+11.6 ptsvs 81.4 average · 309 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
34 of 309tied with 13 others
Score vs similar-size group
+11.2 ptsvs 81.8 average · 156 similarly sized rated charter campuses
Similar size placement
24 of 156tied with 3 others
Score vs state
+11.3 ptsvs 81.7 average · 829 rated Texas charter campuses
Texas charter placement
105 of 829tied with 30 others
A93
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving up; under the rules in force back then it scored 100 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 81.4 average for 309 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 81.8 average for 156 similarly sized rated charter campuses.The current score is above the 81.7 average for 829 rated Texas charter campuses.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
Current strength
Student Achievement above the similar-context average
96+19.1 pts vs 76.9
96 is 19.1 points above
the 76.9 average among 309 charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
Tied for 2nd of 309 charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure; 7 charter campuses share that value.
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Premier HS of Waco is rated A by TEA, scoring 93 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.4 average for 309 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context. It is up 1 point since 2021-22.
Ranks 34th of 309 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context (tied with 13 others).
Premier HS of Waco is rated A by TEA, scoring 93 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.8 average for 156 similarly sized rated charter campuses. It is up 1 point since 2021-22.
Ranks 24th of 156 similarly sized rated charter campuses (tied with 3 others).
Premier HS of Waco is rated A by TEA, scoring 93 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.7 average for 829 rated Texas charter campuses. It is up 1 point since 2021-22.
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 100 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Student Achievement96 A+19.1 vs similar economic context · 309 reporting
School Progress91 A+8.7 vs similar economic context · 308 reporting
Closing the Gaps85 B+6.9 vs similar economic context · 303 reporting
Academic Growth88 B+14.5 vs similar economic context · 291 reporting
Relative Performance91 A+10.3 vs similar economic context · 306 reporting
Premier HS of Waco
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (309 in cohort)
Domain scores
Domain
Score
Grade
Points to next grade
Student Achievement
96
A
—
School Progress
91
A
—
Closing the Gaps
85
B
5
Academic Growth
88
B
2
Relative Performance
91
A
—
Closest to moving up: Closing the Gaps, 5 points below A in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student
Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is Student Achievement (96), so
School Progress (91) is published above but does not enter the overall
score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 96.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
All Subjects
Approaches grade level78%+8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 309 reporting
Meets grade level36%−6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 309 reporting
Masters grade level7%−9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 309 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
Approaches grade level69%−2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 309 reporting
Meets grade level30%−17 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 309 reporting
Masters grade level0%−17 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 309 reporting
Math3 performance levels
Approaches grade level68%+0 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 308 reporting
Meets grade level20%−15 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 308 reporting
Masters grade level4%−9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 308 reporting
Science3 performance levels
Approaches grade level90%+16 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 300 reporting
Meets grade level30%−10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 300 reporting
Masters grade level5%−11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 300 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
Approaches grade level91%+18 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 212 reporting
Meets grade level57%+16 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 212 reporting
Masters grade level20%+2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 212 reporting
Approaches grade level
Meets grade level
Masters grade level
Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (309 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Completion
Four-Year
77.0%+30.0 pts vs similar economic contextaverage forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 46 rated charter campuses reporting
Five-Year
95.8%+40.6 pts vs similar economic contextaverage forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 46 rated charter campuses reporting
Six-Year
96.1%+40.4 pts vs similar economic contextaverage forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 46 rated charter campuses reporting
Dropout Rate
10.2%−1.4 pts vs similar economic contextaverage forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 46 rated charter campuses reporting
These measures use TEA's alternative-education accountability population. Each comparison average includes only charter campuses in that population that report that specific measure; its reporting count is shown beside the average. It is an unweighted average of those reported charter campus rates, not a pooled rate across every student in the group.
College, career and military readiness
Total credit for CCMR criteria
90.0%+6.3 pts vs similar economic context
CCMR criteria
Criterion
This school% of graduates
Averagesimilar economic context
Differencepercentage points
Reportingselected comparison
Total credit for CCMR criteria
90.0%
83.7%
+6.3
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 129 rated charter campuses reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course
83.8%
70.2%
+13.6
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 130 rated charter campuses reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA
8.8%
38.9%
−30.1
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 130 rated charter campuses reporting
Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)
1.5%
29.5%
−28.0
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 130 rated charter campuses reporting
Earned college credit for a dual credit course
7.4%
14.2%
−6.8
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 130 rated charter campuses reporting
Earned an industry-based certification
8.8%
13.5%
−4.7
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 130 rated charter campuses reporting
Earned a level I or level II certificate
1.5%
0.5%
+1.0
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 130 rated charter campuses reporting
Earned an associate degree
0.0%
2.2%
−2.2
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 130 rated charter campuses reporting
Completed an OnRamps course and qualified for college credit
0.0%
4.3%
−4.3
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 130 rated charter campuses reporting
Graduated with completed individualized education program (IEP) and workforce readiness
0.0%
1.4%
−1.4
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 130 rated charter campuses reporting
Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student
5.9%
7.6%
−1.7
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 130 rated charter campuses reporting
Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces
1.5%
1.8%
−0.3
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 130 rated charter campuses reporting
Every row is a share of this school's graduates, and every row is a way of
meeting CCMR — so on every row, a bigger share is better. Difference is this
school minus the average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate,
counted in percentage points: +5.0 would mean five more graduates in every hundred met that
criterion here. The selected comparison is an unweighted average of the reported charter campus percentages, not a pooled rate across all graduates in the group. Graduates may meet several criteria, so the rows do not add up to the total.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only charter campuses for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
After high school: the following fall
Where school graduates appeared in Texas public higher-education records the fall after graduation. This is a limited next-step measure, not an eventual college-going or completion rate.
Graduates in the report
71
Class of 2023–24
Enrolled in Texas public higher education
24
33.8% of graduates
Not found in Texas public higher-ed records
47
66.2% of graduates
Not trackable
0
Fall 2024
Graduates in the report
This school
71
Selected comparison
74
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 103 rated charter campuses reporting
Enrolled in Texas public higher education
This school
24
Selected comparison
38.3
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 103 rated charter campuses reporting
Texas-public enrollment rate
This school
33.8%
Selected comparison
48.3%
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 103 rated charter campuses reporting
−14.5 pts vs similar economic context
Not-found rate
This school
66.2%
Selected comparison
46.5%
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 103 rated charter campuses reporting
+19.7 pts vs similar economic context
Not-trackable rate
This school
0.0%
Selected comparison
5.2%
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 103 rated charter campuses reporting
−5.2 pts vs similar economic context
Most common named Texas public destinations
MCLENNAN COMMUNITY COLLEGE (003590)20
Selected comparison counts are neutral cohort scale context. The percentages put differently sized graduating classes on the same basis, but still cover only the limited Texas-public system observed by this report.
Source: Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board, high-school graduates enrolled in higher education, fetched 24 August 2026. The report covers graduates who enrolled in a Texas public college or university the following fall and includes only districts or campuses with more than 25 graduates.
“Not found” does not mean a graduate did not continue their education. It can include private or out-of-state college, work, military service, enrollment after the fall term, or another path the Texas public system does not observe.
“Not trackable” is not an outcome. THECB uses it for graduates with a non-standard identifier that could not be matched to higher-education records.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
133
Economically disadvantaged
78.2%−2.0 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
14.3%−20.5 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
13.5%+0.4 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
90.4%−1.9 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
42.9%+17.3 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Premier HS of Waco
African American 21.8%
Hispanic 57.9%
White 18%
Two or More Races 2.3%
Selected comparison averageFor charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 309 reporting for every category shown · 309 in full cohort
African American 19%
Hispanic 70.7%
White 6.3%
American Indian 0.2%
Asian 1.9%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 1.9%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized charter campuses · 156 reporting for every category shown · 156 in full cohort
African American 20.3%
Hispanic 60.5%
White 13.5%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 2.1%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.2%
Texas charter average829 reporting for every category shown · 829 Texas charter campuses in full cohort
African American 17.5%
Hispanic 61.8%
White 12.2%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 5.5%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 2.5%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
133
Economically disadvantaged students
104
Emergent bilingual students
19
Special education students
18
TEA context labels
Alternative education campus under AEA procedures
Alternative education type: dropout recovery school
Rated under AEA procedures
Campus mobility · 2024–25
Mobile students
132
Students in TEA mobility denominator
209
TEA-published mobility rate
63.2%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 133 students in 2025–26, an increase of 5 (3.9%) from 2024–25.
Latest enrollment
133
2025–26
Change from 2024–25
+5
Increase · +3.9%
Change since 2021–22
−17
Decrease · −11.3%
Enrollment in 2025–26
This school
133
Selected comparison
510.4
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 309 rated charter campuses reporting
Student enrollment by school year for Premier HS of Waco
School year
Students enrolledPremier HS of Waco
Change from previous school year
Average enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22
150
First available year
490.8
2022–23
156
Increase of 6 (4.0%)
506.8
2023–24
154
Decrease of 2 (1.3%)
507.2
2024–25
128
Decrease of 26 (16.9%)
513.5
2025–26
133
Increase of 5 (3.9%)
510.4
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting charter campuses in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
Suppressed
Rate not available
Disciplinary actions
Suppressed
Rate not available
Cumulative year-end enrollment
209
2024–25
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Premier HS of Waco
School year
Cumulative enrollment
Studentsall discipline
Students% of enrollment
Actionsall discipline
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21
272
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
2021–22
275
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
2022–23
253
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
2023–24
215
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
2024–25
209
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Premier HS of Waco in 2024–25
Category
Students
Students% of enrollment
Actions
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
In-school suspensions
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Out-of-school suspensions
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized charter campuses can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
Premier HS of Waco
Parent district: Premier High Schools
Texas average
Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
This school
$10,728
Selected comparison
$11,661
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 303 rated charter campuses reporting
−$933 vs similar economic context
For 2025, TEA reported $10,728 per student for this campus, $11,324 per student for its parent district, Premier High Schools, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
Year
Premier HS of Waco
Parent district: Premier High Schools
Texas average
Selected comparison average
Reportingselected comparison
2018
$6,167
$7,558
$13,054
$8,256
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 209 rated charter campuses reporting
2019
$6,154
$7,553
$13,108
$8,755
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 228 rated charter campuses reporting
2020
$6,533
$8,603
$14,058
$9,480
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 248 rated charter campuses reporting
2021
$6,053
$8,271
$14,797
$9,420
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 268 rated charter campuses reporting
2022
$6,182
$7,324
$15,708
$10,965
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 280 rated charter campuses reporting
2023
$7,435
$10,578
$16,792
$11,279
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 287 rated charter campuses reporting
2024
$8,276
$10,550
$18,125
$11,720
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 294 rated charter campuses reporting
2025
$10,728
$11,324
$18,972
$11,661
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 303 rated charter campuses reporting
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers
Average salary
$51,173−$11,679 vs similar economic context
Teachers
7−23.2 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
19+1.0 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Premier HS of Waco
1 to 5 years 28.6%
6 to 10 years 28.6%
11 to 20 years 42.9%
Selected comparison averageFor charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 309 reporting for every category shown · 309 in full cohort
Beginning 12.9%
1 to 5 years 46.8%
6 to 10 years 20%
11 to 20 years 14.9%
21 to 30 years 4.6%
Over 30 years 0.8%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized charter campuses · 156 reporting for every category shown · 156 in full cohort
Beginning 13.3%
1 to 5 years 42.1%
6 to 10 years 19.4%
11 to 20 years 17%
21 to 30 years 5.9%
Over 30 years 1.7%
Texas charter average829 reporting for every category shown · 829 Texas charter campuses in full cohort
Beginning 13%
1 to 5 years 44.3%
6 to 10 years 19.6%
11 to 20 years 15.4%
21 to 30 years 4.8%
Over 30 years 0.9%
Where this school ranks best
Out of 120 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
#2–3 rankings
Second- and third-place results
1 measure
2of 309
Student Achievement
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 309 that report this measure · tied with 6
#4–10 rankings
Fourth- through tenth-place results
3 measures
4of 46
Five-Year Completion Rate
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (alternative-education accountability only) · of the 46 that report this measure
4of 46
Six-Year Completion Rate
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (alternative-education accountability only) · of the 46 that report this measure
5of 91
Earned a level I or level II certificate
Similar size · of the 91 that report this measure
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above
this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears
once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any
tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones
no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 072801121.