Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

Prairie Lea HS

Caldwell County · Region 13: Austin · 139 students

Current score
47/1002025-26
Score vs similar economic context
−33.0 ptsvs 80 average · 1,997 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
1,997 of 1,997among reporting schools
F47

At a glance

The current score is below the 80 average for 1,997 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Read the full rating context and placement

Prairie Lea HS is rated F by TEA, scoring 47 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 80 average for 1,997 rated schools serving a similar economic context. TEA has published 1 year of scores for this school, so there is no trend to read yet.

Ranks 1,997th of 1,997 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

1 consecutive year rated unacceptable.

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 1 year of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. Who this school serves
  6. Student counts behind the percentages
  7. Teachers
  8. Where this school ranks best
  9. Where this comes from

1 year of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
9080706050 47 2025-26

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26F4780.0 1,997 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement49 F−28.9 vs similar economic context · 1,894 reporting
  • School Progress54 F−26.8 vs similar economic context · 1,886 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps30 F−47.2 vs similar economic context · 1,867 reporting
  • Academic Growth54 F−19.9 vs similar economic context · 1,829 reporting
  • Relative Performance50 F−29.1 vs similar economic context · 1,886 reporting
  • Prairie Lea HS
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,997 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement49F11
School Progress54F6
Closing the Gaps30F30
Academic Growth54F6
Relative Performance50F10

Closest to moving up: School Progress, 6 points below D in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (54), so Student Achievement (49) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 54.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level47%−27 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,894 reporting
  • Meets grade level16%−32 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,894 reporting
  • Masters grade level3%−17 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,894 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level50%−26 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,890 reporting
  • Meets grade level15%−38 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,890 reporting
  • Masters grade level1%−20 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,890 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level39%−32 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,881 reporting
  • Meets grade level11%−32 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,881 reporting
  • Masters grade level3%−13 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,881 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level54%−20 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,733 reporting
  • Meets grade level19%−27 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,733 reporting
  • Masters grade level4%−17 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,733 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level49%−25 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 942 reporting
  • Meets grade level24%−22 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 942 reporting
  • Masters grade level5%−16 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 942 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,997 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
139
Economically disadvantaged
64.0%−0.2 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
28.1%+10.6 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
19.4%+0.5 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
—
Chronically absent
—

Student demographics

Prairie Lea HS

African American: 7.2%Hispanic: 69.1%White: 19.4%Two or More Races: 4.3%
  • African American 7.2%
  • Hispanic 69.1%
  • White 19.4%
  • Two or More Races 4.3%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,997 reporting for every category shown · 1,997 in full cohort

African American: 11.1%Hispanic: 51.2%White: 31.3%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 2.2%Pacific Islander: 0.2%Two or More Races: 3.7%
  • African American 11.1%
  • Hispanic 51.2%
  • White 31.3%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 2.2%
  • Pacific Islander 0.2%
  • Two or More Races 3.7%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
139
Economically disadvantaged students
89
Emergent bilingual students
39
Special education students
27

TEA context labels

  • New campus compared with last year’s fall enrollment

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
Not reported
Students in TEA mobility denominator
Not reported
TEA-published mobility rate
Not reported

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Teachers

Average salary
$58,895−$7,479 vs similar economic context
Teachers
8−34.0 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
16.8+2.9 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Prairie Lea HS

Beginning: 50.6%1 to 5 years: 1.2%11 to 20 years: 47%
  • Beginning 50.6%
  • 1 to 5 years 1.2%
  • 11 to 20 years 47%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,997 reporting for every category shown · 1,997 in full cohort

Beginning: 6.2%1 to 5 years: 26.2%6 to 10 years: 19.1%11 to 20 years: 28%21 to 30 years: 15.9%Over 30 years: 4.1%
  • Beginning 6.2%
  • 1 to 5 years 26.2%
  • 6 to 10 years 19.1%
  • 11 to 20 years 28%
  • 21 to 30 years 15.9%
  • Over 30 years 4.1%

Where this school ranks best

Out of 102 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.

#4–10 rankings

Fourth- through tenth-place results

3 measures

  • 9of 14

    Science — Masters

    Caldwell County · of the 14 that report this measure

  • 10of 14

    Science — Approaches

    Caldwell County · of the 14 that report this measure

  • 10of 14

    Science — Meets

    Caldwell County · of the 14 that report this measure

These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 028906002.