Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

Red Elem

Harris County · Region 04: Houston · 502 students

Official school websiteSchool information and family resources

Current score
80/1002025-26
Change
−13 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
±0.0 ptsvs 80 average · 2,004 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
1,035 of 2,004tied with 78 others
B80

At a glance

Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 94 in 2021-22. The current score is level with the 80 average for 2,004 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

Recent domain gain

Closing the Gaps rose 8 points

72 to 80 2024-25 to 2025-26

  • 80 is 2.7 points above the 77.3 average among 1,875 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

STAAR result

Reading above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
57%vs 53.1% avg · +3.9 pts
Masters
28%vs 21.3% avg · +6.7 pts

Among 1,898 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Red Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 80 out of 100 for 2025-26 — level with the 80 average for 2,004 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is down 13 points since 2021-22.

Ranks 1,035th of 2,004 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 78 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 5 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. Who this school serves
  6. Student counts behind the percentages
  7. Enrollment over time
  8. Discipline and removal from class
  9. Spending per student
  10. Teachers and actual class size
  11. Where this comes from

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
908070 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas averageRed Elem 9389857880 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 94 that year.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26B8080.0 2,004 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25C7879.8 1,979 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting
2023-24B8577.9 1,959 reporting78.9 7,466 reporting
2022-23B8978.4 1,926 reporting79.1 7,377 reporting
2021-22A9382.2 1,902 reporting83.7 7,283 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement77 C−1.0 vs similar economic context · 1,902 reporting
  • School Progress80 B−0.9 vs similar economic context · 1,894 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps80 B+2.7 vs similar economic context · 1,875 reporting
  • Academic Growth75 C+1.0 vs similar economic context · 1,837 reporting
  • Relative Performance80 B+0.8 vs similar economic context · 1,894 reporting
  • Red Elem
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,004 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement77C3
School Progress80B10
Closing the Gaps80B10
Academic Growth75C5
Relative Performance80B10

Closest to moving up: School Progress, 10 points below A in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (80), so Student Achievement (77) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 80.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level73%−1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,902 reporting
  • Meets grade level49%+1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,902 reporting
  • Masters grade level24%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,902 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level76%±0 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,898 reporting
  • Meets grade level57%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,898 reporting
  • Masters grade level28%+7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,898 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level68%−3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,889 reporting
  • Meets grade level42%−1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,889 reporting
  • Masters grade level18%+2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,889 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level77%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,738 reporting
  • Meets grade level49%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,738 reporting
  • Masters grade level28%+7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,738 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,004 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
502
Economically disadvantaged
63.7%−0.3 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
33.5%+16.0 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
22.2%+3.3 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
95.0%+0.8 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
12.8%−3.6 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Red Elem

African American: 21.6%Hispanic: 56.7%White: 13.8%American Indian: 0.6%Asian: 4.6%Two or More Races: 2.8%
  • African American 21.6%
  • Hispanic 56.7%
  • White 13.8%
  • American Indian 0.6%
  • Asian 4.6%
  • Two or More Races 2.8%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,004 reporting for every category shown · 2,004 in full cohort

African American: 11%Hispanic: 50.9%White: 31.6%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 2.2%Pacific Islander: 0.2%Two or More Races: 3.7%
  • African American 11%
  • Hispanic 50.9%
  • White 31.6%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 2.2%
  • Pacific Islander 0.2%
  • Two or More Races 3.7%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
501
Economically disadvantaged students
319
Emergent bilingual students
168
Special education students
111

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
37
Students in TEA mobility denominator
435
TEA-published mobility rate
8.5%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 502 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 28 (5.3%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
502

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
−28

Decrease · −5.3%

Change since 2021–22
−88

Decrease · −14.9%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
502
Selected comparison
621.2

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,968 rated schools reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Red Elem
School yearStudents enrolledRed ElemChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22 590 First available year 635.9
2022–23 607 Increase of 17 (2.9%) 642.4
2023–24 586 Decrease of 21 (3.5%) 639.1
2024–25 530 Decrease of 56 (9.6%) 634.1
2025–26 502 Decrease of 28 (5.3%) 621.2

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
Suppressed

Rate not available

Disciplinary actions
Suppressed

Rate not available

Cumulative year-end enrollment
555

2024–25

TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Red Elem
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 640 Not reported — Not reported — — —
2021–22 640 Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
2022–23 660 Not reported — Not reported — — —
2023–24 609 Not reported — Not reported — — —
2024–25 555 Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Red Elem in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
In-school suspensions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Out-of-school suspensions Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$6k$13k$20k20182020202220242025
  • Red Elem
  • Parent district: Houston ISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$10,120
Selected comparison
$12,656

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,975 rated schools reporting

−$2,536 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $10,120 per student for this campus, $17,026 per student for its parent district, Houston ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearRed ElemParent district: Houston ISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2018$7,695$14,470$13,054$7,923 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,829 rated schools reporting
2019$6,931$13,643$13,108$8,078 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,845 rated schools reporting
2020$6,932$13,627$14,058$8,669 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,868 rated schools reporting
2021$7,491$13,515$14,797$9,097 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,881 rated schools reporting
2022$7,825$14,985$15,708$10,440 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,903 rated schools reporting
2023$9,440$16,350$16,792$11,145 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,926 rated schools reporting
2024$9,700$18,150$18,125$12,061 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,955 rated schools reporting
2025$10,120$17,026$18,972$12,656 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,975 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$63,466−$2,919 vs similar economic context
Teachers
30−12.4 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
16.7+2.8 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Red Elem

Beginning: 16.7%1 to 5 years: 33.3%6 to 10 years: 20%11 to 20 years: 20%21 to 30 years: 10%
  • Beginning 16.7%
  • 1 to 5 years 33.3%
  • 6 to 10 years 20%
  • 11 to 20 years 20%
  • 21 to 30 years 10%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,004 reporting for every category shown · 2,004 in full cohort

Beginning: 6.1%1 to 5 years: 26.2%6 to 10 years: 19.1%11 to 20 years: 28%21 to 30 years: 15.9%Over 30 years: 4.2%
  • Beginning 6.1%
  • 1 to 5 years 26.2%
  • 6 to 10 years 19.1%
  • 11 to 20 years 28%
  • 21 to 30 years 15.9%
  • Over 30 years 4.2%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for Red Elem in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classRed Elem · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten12.618
Grade 111.418.2
Grade 212.818.4
Grade 310.518.7
Grade 412.119
Grade 512.819.8

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 6 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 101912224.