Recent movement
Overall score rose 8 points
78 to 86 2024-25 to 2025-26
- 86 is 3.1 points above the 82.9 average among 108 charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
Open-enrollment charter campus
Richmond Elem
International Leadership of Texas (ILTexas) · Richmond · 867 students
Official school websiteSchool information and family resources
- Current score
- 86/1002025-26
- Change
- +8 ptssince 2024-25
- Score vs similar economic context
- +3.1 ptsvs 82.9 average · 108 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context
- Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
- 46 of 108tied with 1 other
- Score vs similar-size group
- +3.7 ptsvs 82.3 average · 358 similarly sized rated charter campuses
- Similar size placement
- 149 of 358tied with 13 others
- Score vs state
- +4.3 ptsvs 81.7 average · 829 rated Texas charter campuses
- Texas charter placement
- 335 of 829tied with 30 others
B86
At a glance
The available rating history is moving up. The current score is above the 82.9 average for 108 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 82.3 average for 358 similarly sized rated charter campuses.The current score is above the 81.7 average for 829 rated Texas charter campuses.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
Recent domain gain
Academic Growth rose 20 points
66 to 86 2024-25 to 2025-26
- 86 is 11.2 points above the 74.8 average among 100 charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
STAAR result
All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters
- Meets
- 57%vs 48.1% avg · +8.9 pts
- Masters
- 27%vs 20.6% avg · +6.4 pts
Among 108 charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measureRecent movement
Overall score rose 8 points
78 to 86 2024-25 to 2025-26
- 86 is 3.7 points above the 82.3 average among 358 similarly sized charter campuses reporting this measure.
Recent domain gain
Academic Growth rose 20 points
66 to 86 2024-25 to 2025-26
- 86 is 13 points above the 73 average among 357 similarly sized charter campuses reporting this measure.
STAAR result
All Subjects above similar-size averages at Meets and Masters
- Meets
- 57%vs 49% avg · +8 pts
- Masters
- 27%vs 21.4% avg · +5.6 pts
Among 358 similarly sized charter campuses reporting this measure.
See the full measureRecent movement
Overall score rose 8 points
78 to 86 2024-25 to 2025-26
- 86 is 4.3 points above the 81.7 average among 829 Texas charter campuses reporting this measure.
Recent domain gain
Academic Growth rose 20 points
66 to 86 2024-25 to 2025-26
- 86 is 12 points above the 74 average among 784 Texas charter campuses reporting this measure.
STAAR result
All Subjects above Texas charter averages at Meets and Masters
- Meets
- 57%vs 45.5% avg · +11.5 pts
- Masters
- 27%vs 18.8% avg · +8.2 pts
Among 829 Texas charter campuses reporting this measure.
See the full measureSelected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Richmond Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 86 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 82.9 average for 108 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context. It is up 8 points since 2024-25.
Ranks 46th of 108 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context (tied with 1 other).
Richmond Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 86 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 82.3 average for 358 similarly sized rated charter campuses. It is up 8 points since 2024-25.
Ranks 149th of 358 similarly sized rated charter campuses (tied with 13 others).
Richmond Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 86 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.7 average for 829 rated Texas charter campuses. It is up 8 points since 2024-25.
Ranks 335th of 829 rated Texas charter campuses (tied with 30 others).
Put the numbers in context
Compare with
Jump to a section
2 years of ratings
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
View the yearly scores and comparisons
| Year | Rating | Score | Selected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rate | StateTexas charter average |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | B | 86 | 82.9 108 reporting | 81.7 829 reporting |
| 2024-25 | C | 78 | 83.0 105 reporting | 81.3 797 reporting |
Where the score comes from
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
- Richmond Elem
- Similar economic-disadvantage rate (108 in cohort)
| Domain | Score | Grade | Points to next grade |
|---|---|---|---|
| Student Achievement | 82 | B | 8 |
| School Progress | 86 | B | 4 |
| Closing the Gaps | 86 | B | 4 |
| Academic Growth | 86 | B | 4 |
| Relative Performance | 82 | B | 8 |
Closest to moving up: School Progress, 4 points below A in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (86), so Student Achievement (82) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 86.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
- Approaches grade level
- Meets grade level
- Masters grade level
- Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (108 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only charter campuses for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
- Students
- 867
- Economically disadvantaged
- 53.4%−1.7 pts vs similar economic context
- English learners
- 32.1%+12.2 pts vs similar economic context
- Special education
- 13.6%+0.1 pts vs similar economic context
- Attendance
- 94.6%+2.3 pts vs similar economic context
- Chronically absent
- 18.5%−5.6 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Richmond Elem
- African American 34.9%
- Hispanic 45.3%
- White 8.1%
- American Indian 0.6%
- Asian 6.7%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 4.3%
Selected comparison average For charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 108 reporting for every category shown · 108 in full cohort
- African American 19.7%
- Hispanic 46.4%
- White 22.7%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 7.1%
- Pacific Islander 0.2%
- Two or More Races 3.6%
Selected comparison average For similarly sized charter campuses · 358 reporting for every category shown · 358 in full cohort
- African American 14.8%
- Hispanic 66.2%
- White 9.6%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 6.9%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 2.1%
Texas charter average 829 reporting for every category shown · 829 Texas charter campuses in full cohort
- African American 17.5%
- Hispanic 61.8%
- White 12.2%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 5.5%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 2.5%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
- Students in this TEA accountability summary
- 867
- Economically disadvantaged students
- 463
- Emergent bilingual students
- 278
- Special education students
- 118
Campus mobility · 2024–25
- Mobile students
- 153
- Students in TEA mobility denominator
- 637
- TEA-published mobility rate
- 24%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 867 students in 2025–26, an increase of 163 (23.2%) from 2024–25.
- Latest enrollment
- 867
2025–26
- Change from 2024–25
- +163
Increase · +23.2%
Enrollment in 2025–26
- This school
- 867
- Selected comparison
- 502.9
| School year | Students enrolledRichmond Elem | Change from previous school year | Average enrollmentselected comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024–25 | 704 | First available year | 490 |
| 2025–26 | 867 | Increase of 163 (23.2%) | 502.9 |
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting charter campuses in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
- Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
- 88
11.2% of cumulative year-end enrollment
- Disciplinary actions
- 157
19.95 per 100 students
- Cumulative year-end enrollment
- 787
2024–25
Share of students · 2024–25
- This school
- 11.2%
- Selected comparison
- 9.2%
Actions per 100 students · 2024–25
- This school
- 19.95
- Selected comparison
- 14.5
| School year | Cumulative enrollment | Studentsall discipline | Students% of enrollment | Actionsall discipline | Actionsper 100 students | Studentsselected comparison average % | Actionsselected comparison average per 100 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024–25 | 787 | 88 | 11.2% | 157 | 19.95 | 9.2% | 14.5 |
See 2024–25 discipline categories
| Category | Students | Students% of enrollment | Actions | Actionsper 100 students | Studentsselected comparison average % | Actionsselected comparison average per 100 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All discipline | 88 | 11.2% | 157 | 19.95 | 9.2% | 14.5 |
| In-school suspensions | Suppressed | — | Suppressed | — | — | — |
| Out-of-school suspensions | 87 | 11.1% | 150 | 19.06 | 7.2% | 9.6 |
| DAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Mandatory DAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Discretionary DAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| JJAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Mandatory JJAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Discretionary JJAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Expulsions | Suppressed | — | Suppressed | — | — | — |
| Mandatory expulsions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Discretionary expulsions | Suppressed | — | Suppressed | — | — | — |
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized charter campuses can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
- Richmond Elem
- Parent district: International Leadership of Texas (ILTexas)
- Texas average
- Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
- This school
- $8,523
- Selected comparison
- $11,012
For 2025, TEA reported $8,523 per student for this campus, $18,074 per student for its parent district, International Leadership of Texas (ILTexas), $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
| Year | Richmond Elem | Parent district: International Leadership of Texas (ILTexas) | Texas average | Selected comparison average | Reportingselected comparison |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | $8,523 | $18,074 | $18,972 | $11,012 | average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 105 rated charter campuses reporting |
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
- Average salary
- $61,527−$277 vs similar economic context
- Teachers
- 51+21.7 vs similar economic context
- Students per staff member
- 16.9−1.4 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Richmond Elem
- Beginning 23%
- 1 to 5 years 52.5%
- 6 to 10 years 15.2%
- 11 to 20 years 5.8%
- 21 to 30 years 3.3%
Selected comparison average For charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 108 reporting for every category shown · 108 in full cohort
- Beginning 13.9%
- 1 to 5 years 40.2%
- 6 to 10 years 20.8%
- 11 to 20 years 17.9%
- 21 to 30 years 6%
- Over 30 years 1.2%
Selected comparison average For similarly sized charter campuses · 358 reporting for every category shown · 358 in full cohort
- Beginning 13.7%
- 1 to 5 years 47.6%
- 6 to 10 years 19.8%
- 11 to 20 years 13%
- 21 to 30 years 3.3%
- Over 30 years 0.4%
Texas charter average 829 reporting for every category shown · 829 Texas charter campuses in full cohort
- Beginning 13%
- 1 to 5 years 44.3%
- 6 to 10 years 19.6%
- 11 to 20 years 15.4%
- 21 to 30 years 4.8%
- Over 30 years 0.9%
Average students in a class
| Grade or subject | Average students per classRichmond Elem · 2024–25 | Average students per classselected comparison |
|---|---|---|
| Kindergarten | 17.1 | 22.1 |
| Grade 1 | 1 | 22.1 |
| Grade 2 | 18.2 | 22.9 |
| Grade 3 | 18.6 | 22.9 |
| Grade 4 | 18.9 | 23 |
| Grade 5 | 14 | 23.5 |
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 6 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Download the full dataset · this campus's district
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 057848035.