Recent movement
Overall score rose 18 points
72 to 90 2024-25 to 2025-26
- 90 is 9 points above the 81 average among 134 charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
Open-enrollment charter campus
Richmond MS
International Leadership of Texas (ILTexas) · Richmond · 270 students
Official school websiteSchool information and family resources
- Current score
- 90/1002025-26
- Change
- +18 ptssince 2024-25
- Score vs similar economic context
- +9.0 ptsvs 81 average · 134 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context
- Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
- 32 of 134tied with 2 others
- Score vs similar-size group
- +9.8 ptsvs 80.2 average · 215 similarly sized rated charter campuses
- Similar size placement
- 36 of 215tied with 11 others
- Score vs state
- +8.3 ptsvs 81.7 average · 829 rated Texas charter campuses
- Texas charter placement
- 207 of 829tied with 27 others
A90
At a glance
The available rating history is moving up. The current score is above the 81 average for 134 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 80.2 average for 215 similarly sized rated charter campuses.The current score is above the 81.7 average for 829 rated Texas charter campuses.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
Recent domain gain
Academic Growth rose 26 points
56 to 82 2024-25 to 2025-26
- 82 is 8.8 points above the 73.2 average among 125 charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
STAAR result
All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters
- Meets
- 59%vs 45.4% avg · +13.6 pts
- Masters
- 27%vs 19.7% avg · +7.3 pts
Among 134 charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measureRecent movement
Overall score rose 18 points
72 to 90 2024-25 to 2025-26
- 90 is 9.8 points above the 80.2 average among 215 similarly sized charter campuses reporting this measure.
Recent domain gain
Academic Growth rose 26 points
56 to 82 2024-25 to 2025-26
- 82 is 7.3 points above the 74.7 average among 210 similarly sized charter campuses reporting this measure.
STAAR result
All Subjects above similar-size averages at Meets and Masters
- Meets
- 59%vs 43.2% avg · +15.8 pts
- Masters
- 27%vs 17.6% avg · +9.4 pts
Among 215 similarly sized charter campuses reporting this measure.
See the full measureRecent movement
Overall score rose 18 points
72 to 90 2024-25 to 2025-26
- 90 is 8.3 points above the 81.7 average among 829 Texas charter campuses reporting this measure.
Recent domain gain
Academic Growth rose 26 points
56 to 82 2024-25 to 2025-26
- 82 is 8 points above the 74 average among 784 Texas charter campuses reporting this measure.
STAAR result
All Subjects above Texas charter averages at Meets and Masters
- Meets
- 59%vs 45.5% avg · +13.5 pts
- Masters
- 27%vs 18.8% avg · +8.2 pts
Among 829 Texas charter campuses reporting this measure.
See the full measureSelected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Richmond MS is rated A by TEA, scoring 90 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81 average for 134 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context. It is up 18 points since 2024-25.
Ranks 32nd of 134 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context (tied with 2 others).
Richmond MS is rated A by TEA, scoring 90 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.2 average for 215 similarly sized rated charter campuses. It is up 18 points since 2024-25.
Ranks 36th of 215 similarly sized rated charter campuses (tied with 11 others).
Richmond MS is rated A by TEA, scoring 90 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.7 average for 829 rated Texas charter campuses. It is up 18 points since 2024-25.
Ranks 207th of 829 rated Texas charter campuses (tied with 27 others).
Put the numbers in context
Compare with
Jump to a section
2 years of ratings
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
View the yearly scores and comparisons
| Year | Rating | Score | Selected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rate | StateTexas charter average |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | A | 90 | 81.0 134 reporting | 81.7 829 reporting |
| 2024-25 | C | 72 | 82.9 128 reporting | 81.3 797 reporting |
Where the score comes from
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
- Richmond MS
- Similar economic-disadvantage rate (134 in cohort)
| Domain | Score | Grade | Points to next grade |
|---|---|---|---|
| Student Achievement | 87 | B | 3 |
| School Progress | 90 | A | — |
| Closing the Gaps | 89 | B | 1 |
| Academic Growth | 82 | B | 8 |
| Relative Performance | 90 | A | — |
Closest to moving up: Closing the Gaps, 1 point below A in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (90), so Student Achievement (87) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 90.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
- Approaches grade level
- Meets grade level
- Masters grade level
- Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (134 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only charter campuses for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
- Students
- 270
- Economically disadvantaged
- 59.3%−1.6 pts vs similar economic context
- English learners
- 24.8%+3.2 pts vs similar economic context
- Special education
- 12.2%−1.1 pts vs similar economic context
- Attendance
- 95.0%+2.7 pts vs similar economic context
- Chronically absent
- 15.4%−8.8 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Richmond MS
- African American 36.3%
- Hispanic 46.3%
- White 7%
- Asian 7%
- Pacific Islander 0.4%
- Two or More Races 3%
Selected comparison average For charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 134 reporting for every category shown · 134 in full cohort
- African American 23.1%
- Hispanic 49.6%
- White 16.4%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 7%
- Pacific Islander 0.2%
- Two or More Races 3.4%
Selected comparison average For similarly sized charter campuses · 215 reporting for every category shown · 215 in full cohort
- African American 21.8%
- Hispanic 57.9%
- White 12.8%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 4.4%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 2.7%
Texas charter average 829 reporting for every category shown · 829 Texas charter campuses in full cohort
- African American 17.5%
- Hispanic 61.8%
- White 12.2%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 5.5%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 2.5%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
- Students in this TEA accountability summary
- 270
- Economically disadvantaged students
- 160
- Emergent bilingual students
- 67
- Special education students
- 33
Campus mobility · 2024–25
- Mobile students
- 56
- Students in TEA mobility denominator
- 256
- TEA-published mobility rate
- 21.9%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 270 students in 2025–26, an increase of 43 (18.9%) from 2024–25.
- Latest enrollment
- 270
2025–26
- Change from 2024–25
- +43
Increase · +18.9%
Enrollment in 2025–26
- This school
- 270
- Selected comparison
- 489.2
| School year | Students enrolledRichmond MS | Change from previous school year | Average enrollmentselected comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024–25 | 227 | First available year | 481.6 |
| 2025–26 | 270 | Increase of 43 (18.9%) | 489.2 |
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting charter campuses in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
- Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
- 44
17.5% of cumulative year-end enrollment
- Disciplinary actions
- 74
29.37 per 100 students
- Cumulative year-end enrollment
- 252
2024–25
Share of students · 2024–25
- This school
- 17.5%
- Selected comparison
- 9.8%
Actions per 100 students · 2024–25
- This school
- 29.37
- Selected comparison
- 15.9
| School year | Cumulative enrollment | Studentsall discipline | Students% of enrollment | Actionsall discipline | Actionsper 100 students | Studentsselected comparison average % | Actionsselected comparison average per 100 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024–25 | 252 | 44 | 17.5% | 74 | 29.37 | 9.8% | 15.9 |
See 2024–25 discipline categories
| Category | Students | Students% of enrollment | Actions | Actionsper 100 students | Studentsselected comparison average % | Actionsselected comparison average per 100 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All discipline | 44 | 17.5% | 74 | 29.37 | 9.8% | 15.9 |
| In-school suspensions | Suppressed | — | Suppressed | — | — | — |
| Out-of-school suspensions | 43 | 17.1% | 66 | 26.19 | 7.8% | 11.1 |
| DAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Mandatory DAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Discretionary DAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| JJAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Mandatory JJAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Discretionary JJAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Expulsions | Suppressed | — | Suppressed | — | — | — |
| Mandatory expulsions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Discretionary expulsions | Suppressed | — | Suppressed | — | — | — |
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized charter campuses can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
- Richmond MS
- Parent district: International Leadership of Texas (ILTexas)
- Texas average
- Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
- This school
- $10,252
- Selected comparison
- $11,311
For 2025, TEA reported $10,252 per student for this campus, $18,074 per student for its parent district, International Leadership of Texas (ILTexas), $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
| Year | Richmond MS | Parent district: International Leadership of Texas (ILTexas) | Texas average | Selected comparison average | Reportingselected comparison |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | $10,252 | $18,074 | $18,972 | $11,311 | average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 127 rated charter campuses reporting |
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
- Average salary
- $60,431−$1,828 vs similar economic context
- Teachers
- 22−7.0 vs similar economic context
- Students per staff member
- 12.3−5.6 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Richmond MS
- Beginning 21.8%
- 1 to 5 years 34.5%
- 6 to 10 years 28.2%
- 11 to 20 years 9.1%
- 21 to 30 years 5.9%
Selected comparison average For charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 134 reporting for every category shown · 134 in full cohort
- Beginning 15.4%
- 1 to 5 years 41%
- 6 to 10 years 20.8%
- 11 to 20 years 16.8%
- 21 to 30 years 4.9%
- Over 30 years 1.1%
Selected comparison average For similarly sized charter campuses · 215 reporting for every category shown · 215 in full cohort
- Beginning 11.9%
- 1 to 5 years 41%
- 6 to 10 years 20.3%
- 11 to 20 years 16.8%
- 21 to 30 years 5.7%
- Over 30 years 1.5%
Texas charter average 829 reporting for every category shown · 829 Texas charter campuses in full cohort
- Beginning 13%
- 1 to 5 years 44.3%
- 6 to 10 years 19.6%
- 11 to 20 years 15.4%
- 21 to 30 years 4.8%
- Over 30 years 0.9%
Average students in a class
| Grade or subject | Average students per classRichmond MS · 2024–25 | Average students per classselected comparison |
|---|---|---|
| Grade 6 | 15.3 | 21.5 |
| Secondary English | 13 | 15.9 |
| Secondary languages other than English | 16.8 | 15.4 |
| Secondary math | 15.6 | 16.2 |
| Secondary science | 19.8 | 17 |
| Secondary social studies | 19.8 | 17.6 |
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 6 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
Where this school ranks best
Out of 72 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
#4–10 rankings
Fourth- through tenth-place results
1 measure
-
9of 134
Reading — Meets
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 134 that report this measure
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Download the full dataset · this campus's district
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 057848036.