+4.2 ptsvs 82.8 average · 68 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
32 of 68tied with 1 other
Score vs similar-size group
+7.3 ptsvs 79.7 average · 281 similarly sized rated charter campuses
Similar size placement
81 of 281tied with 10 others
Score vs state
+5.3 ptsvs 81.7 average · 829 rated Texas charter campuses
Texas charter placement
297 of 829tied with 37 others
B87
At a glance
The available rating history is moving up. The current score is above the 82.8 average for 68 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 79.7 average for 281 similarly sized rated charter campuses.The current score is above the 81.7 average for 829 rated Texas charter campuses.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
STAAR result
All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters
Meets
59%vs 53.8% avg · +5.2 pts
Masters
24%vs 22.2% avg · +1.8 pts
Among 68 charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Plainview Classical Academy is rated B by TEA, scoring 87 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 82.8 average for 68 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context. It is up 12 points since 2023-24.
Ranks 32nd of 68 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context (tied with 1 other).
Plainview Classical Academy is rated B by TEA, scoring 87 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 79.7 average for 281 similarly sized rated charter campuses. It is up 12 points since 2023-24.
Ranks 81st of 281 similarly sized rated charter campuses (tied with 10 others).
Plainview Classical Academy is rated B by TEA, scoring 87 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.7 average for 829 rated Texas charter campuses. It is up 12 points since 2023-24.
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Student Achievement85 B+2.3 vs similar economic context · 68 reporting
School Progress82 B+2.3 vs similar economic context · 66 reporting
Closing the Gaps90 A+9.3 vs similar economic context · 64 reporting
Academic Growth81 B+6.7 vs similar economic context · 65 reporting
Relative Performance82 B+4.7 vs similar economic context · 66 reporting
Plainview Classical Academy
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (68 in cohort)
Domain scores
Domain
Score
Grade
Points to next grade
Student Achievement
85
B
5
School Progress
82
B
8
Closing the Gaps
90
A
—
Academic Growth
81
B
9
Relative Performance
82
B
8
Closest to moving up: Student Achievement, 5 points below A in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student
Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is Student Achievement (85), so
School Progress (82) is published above but does not enter the overall
score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 85.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
All Subjects
Approaches grade level85%+6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 68 reporting
Meets grade level59%+5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 68 reporting
Masters grade level24%+2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 68 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
Approaches grade level89%+7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 68 reporting
Meets grade level67%+6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 68 reporting
Masters grade level25%+1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 68 reporting
Math3 performance levels
Approaches grade level85%+12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 67 reporting
Meets grade level58%+15 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 67 reporting
Masters grade level24%+6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 67 reporting
Science3 performance levels
Approaches grade level82%+2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 66 reporting
Meets grade level55%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 66 reporting
Masters grade level28%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 66 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
Approaches grade level71%−9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 46 reporting
Meets grade level29%−23 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 46 reporting
Masters grade level6%−18 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 46 reporting
Approaches grade level
Meets grade level
Masters grade level
Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (68 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Graduation
Four-Year
0.0%−61.1 pts vs similar economic contextaverage forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 30 rated charter campuses reporting
Five-Year
0.0%−53.6 pts vs similar economic contextaverage forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 29 rated charter campuses reporting
Six-Year
0.0%−48.6 pts vs similar economic contextaverage forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 30 rated charter campuses reporting
Dropout Rate
0.0%−0.8 pts vs similar economic contextaverage forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 30 rated charter campuses reporting
These measures use TEA's standard-accountability population. Each comparison average includes only charter campuses in that population that report that specific measure; its reporting count is shown beside the average. It is an unweighted average of those reported charter campus rates, not a pooled rate across every student in the group.
College, career and military readiness
CCMR criteria
Criterion
This school% of graduates
Averagesimilar economic context
Differencepercentage points
Reportingselected comparison
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course
0.0%
54.4%
−54.4
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 37 rated charter campuses reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA
0.0%
34.3%
−34.3
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 37 rated charter campuses reporting
Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)
0.0%
12.7%
−12.7
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 37 rated charter campuses reporting
Earned college credit for a dual credit course
0.0%
32.8%
−32.8
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 37 rated charter campuses reporting
Earned an industry-based certification
0.0%
5.7%
−5.7
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 37 rated charter campuses reporting
Earned a level I or level II certificate
0.0%
0.2%
−0.2
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 37 rated charter campuses reporting
Earned an associate degree
0.0%
6.7%
−6.7
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 37 rated charter campuses reporting
Completed an OnRamps course and qualified for college credit
0.0%
6.6%
−6.6
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 37 rated charter campuses reporting
Graduated with completed individualized education program (IEP) and workforce readiness
0.0%
5.0%
−5.0
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 37 rated charter campuses reporting
Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student
0.0%
5.6%
−5.6
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 37 rated charter campuses reporting
Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces
0.0%
1.7%
−1.7
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 37 rated charter campuses reporting
Every row is a share of this school's graduates, and every row is a way of
meeting CCMR — so on every row, a bigger share is better. Difference is this
school minus the average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate,
counted in percentage points: +5.0 would mean five more graduates in every hundred met that
criterion here. The selected comparison is an unweighted average of the reported charter campus percentages, not a pooled rate across all graduates in the group. Graduates may meet several criteria, so the rows do not add up to the total.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only charter campuses for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
343
Economically disadvantaged
40.2%−0.6 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
7.0%−5.4 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
14.0%+0.5 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
94.6%+0.6 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
10.7%−7.3 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Plainview Classical Academy
African American 2.9%
Hispanic 44.6%
White 48.7%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 2%
Pacific Islander 0.6%
Two or More Races 0.9%
Selected comparison averageFor charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 68 reporting for every category shown · 68 in full cohort
African American 12.6%
Hispanic 40.6%
White 35.4%
American Indian 0.4%
Asian 6.5%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 4.4%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized charter campuses · 281 reporting for every category shown · 281 in full cohort
African American 20.2%
Hispanic 59%
White 12.3%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 5.6%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 2.5%
Texas charter average829 reporting for every category shown · 829 Texas charter campuses in full cohort
African American 17.5%
Hispanic 61.8%
White 12.2%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 5.5%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 2.5%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
343
Economically disadvantaged students
138
Emergent bilingual students
24
Special education students
48
Campus mobility · 2024–25
Mobile students
52
Students in TEA mobility denominator
266
TEA-published mobility rate
19.5%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 343 students in 2025–26, an increase of 81 (30.9%) from 2024–25.
Latest enrollment
343
2025–26
Change from 2024–25
+81
Increase · +30.9%
Change since 2023–24
+130
Increase · +61.0%
Enrollment in 2025–26
This school
343
Selected comparison
522.5
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 68 rated charter campuses reporting
Student enrollment by school year for Plainview Classical Academy
School year
Students enrolledPlainview Classical Academy
Change from previous school year
Average enrollmentselected comparison
2023–24
213
First available year
503
2024–25
262
Increase of 49 (23.0%)
505.7
2025–26
343
Increase of 81 (30.9%)
522.5
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting charter campuses in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
22
7.4% of cumulative year-end enrollment
Disciplinary actions
40
13.38 per 100 students
Cumulative year-end enrollment
299
2024–25
Share of students · 2024–25
This school
7.4%
Selected comparison
7.2%
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 39 rated charter campuses reporting
+0.2 pts vs similar economic context
Actions per 100 students · 2024–25
This school
13.38
Selected comparison
11.5
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 40 rated charter campuses reporting
+1.9 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Plainview Classical Academy
School year
Cumulative enrollment
Studentsall discipline
Students% of enrollment
Actionsall discipline
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2023–24
245
17
6.9%
34
13.88
7.2%
12.7
2024–25
299
22
7.4%
40
13.38
7.2%
11.5
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Plainview Classical Academy in 2024–25
Category
Students
Students% of enrollment
Actions
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline
22
7.4%
40
13.38
7.2%
11.5
In-school suspensions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Out-of-school suspensions
20
6.7%
33
11.04
5.4%
7.3
DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Expulsions
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Mandatory expulsions
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Discretionary expulsions
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized charter campuses can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
Plainview Classical Academy
Parent district: Texas College Preparatory Academies
Texas average
Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
This school
$9,843
Selected comparison
$12,891
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 65 rated charter campuses reporting
−$3,048 vs similar economic context
For 2025, TEA reported $9,843 per student for this campus, $11,086 per student for its parent district, Texas College Preparatory Academies, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
Year
Plainview Classical Academy
Parent district: Texas College Preparatory Academies
Texas average
Selected comparison average
Reportingselected comparison
2024
$8,948
$11,083
$18,125
$11,629
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 63 rated charter campuses reporting
2025
$9,843
$11,086
$18,972
$12,891
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 65 rated charter campuses reporting
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
Average salary
$48,966−$11,060 vs similar economic context
Teachers
22−11.4 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
15.5−4.6 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Plainview Classical Academy
Beginning 29.7%
1 to 5 years 68.9%
11 to 20 years 1.4%
Selected comparison averageFor charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 68 reporting for every category shown · 68 in full cohort
Beginning 12.7%
1 to 5 years 42.2%
6 to 10 years 20.7%
11 to 20 years 17.3%
21 to 30 years 6.3%
Over 30 years 1%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized charter campuses · 281 reporting for every category shown · 281 in full cohort
Beginning 12.6%
1 to 5 years 42%
6 to 10 years 20.2%
11 to 20 years 16.2%
21 to 30 years 5.6%
Over 30 years 1%
Texas charter average829 reporting for every category shown · 829 Texas charter campuses in full cohort
Beginning 13%
1 to 5 years 44.3%
6 to 10 years 19.6%
11 to 20 years 15.4%
21 to 30 years 4.8%
Over 30 years 0.9%
Average students in a class
TEA average class size by grade or subject for Plainview Classical Academy in 2024–25
Grade or subject
Average students per classPlainview Classical Academy · 2024–25
Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten
16
20.3
Grade 1
16
21.3
Grade 2
23
21
Grade 3
19
21
Grade 4
16.6
22.3
Grade 5
16
21.6
Grade 6
17
21.4
Secondary English
16
16.1
Secondary math
16.3
15.2
Secondary science
16
16.8
Secondary social studies
16.3
15.9
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 11 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 221801082.