Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus · Alternative Education Accountability

Rise Academy

Parker County · Region 11: Fort Worth · 83 students

Official school websiteSchool information and family resources

Current score
96/1002025-26
Change
+26 ptssince 2024-25
Score vs similar economic context
+14.8 ptsvs 81.2 average · 1,830 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
32 of 1,830tied with 19 others
A96

At a glance

The available rating history is moving up. The current score is above the 81.2 average for 1,830 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

Recent movement

Overall score rose 26 points

70 to 96 2024-25 to 2025-26

  • 96 is 14.8 points above the 81.2 average among 1,830 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Recent domain gain

Student Achievement rose 9 points

87 to 96 2024-25 to 2025-26

  • 96 is 15.6 points above the 80.4 average among 1,760 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Current strength

School Progress above the similar-context average

92 +10.7 pts vs 81.3

  • 92 is 10.7 points above the 81.3 average among 1,753 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Rise Academy is rated A by TEA, scoring 96 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.2 average for 1,830 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is up 26 points since 2024-25.

Ranks 32nd of 1,830 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 19 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 2 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. Who this school serves
  6. Student counts behind the percentages
  7. Discipline and removal from class
  8. Spending per student
  9. Teachers and actual class size
  10. Where this school ranks best
  11. Where this comes from

2 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
90807060 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas averageRise Academy 7096 2024-252025-26

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26A9681.2 1,830 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25C7081.3 1,805 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement96 A+15.6 vs similar economic context · 1,760 reporting
  • School Progress92 A+10.7 vs similar economic context · 1,753 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps—Not reported · similar economic context 78.4 · 1,737 reporting
  • Academic Growth—Not reported · similar economic context 74.8 · 1,706 reporting
  • Relative Performance92 A+12.6 vs similar economic context · 1,753 reporting
  • Rise Academy
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,830 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement96A—
School Progress92A—
Closing the Gaps—Not rated—
Academic Growth—Not rated—
Relative Performance92A—

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is Student Achievement (96), so School Progress (92) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 96.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level85%+9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,760 reporting
  • Meets grade level36%−15 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,760 reporting
  • Masters grade level11%−11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,760 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level69%−9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,758 reporting
  • Meets grade level31%−25 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,758 reporting
  • Masters grade level0%−23 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,758 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level78%+5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,748 reporting
  • Meets grade level11%−34 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,748 reporting
  • Masters grade level0%−18 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,748 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level—Not reported · Similar economic-disadvantage rate 77.3% · 1,613 reporting
  • Meets grade level—Not reported · Similar economic-disadvantage rate 49.9% · 1,613 reporting
  • Masters grade level—Not reported · Similar economic-disadvantage rate 23.1% · 1,613 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level96%+20 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 911 reporting
  • Meets grade level45%−3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 911 reporting
  • Masters grade level20%−2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 911 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,830 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Completion

Four-Year
0.0%−71.4 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 38 rated schools reporting
Five-Year
0.0%−76.2 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 38 rated schools reporting
Six-Year
0.0%−78.4 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 38 rated schools reporting
Dropout Rate
0.0%−5.0 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 38 rated schools reporting

These measures use TEA's alternative-education accountability population. Each comparison average includes only schools in that population that report that specific measure; its reporting count is shown beside the average. It is an unweighted average of those reported school rates, not a pooled rate across every student in the group.

College, career and military readiness

Total credit for CCMR criteria
97.0%+9.0 pts vs similar economic context
CCMR criteria
CriterionThis school% of graduatesAveragesimilar economic contextDifferencepercentage pointsReportingselected comparison
Total credit for CCMR criteria97.0%88.0%+9.0 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 500 rated schools reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course89.1%58.9%+30.2 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 503 rated schools reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA3.9%28.2%−24.3 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 503 rated schools reporting
Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)2.3%9.9%−7.6 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 503 rated schools reporting
Earned college credit for a dual credit course9.4%33.9%−24.5 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 503 rated schools reporting
Earned an industry-based certification24.2%37.7%−13.5 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 503 rated schools reporting
Earned a level I or level II certificate1.6%1.7%−0.1 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 503 rated schools reporting
Earned an associate degree0.0%5.3%−5.3 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 503 rated schools reporting
Completed an OnRamps course and qualified for college credit0.8%3.7%−2.9 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 503 rated schools reporting
Graduated with completed individualized education program (IEP) and workforce readiness3.1%3.2%−0.1 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 503 rated schools reporting
Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student2.3%7.6%−5.3 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 503 rated schools reporting
Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces5.5%3.4%+2.1 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 503 rated schools reporting

Every row is a share of this school's graduates, and every row is a way of meeting CCMR — so on every row, a bigger share is better. Difference is this school minus the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate, counted in percentage points: +5.0 would mean five more graduates in every hundred met that criterion here. The selected comparison is an unweighted average of the reported school percentages, not a pooled rate across all graduates in the group. Graduates may meet several criteria, so the rows do not add up to the total.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
83
Economically disadvantaged
55.4%−0.4 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
10.8%−3.6 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
16.9%−1.9 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
—
Chronically absent
—

Student demographics

Rise Academy

African American: 2.4%Hispanic: 34.9%White: 59%American Indian: 1.2%Two or More Races: 2.4%
  • African American 2.4%
  • Hispanic 34.9%
  • White 59%
  • American Indian 1.2%
  • Two or More Races 2.4%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,830 reporting for every category shown · 1,830 in full cohort

African American: 10%Hispanic: 44.6%White: 38.3%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 2.6%Pacific Islander: 0.2%Two or More Races: 4%
  • African American 10%
  • Hispanic 44.6%
  • White 38.3%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 2.6%
  • Pacific Islander 0.2%
  • Two or More Races 4%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
83
Economically disadvantaged students
46
Emergent bilingual students
9
Special education students
14

TEA context labels

  • Alternative education campus under AEA procedures
  • Alternative education type: dropout recovery school
  • Rated under AEA procedures

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
Not reported
Students in TEA mobility denominator
Not reported
TEA-published mobility rate
Not reported

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
16

9.5% of cumulative year-end enrollment

Disciplinary actions
29

17.16 per 100 students

Cumulative year-end enrollment
169

2024–25

Share of students · 2024–25

This school
9.5%
Selected comparison
12.4%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,411 rated schools reporting

−2.9 pts vs similar economic context

Actions per 100 students · 2024–25

This school
17.16
Selected comparison
27.8

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,526 rated schools reporting

−10.6 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Rise Academy
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2024–25 169 16 9.5% 29 17.16 12.4% 27.8
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Rise Academy in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline 16 9.5% 29 17.16 12.4% 27.8
In-school suspensions Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Out-of-school suspensions 14 8.3% 17 10.06 6.4% 9
DAEP placements Suppressed — 10 5.92 — 5.5
Mandatory DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$7k$13k$20k2025
  • Rise Academy
  • Parent district: Weatherford ISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$7,688
Selected comparison
$12,279

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,802 rated schools reporting

−$4,591 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $7,688 per student for this campus, $15,200 per student for its parent district, Weatherford ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearRise AcademyParent district: Weatherford ISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2025$7,688$15,200$18,972$12,279 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,802 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$70,339+$3,780 vs similar economic context
Teachers
3−38.3 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
24.5+5.1 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Rise Academy

1 to 5 years: 20.6%6 to 10 years: 8.8%21 to 30 years: 70.6%
  • 1 to 5 years 20.6%
  • 6 to 10 years 8.8%
  • 21 to 30 years 70.6%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,830 reporting for every category shown · 1,830 in full cohort

Beginning: 5.8%1 to 5 years: 24.9%6 to 10 years: 19.3%11 to 20 years: 28.8%21 to 30 years: 16.4%Over 30 years: 4.4%
  • Beginning 5.8%
  • 1 to 5 years 24.9%
  • 6 to 10 years 19.3%
  • 11 to 20 years 28.8%
  • 21 to 30 years 16.4%
  • Over 30 years 4.4%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for Rise Academy in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classRise Academy · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Secondary English3.514.9
Secondary languages other than English1.717.4
Secondary math2.115.8
Secondary science2.717.3
Secondary social studies5.517.2

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 5 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this school ranks best

Out of 149 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.

#1 rankings

First-place results

4 measures

  • 1of 45

    Overall score

    Parker County · of the 45 that report this measure

  • 1of 42

    Student Achievement

    Parker County · of the 42 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 1of 42

    School Progress

    Parker County · of the 42 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 1of 42

    Relative Performance

    Parker County · of the 42 that report this measure

#4–10 rankings

Fourth- through tenth-place results

2 measures

  • 4of 18

    Social Studies — Approaches

    Parker County · of the 18 that report this measure

  • 8of 141

    Completed an OnRamps course and qualified for college credit

    Similar size · of the 141 that report this measure

These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 184903002.