Recent domain gain
Student Achievement rose 2 points
70 to 72 2024-25 to 2025-26
See the full measureTraditional public school campus
Red Oak Elem
Ellis County · Region 10: Richardson · 472 students
Official school websiteSchool information and family resources
- Current score
- 70/1002025-26
- Change
- −21 ptssince 2021-22
- Score vs similar economic context
- −10.6 ptsvs 80.6 average · 1,944 rated schools serving a similar economic context
- Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
- 1,654 of 1,944tied with 33 others
- Score vs region
- −12.2 ptsvs 82.2 average · 1,157 rated schools in Region 10: Richardson
- Region 10: Richardson placement
- 995 of 1,157tied with 11 others
- Score vs county
- −10.2 ptsvs 80.2 average · 64 rated schools in Ellis County
- Ellis County placement
- 55 of 64tied with 1 other
- Score vs similar-size group
- −10.1 ptsvs 80.1 average · 4,590 similarly sized rated schools
- Similar size placement
- 3,725 of 4,590tied with 56 others
- Score vs state
- −11.3 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
- Texas placement
- 6,471 of 7,646tied with 76 others
C70
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 92 in 2021-22. The current score is below the 80.6 average for 1,944 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is below the 82.2 average for 1,157 rated schools in Region 10: Richardson.The current score is below the 80.2 average for 64 rated schools in Ellis County.The current score is below the 80.1 average for 4,590 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is below the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
Current strength
Chronically absent lower than the similar-context average
8.3% −7.9 pts vs 16.2%
- 8.3% is 7.9 percentage points lower than the 16.2% average among 1,886 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
Current strength
Attendance above the similar-context average
95.8% +1.6 pts vs 94.2%
- 95.8% is 1.6 percentage points above the 94.2% average among 1,886 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
Recent domain gain
Student Achievement rose 2 points
70 to 72 2024-25 to 2025-26
See the full measureCurrent strength
Chronically absent lower than the Region 10: Richardson average
8.3% −6.2 pts vs 14.5%
- 8.3% is 6.2 percentage points lower than the 14.5% average among 1,107 schools in Region 10: Richardson reporting this measure.
Current strength
Attendance above the Region 10: Richardson average
95.8% +1.3 pts vs 94.5%
- 95.8% is 1.3 percentage points above the 94.5% average among 1,107 schools in Region 10: Richardson reporting this measure.
Recent domain gain
Student Achievement rose 2 points
70 to 72 2024-25 to 2025-26
See the full measureCurrent strength
Chronically absent lower than the Ellis County average
8.3% −4.8 pts vs 13.1%
- 8.3% is 4.8 percentage points lower than the 13.1% average among 59 schools in Ellis County reporting this measure.
Current strength
Attendance above the Ellis County average
95.8% +1.1 pts vs 94.7%
- 95.8% is 1.1 percentage points above the 94.7% average among 59 schools in Ellis County reporting this measure.
Recent domain gain
Student Achievement rose 2 points
70 to 72 2024-25 to 2025-26
See the full measureCurrent strength
Chronically absent lower than the similar-size average
8.3% −7.3 pts vs 15.6%
- 8.3% is 7.3 percentage points lower than the 15.6% average among 4,456 similarly sized schools reporting this measure.
Current strength
Attendance above the similar-size average
95.8% +1.4 pts vs 94.4%
- 95.8% is 1.4 percentage points above the 94.4% average among 4,461 similarly sized schools reporting this measure.
Recent domain gain
Student Achievement rose 2 points
70 to 72 2024-25 to 2025-26
See the full measureCurrent strength
Chronically absent lower than the Texas average
8.3% −8.4 pts vs 16.7%
- 8.3% is 8.4 percentage points lower than the 16.7% average among 7,358 Texas schools reporting this measure.
Current strength
Attendance above the Texas average
95.8% +1.7 pts vs 94.1%
- 95.8% is 1.7 percentage points above the 94.1% average among 7,366 Texas schools reporting this measure.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Red Oak Elem is rated C by TEA, scoring 70 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 80.6 average for 1,944 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is down 21 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 1,654th of 1,944 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 33 others).
Red Oak Elem is rated C by TEA, scoring 70 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 82.2 average for 1,157 rated schools in Region 10: Richardson. It is down 21 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 995th of 1,157 rated schools in Region 10: Richardson (tied with 11 others).
Red Oak Elem is rated C by TEA, scoring 70 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 80.2 average for 64 rated schools in Ellis County. It is down 21 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 55th of 64 rated schools in Ellis County (tied with 1 other).
Red Oak Elem is rated C by TEA, scoring 70 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 80.1 average for 4,590 similarly sized rated schools. It is down 21 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 3,725th of 4,590 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 56 others).
Red Oak Elem is rated C by TEA, scoring 70 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is down 21 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 6,471st of 7,646 rated Texas schools (tied with 76 others).
Put the numbers in context
Compare with
Jump to a section
5 years of ratings
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 92 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
View the yearly scores and comparisons
| Year | Rating | Score | Selected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rate | StateTexas average |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | C | 70 | 80.6 1,944 reporting | 81.3 7,646 reporting |
| 2024-25 | C | 71 | 80.3 1,921 reporting | 81.2 7,554 reporting |
| 2023-24 | A | 90 | 78.3 1,901 reporting | 78.9 7,466 reporting |
| 2022-23 | C | 74 | 78.8 1,871 reporting | 79.1 7,377 reporting |
| 2021-22 | A | 91 | 82.4 1,847 reporting | 83.7 7,283 reporting |
Where the score comes from
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
- Red Oak Elem
- Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,944 in cohort)
| Domain | Score | Grade | Points to next grade |
|---|---|---|---|
| Student Achievement | 72 | C | 8 |
| School Progress | 71 | C | 9 |
| Closing the Gaps | 66 | D | 4 |
| Academic Growth | 71 | C | 9 |
| Relative Performance | 70 | C | 10 |
Closest to moving up: Closing the Gaps, 4 points below C in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is Student Achievement (72), so School Progress (71) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 72.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
- Approaches grade level
- Meets grade level
- Masters grade level
- Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,944 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
- Students
- 472
- Economically disadvantaged
- 61.4%−0.4 pts vs similar economic context
- English learners
- 10.4%−6.0 pts vs similar economic context
- Special education
- 29.4%+10.6 pts vs similar economic context
- Attendance
- 95.8%+1.6 pts vs similar economic context
- Chronically absent
- 8.3%−7.9 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Red Oak Elem
- African American 43%
- Hispanic 37.3%
- White 15.3%
- Asian 1.1%
- Two or More Races 3.4%
Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,944 reporting for every category shown · 1,944 in full cohort
- African American 10.5%
- Hispanic 49.2%
- White 33.7%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 2.3%
- Pacific Islander 0.2%
- Two or More Races 3.8%
Selected comparison average For Region 10: Richardson · 1,157 reporting for every category shown · 1,157 in full cohort
- African American 17.4%
- Hispanic 43.5%
- White 24.5%
- American Indian 0.6%
- Asian 9.9%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 4%
Selected comparison average For Ellis County · 64 reporting for every category shown · 64 in full cohort
- African American 17%
- Hispanic 43.6%
- White 34.3%
- American Indian 0.2%
- Asian 0.6%
- Pacific Islander 0.2%
- Two or More Races 4.2%
Selected comparison average For similarly sized schools · 4,590 reporting for every category shown · 4,590 in full cohort
- African American 12%
- Hispanic 55.1%
- White 25.2%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 3.9%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 3.4%
Statewide average 7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
- African American 11.5%
- Hispanic 52.6%
- White 27.8%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 4.2%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
- Students in this TEA accountability summary
- 472
- Economically disadvantaged students
- 290
- Emergent bilingual students
- 49
- Special education students
- 139
Campus mobility · 2024–25
- Mobile students
- 58
- Students in TEA mobility denominator
- 414
- TEA-published mobility rate
- 14%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA did not publish an enrollment count for 2025–26 in this PEIMS report, so no current year-over-year change is calculated. The latest available PEIMS count is 528 students in 2022–23.
- Latest available PEIMS enrollment
- 528
2022–23
Enrollment in 2022–23
- This school
- 528
- Selected comparison
- 639.1
| School year | Students enrolledRed Oak Elem | Change from previous school year | Average enrollmentselected comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021–22 | 542 | First available year | 634.3 |
| 2022–23 | 528 | Decrease of 14 (2.6%) | 639.1 |
| 2023–24 | Not reported | Not available | — |
| 2024–25 | Not reported | Not available | — |
| 2025–26 | Not reported | Not available | — |
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
- Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
- 17
3.1% of cumulative year-end enrollment
- Disciplinary actions
- 19
3.50 per 100 students
- Cumulative year-end enrollment
- 543
2024–25
Share of students · 2024–25
- This school
- 3.1%
- Selected comparison
- 12.7%
Actions per 100 students · 2024–25
- This school
- 3.5
- Selected comparison
- 29.1
| School year | Cumulative enrollment | Studentsall discipline | Students% of enrollment | Actionsall discipline | Actionsper 100 students | Studentsselected comparison average % | Actionsselected comparison average per 100 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020–21 | 608 | 21 | 3.5% | 47 | 7.73 | 9.7% | 19.1 |
| 2021–22 | 603 | 13 | 2.2% | 22 | 3.65 | 12.6% | 29 |
| 2022–23 | 560 | 55 | 9.8% | 114 | 20.36 | 13.1% | 30.9 |
| 2023–24 | 574 | 25 | 4.4% | 31 | 5.40 | 13.0% | 30.6 |
| 2024–25 | 543 | 17 | 3.1% | 19 | 3.50 | 12.7% | 29.1 |
See 2024–25 discipline categories
| Category | Students | Students% of enrollment | Actions | Actionsper 100 students | Studentsselected comparison average % | Actionsselected comparison average per 100 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All discipline | 17 | 3.1% | 19 | 3.50 | 12.7% | 29.1 |
| In-school suspensions | 16 | 3.0% | 18 | 3.31 | 11.5% | 22.5 |
| Out-of-school suspensions | Suppressed | — | Suppressed | — | — | — |
| DAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Mandatory DAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Discretionary DAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| JJAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Mandatory JJAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Discretionary JJAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Expulsions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Mandatory expulsions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Discretionary expulsions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
- Red Oak Elem
- Parent district: Red Oak ISD
- Texas average
- Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
- This school
- $11,006
- Selected comparison
- $12,539
For 2025, TEA reported $11,006 per student for this campus, $23,413 per student for its parent district, Red Oak ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
| Year | Red Oak Elem | Parent district: Red Oak ISD | Texas average | Selected comparison average | Reportingselected comparison |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | $6,549 | $11,173 | $13,054 | $7,933 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,779 rated schools reporting |
| 2019 | $6,871 | $11,405 | $13,108 | $8,078 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,795 rated schools reporting |
| 2020 | $7,311 | $12,110 | $14,058 | $8,689 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,815 rated schools reporting |
| 2021 | $8,483 | $12,155 | $14,797 | $9,110 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,829 rated schools reporting |
| 2022 | $8,758 | $12,798 | $15,708 | $10,486 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,848 rated schools reporting |
| 2023 | $9,210 | $13,429 | $16,792 | $11,133 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,871 rated schools reporting |
| 2024 | $10,367 | $16,699 | $18,125 | $11,959 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,897 rated schools reporting |
| 2025 | $11,006 | $23,413 | $18,972 | $12,539 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,917 rated schools reporting |
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
- Average salary
- $66,995+$617 vs similar economic context
- Teachers
- 36−6.4 vs similar economic context
- Students per staff member
- 13.3−5.8 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Red Oak Elem
- Beginning 5.6%
- 1 to 5 years 25.3%
- 6 to 10 years 22.5%
- 11 to 20 years 22.5%
- 21 to 30 years 19.9%
- Over 30 years 3.9%
Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,944 reporting for every category shown · 1,944 in full cohort
- Beginning 6.1%
- 1 to 5 years 25.7%
- 6 to 10 years 19.1%
- 11 to 20 years 28.4%
- 21 to 30 years 16.1%
- Over 30 years 4.2%
Selected comparison average For Region 10: Richardson · 1,157 reporting for every category shown · 1,157 in full cohort
- Beginning 6.9%
- 1 to 5 years 29%
- 6 to 10 years 20.1%
- 11 to 20 years 27.5%
- 21 to 30 years 13.7%
- Over 30 years 2.8%
Selected comparison average For Ellis County · 64 reporting for every category shown · 64 in full cohort
- Beginning 5.1%
- 1 to 5 years 23.9%
- 6 to 10 years 20.5%
- 11 to 20 years 33.1%
- 21 to 30 years 14.9%
- Over 30 years 2.5%
Selected comparison average For similarly sized schools · 4,590 reporting for every category shown · 4,590 in full cohort
- Beginning 6.1%
- 1 to 5 years 26.1%
- 6 to 10 years 19.3%
- 11 to 20 years 29%
- 21 to 30 years 16%
- Over 30 years 3.3%
Statewide average 7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
- Beginning 6.2%
- 1 to 5 years 25.6%
- 6 to 10 years 19.2%
- 11 to 20 years 28.7%
- 21 to 30 years 15.9%
- Over 30 years 3.7%
Average students in a class
| Grade or subject | Average students per classRed Oak Elem · 2024–25 | Average students per classselected comparison |
|---|---|---|
| Kindergarten | 15.9 | 18 |
| Grade 1 | 17.7 | 18.2 |
| Grade 2 | 18 | 18.4 |
| Grade 3 | 18.4 | 18.6 |
| Grade 4 | 18.3 | 18.9 |
| Grade 5 | 18.9 | 19.6 |
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 6 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
Where this school ranks best
Out of 105 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
#4–10 rankings
Fourth- through tenth-place results
1 measure
-
9of 59
Attendance
Ellis County · of the 59 that report this measure · tied with 2
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Download the full dataset · this campus's district
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 070911101.