Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

PSJA Thomas Jefferson T-STEM Early College HS

Hidalgo County · Region 01: Edinburg · 501 students

Official school websiteSchool information and family resources

Current score
98/1002025-26
Change
+3 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
+20.2 ptsvs 77.8 average · 1,717 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
7 of 1,717tied with 5 others
A98

At a glance

Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving up; under the rules in force back then it scored 92 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 77.8 average for 1,717 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

Recent movement

Overall score rose 2 points

96 to 98 2024-25 to 2025-26

  • 98 is 20.2 points above the 77.8 average among 1,717 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Recent domain gain

Academic Growth rose 6 points

81 to 87 2024-25 to 2025-26

  • 87 is 13.6 points above the 73.4 average among 1,574 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Current strength

Closing the Gaps above the similar-context average

100 +24.9 pts vs 75.1

  • 100 is 24.9 points above the 75.1 average among 1,586 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
  • Tied for 1st of 1,586 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure; 6 schools share that value.
See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

PSJA Thomas Jefferson T-STEM Early College HS is rated A by TEA, scoring 98 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 77.8 average for 1,717 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is up 3 points since 2021-22.

Ranks 7th of 1,717 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 5 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 5 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. After high school: the following fall
  6. Who this school serves
  7. Student counts behind the percentages
  8. Enrollment over time
  9. Discipline and removal from class
  10. Spending per student
  11. Teachers and actual class size
  12. Where this school ranks best
  13. Where this comes from

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
90807060 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas averagePSJA Thomas Jefferson T-STEM Early College HS 9596979698 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 92 that year.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26A9877.8 1,717 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25A9677.4 1,700 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting
2023-24A9774.0 1,684 reporting78.9 7,466 reporting
2022-23A9673.3 1,681 reporting79.1 7,377 reporting
2021-22A9581.9 1,663 reporting83.7 7,283 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement97 A+26.8 vs similar economic context · 1,598 reporting
  • School Progress97 A+18.1 vs similar economic context · 1,595 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps100 A+24.9 vs similar economic context · 1,586 reporting
  • Academic Growth87 B+13.6 vs similar economic context · 1,574 reporting
  • Relative Performance97 A+20.2 vs similar economic context · 1,594 reporting
  • PSJA Thomas Jefferson T-STEM Early College HS
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,717 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement97A—
School Progress97A—
Closing the Gaps100A—
Academic Growth87B3
Relative Performance97A—

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level92%+26 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,598 reporting
  • Meets grade level76%+36 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,598 reporting
  • Masters grade level29%+13 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,598 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level91%+23 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,598 reporting
  • Meets grade level80%+36 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,598 reporting
  • Masters grade level20%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,598 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level90%+24 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,595 reporting
  • Meets grade level77%+38 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,595 reporting
  • Masters grade level35%+20 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,595 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level94%+31 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,511 reporting
  • Meets grade level74%+40 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,511 reporting
  • Masters grade level39%+25 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,511 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level95%+33 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 503 reporting
  • Meets grade level70%+36 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 503 reporting
  • Masters grade level33%+18 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 503 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,717 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Graduation

Four-Year
100.0%+11.6 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 168 rated schools reporting
Five-Year
100.0%+11.0 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 168 rated schools reporting
Six-Year
100.0%+11.5 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 168 rated schools reporting
Dropout Rate
0.0%−2.0 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 169 rated schools reporting

These measures use TEA's standard-accountability population. Each comparison average includes only schools in that population that report that specific measure; its reporting count is shown beside the average. It is an unweighted average of those reported school rates, not a pooled rate across every student in the group.

College, career and military readiness

Total credit for CCMR criteria
100.0%+16.5 pts vs similar economic context
CCMR criteria
CriterionThis school% of graduatesAveragesimilar economic contextDifferencepercentage pointsReportingselected comparison
Total credit for CCMR criteria100.0%83.5%+16.5 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 202 rated schools reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course83.8%56.5%+27.3 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 203 rated schools reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA66.2%19.3%+46.9 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 203 rated schools reporting
Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)35.3%13.6%+21.7 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 203 rated schools reporting
Earned college credit for a dual credit course92.6%26.5%+66.1 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 203 rated schools reporting
Earned an industry-based certification27.9%32.7%−4.8 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 203 rated schools reporting
Earned a level I or level II certificate12.5%2.9%+9.6 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 203 rated schools reporting
Earned an associate degree53.7%7.1%+46.6 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 203 rated schools reporting
Completed an OnRamps course and qualified for college credit5.9%6.4%−0.5 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 203 rated schools reporting
Graduated with completed individualized education program (IEP) and workforce readiness0.0%2.4%−2.4 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 203 rated schools reporting
Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student5.9%7.5%−1.6 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 203 rated schools reporting
Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces2.9%2.5%+0.4 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 203 rated schools reporting

Every row is a share of this school's graduates, and every row is a way of meeting CCMR — so on every row, a bigger share is better. Difference is this school minus the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate, counted in percentage points: +5.0 would mean five more graduates in every hundred met that criterion here. The selected comparison is an unweighted average of the reported school percentages, not a pooled rate across all graduates in the group. Graduates may meet several criteria, so the rows do not add up to the total.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

After high school: the following fall

Where school graduates appeared in Texas public higher-education records the fall after graduation. This is a limited next-step measure, not an eventual college-going or completion rate.

Graduates in the report
128

Class of 2023–24

Enrolled in Texas public higher education
90

70.3% of graduates

Not found in Texas public higher-ed records
33

25.8% of graduates

Not trackable
5

Fall 2024

Graduates in the report

This school
128
Selected comparison
254.8

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 189 rated schools reporting

Enrolled in Texas public higher education

This school
90
Selected comparison
93.4

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 189 rated schools reporting

Texas-public enrollment rate

This school
70.3%
Selected comparison
35.7%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 189 rated schools reporting

+34.6 pts vs similar economic context

Not-found rate

This school
25.8%
Selected comparison
55.8%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 189 rated schools reporting

−30.0 pts vs similar economic context

Not-trackable rate

This school
3.9%
Selected comparison
8.5%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 189 rated schools reporting

−4.6 pts vs similar economic context

Most common named Texas public destinations

  1. U. OF TEXAS-RIO GRANDE VALLEY (003599)56
  2. SOUTH TEXAS COLLEGE (031034)21
  3. U. OF TEXAS AT SAN ANTONIO (010115)6

Selected comparison counts are neutral cohort scale context. The percentages put differently sized graduating classes on the same basis, but still cover only the limited Texas-public system observed by this report.

Source: Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board, high-school graduates enrolled in higher education, fetched 24 August 2026. The report covers graduates who enrolled in a Texas public college or university the following fall and includes only districts or campuses with more than 25 graduates.

“Not found” does not mean a graduate did not continue their education. It can include private or out-of-state college, work, military service, enrollment after the fall term, or another path the Texas public system does not observe.

“Not trackable” is not an outcome. THECB uses it for graduates with a non-standard identifier that could not be matched to higher-education records.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
501
Economically disadvantaged
95.8%+3.2 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
25.1%−17.3 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
8.8%−8.6 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
—
Chronically absent
—

Student demographics

PSJA Thomas Jefferson T-STEM Early College HS

African American: 0.2%Hispanic: 97.6%White: 1.8%Asian: 0.4%
  • African American 0.2%
  • Hispanic 97.6%
  • White 1.8%
  • Asian 0.4%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,717 reporting for every category shown · 1,717 in full cohort

African American: 15%Hispanic: 77.4%White: 4.7%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 1.2%Pacific Islander: 0.1%Two or More Races: 1.4%
  • African American 15%
  • Hispanic 77.4%
  • White 4.7%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 1.2%
  • Pacific Islander 0.1%
  • Two or More Races 1.4%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
501
Economically disadvantaged students
480
Emergent bilingual students
126
Special education students
44

Early college pathways

Early College High School
501

TEA-published share: 100%

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
Not reported
Students in TEA mobility denominator
Not reported
TEA-published mobility rate
Not reported

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 501 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 52 (9.4%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
501

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
−52

Decrease · −9.4%

Change since 2021–22
−75

Decrease · −13.0%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
501
Selected comparison
559.9

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,699 rated schools reporting

Student enrollment by school year for PSJA Thomas Jefferson T-STEM Early College HS
School yearStudents enrolledPSJA Thomas Jefferson T-STEM Early College HSChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22 576 First available year 608.2
2022–23 539 Decrease of 37 (6.4%) 604.7
2023–24 524 Decrease of 15 (2.8%) 594.7
2024–25 553 Increase of 29 (5.5%) 587.7
2025–26 501 Decrease of 52 (9.4%) 559.9

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
Suppressed

Rate not available

Disciplinary actions
Suppressed

Rate not available

Cumulative year-end enrollment
545

2024–25

TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for PSJA Thomas Jefferson T-STEM Early College HS
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 668 Not reported — Not reported — — —
2021–22 582 Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
2022–23 537 Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
2023–24 530 41 7.7% 81 15.28 13.9% 33.5
2024–25 545 Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for PSJA Thomas Jefferson T-STEM Early College HS in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
In-school suspensions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Out-of-school suspensions Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$6k$13k$20k20182020202220242025
  • PSJA Thomas Jefferson T-STEM Early College HS
  • Parent district: Pharr-San Juan-Alamo ISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$14,732
Selected comparison
$13,352

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,699 rated schools reporting

+$1,380 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $14,732 per student for this campus, $17,543 per student for its parent district, Pharr-San Juan-Alamo ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearPSJA Thomas Jefferson T-STEM Early College HSParent district: Pharr-San Juan-Alamo ISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2018$7,013$12,616$13,054$8,382 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,621 rated schools reporting
2019$7,343$13,031$13,108$8,382 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,643 rated schools reporting
2020$7,952$13,616$14,058$8,881 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,646 rated schools reporting
2021$9,469$14,704$14,797$9,738 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,648 rated schools reporting
2022$12,253$16,698$15,708$11,238 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,664 rated schools reporting
2023$14,415$16,916$16,792$11,885 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,681 rated schools reporting
2024$16,202$17,365$18,125$12,796 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,688 rated schools reporting
2025$14,732$17,543$18,972$13,352 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,699 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$68,697+$136 vs similar economic context
Teachers
48+8.5 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
10.4−4.3 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

PSJA Thomas Jefferson T-STEM Early College HS

1 to 5 years: 14.6%6 to 10 years: 20.3%11 to 20 years: 50.9%21 to 30 years: 9.6%Over 30 years: 4.6%
  • 1 to 5 years 14.6%
  • 6 to 10 years 20.3%
  • 11 to 20 years 50.9%
  • 21 to 30 years 9.6%
  • Over 30 years 4.6%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,717 reporting for every category shown · 1,717 in full cohort

Beginning: 7.7%1 to 5 years: 27.1%6 to 10 years: 18.6%11 to 20 years: 27%21 to 30 years: 14.8%Over 30 years: 3.5%
  • Beginning 7.7%
  • 1 to 5 years 27.1%
  • 6 to 10 years 18.6%
  • 11 to 20 years 27%
  • 21 to 30 years 14.8%
  • Over 30 years 3.5%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for PSJA Thomas Jefferson T-STEM Early College HS in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classPSJA Thomas Jefferson T-STEM Early College HS · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Secondary English16.515
Secondary languages other than English16.618
Secondary math15.316.7
Secondary science17.817.5
Secondary social studies16.817.5

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 5 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this school ranks best

Out of 190 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.

#1 rankings

First-place results

2 measures

  • 1of 7,185

    Closing the Gaps

    Texas average · of the 7,185 that report this measure · tied with 39 · full ranking

  • 1of 42

    Earned a level I or level II certificate

    Hidalgo County · of the 42 that report this measure

#4–10 rankings

Fourth- through tenth-place results

13 measures

  • 4of 253

    Overall score

    Hidalgo County · of the 253 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 4of 242

    Student Achievement

    Hidalgo County · of the 242 that report this measure · tied with 4

  • 4of 241

    School Progress

    Hidalgo County · of the 241 that report this measure · tied with 4

  • 4of 241

    Relative Performance

    Hidalgo County · of the 241 that report this measure · tied with 3

  • 5of 42

    Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course

    Hidalgo County · of the 42 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 5of 42

    Earned an associate degree

    Hidalgo County · of the 42 that report this measure

  • 7of 242

    Reading — Meets

    Hidalgo County · of the 242 that report this measure · tied with 2

  • 7of 241

    Math — Meets

    Hidalgo County · of the 241 that report this measure

  • 7of 42

    Earned college credit for a dual credit course

    Hidalgo County · of the 42 that report this measure

  • 7of 42

    Completed an OnRamps course and qualified for college credit

    Hidalgo County · of the 42 that report this measure

  • 8of 242

    All Subjects — Meets

    Hidalgo County · of the 242 that report this measure

  • 8of 42

    Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA

    Hidalgo County · of the 42 that report this measure

  • 9of 242

    All Subjects — Approaches

    Hidalgo County · of the 242 that report this measure · tied with 1

Other top-5% rankings

High placements in larger reporting groups

6 measures

  • 11of 239

    Science — Meets

    Hidalgo County · of the 239 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 13of 242

    Reading — Approaches

    Hidalgo County · of the 242 that report this measure · tied with 2

  • 42of 1,595

    Math — Masters

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,595 that report this measure · tied with 7

  • 43of 1,595

    Math — Approaches

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,595 that report this measure · tied with 8

  • 45of 1,511

    Science — Masters

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,511 that report this measure · tied with 4

  • 57of 1,511

    Science — Approaches

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,511 that report this measure · tied with 11

These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 108909009.