+4.3 ptsvs 83.7 average · 1,439 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
468 of 1,439tied with 53 others
Score vs region
+4.7 ptsvs 83.3 average · 1,303 rated schools in Region 04: Houston
Region 04: Houston placement
446 of 1,303tied with 42 others
Score vs county
+4.0 ptsvs 84 average · 140 rated schools in Fort Bend County
Fort Bend County placement
57 of 140tied with 5 others
Score vs similar-size group
+6.1 ptsvs 81.9 average · 2,421 similarly sized rated schools
Similar size placement
749 of 2,421tied with 85 others
Score vs state
+6.7 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
Texas placement
2,199 of 7,646tied with 256 others
B88
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 89 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 83.7 average for 1,439 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 83.3 average for 1,303 rated schools in Region 04: Houston.The current score is above the 84 average for 140 rated schools in Fort Bend County.The current score is above the 81.9 average for 2,421 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
STAAR result
All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters
Meets
67%vs 57% avg · +10 pts
Masters
47%vs 25.9% avg · +21.1 pts
Among 1,398 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Quail Valley MS is rated B by TEA, scoring 88 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 83.7 average for 1,439 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is down 1 point since 2021-22.
Ranks 468th of 1,439 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 53 others).
Quail Valley MS is rated B by TEA, scoring 88 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 83.3 average for 1,303 rated schools in Region 04: Houston. It is down 1 point since 2021-22.
Ranks 446th of 1,303 rated schools in Region 04: Houston (tied with 42 others).
Quail Valley MS is rated B by TEA, scoring 88 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 84 average for 140 rated schools in Fort Bend County. It is down 1 point since 2021-22.
Ranks 57th of 140 rated schools in Fort Bend County (tied with 5 others).
Quail Valley MS is rated B by TEA, scoring 88 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.9 average for 2,421 similarly sized rated schools. It is down 1 point since 2021-22.
Ranks 749th of 2,421 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 85 others).
Quail Valley MS is rated B by TEA, scoring 88 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is down 1 point since 2021-22.
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated B with 89 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Student Achievement92 A+8.0 vs similar economic context · 1,398 reporting
School Progress91 A+8.7 vs similar economic context · 1,395 reporting
Closing the Gaps79 C−2.0 vs similar economic context · 1,386 reporting
Academic Growth84 B+6.7 vs similar economic context · 1,371 reporting
Relative Performance91 A+11.5 vs similar economic context · 1,395 reporting
Quail Valley MS
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,439 in cohort)
Domain scores
Domain
Score
Grade
Points to next grade
Student Achievement
92
A
—
School Progress
91
A
—
Closing the Gaps
79
C
1
Academic Growth
84
B
6
Relative Performance
91
A
—
Closest to moving up: Closing the Gaps, 1 point below B in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student
Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is Student Achievement (92), so
School Progress (91) is published above but does not enter the overall
score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 92.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
All Subjects
Approaches grade level83%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,398 reporting
Meets grade level67%+10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,398 reporting
Masters grade level47%+21 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,398 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
Approaches grade level87%+5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,397 reporting
Meets grade level73%+11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,397 reporting
Masters grade level55%+27 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,397 reporting
Math3 performance levels
Approaches grade level79%+1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,393 reporting
Meets grade level63%+13 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,393 reporting
Masters grade level41%+20 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,393 reporting
Science3 performance levels
Approaches grade level86%+5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,300 reporting
Meets grade level72%+16 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,300 reporting
Masters grade level50%+22 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,300 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
Approaches grade level77%−2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 724 reporting
Meets grade level59%+5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 724 reporting
Masters grade level38%+12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 724 reporting
Approaches grade level
Meets grade level
Masters grade level
Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,439 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
1,039
Economically disadvantaged
42.4%−0.9 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
5.6%−6.0 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
13.6%−4.6 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
95.2%+0.4 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
13.6%+0.6 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Quail Valley MS
African American 28.7%
Hispanic 23.1%
White 11.3%
American Indian 0.6%
Asian 31.7%
Two or More Races 4.7%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,439 reporting for every category shown · 1,439 in full cohort
African American 9.3%
Hispanic 36.8%
White 44.8%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.2%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 4.4%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 04: Houston · 1,303 reporting for every category shown · 1,303 in full cohort
African American 19.1%
Hispanic 53.8%
White 16.9%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 6.7%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.1%
Selected comparison averageFor Fort Bend County · 140 reporting for every category shown · 140 in full cohort
African American 26.7%
Hispanic 34.3%
White 15.3%
American Indian 0.5%
Asian 19%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.9%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 2,421 reporting for every category shown · 2,421 in full cohort
African American 12.6%
Hispanic 51.6%
White 24.6%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 6.9%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 3.8%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
African American 11.5%
Hispanic 52.6%
White 27.8%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
1,039
Economically disadvantaged students
441
Emergent bilingual students
58
Special education students
141
Campus mobility · 2024–25
Mobile students
106
Students in TEA mobility denominator
1,054
TEA-published mobility rate
10.1%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 1,039 students in 2025–26, an increase of 37 (3.7%) from 2024–25.
Latest enrollment
1,039
2025–26
Change from 2024–25
+37
Increase · +3.7%
Change since 2021–22
−41
Decrease · −3.8%
Enrollment in 2025–26
This school
1,039
Selected comparison
699.1
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,406 rated schools reporting
Student enrollment by school year for Quail Valley MS
School year
Students enrolledQuail Valley MS
Change from previous school year
Average enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22
1,080
First available year
696.6
2022–23
1,043
Decrease of 37 (3.4%)
702.6
2023–24
1,042
Decrease of 1 (0.1%)
703.7
2024–25
1,002
Decrease of 40 (3.8%)
700.5
2025–26
1,039
Increase of 37 (3.7%)
699.1
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
145
14.1% of cumulative year-end enrollment
Disciplinary actions
393
38.08 per 100 students
Cumulative year-end enrollment
1,032
2024–25
Share of students · 2024–25
This school
14.1%
Selected comparison
10.9%
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,116 rated schools reporting
+3.2 pts vs similar economic context
Actions per 100 students · 2024–25
This school
38.08
Selected comparison
23.9
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,194 rated schools reporting
+14.2 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Quail Valley MS
School year
Cumulative enrollment
Studentsall discipline
Students% of enrollment
Actionsall discipline
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21
1,074
64
6.0%
102
9.50
9.2%
17.3
2021–22
1,147
155
13.5%
401
34.96
11.2%
24
2022–23
1,078
131
12.2%
291
26.99
11.5%
25.1
2023–24
1,071
200
18.7%
498
46.50
11.4%
25.6
2024–25
1,032
145
14.1%
393
38.08
10.9%
23.9
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Quail Valley MS in 2024–25
Category
Students
Students% of enrollment
Actions
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline
145
14.1%
393
38.08
10.9%
23.9
In-school suspensions
125
12.1%
252
24.42
9.8%
18.3
Out-of-school suspensions
76
7.4%
116
11.24
5.4%
7.5
DAEP placements
19
1.8%
21
2.03
4.1%
4.8
Mandatory DAEP placements
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Discretionary DAEP placements
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
Quail Valley MS
Parent district: Fort Bend ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
This school
$12,696
Selected comparison
$11,999
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,410 rated schools reporting
+$697 vs similar economic context
For 2025, TEA reported $12,696 per student for this campus, $18,181 per student for its parent district, Fort Bend ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
Year
Quail Valley MS
Parent district: Fort Bend ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison average
Reportingselected comparison
2018
$7,473
$14,055
$13,054
$7,803
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,292 rated schools reporting
2019
$8,669
$13,701
$13,108
$8,014
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,312 rated schools reporting
2020
$8,721
$15,136
$14,058
$8,410
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,321 rated schools reporting
2021
$9,383
$15,034
$14,797
$8,809
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,341 rated schools reporting
2022
$9,150
$15,054
$15,708
$10,150
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,353 rated schools reporting
2023
$9,859
$13,283
$16,792
$10,580
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,372 rated schools reporting
2024
$10,328
$14,142
$18,125
$11,637
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,388 rated schools reporting
2025
$12,696
$18,181
$18,972
$11,999
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,410 rated schools reporting
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
Average salary
$70,571+$3,274 vs similar economic context
Teachers
58+13.1 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
17.9−3.2 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Quail Valley MS
Beginning 1.7%
1 to 5 years 13.9%
6 to 10 years 18%
11 to 20 years 47.4%
21 to 30 years 15.5%
Over 30 years 3.4%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,439 reporting for every category shown · 1,439 in full cohort
Beginning 5.3%
1 to 5 years 23.4%
6 to 10 years 19.5%
11 to 20 years 30.6%
21 to 30 years 17%
Over 30 years 3.8%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 04: Houston · 1,303 reporting for every category shown · 1,303 in full cohort
Beginning 7.7%
1 to 5 years 27.3%
6 to 10 years 20.6%
11 to 20 years 27.2%
21 to 30 years 13.5%
Over 30 years 2.6%
Selected comparison averageFor Fort Bend County · 140 reporting for every category shown · 140 in full cohort
Beginning 5.7%
1 to 5 years 23.9%
6 to 10 years 21.9%
11 to 20 years 30.1%
21 to 30 years 15.4%
Over 30 years 2.9%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 2,421 reporting for every category shown · 2,421 in full cohort
Beginning 6.3%
1 to 5 years 27%
6 to 10 years 20.5%
11 to 20 years 28.8%
21 to 30 years 14.4%
Over 30 years 2.7%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 25.6%
6 to 10 years 19.2%
11 to 20 years 28.7%
21 to 30 years 15.9%
Over 30 years 3.7%
Average students in a class
TEA average class size by grade or subject for Quail Valley MS in 2024–25
Grade or subject
Average students per classQuail Valley MS · 2024–25
Average students per classselected comparison
Grade 6
24.4
17.9
Secondary English
20.4
15.5
Secondary languages other than English
20.8
18.1
Secondary math
22
16.6
Secondary science
23.6
18
Secondary social studies
23.5
17.9
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 6 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
Out of 120 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
Other top-5% rankings
High placements in larger reporting groups
3 measures
32of 1,397
Reading — Masters
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,397 that report this measure · tied with 4
40of 1,398
All Subjects — Masters
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,398 that report this measure · tied with 10
73of 1,393
Math — Masters
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,393 that report this measure · tied with 7
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above
this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears
once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any
tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones
no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 079907044.