Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

Rita Smith Elem

Collin County · Region 10: Richardson · 500 students

Current score
94/1002025-26
Change
±0 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
+6.1 ptsvs 87.9 average · 951 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
85 of 951tied with 60 others
A94

At a glance

Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is flat; under the rules in force back then it scored 96 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 87.9 average for 951 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

STAAR result

All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
82%vs 65.6% avg · +16.4 pts
Masters
55%vs 33.8% avg · +21.2 pts

Among 930 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

STAAR result

Math above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
82%vs 60% avg · +22 pts
Masters
58%vs 28.7% avg · +29.3 pts

Among 927 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

STAAR result

Reading above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
82%vs 69.9% avg · +12.1 pts
Masters
53%vs 35.2% avg · +17.8 pts

Among 929 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Rita Smith Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 94 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 87.9 average for 951 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is unchanged since 2021-22.

Ranks 85th of 951 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 60 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 5 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. Who this school serves
  6. Student counts behind the percentages
  7. Enrollment over time
  8. Discipline and removal from class
  9. Spending per student
  10. Teachers and actual class size
  11. Where this school ranks best
  12. Where this comes from

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
908070 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas averageRita Smith Elem 9493969494 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 96 that year.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26A9487.9 951 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25A9487.8 937 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting
2023-24A9686.5 924 reporting78.9 7,466 reporting
2022-23A9386.8 907 reporting79.1 7,377 reporting
2021-22A9488.0 893 reporting83.7 7,283 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement94 A+5.4 vs similar economic context · 930 reporting
  • School Progress91 A+6.4 vs similar economic context · 928 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps95 A+9.6 vs similar economic context · 921 reporting
  • Academic Growth91 A+10.0 vs similar economic context · 911 reporting
  • Relative Performance91 A+11.1 vs similar economic context · 928 reporting
  • Rita Smith Elem
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (951 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement94A—
School Progress91A—
Closing the Gaps95A—
Academic Growth91A—
Relative Performance91A—

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is Student Achievement (94), so School Progress (91) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 94.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level94%+9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 930 reporting
  • Meets grade level82%+16 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 930 reporting
  • Masters grade level55%+21 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 930 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level93%+7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 929 reporting
  • Meets grade level82%+12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 929 reporting
  • Masters grade level53%+18 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 929 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level95%+12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 927 reporting
  • Meets grade level82%+22 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 927 reporting
  • Masters grade level58%+29 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 927 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (951 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
500
Economically disadvantaged
27.8%−1.0 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
19.2%+9.0 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
24.8%+7.6 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
96.1%+0.8 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
6.1%−4.1 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Rita Smith Elem

African American: 11.2%Hispanic: 15.2%White: 48.6%American Indian: 0.2%Asian: 18%Pacific Islander: 0.4%Two or More Races: 6.4%
  • African American 11.2%
  • Hispanic 15.2%
  • White 48.6%
  • American Indian 0.2%
  • Asian 18%
  • Pacific Islander 0.4%
  • Two or More Races 6.4%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 951 reporting for every category shown · 951 in full cohort

African American: 9%Hispanic: 28.9%White: 48%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 8.7%Pacific Islander: 0.1%Two or More Races: 5%
  • African American 9%
  • Hispanic 28.9%
  • White 48%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 8.7%
  • Pacific Islander 0.1%
  • Two or More Races 5%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
500
Economically disadvantaged students
139
Emergent bilingual students
96
Special education students
124

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
41
Students in TEA mobility denominator
429
TEA-published mobility rate
9.6%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 500 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 87 (14.8%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
500

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
−87

Decrease · −14.8%

Change since 2021–22
+13

Increase · +2.7%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
500
Selected comparison
812.5

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 941 rated schools reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Rita Smith Elem
School yearStudents enrolledRita Smith ElemChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22 487 First available year 828.6
2022–23 521 Increase of 34 (7.0%) 832.7
2023–24 606 Increase of 85 (16.3%) 826.5
2024–25 587 Decrease of 19 (3.1%) 823.2
2025–26 500 Decrease of 87 (14.8%) 812.5

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
Suppressed

Rate not available

Disciplinary actions
22

3.51 per 100 students

Cumulative year-end enrollment
627

2024–25

Actions per 100 students · 2024–25

This school
3.51
Selected comparison
16.7

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 781 rated schools reporting

−13.2 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Rita Smith Elem
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 503 Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
2021–22 499 12 2.4% 19 3.81 8.8% 17.7
2022–23 537 Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
2023–24 627 Suppressed — 13 2.07 — 17.7
2024–25 627 Suppressed — 22 3.51 — 16.7
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Rita Smith Elem in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline Suppressed — 22 3.51 — 16.7
In-school suspensions Suppressed — 12 1.91 — 13.1
Out-of-school suspensions Suppressed — 10 1.59 — 5.5
DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$7k$13k$20k20182020202220242025
  • Rita Smith Elem
  • Parent district: Wylie ISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$11,939
Selected comparison
$11,409

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 936 rated schools reporting

+$531 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $11,939 per student for this campus, $18,992 per student for its parent district, Wylie ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearRita Smith ElemParent district: Wylie ISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2018$7,754$11,092$13,054$7,603 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 841 rated schools reporting
2019$7,713$11,302$13,108$7,707 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 855 rated schools reporting
2020$8,498$14,022$14,058$8,037 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 865 rated schools reporting
2021$10,325$19,093$14,797$8,503 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 874 rated schools reporting
2022$10,626$14,727$15,708$9,709 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 892 rated schools reporting
2023$9,932$13,514$16,792$10,170 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 908 rated schools reporting
2024$9,946$14,796$18,125$11,334 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 923 rated schools reporting
2025$11,939$18,992$18,972$11,409 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 936 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$71,411+$3,027 vs similar economic context
Teachers
36−16.4 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
13.8−0.8 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Rita Smith Elem

Beginning: 8.3%1 to 5 years: 30.3%6 to 10 years: 16.5%11 to 20 years: 20.1%21 to 30 years: 24.8%
  • Beginning 8.3%
  • 1 to 5 years 30.3%
  • 6 to 10 years 16.5%
  • 11 to 20 years 20.1%
  • 21 to 30 years 24.8%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 951 reporting for every category shown · 951 in full cohort

Beginning: 4.8%1 to 5 years: 22.5%6 to 10 years: 19.6%11 to 20 years: 32.3%21 to 30 years: 17.4%Over 30 years: 3.2%
  • Beginning 4.8%
  • 1 to 5 years 22.5%
  • 6 to 10 years 19.6%
  • 11 to 20 years 32.3%
  • 21 to 30 years 17.4%
  • Over 30 years 3.2%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for Rita Smith Elem in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classRita Smith Elem · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten15.118.5
Grade 115.918.9
Grade 216.119.5
Grade 317.720.4
Grade 418.120

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 5 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this school ranks best

Out of 90 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.

Other top-5% rankings

High placements in larger reporting groups

11 measures

  • 17of 292

    Math — Masters

    Collin County · of the 292 that report this measure · tied with 4

  • 35of 927

    Math — Meets

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 927 that report this measure · tied with 4

  • 36of 1,102

    Closing the Gaps

    Region 10: Richardson · of the 1,102 that report this measure · tied with 12

  • 42of 930

    All Subjects — Masters

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 930 that report this measure · tied with 3

  • 43of 1,106

    Math — Approaches

    Region 10: Richardson · of the 1,106 that report this measure · tied with 14

  • 130of 4,490

    All Subjects — Meets

    Similar size · of the 4,490 that report this measure · tied with 15

  • 146of 4,490

    All Subjects — Approaches

    Similar size · of the 4,490 that report this measure · tied with 37

  • 184of 4,490

    Student Achievement

    Similar size · of the 4,490 that report this measure · tied with 83

  • 190of 4,707

    Overall score

    Similar size · of the 4,707 that report this measure · tied with 74

  • 212of 4,490

    Reading — Masters

    Similar size · of the 4,490 that report this measure · tied with 21

  • 218of 4,490

    Reading — Meets

    Similar size · of the 4,490 that report this measure · tied with 22

These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 043914108.