Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

Pringle-Morse Schools

Hansford County · Region 16: Amarillo · 127 students

Official school websiteSchool information and family resources

Current score
73/1002025-26
Change
−17 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
−8.7 ptsvs 81.7 average · 1,736 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
1,432 of 1,736tied with 41 others
C73

At a glance

Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 86 in 2021-22. The current score is below the 81.7 average for 1,736 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

Current strength

Chronically absent lower than the similar-context average

5.3% −9.4 pts vs 14.7%

  • 5.3% is 9.4 percentage points lower than the 14.7% average among 1,684 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Current strength

Attendance above the similar-context average

95.5% +1 pts vs 94.5%

  • 95.5% is 1 percentage points above the 94.5% average among 1,684 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Pringle-Morse Schools is rated C by TEA, scoring 73 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 81.7 average for 1,736 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is down 17 points since 2021-22.

Ranks 1,432nd of 1,736 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 41 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 5 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. Who this school serves
  6. Student counts behind the percentages
  7. Enrollment over time
  8. Discipline and removal from class
  9. Spending per student
  10. Teachers and actual class size
  11. Where this school ranks best
  12. Where this comes from

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
90807060 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas averagePringle-Morse Schools 9090847773 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated B with 86 that year.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26C7381.7 1,736 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25C7781.9 1,712 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting
2023-24B8479.8 1,688 reporting78.9 7,466 reporting
2022-23A9080.5 1,664 reporting79.1 7,377 reporting
2021-22A9083.2 1,643 reporting83.7 7,283 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement74 C−7.2 vs similar economic context · 1,672 reporting
  • School Progress70 C−11.4 vs similar economic context · 1,666 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps69 D−10.0 vs similar economic context · 1,651 reporting
  • Academic Growth70 C−5.4 vs similar economic context · 1,629 reporting
  • Relative Performance69 D−10.3 vs similar economic context · 1,666 reporting
  • Pringle-Morse Schools
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,736 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement74C6
School Progress70C10
Closing the Gaps69D1
Academic Growth70C10
Relative Performance69D1

Closest to moving up: Closing the Gaps, 1 point below C in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is Student Achievement (74), so School Progress (70) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 74.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level76%−1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,672 reporting
  • Meets grade level52%−1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,672 reporting
  • Masters grade level14%−9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,672 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level77%−2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,670 reporting
  • Meets grade level55%−3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,670 reporting
  • Masters grade level18%−6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,670 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level71%−4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,664 reporting
  • Meets grade level49%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,664 reporting
  • Masters grade level13%−6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,664 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level79%+1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,544 reporting
  • Meets grade level45%−6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,544 reporting
  • Masters grade level3%−21 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,544 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level92%+16 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 872 reporting
  • Meets grade level67%+18 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 872 reporting
  • Masters grade level17%−6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 872 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,736 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Graduation

Four-Year
0.0%−93.3 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 449 rated schools reporting
Five-Year
0.0%−93.1 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 446 rated schools reporting
Six-Year
0.0%−92.5 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 447 rated schools reporting
Dropout Rate
0.0%−0.4 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 451 rated schools reporting

These measures use TEA's standard-accountability population. Each comparison average includes only schools in that population that report that specific measure; its reporting count is shown beside the average. It is an unweighted average of those reported school rates, not a pooled rate across every student in the group.

College, career and military readiness

Total credit for CCMR criteria
71.0%−17.1 pts vs similar economic context
CCMR criteria
CriterionThis school% of graduatesAveragesimilar economic contextDifferencepercentage pointsReportingselected comparison
Total credit for CCMR criteria71.0%88.1%−17.1 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 473 rated schools reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course14.3%59.1%−44.8 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 475 rated schools reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA14.3%29.4%−15.1 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 475 rated schools reporting
Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)0.0%10.5%−10.5 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 475 rated schools reporting
Earned college credit for a dual credit course71.4%33.8%+37.6 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 475 rated schools reporting
Earned an industry-based certification0.0%38.3%−38.3 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 475 rated schools reporting
Earned a level I or level II certificate0.0%1.5%−1.5 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 475 rated schools reporting
Earned an associate degree0.0%4.8%−4.8 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 475 rated schools reporting
Completed an OnRamps course and qualified for college credit0.0%4.6%−4.6 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 475 rated schools reporting
Graduated with completed individualized education program (IEP) and workforce readiness0.0%3.1%−3.1 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 475 rated schools reporting
Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student0.0%7.5%−7.5 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 475 rated schools reporting
Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces0.0%3.5%−3.5 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 475 rated schools reporting

Every row is a share of this school's graduates, and every row is a way of meeting CCMR — so on every row, a bigger share is better. Difference is this school minus the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate, counted in percentage points: +5.0 would mean five more graduates in every hundred met that criterion here. The selected comparison is an unweighted average of the reported school percentages, not a pooled rate across all graduates in the group. Graduates may meet several criteria, so the rows do not add up to the total.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
127
Economically disadvantaged
51.6%−0.6 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
13.5%+0.1 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
11.9%−6.9 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
95.5%+1.0 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
5.3%−9.4 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Pringle-Morse Schools

Hispanic: 50.8%White: 46.8%Two or More Races: 2.4%
  • Hispanic 50.8%
  • White 46.8%
  • Two or More Races 2.4%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,736 reporting for every category shown · 1,736 in full cohort

African American: 9.6%Hispanic: 41.9%White: 40.9%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 3%Pacific Islander: 0.2%Two or More Races: 4.2%
  • African American 9.6%
  • Hispanic 41.9%
  • White 40.9%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 3%
  • Pacific Islander 0.2%
  • Two or More Races 4.2%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
126
Economically disadvantaged students
65
Emergent bilingual students
17
Special education students
15

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
9
Students in TEA mobility denominator
115
TEA-published mobility rate
7.8%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 127 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 1 (0.8%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
127

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
−1

Decrease · −0.8%

Change since 2021–22
−2

Decrease · −1.6%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
127
Selected comparison
646.1

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,693 rated schools reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Pringle-Morse Schools
School yearStudents enrolledPringle-Morse SchoolsChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22 129 First available year 648.5
2022–23 107 Decrease of 22 (17.1%) 653.7
2023–24 119 Increase of 12 (11.2%) 653.8
2024–25 128 Increase of 9 (7.6%) 650
2025–26 127 Decrease of 1 (0.8%) 646.1

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
13

9.8% of cumulative year-end enrollment

Disciplinary actions
14

10.61 per 100 students

Cumulative year-end enrollment
132

2024–25

Share of students · 2024–25

This school
9.8%
Selected comparison
12.2%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,346 rated schools reporting

−2.3 pts vs similar economic context

Actions per 100 students · 2024–25

This school
10.61
Selected comparison
27.5

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,448 rated schools reporting

−16.9 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Pringle-Morse Schools
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 126 Suppressed — 11 8.73 — 18.7
2021–22 135 Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
2022–23 120 Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
2023–24 131 Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
2024–25 132 13 9.8% 14 10.61 12.2% 27.5
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Pringle-Morse Schools in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline 13 9.8% 14 10.61 12.2% 27.5
In-school suspensions 13 9.8% 14 10.61 11.0% 21.2
Out-of-school suspensions Not reported — Not reported — — —
DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$7k$17k$28k20182020202220242025
  • Pringle-Morse Schools
  • Parent district: Pringle-Morse CISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$22,303
Selected comparison
$12,172

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,710 rated schools reporting

+$10,131 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $22,303 per student for this campus, $26,518 per student for its parent district, Pringle-Morse CISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearPringle-Morse SchoolsParent district: Pringle-Morse CISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2018$13,378$19,801$13,054$7,850 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,589 rated schools reporting
2019$13,823$20,520$13,108$8,041 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,605 rated schools reporting
2020$15,164$22,063$14,058$8,571 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,619 rated schools reporting
2021$15,902$21,029$14,797$8,981 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,635 rated schools reporting
2022$17,755$21,505$15,708$10,279 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,645 rated schools reporting
2023$21,596$26,486$16,792$10,747 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,663 rated schools reporting
2024$21,695$26,326$18,125$11,663 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,686 rated schools reporting
2025$22,303$26,518$18,972$12,172 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,710 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$52,020−$14,774 vs similar economic context
Teachers
17−25.7 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
7.5−12.2 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Pringle-Morse Schools

Beginning: 17.9%1 to 5 years: 17.9%6 to 10 years: 17.9%11 to 20 years: 35.7%21 to 30 years: 6%Over 30 years: 5.4%
  • Beginning 17.9%
  • 1 to 5 years 17.9%
  • 6 to 10 years 17.9%
  • 11 to 20 years 35.7%
  • 21 to 30 years 6%
  • Over 30 years 5.4%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,736 reporting for every category shown · 1,736 in full cohort

Beginning: 5.7%1 to 5 years: 24.6%6 to 10 years: 19.2%11 to 20 years: 29.2%21 to 30 years: 16.6%Over 30 years: 4.3%
  • Beginning 5.7%
  • 1 to 5 years 24.6%
  • 6 to 10 years 19.2%
  • 11 to 20 years 29.2%
  • 21 to 30 years 16.6%
  • Over 30 years 4.3%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for Pringle-Morse Schools in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classPringle-Morse Schools · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten718
Grade 11018.3
Grade 21018.5
Grade 31618.9
Grade 41519
Grade 51219.9
Grade 61017.7
Secondary English5.815
Secondary languages other than English617.5
Secondary math6.715.9
Secondary science7.317.4
Secondary social studies5.517.5

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 12 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this school ranks best

Out of 160 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.

#4–10 rankings

Fourth- through tenth-place results

1 measure

  • 7of 207

    Per-student spending

    Region 16: Amarillo · of the 207 that report this measure

Other top-5% rankings

High placements in larger reporting groups

1 measure

  • 93of 1,684

    Chronically absent (lowest is best)

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,684 that report this measure · tied with 2

These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 098903101.