Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Open-enrollment charter campus · Alternative Education Accountability

Premier HS Mesquite

Premier High Schools · Mesquite · 122 students

Official school websiteSchool information and family resources

Current score
87/1002025-26
Change
−3 ptssince 2023-24
Score vs similar economic context
+6.5 ptsvs 80.5 average · 427 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
135 of 427tied with 17 others
B87

At a glance

The available rating history is moving down. The current score is above the 80.5 average for 427 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

STAAR result

Science above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
42%vs 39.5% avg · +2.5 pts
Masters
17%vs 15.4% avg · +1.6 pts

Among 403 charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

Current strength

Overall score above the similar-context average

87 +6.5 pts vs 80.5

  • 87 is 6.5 points above the 80.5 average among 427 charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Premier HS Mesquite is rated B by TEA, scoring 87 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.5 average for 427 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context. It is down 3 points since 2023-24.

Ranks 135th of 427 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context (tied with 17 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 3 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. Who this school serves
  6. Student counts behind the percentages
  7. Enrollment over time
  8. Discipline and removal from class
  9. Spending per student
  10. Teachers
  11. Where this comes from

3 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
908070 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas charter averagePremier HS Mesquite 909287 2023-242024-252025-26

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas charter average
2025-26B8780.5 427 reporting81.7 829 reporting
2024-25A9279.2 419 reporting81.3 797 reporting
2023-24A9076.9 410 reporting79.5 776 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement90 A+15.2 vs similar economic context · 427 reporting
  • School Progress79 C−2.6 vs similar economic context · 427 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps80 B+2.9 vs similar economic context · 423 reporting
  • Academic Growth68 D−5.2 vs similar economic context · 408 reporting
  • Relative Performance79 C−0.9 vs similar economic context · 424 reporting
  • Premier HS Mesquite
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (427 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement90A—
School Progress79C1
Closing the Gaps80B10
Academic Growth68D2
Relative Performance79C1

Closest to moving up: Closing the Gaps, 10 points below A in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is Student Achievement (90), so School Progress (79) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 90.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level62%−7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 427 reporting
  • Meets grade level33%−8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 427 reporting
  • Masters grade level12%−4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 427 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level54%−15 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 427 reporting
  • Meets grade level27%−18 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 427 reporting
  • Masters grade level4%−13 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 427 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level38%−29 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 426 reporting
  • Meets grade level14%−21 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 426 reporting
  • Masters grade level10%−3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 426 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level83%+12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 403 reporting
  • Meets grade level42%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 403 reporting
  • Masters grade level17%+2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 403 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level83%+13 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 273 reporting
  • Meets grade level53%+14 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 273 reporting
  • Masters grade level28%+11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 273 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (427 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Completion

Four-Year
0.0%−45.1 pts vs similar economic context average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 51 rated charter campuses reporting
Five-Year
0.0%−51.5 pts vs similar economic context average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 51 rated charter campuses reporting
Six-Year
0.0%−53.5 pts vs similar economic context average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 51 rated charter campuses reporting
Dropout Rate
19.3%+8.5 pts vs similar economic context average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 51 rated charter campuses reporting

These measures use TEA's alternative-education accountability population. Each comparison average includes only charter campuses in that population that report that specific measure; its reporting count is shown beside the average. It is an unweighted average of those reported charter campus rates, not a pooled rate across every student in the group.

College, career and military readiness

Total credit for CCMR criteria
61.0%−22.8 pts vs similar economic context
CCMR criteria
CriterionThis school% of graduatesAveragesimilar economic contextDifferencepercentage pointsReportingselected comparison
Total credit for CCMR criteria61.0%83.8%−22.8 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 149 rated charter campuses reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course47.8%68.1%−20.3 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 151 rated charter campuses reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA4.3%35.5%−31.2 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 151 rated charter campuses reporting
Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)4.3%29.3%−25.0 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 151 rated charter campuses reporting
Earned college credit for a dual credit course13.0%11.4%+1.6 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 151 rated charter campuses reporting
Earned an industry-based certification8.7%14.6%−5.9 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 151 rated charter campuses reporting
Earned a level I or level II certificate0.0%0.4%−0.4 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 151 rated charter campuses reporting
Earned an associate degree0.0%1.9%−1.9 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 151 rated charter campuses reporting
Completed an OnRamps course and qualified for college credit0.0%3.9%−3.9 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 151 rated charter campuses reporting
Graduated with completed individualized education program (IEP) and workforce readiness0.0%1.4%−1.4 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 151 rated charter campuses reporting
Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student0.0%8.0%−8.0 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 151 rated charter campuses reporting
Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces0.0%1.9%−1.9 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 151 rated charter campuses reporting

Every row is a share of this school's graduates, and every row is a way of meeting CCMR — so on every row, a bigger share is better. Difference is this school minus the average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate, counted in percentage points: +5.0 would mean five more graduates in every hundred met that criterion here. The selected comparison is an unweighted average of the reported charter campus percentages, not a pooled rate across all graduates in the group. Graduates may meet several criteria, so the rows do not add up to the total.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only charter campuses for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
122
Economically disadvantaged
88.3%−0.2 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
30.8%−12.3 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
10.0%−2.6 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
83.7%−8.9 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
64.9%+40.8 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Premier HS Mesquite

African American: 16.7%Hispanic: 68.3%White: 10%Asian: 0.8%Two or More Races: 4.2%
  • African American 16.7%
  • Hispanic 68.3%
  • White 10%
  • Asian 0.8%
  • Two or More Races 4.2%

Selected comparison average For charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 427 reporting for every category shown · 427 in full cohort

African American: 18.1%Hispanic: 74.9%White: 3.8%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 1.6%Pacific Islander: 0.1%Two or More Races: 1.3%
  • African American 18.1%
  • Hispanic 74.9%
  • White 3.8%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 1.6%
  • Pacific Islander 0.1%
  • Two or More Races 1.3%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
120
Economically disadvantaged students
106
Emergent bilingual students
37
Special education students
12

TEA context labels

  • Alternative education campus under AEA procedures
  • Alternative education type: dropout recovery school
  • Rated under AEA procedures

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
163
Students in TEA mobility denominator
208
TEA-published mobility rate
78.4%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 122 students in 2025–26, an increase of 19 (18.4%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
122

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
+19

Increase · +18.4%

Change since 2023–24
+85

Increase · +229.7%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
122
Selected comparison
514.2

average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 427 rated charter campuses reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Premier HS Mesquite
School yearStudents enrolledPremier HS MesquiteChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2023–24 37 First available year 516.3
2024–25 103 Increase of 66 (178.4%) 518.2
2025–26 122 Increase of 19 (18.4%) 514.2

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting charter campuses in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
20

9.8% of cumulative year-end enrollment

Disciplinary actions
28

13.73 per 100 students

Cumulative year-end enrollment
204

2024–25

Share of students · 2024–25

This school
9.8%
Selected comparison
10.7%

average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 269 rated charter campuses reporting

−0.9 pts vs similar economic context

Actions per 100 students · 2024–25

This school
13.73
Selected comparison
17.7

average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 285 rated charter campuses reporting

−4.0 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Premier HS Mesquite
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2023–24 100 12 12.0% 15 15.00 11.2% 18.7
2024–25 204 20 9.8% 28 13.73 10.7% 17.7
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Premier HS Mesquite in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline 20 9.8% 28 13.73 10.7% 17.7
In-school suspensions 13 6.4% 18 8.82 7.1% 10.2
Out-of-school suspensions Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Mandatory expulsions Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized charter campuses can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$9k$21k$32k20242025
  • Premier HS Mesquite
  • Parent district: Premier High Schools
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$13,145
Selected comparison
$11,831

average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 421 rated charter campuses reporting

+$1,314 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $13,145 per student for this campus, $11,324 per student for its parent district, Premier High Schools, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearPremier HS MesquiteParent district: Premier High SchoolsTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2024$30,094$10,550$18,125$11,559 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 407 rated charter campuses reporting
2025$13,145$11,324$18,972$11,831 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 421 rated charter campuses reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers

Average salary
$56,526−$7,382 vs similar economic context
Teachers
3−26.9 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
43.1+25.2 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Premier HS Mesquite

1 to 5 years: 82.1%11 to 20 years: 17.9%
  • 1 to 5 years 82.1%
  • 11 to 20 years 17.9%

Selected comparison average For charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 427 reporting for every category shown · 427 in full cohort

Beginning: 13.2%1 to 5 years: 47.7%6 to 10 years: 19.8%11 to 20 years: 14.7%21 to 30 years: 4%Over 30 years: 0.7%
  • Beginning 13.2%
  • 1 to 5 years 47.7%
  • 6 to 10 years 19.8%
  • 11 to 20 years 14.7%
  • 21 to 30 years 4%
  • Over 30 years 0.7%

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 072801165.