+6.3 ptsvs 80.7 average · 1,935 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
501 of 1,935tied with 81 others
Score vs region
+8.5 ptsvs 78.5 average · 301 rated schools in Region 12: Waco
Region 12: Waco placement
62 of 301tied with 14 others
Score vs county
+7.9 ptsvs 79.1 average · 100 rated schools in Bell County
Bell County placement
14 of 100tied with 5 others
Score vs similar-size group
+6.9 ptsvs 80.1 average · 4,747 similarly sized rated schools
Similar size placement
1,328 of 4,747tied with 202 others
Score vs state
+5.7 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
Texas placement
2,456 of 7,646tied with 307 others
B87
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 87 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 80.7 average for 1,935 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 78.5 average for 301 rated schools in Region 12: Waco.The current score is above the 79.1 average for 100 rated schools in Bell County.The current score is above the 80.1 average for 4,747 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
STAAR result
All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters
Meets
64%vs 49.5% avg · +14.5 pts
Masters
32%vs 20.4% avg · +11.6 pts
Among 1,849 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Richard E Cavazos Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 87 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.7 average for 1,935 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is down 4 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 501st of 1,935 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 81 others).
Richard E Cavazos Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 87 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 78.5 average for 301 rated schools in Region 12: Waco. It is down 4 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 62nd of 301 rated schools in Region 12: Waco (tied with 14 others).
Richard E Cavazos Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 87 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 79.1 average for 100 rated schools in Bell County. It is down 4 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 14th of 100 rated schools in Bell County (tied with 5 others).
Richard E Cavazos Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 87 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.1 average for 4,747 similarly sized rated schools. It is down 4 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 1,328th of 4,747 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 202 others).
Richard E Cavazos Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 87 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is down 4 points since 2021-22.
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated B with 87 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Student Achievement90 A+11.0 vs similar economic context · 1,849 reporting
School Progress90 A+8.6 vs similar economic context · 1,842 reporting
Closing the Gaps80 B+2.1 vs similar economic context · 1,825 reporting
Academic Growth83 B+8.6 vs similar economic context · 1,788 reporting
Relative Performance90 A+10.4 vs similar economic context · 1,842 reporting
Richard E Cavazos Elem
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,935 in cohort)
Domain scores
Domain
Score
Grade
Points to next grade
Student Achievement
90
A
—
School Progress
90
A
—
Closing the Gaps
80
B
10
Academic Growth
83
B
7
Relative Performance
90
A
—
Closest to moving up: Closing the Gaps, 10 points below A in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student
Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
All Subjects
Approaches grade level86%+11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,849 reporting
Meets grade level64%+15 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,849 reporting
Masters grade level32%+12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,849 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
Approaches grade level90%+13 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,846 reporting
Meets grade level73%+19 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,846 reporting
Masters grade level37%+15 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,846 reporting
Math3 performance levels
Approaches grade level87%+15 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,838 reporting
Meets grade level64%+21 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,838 reporting
Masters grade level33%+16 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,838 reporting
Science3 performance levels
Approaches grade level70%−6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,693 reporting
Meets grade level40%−8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,693 reporting
Masters grade level15%−7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,693 reporting
Approaches grade level
Meets grade level
Masters grade level
Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,935 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
518
Economically disadvantaged
60.9%−0.4 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
10.9%−5.3 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
28.5%+9.7 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
94.9%+0.7 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
12.2%−3.9 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Richard E Cavazos Elem
African American 17.2%
Hispanic 41.5%
White 30.2%
Asian 0.8%
Pacific Islander 1.6%
Two or More Races 8.7%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,935 reporting for every category shown · 1,935 in full cohort
African American 10.4%
Hispanic 48.9%
White 34.2%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 2.2%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 3.8%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 12: Waco · 301 reporting for every category shown · 301 in full cohort
African American 14.2%
Hispanic 37.4%
White 40.7%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 1.1%
Pacific Islander 0.7%
Two or More Races 5.7%
Selected comparison averageFor Bell County · 100 reporting for every category shown · 100 in full cohort
African American 21.7%
Hispanic 37%
White 30%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 1.8%
Pacific Islander 1.3%
Two or More Races 8.1%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 4,747 reporting for every category shown · 4,747 in full cohort
African American 12.2%
Hispanic 55%
White 24.7%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.5%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
African American 11.5%
Hispanic 52.6%
White 27.8%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
516
Economically disadvantaged students
314
Emergent bilingual students
56
Special education students
147
Campus mobility · 2024–25
Mobile students
78
Students in TEA mobility denominator
478
TEA-published mobility rate
16.3%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 518 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 49 (8.6%) from 2024–25.
Latest enrollment
518
2025–26
Change from 2024–25
−49
Decrease · −8.6%
Change since 2021–22
−77
Decrease · −12.9%
Enrollment in 2025–26
This school
518
Selected comparison
624.2
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,901 rated schools reporting
Student enrollment by school year for Richard E Cavazos Elem
School year
Students enrolledRichard E Cavazos Elem
Change from previous school year
Average enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22
595
First available year
635.8
2022–23
607
Increase of 12 (2.0%)
640.1
2023–24
550
Decrease of 57 (9.4%)
638.1
2024–25
567
Increase of 17 (3.1%)
634.2
2025–26
518
Decrease of 49 (8.6%)
624.2
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
56
9.1% of cumulative year-end enrollment
Disciplinary actions
269
43.53 per 100 students
Cumulative year-end enrollment
618
2024–25
Share of students · 2024–25
This school
9.1%
Selected comparison
12.8%
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,470 rated schools reporting
−3.7 pts vs similar economic context
Actions per 100 students · 2024–25
This school
43.53
Selected comparison
29.1
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,592 rated schools reporting
+14.4 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Richard E Cavazos Elem
School year
Cumulative enrollment
Studentsall discipline
Students% of enrollment
Actionsall discipline
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21
666
41
6.2%
116
17.42
9.7%
19.1
2021–22
664
54
8.1%
229
34.49
12.6%
29
2022–23
647
64
9.9%
188
29.06
13.1%
30.9
2023–24
595
67
11.3%
342
57.48
13.0%
30.6
2024–25
618
56
9.1%
269
43.53
12.8%
29.1
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Richard E Cavazos Elem in 2024–25
Category
Students
Students% of enrollment
Actions
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline
56
9.1%
269
43.53
12.8%
29.1
In-school suspensions
55
8.9%
260
42.07
11.5%
22.5
Out-of-school suspensions
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
DAEP placements
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Mandatory DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary DAEP placements
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
Richard E Cavazos Elem
Parent district: Killeen ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
This school
$11,671
Selected comparison
$12,497
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,908 rated schools reporting
−$826 vs similar economic context
For 2025, TEA reported $11,671 per student for this campus, $14,322 per student for its parent district, Killeen ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
Year
Richard E Cavazos Elem
Parent district: Killeen ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison average
Reportingselected comparison
2018
$7,684
$9,955
$13,054
$7,916
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,769 rated schools reporting
2019
$8,278
$10,689
$13,108
$8,061
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,786 rated schools reporting
2020
$8,854
$13,484
$14,058
$8,671
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,805 rated schools reporting
2021
$9,556
$14,264
$14,797
$9,096
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,819 rated schools reporting
2022
$10,498
$13,404
$15,708
$10,431
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,837 rated schools reporting
2023
$10,773
$14,811
$16,792
$11,103
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,861 rated schools reporting
2024
$12,683
$15,038
$18,125
$11,929
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,887 rated schools reporting
2025
$11,671
$14,322
$18,972
$12,497
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,908 rated schools reporting
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
Average salary
$73,449+$7,068 vs similar economic context
Teachers
33−8.7 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
15.5−3.7 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Richard E Cavazos Elem
Beginning 3%
1 to 5 years 23.4%
6 to 10 years 38%
11 to 20 years 26.6%
21 to 30 years 6%
Over 30 years 3%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,935 reporting for every category shown · 1,935 in full cohort
Beginning 6.1%
1 to 5 years 25.5%
6 to 10 years 19.1%
11 to 20 years 28.4%
21 to 30 years 16.2%
Over 30 years 4.2%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 12: Waco · 301 reporting for every category shown · 301 in full cohort
Beginning 6.8%
1 to 5 years 26.8%
6 to 10 years 19%
11 to 20 years 27.1%
21 to 30 years 16.2%
Over 30 years 4.2%
Selected comparison averageFor Bell County · 100 reporting for every category shown · 100 in full cohort
Beginning 6.1%
1 to 5 years 29.2%
6 to 10 years 21.5%
11 to 20 years 26.2%
21 to 30 years 13.8%
Over 30 years 3.2%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 4,747 reporting for every category shown · 4,747 in full cohort
Beginning 6.1%
1 to 5 years 26.2%
6 to 10 years 19.5%
11 to 20 years 29%
21 to 30 years 15.8%
Over 30 years 3.2%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 25.6%
6 to 10 years 19.2%
11 to 20 years 28.7%
21 to 30 years 15.9%
Over 30 years 3.7%
Average students in a class
TEA average class size by grade or subject for Richard E Cavazos Elem in 2024–25
Grade or subject
Average students per classRichard E Cavazos Elem · 2024–25
Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten
18.6
17.9
Grade 1
21.3
18.2
Grade 2
16.2
18.4
Grade 3
18.8
18.6
Grade 4
21.9
18.9
Grade 5
22.6
19.6
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 6 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
Out of 105 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
#1 rankings
First-place results
1 measure
1of 95
Math — Masters
Bell County · of the 95 that report this measure · tied with 2
#4–10 rankings
Fourth- through tenth-place results
7 measures
4of 95
All Subjects — Masters
Bell County · of the 95 that report this measure · tied with 2
5of 95
Reading — Approaches
Bell County · of the 95 that report this measure · tied with 1
6of 95
Reading — Masters
Bell County · of the 95 that report this measure
7of 95
School Progress
Bell County · of the 95 that report this measure · tied with 2
7of 95
Reading — Meets
Bell County · of the 95 that report this measure
7of 95
Math — Approaches
Bell County · of the 95 that report this measure · tied with 1
7of 95
Math — Meets
Bell County · of the 95 that report this measure
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above
this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears
once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any
tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones
no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 014906137.