Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

Preston Hollow Elem

Dallas County · Region 10: Richardson · 390 students

Official school websiteSchool information and family resources

Current score
72/1002025-26
Change
−13 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
−6.2 ptsvs 78.2 average · 2,089 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
1,540 of 2,089tied with 36 others
C72

At a glance

Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 81 in 2021-22. The current score is below the 78.2 average for 2,089 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

STAAR result

Reading above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
53%vs 48.5% avg · +4.5 pts
Masters
26%vs 19.1% avg · +6.9 pts

Among 1,934 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

Current strength

Chronically absent lower than the similar-context average

17.6% −1.7 pts vs 19.3%

  • 17.6% is 1.7 percentage points lower than the 19.3% average among 2,012 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Preston Hollow Elem is rated C by TEA, scoring 72 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 78.2 average for 2,089 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is down 13 points since 2021-22.

Ranks 1,540th of 2,089 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 36 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. Official improvement and transfer notices
  3. 5 years of ratings
  4. Where the score comes from
  5. Student outcomes
  6. Who this school serves
  7. Student counts behind the percentages
  8. Enrollment over time
  9. Discipline and removal from class
  10. Spending per student
  11. Teachers and actual class size
  12. Where this comes from

Official improvement and transfer notices

Official state and federal designations can carry support, reporting requirements or a family transfer option that a single A–F rating does not explain.

2026 federal improvement status

Targeted Support and Improvement

Official support label: TSI

Identification reason: Continuously Enrolled

TEA track year 0 · Title I campus

Open the official TEA list and methodology

Schools identified for improvement

This school
Listed
Selected comparison
32.4%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,089 rated schools reporting

Schools on the PEG list

This school
Not listed
Selected comparison
5.8%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,089 rated schools reporting

Selected comparison percentages are the share of reporting schools in that group found on each dated list. They are neutral prevalence context; changing the comparison never changes this school's official status.

These are dated TEA statuses, fetched 24 August 2026; they are not added to or subtracted from this site's rating.

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
90807060 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas averagePreston Hollow Elem 8583798472 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated B with 81 that year.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26C7278.2 2,089 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25B8477.8 2,078 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting
2023-24C7975.5 2,066 reporting78.9 7,466 reporting
2022-23B8376.0 2,043 reporting79.1 7,377 reporting
2021-22B8581.8 2,025 reporting83.7 7,283 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement67 D−6.8 vs similar economic context · 1,936 reporting
  • School Progress73 C−6.4 vs similar economic context · 1,931 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps70 C−5.5 vs similar economic context · 1,917 reporting
  • Academic Growth73 C+0.4 vs similar economic context · 1,877 reporting
  • Relative Performance70 C−7.8 vs similar economic context · 1,931 reporting
  • Preston Hollow Elem
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,089 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement67D3
School Progress73C7
Closing the Gaps70C10
Academic Growth73C7
Relative Performance70C10

Closest to moving up: School Progress, 7 points below B in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (73), so Student Achievement (67) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 73.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level63%−7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,936 reporting
  • Meets grade level37%−7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,936 reporting
  • Masters grade level16%−1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,936 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level73%+1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,934 reporting
  • Meets grade level53%+5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,934 reporting
  • Masters grade level26%+7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,934 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level56%−12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,926 reporting
  • Meets grade level32%−7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,926 reporting
  • Masters grade level11%−4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,926 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level57%−12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,782 reporting
  • Meets grade level6%−34 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,782 reporting
  • Masters grade level2%−15 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,782 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,089 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
390
Economically disadvantaged
76.2%−0.2 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
56.2%+30.9 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
11.5%−7.3 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
94.2%+0.6 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
17.6%−1.7 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Preston Hollow Elem

African American: 22.1%Hispanic: 66.4%White: 6.4%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 1%Two or More Races: 3.8%
  • African American 22.1%
  • Hispanic 66.4%
  • White 6.4%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 1%
  • Two or More Races 3.8%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,089 reporting for every category shown · 2,089 in full cohort

African American: 13.4%Hispanic: 63.4%White: 17.8%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 1.8%Pacific Islander: 0.2%Two or More Races: 3%
  • African American 13.4%
  • Hispanic 63.4%
  • White 17.8%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 1.8%
  • Pacific Islander 0.2%
  • Two or More Races 3%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
390
Economically disadvantaged students
297
Emergent bilingual students
219
Special education students
45

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
52
Students in TEA mobility denominator
300
TEA-published mobility rate
17.3%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 390 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 12 (3.0%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
390

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
−12

Decrease · −3.0%

Change since 2021–22
−62

Decrease · −13.7%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
390
Selected comparison
636.1

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,062 rated schools reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Preston Hollow Elem
School yearStudents enrolledPreston Hollow ElemChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22 452 First available year 654.1
2022–23 400 Decrease of 52 (11.5%) 657.3
2023–24 398 Decrease of 2 (0.5%) 654.5
2024–25 402 Increase of 4 (1.0%) 652.3
2025–26 390 Decrease of 12 (3.0%) 636.1

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
Not reported

Rate not available

Disciplinary actions
Not reported

Rate not available

Cumulative year-end enrollment
426

2024–25

TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Preston Hollow Elem
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 447 Not reported — Not reported — — —
2021–22 506 Not reported — Not reported — — —
2022–23 440 Not reported — Not reported — — —
2023–24 434 Not reported — Not reported — — —
2024–25 426 Not reported — Not reported — — —
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Preston Hollow Elem in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline Not reported — Not reported — — —
In-school suspensions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Out-of-school suspensions Not reported — Not reported — — —
DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$7k$16k$24k20182020202220242025
  • Preston Hollow Elem
  • Parent district: Dallas ISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$19,623
Selected comparison
$13,053

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,076 rated schools reporting

+$6,570 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $19,623 per student for this campus, $23,271 per student for its parent district, Dallas ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearPreston Hollow ElemParent district: Dallas ISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2018$8,656$13,363$13,054$8,041 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,959 rated schools reporting
2019$9,751$13,990$13,108$8,199 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,978 rated schools reporting
2020$9,458$14,981$14,058$8,738 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,996 rated schools reporting
2021$10,039$17,075$14,797$9,312 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,008 rated schools reporting
2022$11,364$18,716$15,708$10,608 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,025 rated schools reporting
2023$13,713$20,932$16,792$11,253 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,043 rated schools reporting
2024$19,918$22,990$18,125$12,278 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,064 rated schools reporting
2025$19,623$23,271$18,972$13,053 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,076 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$73,246+$6,498 vs similar economic context
Teachers
30−13.8 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
13.2−0.8 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Preston Hollow Elem

Beginning: 3.4%1 to 5 years: 33.9%6 to 10 years: 13.6%11 to 20 years: 27.1%21 to 30 years: 11.9%Over 30 years: 10.2%
  • Beginning 3.4%
  • 1 to 5 years 33.9%
  • 6 to 10 years 13.6%
  • 11 to 20 years 27.1%
  • 21 to 30 years 11.9%
  • Over 30 years 10.2%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,089 reporting for every category shown · 2,089 in full cohort

Beginning: 6.8%1 to 5 years: 27.5%6 to 10 years: 19%11 to 20 years: 27.2%21 to 30 years: 15.2%Over 30 years: 3.7%
  • Beginning 6.8%
  • 1 to 5 years 27.5%
  • 6 to 10 years 19%
  • 11 to 20 years 27.2%
  • 21 to 30 years 15.2%
  • Over 30 years 3.7%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for Preston Hollow Elem in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classPreston Hollow Elem · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten14.418
Grade 111.818.2
Grade 221.118.3
Grade 318.718.7
Grade 418.319
Grade 518.120

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 6 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 057905195.