Districts, charter school systems & campuses · Source: Texas Education Agency
Port O'Connor ElemA97vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Traditional public school campus
Port O'Connor Elem
Calhoun County · Region 03: Victoria · 59 students
Current score
97/1002025-26
Change
+4 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
+16.4 ptsvs 80.6 average · 1,948 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
20 of 1,948tied with 17 others
Score vs region
+17.2 ptsvs 79.8 average · 129 rated schools in Region 03: Victoria
Region 03: Victoria placement
1 of 129among reporting schools
Score vs county
+9.6 ptsvs 87.4 average · 7 rated schools in Calhoun County
Score vs similar-size group
+13.9 ptsvs 83.1 average · 142 similarly sized rated schools
Similar size placement
6 of 142tied with 2 others
Score vs state
+15.7 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
Texas placement
82 of 7,646tied with 63 others
A97
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving up; under the rules in force back then it scored 93 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 80.6 average for 1,948 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 79.8 average for 129 rated schools in Region 03: Victoria.The current score is above the 87.4 average for 7 rated schools in Calhoun County.The current score is above the 83.1 average for 142 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
Current strength
Academic Growth above the similar-context average
94+19.7 pts vs 74.3
94 is 19.7 points above
the 74.3 average among 1,799 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
Tied for 3rd of 1,799 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure; 7 schools share that value.
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Port O'Connor Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 97 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.6 average for 1,948 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is up 4 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 20th of 1,948 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 17 others).
Port O'Connor Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 97 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 79.8 average for 129 rated schools in Region 03: Victoria. It is up 4 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 1st of 129 rated schools in Region 03: Victoria.
Port O'Connor Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 97 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 87.4 average for 7 rated schools in Calhoun County. It is up 4 points since 2021-22.
Port O'Connor Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 97 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 83.1 average for 142 similarly sized rated schools. It is up 4 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 6th of 142 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 2 others).
Port O'Connor Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 97 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is up 4 points since 2021-22.
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 93 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Student Achievement96 A+17.0 vs similar economic context · 1,861 reporting
School Progress96 A+14.7 vs similar economic context · 1,854 reporting
Closing the Gaps98 A+20.1 vs similar economic context · 1,836 reporting
Academic Growth94 A+19.7 vs similar economic context · 1,799 reporting
Relative Performance96 A+16.4 vs similar economic context · 1,854 reporting
Port O'Connor Elem
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,948 in cohort)
Domain scores
Domain
Score
Grade
Points to next grade
Student Achievement
96
A
—
School Progress
96
A
—
Closing the Gaps
98
A
—
Academic Growth
94
A
—
Relative Performance
96
A
—
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student
Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
All Subjects
Approaches grade level100%+25 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,861 reporting
Meets grade level88%+39 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,861 reporting
Masters grade level63%+43 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,861 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
Approaches grade level100%+23 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,858 reporting
Meets grade level95%+41 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,858 reporting
Masters grade level74%+52 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,858 reporting
Math3 performance levels
Approaches grade level100%+28 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,850 reporting
Meets grade level79%+36 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,850 reporting
Masters grade level53%+36 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,850 reporting
Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,948 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
59
Economically disadvantaged
61.0%−0.5 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
6.8%−9.5 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
6.8%−12.0 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
95.3%+1.1 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
13.0%−3.1 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Port O'Connor Elem
Hispanic 35.6%
White 59.3%
Asian 1.7%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,948 reporting for every category shown · 1,948 in full cohort
African American 10.5%
Hispanic 49.1%
White 33.9%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 2.2%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 3.8%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 03: Victoria · 129 reporting for every category shown · 129 in full cohort
African American 6%
Hispanic 57.6%
White 33.3%
American Indian 0.2%
Asian 0.7%
Two or More Races 2.1%
Selected comparison averageFor Calhoun County · 7 reporting for every category shown · 7 in full cohort
African American 1.9%
Hispanic 62.1%
White 30.3%
Asian 3.5%
Two or More Races 2.2%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 142 reporting for every category shown · 142 in full cohort
African American 9.3%
Hispanic 49.7%
White 36.3%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 1.2%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 3%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
African American 11.5%
Hispanic 52.6%
White 27.8%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
59
Economically disadvantaged students
36
Emergent bilingual students
4
Special education students
4
Campus mobility · 2024–25
Mobile students
8
Students in TEA mobility denominator
48
TEA-published mobility rate
16.7%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 59 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 5 (7.8%) from 2024–25.
Latest enrollment
59
2025–26
Change from 2024–25
−5
Decrease · −7.8%
Change since 2021–22
−8
Decrease · −11.9%
Enrollment in 2025–26
This school
59
Selected comparison
622.3
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,913 rated schools reporting
Student enrollment by school year for Port O'Connor Elem
School year
Students enrolledPort O'Connor Elem
Change from previous school year
Average enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22
67
First available year
634.9
2022–23
63
Decrease of 4 (6.0%)
639.1
2023–24
65
Increase of 2 (3.2%)
636.7
2024–25
64
Decrease of 1 (1.5%)
632.3
2025–26
59
Decrease of 5 (7.8%)
622.3
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
Not reported
Rate not available
Disciplinary actions
Not reported
Rate not available
Cumulative year-end enrollment
69
2024–25
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Port O'Connor Elem
School year
Cumulative enrollment
Studentsall discipline
Students% of enrollment
Actionsall discipline
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21
74
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
2021–22
72
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
2022–23
70
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
2023–24
68
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
2024–25
69
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Port O'Connor Elem in 2024–25
Category
Students
Students% of enrollment
Actions
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
In-school suspensions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Out-of-school suspensions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
Port O'Connor Elem
Parent district: Calhoun County ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
This school
$16,117
Selected comparison
$12,501
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,921 rated schools reporting
+$3,616 vs similar economic context
For 2025, TEA reported $16,117 per student for this campus, $19,276 per student for its parent district, Calhoun County ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
Year
Port O'Connor Elem
Parent district: Calhoun County ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison average
Reportingselected comparison
2018
$7,245
$14,866
$13,054
$7,927
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,780 rated schools reporting
2019
$7,966
$13,307
$13,108
$8,071
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,797 rated schools reporting
2020
$8,988
$13,528
$14,058
$8,685
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,818 rated schools reporting
2021
$10,975
$13,779
$14,797
$9,105
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,832 rated schools reporting
2022
$12,106
$16,018
$15,708
$10,477
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,851 rated schools reporting
2023
$14,655
$17,629
$16,792
$11,114
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,874 rated schools reporting
2024
$15,296
$17,179
$18,125
$11,943
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,900 rated schools reporting
2025
$16,117
$19,276
$18,972
$12,501
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,921 rated schools reporting
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
Average salary
$63,177−$3,181 vs similar economic context
Teachers
6−36.2 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
10.1−9.0 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Port O'Connor Elem
Beginning 17.2%
1 to 5 years 32.8%
11 to 20 years 17.2%
21 to 30 years 32.8%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,948 reporting for every category shown · 1,948 in full cohort
Beginning 6.1%
1 to 5 years 25.6%
6 to 10 years 19.1%
11 to 20 years 28.4%
21 to 30 years 16.1%
Over 30 years 4.2%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 03: Victoria · 129 reporting for every category shown · 129 in full cohort
Beginning 7.1%
1 to 5 years 24.6%
6 to 10 years 15.4%
11 to 20 years 29.3%
21 to 30 years 17.1%
Over 30 years 6.4%
Selected comparison averageFor Calhoun County · 7 reporting for every category shown · 7 in full cohort
Beginning 6.1%
1 to 5 years 19.6%
6 to 10 years 11.6%
11 to 20 years 28.1%
21 to 30 years 24.7%
Over 30 years 9.9%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 142 reporting for every category shown · 142 in full cohort
Beginning 6.3%
1 to 5 years 21.6%
6 to 10 years 15%
11 to 20 years 26%
21 to 30 years 16.7%
Over 30 years 6.7%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 25.6%
6 to 10 years 19.2%
11 to 20 years 28.7%
21 to 30 years 15.9%
Over 30 years 3.7%
Average students in a class
TEA average class size by grade or subject for Port O'Connor Elem in 2024–25
Grade or subject
Average students per classPort O'Connor Elem · 2024–25
Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten
7
18
Grade 1
10
18.2
Grade 2
17
18.4
Grade 3
9
18.6
Grade 4
3
18.9
Grade 5
4
19.6
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 6 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
Out of 72 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
#1 rankings
First-place results
12 measures
1of 7,260
All Subjects — Approaches
Texas average · of the 7,260 that report this measure · tied with 24
1of 7,254
Reading — Approaches
Texas average · of the 7,254 that report this measure · tied with 32
1of 7,227
Math — Approaches
Texas average · of the 7,227 that report this measure · tied with 37
1of 129
Overall score
Region 03: Victoria · of the 129 that report this measure
1of 119
All Subjects — Meets
Region 03: Victoria · of the 119 that report this measure · tied with 1
1of 119
All Subjects — Masters
Region 03: Victoria · of the 119 that report this measure
1of 118
Reading — Meets
Region 03: Victoria · of the 118 that report this measure
1of 118
Reading — Masters
Region 03: Victoria · of the 118 that report this measure
1of 117
School Progress
Region 03: Victoria · of the 117 that report this measure
1of 117
Relative Performance
Region 03: Victoria · of the 117 that report this measure
1of 116
Closing the Gaps
Region 03: Victoria · of the 116 that report this measure
1of 116
Math — Masters
Region 03: Victoria · of the 116 that report this measure
#2–3 rankings
Second- and third-place results
1 measure
2of 114
Academic Growth
Region 03: Victoria · of the 114 that report this measure
#4–10 rankings
Fourth- through tenth-place results
1 measure
4of 116
Math — Meets
Region 03: Victoria · of the 116 that report this measure · tied with 1
Other top-5% rankings
High placements in larger reporting groups
1 measure
33of 1,861
Student Achievement
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,861 that report this measure · tied with 23
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above
this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears
once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any
tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones
no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 029901105.