+3.0 ptsvs 79 average · 2,028 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
795 of 2,028tied with 84 others
Score vs region
−1.3 ptsvs 83.3 average · 1,303 rated schools in Region 04: Houston
Region 04: Houston placement
742 of 1,303tied with 55 others
Score vs county
−1.4 ptsvs 83.4 average · 911 rated schools in Harris County
Harris County placement
519 of 911tied with 38 others
Score vs similar-size group
+1.3 ptsvs 80.7 average · 4,145 similarly sized rated schools
Similar size placement
1,997 of 4,145tied with 156 others
Score vs state
+0.7 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
Texas placement
3,846 of 7,646tied with 294 others
B82
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 87 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 79 average for 2,028 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is below the 83.3 average for 1,303 rated schools in Region 04: Houston.The current score is below the 83.4 average for 911 rated schools in Harris County.The current score is above the 80.7 average for 4,145 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
STAAR result
All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters
Meets
52%vs 45.5% avg · +6.5 pts
Masters
27%vs 18.1% avg · +8.9 pts
Among 1,897 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Post Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 82 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 79 average for 2,028 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is down 9 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 795th of 2,028 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 84 others).
Post Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 82 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 83.3 average for 1,303 rated schools in Region 04: Houston. It is down 9 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 742nd of 1,303 rated schools in Region 04: Houston (tied with 55 others).
Post Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 82 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 83.4 average for 911 rated schools in Harris County. It is down 9 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 519th of 911 rated schools in Harris County (tied with 38 others).
Post Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 82 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.7 average for 4,145 similarly sized rated schools. It is down 9 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 1,997th of 4,145 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 156 others).
Post Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 82 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is down 9 points since 2021-22.
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated B with 87 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Student Achievement78 C+2.4 vs similar economic context · 1,897 reporting
School Progress84 B+3.9 vs similar economic context · 1,890 reporting
Closing the Gaps76 C−0.2 vs similar economic context · 1,878 reporting
Academic Growth73 C−0.2 vs similar economic context · 1,834 reporting
Relative Performance84 B+5.5 vs similar economic context · 1,890 reporting
Post Elem
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,028 in cohort)
Domain scores
Domain
Score
Grade
Points to next grade
Student Achievement
78
C
2
School Progress
84
B
6
Closing the Gaps
76
C
4
Academic Growth
73
C
7
Relative Performance
84
B
6
Closest to moving up: Closing the Gaps, 4 points below B in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student
Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (84), so
Student Achievement (78) is published above but does not enter the overall
score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 84.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
All Subjects
Approaches grade level75%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,897 reporting
Meets grade level52%+7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,897 reporting
Masters grade level27%+9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,897 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
Approaches grade level80%+6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,895 reporting
Meets grade level62%+12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,895 reporting
Masters grade level34%+14 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,895 reporting
Math3 performance levels
Approaches grade level70%+1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,886 reporting
Meets grade level45%+5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,886 reporting
Masters grade level21%+6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,886 reporting
Science3 performance levels
Approaches grade level76%+5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,742 reporting
Meets grade level46%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,742 reporting
Masters grade level22%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,742 reporting
Approaches grade level
Meets grade level
Masters grade level
Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,028 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
734
Economically disadvantaged
71.4%−0.1 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
27.4%+6.0 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
20.7%+1.9 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
94.0%+0.2 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
18.3%+0.3 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Post Elem
African American 21%
Hispanic 54%
White 13.5%
American Indian 0.4%
Asian 5.5%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 5.5%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,028 reporting for every category shown · 2,028 in full cohort
African American 12.5%
Hispanic 58.2%
White 23.5%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 2%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 3.3%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 04: Houston · 1,303 reporting for every category shown · 1,303 in full cohort
African American 19.1%
Hispanic 53.8%
White 16.9%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 6.7%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.1%
Selected comparison averageFor Harris County · 911 reporting for every category shown · 911 in full cohort
African American 19.3%
Hispanic 59.1%
White 13.1%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 5.4%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 2.7%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 4,145 reporting for every category shown · 4,145 in full cohort
African American 12.3%
Hispanic 53.8%
White 24.3%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 5.5%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 3.6%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
African American 11.5%
Hispanic 52.6%
White 27.8%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
733
Economically disadvantaged students
523
Emergent bilingual students
201
Special education students
152
Campus mobility · 2024–25
Mobile students
137
Students in TEA mobility denominator
689
TEA-published mobility rate
19.9%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 734 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 64 (8.0%) from 2024–25.
Latest enrollment
734
2025–26
Change from 2024–25
−64
Decrease · −8.0%
Change since 2021–22
−129
Decrease · −14.9%
Enrollment in 2025–26
This school
734
Selected comparison
632.7
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,994 rated schools reporting
Student enrollment by school year for Post Elem
School year
Students enrolledPost Elem
Change from previous school year
Average enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22
863
First available year
646.5
2022–23
868
Increase of 5 (0.6%)
651.9
2023–24
825
Decrease of 43 (5.0%)
650.3
2024–25
798
Decrease of 27 (3.3%)
648.9
2025–26
734
Decrease of 64 (8.0%)
632.7
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
49
5.6% of cumulative year-end enrollment
Disciplinary actions
116
13.17 per 100 students
Cumulative year-end enrollment
881
2024–25
Share of students · 2024–25
This school
5.6%
Selected comparison
13.0%
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,546 rated schools reporting
−7.4 pts vs similar economic context
Actions per 100 students · 2024–25
This school
13.17
Selected comparison
30.9
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,659 rated schools reporting
−17.7 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Post Elem
School year
Cumulative enrollment
Studentsall discipline
Students% of enrollment
Actionsall discipline
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21
890
35
3.9%
62
6.97
9.5%
18.8
2021–22
907
34
3.8%
83
9.15
13.0%
30.6
2022–23
955
59
6.2%
175
18.32
13.5%
32.6
2023–24
931
45
4.8%
101
10.85
13.3%
32.4
2024–25
881
49
5.6%
116
13.17
13.0%
30.9
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Post Elem in 2024–25
Category
Students
Students% of enrollment
Actions
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline
49
5.6%
116
13.17
13.0%
30.9
In-school suspensions
45
5.1%
87
9.88
11.6%
23.3
Out-of-school suspensions
13
1.5%
25
2.84
7.4%
11.2
DAEP placements
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Mandatory DAEP placements
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Discretionary DAEP placements
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
Post Elem
Parent district: Cypress-Fairbanks ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
This school
$9,335
Selected comparison
$13,143
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,009 rated schools reporting
−$3,808 vs similar economic context
For 2025, TEA reported $9,335 per student for this campus, $16,633 per student for its parent district, Cypress-Fairbanks ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
Year
Post Elem
Parent district: Cypress-Fairbanks ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison average
Reportingselected comparison
2018
$5,656
$12,265
$13,054
$8,027
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,880 rated schools reporting
2019
$6,083
$12,730
$13,108
$8,176
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,898 rated schools reporting
2020
$6,985
$12,750
$14,058
$8,729
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,918 rated schools reporting
2021
$8,210
$14,470
$14,797
$9,239
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,931 rated schools reporting
2022
$8,125
$15,507
$15,708
$10,505
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,954 rated schools reporting
2023
$8,299
$15,990
$16,792
$11,238
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,974 rated schools reporting
2024
$8,708
$16,047
$18,125
$12,399
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,995 rated schools reporting
2025
$9,335
$16,633
$18,972
$13,143
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,009 rated schools reporting
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
Average salary
$68,802+$2,366 vs similar economic context
Teachers
51+8.5 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
14.3+0.3 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Post Elem
Beginning 17.7%
1 to 5 years 50.8%
6 to 10 years 8%
11 to 20 years 17.5%
21 to 30 years 6%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,028 reporting for every category shown · 2,028 in full cohort
Beginning 6.6%
1 to 5 years 27%
6 to 10 years 18.9%
11 to 20 years 27.3%
21 to 30 years 15.4%
Over 30 years 4%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 04: Houston · 1,303 reporting for every category shown · 1,303 in full cohort
Beginning 7.7%
1 to 5 years 27.3%
6 to 10 years 20.6%
11 to 20 years 27.2%
21 to 30 years 13.5%
Over 30 years 2.6%
Selected comparison averageFor Harris County · 911 reporting for every category shown · 911 in full cohort
Beginning 8.9%
1 to 5 years 28.4%
6 to 10 years 20.3%
11 to 20 years 26.2%
21 to 30 years 13%
Over 30 years 2.5%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 4,145 reporting for every category shown · 4,145 in full cohort
Beginning 6.1%
1 to 5 years 26.6%
6 to 10 years 20%
11 to 20 years 29%
21 to 30 years 15.1%
Over 30 years 2.9%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 25.6%
6 to 10 years 19.2%
11 to 20 years 28.7%
21 to 30 years 15.9%
Over 30 years 3.7%
Average students in a class
TEA average class size by grade or subject for Post Elem in 2024–25
Grade or subject
Average students per classPost Elem · 2024–25
Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten
18.7
18
Grade 1
17.3
18.2
Grade 2
17.4
18.3
Grade 3
21.1
18.6
Grade 4
18.9
18.8
Grade 5
20.9
19.8
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 6 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 101907104.