%−9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 772 reporting
  • Masters grade level11%−4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 772 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,386 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
638
Economically disadvantaged
87.3%−0.5 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
17.4%−19.6 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
22.4%+4.2 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
93.0%±0.0 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
26.6%+4.2 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Robert C Zamora MS

African American: 1.7%Hispanic: 93.6%White: 3.8%Asian: 0.3%Two or More Races: 0.6%
  • African American 1.7%
  • Hispanic 93.6%
  • White 3.8%
  • Asian 0.3%
  • Two or More Races 0.6%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,386 reporting for every category shown · 2,386 in full cohort

African American: 14.3%Hispanic: 74.2%White: 7.8%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 1.4%Pacific Islander: 0.1%Two or More Races: 1.9%
  • African American 14.3%
  • Hispanic 74.2%
  • White 7.8%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 1.4%
  • Pacific Islander 0.1%
  • Two or More Races 1.9%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
638
Economically disadvantaged students
557
Emergent bilingual students
111
Special education students
143

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
135
Students in TEA mobility denominator
727
TEA-published mobility rate
18.6%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 638 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 17 (2.6%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
638

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
−17

Decrease · −2.6%

Change since 2021–22
+139

Increase · +27.9%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
638
Selected comparison
591.8

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,358 rated schools reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Robert C Zamora MS
School yearStudents enrolledRobert C Zamora MSChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22 499 First available year 632.3
2022–23 437 Decrease of 62 (12.4%) 628.3
2023–24 637 Increase of 200 (45.8%) 619
2024–25 655 Increase of 18 (2.8%) 613.6
2025–26 638 Decrease of 17 (2.6%) 591.8

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
187

26.0% of cumulative year-end enrollment

Disciplinary actions
450

62.59 per 100 students

Cumulative year-end enrollment
719

2024–25

Share of students · 2024–25

This school
26.0%
Selected comparison
13.3%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,573 rated schools reporting

+12.7 pts vs similar economic context

Actions per 100 students · 2024–25

This school
62.59
Selected comparison
31.9

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,694 rated schools reporting

+30.7 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Robert C Zamora MS
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 555 25 4.5% 45 8.11 7.6% 14.7
2021–22 535 115 21.5% 248 46.36 12.7% 30.4
2022–23 474 186 39.2% 671 141.56 13.7% 33.5
2023–24 704 225 32.0% 585 83.10 13.8% 33.8
2024–25 719 187 26.0% 450 62.59 13.3% 31.9
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Robert C Zamora MS in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline 187 26.0% 450 62.59 13.3% 31.9
In-school suspensions 146 20.3% 260 36.16 11.7% 22.9
Out-of-school suspensions 92 12.8% 130 18.08 9.0% 14.5
DAEP placements 55 7.7% 60 8.34 5.2% 6.3
Mandatory DAEP placements 44 6.1% 48 6.68 4.0% 4.6
Discretionary DAEP placements 12 1.7% 12 1.67 3.4% 4
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$6k$13k$20k20182020202220242025
  • Robert C Zamora MS
  • Parent district: South San Antonio ISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$9,899
Selected comparison
$12,973

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,372 rated schools reporting

−$3,074 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $9,899 per student for this campus, $16,651 per student for its parent district, South San Antonio ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearRobert C Zamora MSParent district: South San Antonio ISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2018$6,463$11,317$13,054$8,286 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,250 rated schools reporting
2019$6,812$12,074$13,108$8,338 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,282 rated schools reporting
2020$8,218$13,296$14,058$8,853 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,292 rated schools reporting
2021$8,552$13,922$14,797$9,579 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,297 rated schools reporting
2022$9,534$15,668$15,708$11,094 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,317 rated schools reporting
2023$9,990$15,705$16,792$11,624 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,343 rated schools reporting
2024$9,690$16,951$18,125$12,432 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,357 rated schools reporting
2025$9,899$16,651$18,972$12,973 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,372 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$68,192+$361 vs similar economic context
Teachers
45+3.5 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
14.2−0.2 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Robert C Zamora MS

Beginning: 6.7%1 to 5 years: 16.5%6 to 10 years: 29.6%11 to 20 years: 34.3%21 to 30 years: 11.8%Over 30 years: 1.1%
  • Beginning 6.7%
  • 1 to 5 years 16.5%
  • 6 to 10 years 29.6%
  • 11 to 20 years 34.3%
  • 21 to 30 years 11.8%
  • Over 30 years 1.1%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,386 reporting for every category shown · 2,386 in full cohort

Beginning: 7.3%1 to 5 years: 27.3%6 to 10 years: 19%11 to 20 years: 27.1%21 to 30 years: 15.1%Over 30 years: 3.5%
  • Beginning 7.3%
  • 1 to 5 years 27.3%
  • 6 to 10 years 19%
  • 11 to 20 years 27.1%
  • 21 to 30 years 15.1%
  • Over 30 years 3.5%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for Robert C Zamora MS in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classRobert C Zamora MS · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Grade 618.717.5
Secondary English1515.3
Secondary languages other than English20.418.3
Secondary math14.116.7
Secondary science19.317.9
Secondary social studies17.817.9

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 6 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 015908044.