Current strength
Overall score above the similar-context average
85 +4.7 pts vs 80.3
- 85 is 4.7 points above the 80.3 average among 346 charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
Open-enrollment charter campus · Alternative Education Accountability
Premier HS of San Juan
Premier High Schools · San Juan · 99 students
Official school websiteSchool information and family resources
- Current score
- 85/1002025-26
- Change
- −12 ptssince 2021-22
- Score vs similar economic context
- +4.7 ptsvs 80.3 average · 346 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context
- Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
- 136 of 346tied with 14 others
- Score vs similar-size group
- +2.3 ptsvs 82.7 average · 121 similarly sized rated charter campuses
- Similar size placement
- 64 of 121tied with 5 others
- Score vs state
- +3.3 ptsvs 81.7 average · 829 rated Texas charter campuses
- Texas charter placement
- 366 of 829tied with 34 others
B85
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 100 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 80.3 average for 346 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 82.7 average for 121 similarly sized rated charter campuses.The current score is above the 81.7 average for 829 rated Texas charter campuses.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
Current strength
School Progress above the similar-context average
86 +4.6 pts vs 81.4
- 86 is 4.6 points above the 81.4 average among 346 charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
Current strength
Student Achievement above the similar-context average
89 +14.7 pts vs 74.3
- 89 is 14.7 points above the 74.3 average among 346 charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
Current strength
Overall score above the similar-size average
85 +2.3 pts vs 82.7
- 85 is 2.3 points above the 82.7 average among 121 similarly sized charter campuses reporting this measure.
Current strength
School Progress above the similar-size average
86 +3.4 pts vs 82.6
- 86 is 3.4 points above the 82.6 average among 120 similarly sized charter campuses reporting this measure.
Current strength
Student Achievement above the similar-size average
89 +9 pts vs 80
- 89 is 9 points above the 80 average among 121 similarly sized charter campuses reporting this measure.
Current strength
Overall score above the Texas charter average
85 +3.3 pts vs 81.7
- 85 is 3.3 points above the 81.7 average among 829 Texas charter campuses reporting this measure.
Current strength
School Progress above the Texas charter average
86 +4.7 pts vs 81.3
- 86 is 4.7 points above the 81.3 average among 823 Texas charter campuses reporting this measure.
Current strength
Student Achievement above the Texas charter average
89 +10.9 pts vs 78.1
- 89 is 10.9 points above the 78.1 average among 829 Texas charter campuses reporting this measure.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Premier HS of San Juan is rated B by TEA, scoring 85 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.3 average for 346 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context. It is down 12 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 136th of 346 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context (tied with 14 others).
Premier HS of San Juan is rated B by TEA, scoring 85 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 82.7 average for 121 similarly sized rated charter campuses. It is down 12 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 64th of 121 similarly sized rated charter campuses (tied with 5 others).
Premier HS of San Juan is rated B by TEA, scoring 85 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.7 average for 829 rated Texas charter campuses. It is down 12 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 366th of 829 rated Texas charter campuses (tied with 34 others).
Put the numbers in context
Compare with
Jump to a section
- Overview
- 5 years of ratings
- Where the score comes from
- Student outcomes
- After high school: the following fall
- Who this school serves
- Student counts behind the percentages
- Enrollment over time
- Discipline and removal from class
- Spending per student
- Teachers and actual class size
- Where this school ranks best
- Where this comes from
5 years of ratings
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 100 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
View the yearly scores and comparisons
| Year | Rating | Score | Selected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rate | StateTexas charter average |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | B | 85 | 80.3 346 reporting | 81.7 829 reporting |
| 2024-25 | A | 96 | 78.7 340 reporting | 81.3 797 reporting |
| 2023-24 | A | 94 | 76.6 332 reporting | 79.5 776 reporting |
| 2022-23 | A | 97 | 76.0 322 reporting | 79.6 749 reporting |
| 2021-22 | A | 97 | 83.7 304 reporting | 84.5 700 reporting |
Where the score comes from
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
- Premier HS of San Juan
- Similar economic-disadvantage rate (346 in cohort)
| Domain | Score | Grade | Points to next grade |
|---|---|---|---|
| Student Achievement | 89 | B | 1 |
| School Progress | 86 | B | 4 |
| Closing the Gaps | 75 | C | 5 |
| Academic Growth | — | Not rated | — |
| Relative Performance | 86 | B | 4 |
Closest to moving up: Student Achievement, 1 point below A in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is Student Achievement (89), so School Progress (86) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 89.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
- Approaches grade level
- Meets grade level
- Masters grade level
- Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (346 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Completion
- Four-Year
- 58.7%+9.4 pts vs similar economic context average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 41 rated charter campuses reporting
- Five-Year
- 63.6%+8.9 pts vs similar economic context average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 41 rated charter campuses reporting
- Six-Year
- 77.4%+19.8 pts vs similar economic context average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 41 rated charter campuses reporting
- Dropout Rate
- 19.6%+8.5 pts vs similar economic context average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 41 rated charter campuses reporting
These measures use TEA's alternative-education accountability population. Each comparison average includes only charter campuses in that population that report that specific measure; its reporting count is shown beside the average. It is an unweighted average of those reported charter campus rates, not a pooled rate across every student in the group.
College, career and military readiness
- Total credit for CCMR criteria
- 100.0%+16.8 pts vs similar economic context
| Criterion | This school% of graduates | Averagesimilar economic context | Differencepercentage points | Reportingselected comparison |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total credit for CCMR criteria | 100.0% | 83.2% | +16.8 | average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 119 rated charter campuses reporting |
| Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course | 88.9% | 65.8% | +23.1 | average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 120 rated charter campuses reporting |
| Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA | 11.1% | 34.1% | −23.0 | average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 120 rated charter campuses reporting |
| Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s) | 5.6% | 28.9% | −23.3 | average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 120 rated charter campuses reporting |
| Earned college credit for a dual credit course | 19.4% | 10.0% | +9.4 | average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 120 rated charter campuses reporting |
| Earned an industry-based certification | 16.7% | 14.7% | +2.0 | average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 120 rated charter campuses reporting |
| Earned a level I or level II certificate | 2.8% | 0.4% | +2.4 | average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 120 rated charter campuses reporting |
| Earned an associate degree | 0.0% | 1.8% | −1.8 | average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 120 rated charter campuses reporting |
| Completed an OnRamps course and qualified for college credit | 0.0% | 4.3% | −4.3 | average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 120 rated charter campuses reporting |
| Graduated with completed individualized education program (IEP) and workforce readiness | 8.3% | 2.1% | +6.2 | average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 120 rated charter campuses reporting |
| Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student | 0.0% | 8.6% | −8.6 | average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 120 rated charter campuses reporting |
| Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces | 0.0% | 1.9% | −1.9 | average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 120 rated charter campuses reporting |
Every row is a share of this school's graduates, and every row is a way of meeting CCMR — so on every row, a bigger share is better. Difference is this school minus the average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate, counted in percentage points: +5.0 would mean five more graduates in every hundred met that criterion here. The selected comparison is an unweighted average of the reported charter campus percentages, not a pooled rate across all graduates in the group. Graduates may meet several criteria, so the rows do not add up to the total.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only charter campuses for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
After high school: the following fall
Where school graduates appeared in Texas public higher-education records the fall after graduation. This is a limited next-step measure, not an eventual college-going or completion rate.
- Graduates in the report
- 36
Class of 2023–24
- Enrolled in Texas public higher education
- 7
19.4% of graduates
- Not found in Texas public higher-ed records
- 29
80.6% of graduates
- Not trackable
- 0
Fall 2024
Graduates in the report
- This school
- 36
- Selected comparison
- 82
Enrolled in Texas public higher education
- This school
- 7
- Selected comparison
- 39.6
Texas-public enrollment rate
- This school
- 19.4%
- Selected comparison
- 45.0%
Not-found rate
- This school
- 80.6%
- Selected comparison
- 49.4%
Not-trackable rate
- This school
- 0.0%
- Selected comparison
- 5.6%
Most common named Texas public destinations
- U. OF TEXAS-RIO GRANDE VALLEY (003599)5
Selected comparison counts are neutral cohort scale context. The percentages put differently sized graduating classes on the same basis, but still cover only the limited Texas-public system observed by this report.
Source: Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board, high-school graduates enrolled in higher education, fetched 24 August 2026. The report covers graduates who enrolled in a Texas public college or university the following fall and includes only districts or campuses with more than 25 graduates.
“Not found” does not mean a graduate did not continue their education. It can include private or out-of-state college, work, military service, enrollment after the fall term, or another path the Texas public system does not observe.
“Not trackable” is not an outcome. THECB uses it for graduates with a non-standard identifier that could not be matched to higher-education records.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
- Students
- 99
- Economically disadvantaged
- 93.9%+2.5 pts vs similar economic context
- English learners
- 52.5%+7.4 pts vs similar economic context
- Special education
- 4.0%−8.6 pts vs similar economic context
- Attendance
- 75.4%−17.3 pts vs similar economic context
- Chronically absent
- 81.1%+57.3 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Premier HS of San Juan
- Hispanic 100%
Selected comparison average For charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 346 reporting for every category shown · 346 in full cohort
- African American 18%
- Hispanic 75.8%
- White 3.2%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 1.5%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 1.3%
Selected comparison average For similarly sized charter campuses · 121 reporting for every category shown · 121 in full cohort
- African American 17.1%
- Hispanic 61.5%
- White 15.8%
- American Indian 0.2%
- Asian 2.1%
- Pacific Islander 0.2%
- Two or More Races 3.2%
Texas charter average 829 reporting for every category shown · 829 Texas charter campuses in full cohort
- African American 17.5%
- Hispanic 61.8%
- White 12.2%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 5.5%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 2.5%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
- Students in this TEA accountability summary
- 99
- Economically disadvantaged students
- 93
- Emergent bilingual students
- 52
- Special education students
- 4
Early college pathways
- Pathways in Technology Early College High School (P-TECH)
- 8
TEA-published share: 8.1%
TEA context labels
- Alternative education campus under AEA procedures
- Alternative education type: dropout recovery school
- Rated under AEA procedures
Campus mobility · 2024–25
- Mobile students
- 143
- Students in TEA mobility denominator
- 186
- TEA-published mobility rate
- 76.9%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 99 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 9 (8.3%) from 2024–25.
- Latest enrollment
- 99
2025–26
- Change from 2024–25
- −9
Decrease · −8.3%
- Change since 2021–22
- −1
Decrease · −1.0%
Enrollment in 2025–26
- This school
- 99
- Selected comparison
- 516.1
| School year | Students enrolledPremier HS of San Juan | Change from previous school year | Average enrollmentselected comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021–22 | 100 | First available year | 485.9 |
| 2022–23 | 113 | Increase of 13 (13.0%) | 502.3 |
| 2023–24 | 124 | Increase of 11 (9.7%) | 514 |
| 2024–25 | 108 | Decrease of 16 (12.9%) | 516.4 |
| 2025–26 | 99 | Decrease of 9 (8.3%) | 516.1 |
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting charter campuses in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
- Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
- 16
8.7% of cumulative year-end enrollment
- Disciplinary actions
- 27
14.59 per 100 students
- Cumulative year-end enrollment
- 185
2024–25
Share of students · 2024–25
- This school
- 8.7%
- Selected comparison
- 11.0%
Actions per 100 students · 2024–25
- This school
- 14.59
- Selected comparison
- 18.4
| School year | Cumulative enrollment | Studentsall discipline | Students% of enrollment | Actionsall discipline | Actionsper 100 students | Studentsselected comparison average % | Actionsselected comparison average per 100 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020–21 | 179 | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| 2021–22 | 163 | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| 2022–23 | 170 | 15 | 8.8% | 20 | 11.76 | 11.6% | 19.6 |
| 2023–24 | 194 | 30 | 15.5% | 34 | 17.53 | 11.3% | 19.4 |
| 2024–25 | 185 | 16 | 8.7% | 27 | 14.59 | 11.0% | 18.4 |
See 2024–25 discipline categories
| Category | Students | Students% of enrollment | Actions | Actionsper 100 students | Studentsselected comparison average % | Actionsselected comparison average per 100 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All discipline | 16 | 8.7% | 27 | 14.59 | 11.0% | 18.4 |
| In-school suspensions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Out-of-school suspensions | 16 | 8.7% | 21 | 11.35 | 8.8% | 12.5 |
| DAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Mandatory DAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Discretionary DAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| JJAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Mandatory JJAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Discretionary JJAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Expulsions | Suppressed | — | Suppressed | — | — | — |
| Mandatory expulsions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Discretionary expulsions | Suppressed | — | Suppressed | — | — | — |
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized charter campuses can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
- Premier HS of San Juan
- Parent district: Premier High Schools
- Texas average
- Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
- This school
- $13,413
- Selected comparison
- $11,993
For 2025, TEA reported $13,413 per student for this campus, $11,324 per student for its parent district, Premier High Schools, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
| Year | Premier HS of San Juan | Parent district: Premier High Schools | Texas average | Selected comparison average | Reportingselected comparison |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | $8,698 | $7,558 | $13,054 | $8,633 | average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 203 rated charter campuses reporting |
| 2019 | $8,837 | $7,553 | $13,108 | $8,631 | average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 258 rated charter campuses reporting |
| 2020 | $9,697 | $8,603 | $14,058 | $9,262 | average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 274 rated charter campuses reporting |
| 2021 | $7,774 | $8,271 | $14,797 | $9,636 | average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 298 rated charter campuses reporting |
| 2022 | $7,603 | $7,324 | $15,708 | $11,579 | average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 316 rated charter campuses reporting |
| 2023 | $13,855 | $10,578 | $16,792 | $11,575 | average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 325 rated charter campuses reporting |
| 2024 | $12,461 | $10,550 | $18,125 | $11,566 | average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 333 rated charter campuses reporting |
| 2025 | $13,413 | $11,324 | $18,972 | $11,993 | average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 343 rated charter campuses reporting |
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
- Average salary
- $53,889−$10,306 vs similar economic context
- Teachers
- 5−24.9 vs similar economic context
- Students per staff member
- 21.5+3.7 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Premier HS of San Juan
- Beginning 21.7%
- 1 to 5 years 21.7%
- 6 to 10 years 21.7%
- 11 to 20 years 34.8%
Selected comparison average For charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 346 reporting for every category shown · 346 in full cohort
- Beginning 13.1%
- 1 to 5 years 47.5%
- 6 to 10 years 19.9%
- 11 to 20 years 14.6%
- 21 to 30 years 4.1%
- Over 30 years 0.8%
Selected comparison average For similarly sized charter campuses · 121 reporting for every category shown · 121 in full cohort
- Beginning 14.7%
- 1 to 5 years 42.4%
- 6 to 10 years 17.7%
- 11 to 20 years 17.2%
- 21 to 30 years 6%
- Over 30 years 1.3%
Texas charter average 829 reporting for every category shown · 829 Texas charter campuses in full cohort
- Beginning 13%
- 1 to 5 years 44.3%
- 6 to 10 years 19.6%
- 11 to 20 years 15.4%
- 21 to 30 years 4.8%
- Over 30 years 0.9%
Average students in a class
| Grade or subject | Average students per classPremier HS of San Juan · 2024–25 | Average students per classselected comparison |
|---|---|---|
| Secondary English | 1 | 18.7 |
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 1 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
Where this school ranks best
Out of 108 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
#4–10 rankings
Fourth- through tenth-place results
2 measures
-
4of 80
Earned a level I or level II certificate
Similar size · of the 80 that report this measure
-
5of 80
Graduated with completed individualized education program (IEP) and workforce readiness
Similar size · of the 80 that report this measure · tied with 1
Other top-5% rankings
High placements in larger reporting groups
1 measure
-
13of 219
Social Studies — Approaches
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 219 that report this measure · tied with 3
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Download the full dataset · this campus's district
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 072801130.